Comments by "afcgeo" (@afcgeo882) on "Doug DeMuro"
channel.
-
53
-
34
-
27
-
25
-
19
-
19
-
16
-
I think it's because Doug doesn't know that this is a commercial van not meant for families and he's comparing it to family minivans, which are completely different vehicles. It's like comparing a truck to a bus. They're both big and they're both somewhat similar, but they have very different uses, so a truck makes a terrible bus and a bus makes a terrible truck. He thinks it's just another minivan, but done terribly, so he's comparing it to minivans. Also, there's no doubt that Doug thinks he knows more about cars than anyone else on the planet, including all the Daimler executives. That causes him to stick his foot in his mouth quite often. He's entertaining, but he makes A LOT of mistakes and assumptions, which is quite unprofessional. That's just my opinion though.
Notice that Doug didn't mention even once that this is a commercial application vehicle sold through a commercial dealer network. Not once did he mention that this van carries 8 people instead of 7, which is maximum in any regular minivan. He never mentioned that the load floor is low, making entering and exiting all rows of the vehicle super easy compared to minivans and making it super easy to load/unload the cargo in the back. He failed to mention that all the seats seat upright unlike the 3rd rows of minivans, which have an odd, upward-angled seat, that there is more legroom and much more head room for all passengers (partly due to that upright seating and a tall, box-like shape of the vehicle.) That since it's a commercial van, it wouldn't be driven by the owners, but by chauffeurs on their shift, which is why they're low in driver amenities and comfort. That the wheels are tiny because it works MUCH better for fleet applications and gets a better ride quality than large 17"/18" wheels (though it looks worse). That third row bench is meant to be either moved to points front/back to customize the interior or be completely removed to provide a flat, large cargo interior, which fits standard dry wall sheets btw. Him tilting it is idiotic because that lever is for disconnecting the bench and pulling it out. All the seats come out or can be re-arranged. This van is super popular as a cab in Europe and is picking up here in NYC as well. It's also easily customized as a wheelchair accessible van.
Then, in the comment below, he belittles his followers by calling them "sweetie" while talking complete nonsense, "Well, sweetie, it's nice that Mercedes-Benz marketing has convinced you of this -- but it's the same size as a Sienna/Odyssey, with the same price as a Sienna/Odyssey, and the same scope as a Sienna/Odyssey.
If I were buying a "commercial shuttle van," I'd literally fall over laughing at the Metris ... annnnnd then I'd buy a Sienna/Odyssey. Which is what everyone does anyway."
Yeah... NO ONE buys Sienna/Odyssey vans for commercial use. NOT ONE PERSON. People buy Ford Transit Connects, Ram PromasterCity, any full-size van or back in the day an Astro van, but no one buys soft, short and narrow Siennas or Odysseys for commercial use. The load floor is too small and too high for that. The only minivan that has been used for commercial use is the Dodge Grand Caravan and they actually made a W/T version of it. That's because its interior is boxy and low to the ground, giving people an easy loading hight and an interior that can actually fit large things.
13
-
13
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
When you talk about power, Doug,.. you must also talk about the weight that power is carrying, not the "size" of the car. Not a terribly difficult concept to think about. The 2018 AMG E63's curb weight is 4669lbs with 603hp or 7.4lbs/1hp. The Panamera Sport Tourismo weighs in at 4486lbs with 550hp or 8.16lb/1hp. That's the explanation for it being a bit slower. However, that's a tiny difference and can easily be negated by the transmission, engine tuning or even the exhaust setup. Had the Panamera been heavier than the Benz, it would be a significant number, but since it's actually lighter, it isn't.
Now... you have a 2012 AMG E63 and its curb weight is only 4282lbs, but it only makes 550hp giving you 7.78lbs/1hp, for an even smaller difference.
