Comments by "gibbo" (@gibbo822) on "Former FBI agent explains DNA evidence in Kohberger case | NewsNation Now" video.

Cars a year older in the CCTV also doesn't have PA plates on sorry but weak. The DNA is touch DNA and doesn't put him at the crime scene it shows he handled it at some point ... Prosecuting team are messing about and about to get clapped with facts
5
 @bambooprincess3495 what a stupid thing to say!! It's more and more likely that he's not guilty! Your aware most will be thrown out due to prosecutor not supporting the discovery!
5
@ArtemisCables So why are the defence using that as their main point? Ok why is there no evidence of blood in his vehicle you can't get rid of that! None in his apartment? They stated they had hair in his apartment from a victim now they don't? Watch this prosection fail regardless
5
 @Art-vz6qh actually anyone with a Brain can see prosecuting team aren't playing ball which means cover up this team are known for it
4
@Silence_Duder_Gooder pull them all in and test them for blood DNA might be destroyed but blood stains forever
3
@lordrataxes5192 show proof even the prosecuting team haven done that yet
3
@bud-9668 They pinged him in Moscow at a specific time and he wasn't in Moscow he was in a store buying items or a drink on CCTV. The issue is the prosecuting team have said a lot but once the facts are out like his car being newer than the one on CCTV and wasn't PA plates. There were multiple cars fitting the year of that model in the CCTV who are they and why are they not Infront of the defence? Moscow found no blood in the car right ? It was a blood bath right? CCTV on camera just shows that he left the area which the shop CCTV would clarify His car would also tell them exactly where he's been why haven't they just simply confirmed that to the defence? You know discovery has happened yet the defense are the ones doing all the police work that police should have done.... All these things like "we have messages of him and one of the victims" So where are these messages? Seems to me they flogged you a dead horse mate and your trying to ride it there is so much more that I'm not even mentioning like other suspects and what ruled them out? Idaho have history just watch and see
2
@user-di8hm2jl2u Not only that they have his vehicle why haven't the pinned him to the location yet? What happens too "we have messages between him and a victim" Or and this is my fave why haven't they explained how there's atleast two Elantras in the area on CCTV but different models (years)
2
@bud-9668 Don't plan on using? If it could solidify the case and is stronger than what they've already given why wouldn't they use it? Why was they arguing in court that they shouldn't have to show all what they have yet? On Law and Crime channel in the video it's stated that it's a fox guarding your chickens by a PROSECUTOR..
1
@bud-9668 They have a time line in the PCA and on one of either law and crime or court tv I think it's the latter. He was pinged by a tower in Moscow but wasn't in Moscow he was in a store on CCTV. His car was also on CCTV and they built the time line off these CCTV cameras. They have his mobile now why haven't they solidified it by putting him in the house or near. They just stated his phone was off but what they mean to say is.they checked and it didn't match their time line
1