Comments by "antonyjh1234" (@antonyjh1234) on "The AMOC Might Be WAY More Unstable Than We Thought...Here's Why" video.

@herauthon The whole earth system has been changed 1.5 degrees by our actions in around 170 years and another 1.5 coming in the next 100, something that would take thousands of years naturally, in the earths speed that is tremendously fast.
9
@Greg-Horne "We " as in the world, each and every person and it really comes down to per capita, not sure where your "we" is but USA is 4% of the world but uses 25% of the worlds energy and considering China makes all AMerica's stuff, well the worlds, bit unfair to blame them when we are the reason they make the stuff.
5
We know it's changing 1000 times faster, Accelerated Global Warming AGW means rapid change because of that acceleration, without any experience of being this warm before written down except for flood stories, at some time in the future, melt pulses of a couple of metres per decade should be fast enough. I thought the melt pulse reaching 8.1mm last year compared to the average of 4, I thought was enough speed change. They say at fivec at the fastest rate it will take 2000 years for all the ice to melt, 72 metres, sounds a long time, but does 5 metres in 200 years, or 2 metres in 100 years not ruin most modern cities? Then it doesn't matter the speed, just a slow motion accident that will take tens of thousands of years to get back to now.
4
@kayakMike1000 The science of what that little uptick in heat means has to have a cause, half the emissions have been in the last forty years and we can't put energy into a system without it meaning system and the ppm means we are adding trillions of molecules that trap radiant energy, why isn't the obvious problem being discussed, obvious, to you?
4
@tufftimesbc THe world had a 400 percent growth rate the last 80 years and will be lucky to be 40% the next 80 years, growth has effectively stopped and 23 countries are going to lose half their populations the next 80 years, but it is our energy consumption that is still increasing.
3
@MalcolmYoung-h4k In whose timeframe? I have seen 16 mentioned but as far as this persons lifetime and do you think 10c will happen?
3
@quickmythril2398 why not prove that it is for another reason because if you can show a natural way that means 1000 times faster change isn't CO2, the you will have changed the world, so if you can prove that it would be great because of the dramatic change as shown by the vertical line in temperature there is nothing else that it could be without humans being aware of it.
2
@Peregringlk I found data on that confusing, 1 source said forests world-wide absorb that much and amazon a quarter of that, others said it's losing 3 billion and others said it's almost a net emitter but still absorbing, but we couldn't stop subsistence people or farmers cutting down trees when we had them, not sure if we can stop them.
2
If we reduce emissions 80% as is asked, that will lower consumption overall, we do not need to do anything else but lower emissions, the tree's and mangroves etc will look after themselves. Have you lowered emissions at all or consumption overall the last few decades?
2
@Peregringlk Light intensity, Carbon dioxide concentration, Temperature, Amount of chlorophyll are the four things that affect photosynthesis and at the moment trees worldwide, for the last 30 years have had declining amounts of carbon stored while temperature and carbon have increased because of the lower light intensity aerosols and particulate. The Brasil Amazon is a net emitter because they are burning so much but generally old growth forests are pretty much carbon neutral, it's like cattle or a bog, as a bog gets bigger it emits more methane, when it reaches full size there can only be so much warming from it, as long as the bog, herd, forest doesn't get any bigger and old growth forests where tree's that die of old age, will fall, all the carbon released ( no matter the carbon level in the atmosphere ) and as long as another tree grows they are carbon neutral, overall there can only be carbon absorption on a mass scale is if there is mass new planting but eventually they too will be carbon neutral and unless we change our ways trees won't help.
2
@JBaxter-pi8oj " However, farmers usually farm only a limited number of products that usually compete with Big Agriculture" I can't believe you put a comma after your however, like you had "the " answer, do you know of any situations where farmers aren't all selling to the open market? What is the goal, to make food more expensive or cheaper and do you know any other catchy bywords because this is just word salad without any physical meaning, sorry ; "If farmers can be supported by farming in different ways, such as participating in collectives, they can achieve more sustainable incomes by using biodiverse methods and can do that on a smaller scale" Do you know of any small scale co-operative that is biodiverse with or without support, in person, or are you just putting out words that say nothing overall?