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
That’s correct. In the 1980’s this car had two basic roles in the USSR: taxi fleet and government fleet (first responders, KGB, military (non-combat, obviously) factory executives, and other chauffeured roles.) Ordinary Russians had no access to this, could not afford it, and even if they could, the order wait times were around a decade. Compared to the Ladas, Moskvich, and Zapotozhets of the time, the Volga was a large and comfortable sedan. This specific car seems to be the uprated 100hp version which required 92 octane. The 90hp version ran on a more common 76 octane fuel. The top speed on this version was 91mph or 147km/h.
The taxis were technically 24-11s and 24-14s as they ran on 80 oct gasoline.There were also natural gas (24-17) and a station wagon (24-12).
The best part is that V8 powered Volgas were also produced as special pursuit vehicles for federal security in two versions: 195 and 220hp.
The Gaz 3102 Volga was a government service (politicians) vehicle derived from this.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@_zigger_ It’s not their master’s measurement, it’s history. By the time the metric system was invented, all manufacturing and trade measurements in the US were standardized in the Imperial form. Everywhere else, however, all kinds of measurements were used and nothing was standardized. That’s why the metric system took off there, quickly. However, there was no need, but a giant expense, to change over an entire booming economy in manufacturing standards as by the time the metric system was standardized, the US was already the world leader in those sectors. In fact, there are many things that are still standardized in inches and pounds and then just converted into random metric measurements.
#history #factsmatter
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Why have theories when the truth is well-publicized and known by people who care to know? Oh... it's for those people who prefer to stay ignorant.
The Metris (or the V Class as it's known in Europe) is a rear or all wheel drive work van that's sold in 3 different lengths and with 4 different available engines in Europe. In the past, the commercial and passenger versions were separated by different names (Vito and Viano, respectively) with the latter being completely differently equipped on the inside and slightly differently styled on the outside than the former. About a decade ago Mercedes considered whether they should bring the Viano to North America, but after lots of researched decided that the luxury minivan segment would compete against Escalades, Navigators and the like and that there wouldn't be much profit in it. They dropped it. However, the Mercedes Commercial Division saw the success of Ford Transit Connect and the Dodge Ram PromasterCity with fleets and decided to do the same with the Vito, which by then was renamed into simply the V Class, alongside the Viano. Thus, the cargo V vans are shipped to the US and then some are converted (to avoid the chicken tax) into passenger vans by addition of windows and seats. These vans are NOT sold through the regular M-B channels and you won't find them on their regular website. They are sold through the M-B Commercial Division and a website set up for them and Sprinter vans. They are meant for shuttle duties. They are durable, economical, spacious and easy to maintain, unlike the M-B passenger cars. They are sold and serviced at M-B commercial dealerships. These are FLEET vehicles sold as corporate vans, Uber cars, taxis, airport shuttles and light cargo trucks. They are NOT family haulers. What makes them popular with those crowds are a box shape that fits cargo and people well (8 grown adults fit easily), low floor, high torque with low horsepower (economical), able to tow heavy trailers and easy to maintain. They are not meant to be stylish or comfortable for long trips or luxurious. They're tiny buses.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@automation7295 What exactly is your psychiatric diagnosis?
First off, ALL of North America is like that, from Mexico to Canada. Second, Europe isn’t superior. It’s just different, and if you knew the history of why, you wouldn’t talk at all. Europe is the way it is because it was developed under feudalism (compact, central towns where all live, and the fields they tended to outside of town). America was developed by Europeans wanting more space and freedom and built their homes on their fields, which was more convenient to farmers, with huge distances from house to house, and this no centralization.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
So first off, FiatChrysler Automobiles or FCA (as the company is known) owns ZERO shares of Ford Motor Company. Second, Ford Motor Company owns ZERO shares of Mazda. Ford divested itself of any Mazda shares in 2015. FCA doesn't invest much into brands they don't own outright (such as Fiat, Iveco, Maserati, Lancia, Jeep, Chrysler, Dodge, and Alfa Romeo.) They do have some local agreements, partnerships and joint ventures, but nothing with the competition. Lastly, there is NOTHING that's even remotely similar in the Taurus and Mazda 3. Unless you consider that having steering wheels, pedals, stalks and screens makes them the same.
