Comments by "afcgeo" (@afcgeo882) on "TAP Air Portugal Operates Epic 10 Hour Long Airbus A321LR Flight" video.

  1.  @michaelrmurphy2734  The 757-200 is a large and powerful aircraft. I’ve flown it to Europe several times, including the EDI-EWR route. The seats are the same as on the 767 or 777. The service is the same too. Nothing scary or odd about it.
    2
  2. Actually, they bought NONE of them. They wet lease two A321LRs from HI FLY.
    2
  3.  @mikeward1701  In practice, not really. Single aisles have been doing 8 hour flights for decades. 707s, DC-8s, 757s...
    2
  4. You don’t. This plane can’t do a 7 hour flight with passengers and cargo. This was just a ferry flight.
    2
  5.  @CPKCrailfan  Okay... I never said anything to you.
    2
  6.  @michaelrmurphy2734  Where do you see me mention the 787? What does it have to do with it?
    1
  7. DVT doesn’t care if it’s single aisle or twin and lavatories are divided by the passenger count. With only 160 passengers, this A321 has 3 lavatories, which is better than most 777s.
    1
  8. Who cares? This was a non-rev repositioning flight. Are you going to count delivery flights now too?
    1
  9. TAP flies the twin aisle A330 on that route.
    1
  10.  @sainnt  Okay, they only flew then for a couple of months and went back to the 330 for the cargo capacity.
    1
  11.  @TysonIke  Yes, at 4,700 mile maximum range, it’ll be about a 10 hour maximum, but most carriers aren’t going to include extra crews or crew rest positions, so you’ll likely see them on 7-8 hour legs. That’s the XLR though. This is not.
    1
  12.  @TysonIke  You THINK that or you guess that?
    1
  13.  @TysonIke  Yes, but based on something factual. In turn, the definition of “guess” is to have an opinion based solely on supposition and conjecture, without any degree of factual basing. So if you think that because something leads you to believe it (precedent, public statement, etc) then that’s a thought. If you think that based on pure assumptions, then it’s a guess.
    1
  14.  @TysonIke  Corruption? God... you’re desperate in your desire to be right, when you’re wrong. Literally NONE of what you just said has ANYTHING to do with the point in argument. Stop already.
    1
  15.  @TysonIke  Thanks for proving you know nothing. United wasn’t the corrupt one in that case. They were threatened, illegally, and the director of the port authority was convicted on federal charges. The US Attorney’s office declined to charge United with wrongdoing. Also, it has NOTHING to with what was being discussed. I’m honestly done with you. You’re nothing, but an internet troll.
    1