2
@JBaxter-pi8oj Which is such a weak reply when all I asked was you to back up your words. It's not that you questioned, it's that you thought you had the answers
2
@quickmythril2398 because of the dramatic change as shown by the vertical line in temperature there is nothing else that it could be with humnas being aware of it. A tank of diesel has the same amount of energy as around 3 months of my total electrical energy with the air con going 24-7, a huge amount of energy we emit along witht he co2 that traps radiant heat, scientists proved this over a hundred years ago, why don't you prove that it is for another reason because if you can show a natural way that means 1000 times faster change isn't CO2, the you will have changed the world, so if you can prove that, I and the rest of the world, are waiting.
1
@quickmythril2398 because of the dramatic change as shown by the vertical line in temperature there is nothing else that it could be with humnas being aware of it. A tank of diesel has the same amount of energy as around 3 months of my total electrical energy with the air con going 24-7, a huge amount of energy we emit along witht he co2 that traps radiant heat, scientists proved this over a hundred years ago, why don't you prove that it is for another reason because if you can show a natural way that means 1000 times faster change isn't CO2, the you will have changed the world, so if you can prove that
1
@quickmythril2398 A tank of diesel has the same amount of energy as around 3 months of my total electrical energy with the air con going 24-7, a huge amount of energy we emit along with the co2 that traps radiant heat, scientists proved this over a hundred years ago, why don't you prove that it is for another reason because if you can show a natural way that means 1000 times faster change isn't CO2, the you will have changed the world, so if you can prove that it would be great because of the dramatic change as shown by the vertical line in temperature there is nothing else that it could be without humans being aware of it.
1
@quickmythril2398 A tank of diesel has the same amount of energy as around 3 months of my total electrical energy with the air con going 24-7, a huge amount of energy we emit along with the co2 that traps radiant heat, scientists proved this over a hundred years ago, why don't you prove that it is for another reason because if you can show a natural way that means 1000 times faster change isn't CO2, the you will have changed the world, so if you can prove that it would be great because of the dramatic change as shown by the vertical line in temperature there is nothing else that it could be without humans being aware of it.
1
@quickmythril2398 A tank of diesel has the same amount of energy as around 3 months of my total electrical energy with the air con going 24-7, a huge amount of energy we emit along with the co2 that traps radiant heat, scientists proved this over a hundred years ago, why not prove that it is for another reason because if you can show a natural way that means 1000 times faster change isn't CO2, the you will have changed the world, so if you can prove that it would be great because of the dramatic change as shown by the vertical line in temperature there is nothing else that it could be without humans being aware of it.
1
@Greg-Horne Not sure why people have to add their personal experiences about one place in time like it means anything...good for you then, I will tell the people in Valencia to not worry about their oranges anymore.
1
@r0bt93 What a shame we need more than food replaced, the 75% of the land we use we don't put any sprays on, don't irrigate and don't plow, a much cleaner system than vegan that needs fossil fuels to survive and I say this as an ex vegan, a much worse system overall than something that is not much different to a wild anaimal. If we still want toilet paper held together then gelatine needs a replacement, same as fats in plastics like this device, wool, leather, dairy, Unless we can have a grown replacement for all that we get and cows are mostly carbon neutral than you're not freeing any land up if the same stocking rate in animals is going to occupy the same non arable land, Veganism is supposed to be a complete replacement to work, not less than half the animals and say we are done, problem solved.
1
@fanOfMinecraft-UAs_channel Wetlands and rice paddies are supposed to double their methane output on a warming planet. In a tank of diesel is the same amount of energy as 3.2 months of my electrical energy over summer with the air con going 24-7, if somebody uses a tank a week for a year that is equal to 17 years of my electrical energy. None of the 3 ways included changing our ways?