Please don't talk about things you clearly know nothing about.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sher's Fords and Others So lets not bullshit here.
The Civic Base/LX Sedan (2.0L) is rated 30mpg city/33 combined/38 hwy. The Jetta is rated 30mpg city/35mpg combined/40mpg hwy. However, Car and Driver tested it and got 43mpg highway on the Jetta with auto, 48mpg on the Jetta manual. https://www.caranddriver.com/volkswagen/jetta
The Civic LX sedan has 158hp and 138 lb-ft of torque and its 0-60 time is 8.2 seconds (Car and Driver test). The Jetta’s 1.4T produces 147hp and 184 lb-ft of torque with a 0-60 time of 7.6 seconds (0.6 seconds FASTER than the Civic).
So to recap, the Civic LX sedan has a little more horsepower, a LOT less torque, is .6 seconds slower and gets worse fuel economy than the Jetta. To get the better (still not better than the Jetta) fuel economy you have to pony up to the EX or higher, which gets the 1.5T. That 1.5T is also more powerful, at 174hp/162 lb-ft of torque (still less than the Jetta) and clocks in at 6.8 seconds.That trim starts at $23,800. The Jetta starts at $18,895. That’s an almost $5,000 difference.
The important part of the acceleration curve is that the Jetta will actually be faster at 0-30 than the Civic as the Civic 1.5T’s torque is lower and that peak horsepower comes in at the crazy 6,000rpms that no one will drive at. The Jetta’s torque peaks at around 1,300rpm and stays there until 4,000rpm. https://www.motorbiscuit.com/a-new-engine-shows-that-vws-turbo-power-is-better-than-ever/
The Civic’s peak torque starts at 1,900rpms and stays until 5,000rpms. So to utilize the most of it, you’d have to rev that engine high, destroying the fuel economy.
So unless you’re full on racing, the Jetta is the winner.
#factsmatter
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
First off, GM used to own Opel and sold it to PSA just a couple of years ago. The reason why some Opels are sold under the Buick brand in the United States is because that as an agreement as part of the sale. GM invested into those models' developments. Once they are updated, they won't be sold under a GM brand anymore. So, no, there's no PSA brand to sell them under in the United States as no other PSA brands are sold here. Furthermore, each model would need to comply with US safety standards, which are different than anywhere else. They'd also have to meet US emissions standards, which are also different. All of that would require special development and investment with a belief that the car would sell enough to make a profit. Considering the lack of brand awareness, trust in French reliability (when that trust isn't even there in Europe), an already loaded market and the difficulties of establishing dealership and distribution networks all mean that there's almost no chance that PSA will bring anything here anytime soon. If anything, Fiat is proving just how hard that is and Fiat actually has lots of support from the Chrysler side. PSA's brands are all very European and its focus is on that market.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
DrScopeify I’m a major rental car fleet manager.
1. The smallest car in our fleet is the Mitsubishi Mirage, Chevy Spark, Ford Fiesta, etc.
2. The Camry, Altima, etc are full-size sedans, which are 4 classes larger than those I just mentioned in point 1. In fact, only 2 classes of larger sedans exist (premium and luxury).
3. The CH-R and HR-V are sub-compact crossovers and are 2-3 classes smaller than the crossover equivalent of the Altima or Camry, which would be something like a Grand Cherokee, Edge, Santa Fe or Blazer.
4. Uber drivers need more rear leg room and trunk space. A Corolla/Civic would be more economical, cheaper and roomier for Uber use. A hybrid is ultimately what is best for that.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Doug, like others have mentioned, this is a cargo van that's been adopted for limited passenger use. What they didn't mention (I don't think) and certainly what you didn't mention, is that it is sold not by Mercedes-Benz the normal car company, but rather by the Mercedes-Benz Commercial Vehicles division.
