Comments by "afcgeo" (@afcgeo882) on "CNBC Television"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jamesreisenauer1778 First off, it doesn’t keep its members from integrating in the local community. Most airmen and other personnel assigned to Ramstein live in the towns around it. The products sold at the Base Exchange at Ramstein are very often local. The fuel and supplies are local. There are actually whole cities that have grown just on US service members being there. The mist famous one is Kaiserslautern in Rhineland-Palatinate. It’s a city if 100,000 native residents and about 45,000 NATO personnel, which contribute about $1 billion USD a year to the German economy.
As per Afghanistan… I don’t even know where to start with you. You’re INCREDIBLY ignorant on the subject. The North of Afghanistan is the MOST friendly area to the US and the West in general out of the whole country. The North is held by Pashtun and Uzbek tribes that paired with the US to topple the Taliban. The Northern AOR (RC-N) was divided between Germany, Hungary, Norway, and Sweden to patrol because it had very friendly populations. The toughest areas were the East and Southeast, which were almost completely American responsibility, with assistance from France, Denmark, Australia and Georgia. Why do I know this? I spent an entire deployment in working C-17 operations out of Bagram AB and three years working out of Ramstein AB. Why was Germany there? That’s simple. The US invoked the NATO Article 5 after 9/11. This created the ISAF mission to eradicate Al Qaeda and Taliban that supported it. All of NATO was involved. The fact thar you don’t know this demonstrates just how ignorant you are about events of just 22 years ago (or thar you are a simple internet troll).
The events at Chernobyl and Fukushima were great examples of mismanagement at power stations, but the safety record of the world’s nuclear power stations is incredible. There are 440 nuclear power reactors in the world, in 32 countries, plus Taiwan. They provide about 10% of the world’s electricity. If German plants were old, the solution to that is to build modern ones. Modern plants are small, clean, and incredibly safe. Instead, Germany chose the easy way out - buy fossil fuels from Russia.
Germany wants to LOOK like they’re using clean energy, but in reality simply increased their fossil fuel expenditures.
Fossil fuel pollution has NOT increased in Russia or in the US. In fact, it has decreased, as both have switched to cleaner coal, natural gas and renewable energy production, including wind and solar. Russia was never a large CO2 producer. It relies mostly on hydro power for electricity. Most of its coal and oil were, and are, for export.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1