Comments by "city_of_coompton 68" (@city_of_coompton6832) on "Whatifalthist" channel.

How many of those are bots though I wonder
31
@joshuacollins5022 Makes sense. If you feel secure in your position at the top of the hierarchy - it doesn't threaten you to feel compassion for those at the bottom and throw them a bone. It's the guys in the middle of the hierarchy - the betas - who are constantly striving to move up and in constant fear of slipping down to the bottom - they're the ones who denounce the inkcells the loudest out of fear of being associated with them and mistaken for one
30
If my country (Canada) were invaded I'd be looking for a way to flee the country, not fight and defend it 🤣
28
@Cajaquarius There's never been a great civilization BUILT on progressive ideals. Read John Glubb's "Fate of Empires." Welfare state-ism, social libertine-ism, championing the rights of women and minorities, etc. happened before. During the decline of the Roman and Arab Empires. Progressive ideals are nothing more than dismantling the building blocks of civilization for short-term personal pleasure.
24
@RequiemBae What does being equal mean to you? How can a ship have two captains? What happens when the two captains disagree?
21
Seed oils. Avoiding them fixed my chronic digestion issues.
11
@tfkdandsvkc Ok maybe you don't like the connotations of that word. But for a captain to effectively pilot a ship, for a coach to lead a sports team to victory, etc. the people under him need to obey his orders. The leader has a goal that the people under him share, and obeying his orders is the best way to reach that goal. That's not "equality". But both parties benefit. AND the leader has a responsibility to do a good job and can be held accountable if he does a really bad job or acts maliciously. He's not just a tyrant for the sake of being a tyrant. If everyone is "equal" - they'll be constantly arguing about the best way to run the ship, the best strategy for the team... and nothing will get done. It benefits everyone to designate one guy to lead then follow his orders even if they don't always like the orders.
6
"Inkwells of the world united! Seize the means of reproduction! We have nothing to lose but our virginities!"
5
@mrconfusion87 It's welfare state-ism. The government has replaced the traditional roles of fathers and husbands. Women can now rely on the government for provision and protection. So they've gotten the impression they don't need men. Don't need to commit to one man. Be faithful to one man. This is true in the short term. But the government is funded by men's tax dollars. If enough men who aren't getting any decide to stop working and paying into the system those welfare payments and 911 services will collapse... who know if that will happen within our lifetimes or ever but this current situation is artificial and completely outside the historical norm
2
@GrigRP ghee and coconut oil
1