In fact, if you wanted to buy this minivan for your family and you went to the Mercedes-Benz website (www.mbusa), you wouldn't find the Metris or any reference to it. Not in any category. This van is sold alongside the Sprinter vans and trucks through www.mbvans.com, which is their commercial vehicle website. This vehicle isn't meant to be sold to families. This is a FLEET vehicle. It is meant to be a taxi, corporate shuttle or delivery van. It is very similar to the use of Ford Transit Connect and Dodge PromasterCity and not at all comparable to the Honda Oddyseys, Toyota Siennas or Chrysler Pacificas.
You just fail to understand this whole vehicle segment which is common in other countries, but only starting in the United States. These are commercial vehicles and are not there to compete with passenger vehicles just like buses aren't meant to compete with limousines. These are not marketed to families. They are marketed toward corporations and fleet managers. This was the decision of M-B when they evaluated their presence in the minivan segment. They didn't want to enter their V Class as they didn't see people spending that much on a luxury minivan. However, they identified a niche in the commercial market for a people hauler at the 8 person capacity. It is attractive to fleet buyers who simply don't need the 10+ Ford Transit, Ram Promaster (Fiat Doblo) or Mercedes-Benz Sprinter capacity. The van bypasses the chicken tax by being built and shipped to the United States as a cargo version, where it is converted with seats and windows into what you see there. That's why it's so spartan.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's the dumbest Land Rover model EVER made and it simply emphasizes the idiocy of Land Rover. It is, indeed, slotted to fight the SUV coupes, which are only popular because they are... get this... SUV COUPES, so of course LR make it non-coupe. It also produces a Jaguar that sits on the exact same platform and is the same size, but is faster AND cheaper, so (shocker!) it's more popular. This car is desperately underpowered with either engine choice available in the US, has approach and departure angles which ensure it will never go off-road and competes ONLY against other JLR products. Well done!
I like technology. No, I LOVE technology, but at some point, the technology needs to improve the driving and utility aspects of the vehicle, not be gimmicks prone to breakage. Now I get that this is a luxury car, but let's face it, its capabilities are still mostly mechanical, not electronic. Oh and by the way, the F-Pace, according to all actual measured reviews is faster, stops faster and provides more grip on the skid pad.
P.S. Considering LR's famous (err... infamous) dependability issues with electronics, those electrical panels that handle EVERY SINGLE FUNCTION will mean the car will literally put on more miles on the bed of a flatbed truck than on its own rolling wheels.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Winroo Wherever they’re modified, they’re modified for the client, or at least the local market preferences. The preferences in S. Korea and China are mostly fake wood and gold plating... everywhere! In Japan they are different. Much more modest and more into quality leather. The Japanese also don’t like light color interiors much.
What it seems you wanted to comment on was the aesthetics of electrical components, not the seats, cabinetry, carpeting or 99% of other stuff you see in that van. Electrical options, like everything else are completely up to the owner. This is CUSTOM work, after all. It’s all specialized to order. These vehicles, in the US are mostly owned by limousine fleet owners, not celebrities. They’re rented out for parties or VIP transportation, along with the driver, just like a limousine. They’re great for a trip to Las Vegas or Atlantic City!
Also, if you don’t know about Korea’s situation, why did you specifically mention Korea?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bindingcurve A wise person once said, “you can’t fix stupid.” If you leave your belongings out in the open they will be stolen eventually. Duh!
I’ve had pick-ups my whole life and I live in NYC. I’ve always had retractable covers or caps on them. They’ve always given me flexibility and and fantastic utility. I can drive 4 passengers, each with five large suitcases, to the airport. No SUV aside from a Suburban can do that. I have a Frontier mind you. Nothing huge or fancy. I’ve always had compact/mid-size trucks, from a 1988 Toyota pick-up, to a Ranger, a Mazda B, a Raider and now a Frontier. I’ve also had a number of sedans as my dailies. While the sedans were far more comfortable and economical, their trunks are simply limiting. The Maverick combines the utility I’ve always had and needed with the space, comfort and fuel economy of a sedan, meaning I won’t need two vehicles anymore.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1