Comments by "afcgeo" (@afcgeo882) on "WarLeaks - Military Blog" channel.

  1. No, this isn’t an issue of globalism. If France purchased foreign-made ammunition that was made to the French standard, this wouldn’t be happening. In fact, had France done what it was supposed to and designed the FAMAS to operate properly with NATO munitions, it wouldn’t be happening. The problem here is France
    37
  2. No, which is why Russia is not doing well. It seems their infantry doesn’t want to fight.
    10
  3. Yes, but then targeting that home with a BTR for TikTok views.
    6
  4. He hesitated quite a lot, given his position. He also missed every single shot. Literally got one kill off a rocochet.
    6
  5. The bullet absolutely penetrated. It was commented it went through. It missed his head under the helmet. A tiny bullet with that much force penetrates easier than a tank driving over it.
    5
  6. Some idiots weren’t trained on using NLAWs properly and think they’re the same as RPGs. NLAWs are meant to be used at stand-off ranges, up to a few kilometers away and their missiles need distance to go up, and land on top of the target, as well as to arm.
    4
  7.  @tedcrilly46  The helo pilot, after evading the targeting, will blow the F out of the source of the laser within seconds.
    4
  8.  @mexikatl5656  He could teach Stalin a few himself. Putin is FAR more ruthless. It just hasn’t been publicized yet.
    3
  9.  @messier8379  That’s a plain lie. Putin has killed and jailed countless millions already. Also, you’re a neo-Nazi.
    3
  10. The Iskander M is not really ballistic as it constantly changes its trajectory in-flight and can be adjusted during mission, but you’re right, it’s a K in this video. The M has no wings and is much larger in diameter.
    3
  11. 100% не показали как чеченцы потом использовали её как мишень. По первому каналу бабушки не было, чеченцев тоже… да и вообще… а Мариуполе все дома стоят и народ танцует на улицах.
    2
  12. And rightfully so. I watched it slowed down a little, about 5 times. The tank missed all its shots, by quite a lot. It lit up one BTR, purely by luck, as its shot ricocheted off the ground, way short of the target. Considering the dead on distance and slow speed of vehicles, and this tank being alone, it’s obvious that no one it it knew what they were doing. The arty volley that followed was unguided and hit absolutely nothing, as the BTRs continued down their path. We don’t know what happened to the tank. Perhaps it escaped. Its armor can withstand 30mm fire from the BTRs. It’s also possible that it’s still sitting there, with its turret a few meters away.
    2
  13. Like the fact that the tank and the artillery missed every round? The only hit we see is from a ricochet.
    2
  14.  @DixxyV  You don’t know is the obvious part.
    2
  15. Meh… if there was a real firefight, she wouldn’t walk into it and he wouldn’t walk slowly out in the open with her. He’d just shout at her to get back and take cover. There was no firefight either.
    2
  16. Not the first attack. There were two attacks in the first week of action as well, against a Russian air force air field, with good success.
    2
  17. Simple? lol That thing breaks down every other day. There’s no way to fire it manually either. Only 2 men in the crew. It’s a useless POS in combat. Since it’s slow to displace, it’s also very susceptible to counter-battery fire.
    2
  18. Jim Bob In reality this is 1970s era guns. They have much more modern ones they would use in actual combat. These are primarily just shock and awe weapons against asymmetric enemies’ camps/compounds.
    2
  19. Jim Bob You read something wrong. Ukraine never fired onto Russian territory. All fighting was within Ukraine.
    2
  20. Herman Greenfield Thanks... That’s what I said. I’m both, Russian and Ukranian.
    2
  21.  @Mac-ik1sg  Your “feels” are funny. You should enlist and get real ones.
    2
  22.  @adampustos1155  That’s false as there are no articles in the Russian language. There is no “the” or “a” or “an” in the language at all. Given the rules of the English language, it is NOT grammatically correct. That’s the point. People do use it, but people also use double negatives and made up words all the time.
    2
  23.  @jima9863  Not really, no. In armies that fight for their national pride or freedom, for sure, but most of these idiots are religious fanatics without even a hint of an education. They’re indoctrinated from childhood and are simply blood thirsty.
