Comments by "QWE RTY" (@QWERTY-gp8fd) on "How the US created a disaster in Afghanistan" video.

  1. because usa never funded taliban. mujihadeen was not taliban. talibans were refugees that fled during the war and came back funded by isis to "liberate" afghanistan from mujihadeen. the mujihadeen has became the northern alliance and later the government.
    14
  2.  @StarKillerSK  biden was capable of withdrawing usa troops within his first year is slow . but trump that didnt even pull single troops from afghan within 4 year is not slow? hmm.
    9
  3. 88k allied afghan nationals,americans were evacuated. so disorganized
    3
  4. only if they werent betrayed in the homefront.
    3
  5. so how is that related to taliban? talibans were refugees that fleed to pakistan during the war and came back funded by isi to "liberate" afghanistan from barbaric mujihadeens
    1
  6.  @omanajz  afghanistan has no oil. usa literally gained nothing from this war. lost trillions,thousands tramatized
    1
  7. there is no consequence. it dont effect average american whether taliban won or lost
    1
  8. ​ @kaoko111  murica is playing 4d chess. remember alaskan purchase? its pretty irrevelant for its time but century later russia selling alaska was her biggest mistake. usa caused collapse of weimar republic by inflation. creation of treaty of versailles indirectly greating ww2 in europe,effectively eliminating british,french as superpower. only reason why germany wasnt divided into multiple pieces like austria,ottomans. when germany was no longer useful it was divided. even greater example is space race that bankrupted ussr economy and 1964 afghan change constitution by usa that prevented Mohammed Daoud Khan from holding political office which resulted in eventual soviet dissolution. china is going to be next on the list. and usa is going to use taliban for that.
    1
  9.  @sriharsha5900  isi funded taliban. mujihadeen was not taliban. murica never promised democracy. it promoted stability. cant blame murica for afghan government surrender. they literally lost kabul in 1 day.
    1
  10. *george bush
    1
  11.  @user-op8fg3ny3j  because they are rivals. meanwhile mongolia is literally sending their men to death in afghanistan just to get american support. thats how good america is compared to other alternatives.
    1
  12.  @Belioyt  there are 0 soldiers in mainland japan so ur point is moot.
    1
  13.  @Alex-cy7wg  but there are currently 0 soldiers in camp fuji
    1
  14.  @Alex-cy7wg  both. however there are japanese soldiers but thats irrelevant to my point so.
    1
  15.  @Belioyt  okinawa is more of a oversea territory or colony of japan with usa troops stationed. the 4 largest island, japanese themselves refer it as 内地 "mainland" has no murican troops. just like falkland Islands is for part of uk itself but part of uk oversea territory.
    1
  16.  @Belioyt  okinawa is more of a oversea territory or colony of japan with usa troops stationed. the 4 largest island, japanese themselves refer it as 内地 "mainland" has no murican troops. just like falkland Islands is for part of uk itself but part of uk oversea territory.
    1
  17. u mean saudi funded bin laden? bin laden was never part of afghan mujihadeen
    1
  18. myth. just like big foot
    1
  19.  @enki1597  that irrelevant to my point
    1
  20.  @harukrentz435  disagree. soviets already killed 1 million,displaced 4 million just within first 3 years of occupation. afghanistan as a nation would cease to exist if murica didnt help. better to be a terrorist safe haven than complete genocide.
    1
  21.  @Belioyt  mujahideen has nothing to do with taliban. even their name is different fool.
    1
  22.  @Belioyt  *northern alliance. talibans were refugees that came back after soviet afghan war
    1