1
@fanOfMinecraft-UAs_channel It's like a fairytale, at our current rate it will take 10,000 years for the carbon to come out naturally and we are still increasing the amount we put in and then you use words like "lastly". Unless you understand the problem how can you have the answers but why does the earth need to slowly cool down, we are speeding up 1000 times faster than normal and we haven't slowed that or come close to reversing it.
1
@JBaxter-pi8oj " As I'd mentioned, there are collectives in the UK who are working on a smaller scale so they can produce better and more sustainable products" Name one otherwise this is pie in the sky talking about fairytales, isn't it? What happens commonly is people say " oh we can just invent a replacement" without knowing anything of the products or the industry and I was wondering which side you fell on?
1
@davebrown6552 What would you say about the particulate shading plants where tree rings are tighter so less wood overall, that leaves have becomes smaller to combat heat, that tropical fish are moving north and south and do you deny ice is melting and temperature change is happening faster than any time in history?
1
@JBaxter-pi8oj Does it hurt to have your head so far up your own...? " If only you would use your talents for driving humanity towards a better future instead of tearing down anyone and everyone who questions the status quo" Is such a wimpy reply to the question I asked you. I asked you for proof of your own words and now suddenly I am tearing you down? I mean what really gets me is people have wishy washy words like they have some sort of clue but in all reality they are using it as an upbeat writing exercise, at best. Let me explain, the best thing big tobacco could do to slow down the decline in sales was to create doubt, your offering does exactly that, your comment that you don't back up, has no basis in reality and now because I think you don't know what you are talking about I say so and somehow, it's my fault. Saying that I should use these talents for a better world is exactly what I am doing by asking for the basis of conversation to be based in truth, not regurgitated nonsense, that slows down change, cheers.
1
@JBaxter-pi8oj " If only you would use your talents for driving humanity towards a better future instead of tearing down anyone and everyone who questions the status quo" Is such a wimpy reply to the question I asked you. I asked you for proof of your own words and now suddenly I am tearing you down? I mean what really gets me is people have wishy washy words like they have some sort of clue but in all reality they are using it as an upbeat writing exercise, at best. Let me explain, the best thing big tobacco could do to slow down the decline in sales was to create doubt, your offering does exactly that, your comment that you don't back up, has no basis in reality and now because I think you don't know what you are talking about I say so and somehow, it's my fault. Saying that I should use these talents for a better world is exactly what I am doing by asking for the basis of conversation to be based in truth, not regurgitated nonsense, that slows down change, cheers.
1
@JBaxter-pi8oj " If only you would use your talents for driving humanity towards a better future instead of tearing down anyone and everyone who questions the status quo" Is such a wimpy reply to the question I asked you. I asked you for proof of your own words and now suddenly I am tearing you down? I mean what really gets me is people have wishy washy words like they have some sort of clue but in all reality they are using it as an upbeat writing exercise, at best. Let me explain, the best thing big tobacco could do to slow down the decline in sales was to create doubt, your offering does exactly that, your comment that you don't back up, has no basis in reality and now because I think you don't know what you are talking about I say so and somehow, it's my fault. Saying that I should use these talents for a better world is exactly what I am doing by asking for the basis of conversation to be based in truth, not regurgitated nonsense, that slows down change, cheers.
1
@JBaxter-pi8oj " If only you would use your talents for driving humanity towards a better future instead of tearing down anyone and everyone who questions the status quo" Is such a wimpy reply to the question I asked you. I asked you for proof of your own words and now suddenly I am tearing you down? I mean what really gets me is people have wishy washy words like they have some sort of clue but in all reality they are using it as an upbeat writing exercise, at best. Let me explain, the best thing big tobacco could do to slow down the decline in sales was to create doubt, your offering does exactly that, your comment that you don't back up, has no basis in reality and now because I think you don't know what you are talking about I say so and somehow, it's my fault. Saying that I should use these talents for a better world is exactly what I am doing by asking for the basis of conversation to be based in truth, not regurgitated nonsense, that slows down change, cheers.
1
@JBaxter-pi8oj AAAAAhhhhhhhahahahahaha Cos I would do bad things with that information for sure..Do you have any trouble getting your head through doorways?
1