    2
  24.  @abdulazizdizayee7191  I’m talking about developing nations like Syria, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Yemen, etc. You’re incredibly ignorant about the US, and that’s for a hood reason: you’ve never been outside your hellhole. I’ve been to all the countries I’ve mentioned. I’ve listened to the people.
    2
  25.  @heraclitus9721  But ignorance is an excuse for you, or is it just pure hate of everyone not like you? Also, what imperialism? Do you even know what the word means?
    2
  26. Do they care? They get paid the same.
    1
  27. Those launch systems are basically single use platforms anyway.
    1
  28.  @PhilippSeven  Yes, I’m very aware that they “can”, but realistically they most often do not. The launch vehicles are often damaged after launches.
    1
  29.  @TheEpicLinkFreeman  Just FYI, the most common AKs today are 5.45 caliber AK-74, AK-74M, AKS-74, AKS-74U, AK-105 carbine, AK-107, and AK-12.
    1
  30.  NI GGER KILLER  Or maybe they should use the right weapons, properly. An NLAW isn’t an RPG.
    1
  31. It was destroyed in both. It’s still being destroyed.
    1
  32.  @SkeezyFPV  Hey dummy, XM395 is a US munition that only works with NATO mortars, which the Ukranian army doesn’t own or operate. They wouldn’t know how if we gave them any. They take training to learn. Ukrainians use Russian 120mm mortars, which are simpler and have no guided munitions.
    1
  33.  @wigon  ASSumed? Don’t assume. No, they don’t have NATO mortar systems as they wouldn’t know how to properly operate them. They have plenty of 120mm Russian mortars, which is why NATO units wouldn’t be fielded.
    1
  34.  @SkeezyFPV  I do have a pretty good idea. I was one of those people who trained them.
    1
  35. Except all those were led by the UN.
    1
  36.  @K3Best  Check history. Both were, in FACT, preceded by UN resolutions for military action.
    1
  37.  @K3Best  UN Resolutions 1441, 2165, and 2191. LOOK IT UP! The operation against Bin Laden was an incursion against a well-known terrorist that even Pakistan officially recognized as one, but unfortunately chose to harbor. It was not an invasion of anything. No one except Bin Laden and his security were harmed. Your support for terrorism, however, is noted, and reported.
    1
  38.  @K3Best  All you do is assume, quite clearly. You’re done here.
    1
  39. if the round penetrates, then it blows inside, destroying the tank and killing the crew. Stick to video games!
    1
  40. What parts came from where? You know that Russia is a major producer of semiconductors, right? No, CPUs in their defense systems don’t come from the US. Possibly something from China, but unlikely. The Russians are extremely paranoid about defense being 100% domestic.
    1
  41.  @lokisg3  You’d be surprised how simple of a system missile targeting systems use (and on purpose.) You forget that people flew to the moon and back on 1960’s computer technology, which my watch supersedes by hundreds of times. Missiles only require satellite connections, simple course corrections, activation commands and that’s about it. Corruption has NOTHING to do with technology. If you have nothing intelligent to day, do yourself a favor and keep quiet. The only thing worse than people thinking you’re stupid is you proving them right.
    1
  42. What Marines? 😂 These are Chechen thugs.
    1
  43. But also… a camera over the Buk’s head that its crew is unaware of?
    1
  44. It’s not for that. It never could do that.
    1
  45. @cockyhemi That’s only true of the Korean conflict.
    1
  46.  @chrisbreezy-ryanbarbosa4320  Look up what Wild Weasels are.
    1
  47. Good guys, good fighters… very poorly equipped.
    1
  48. Andre McGoo They don’t want it, but if it happens it’s not a huge deal either. Have you heard of such occurrences? No. You never will either. And it’s not because it doesn’t happen.
    1
  49.  @corinth2941  Despite your PTSD, my DD-214 says you’re a full-of-shit-POG.
    1
  50.  @ianMcFarlane112  Russia is mostly in Asia and only the largest by territory, which is pretty pointless. Ukraine is the largest European nation, which Russia is not.
    1