Comments by "" (@DuandaleQingle) on "Jake Broe"
channel.
-
10
-
9
-
7
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The argument that "the US will never attack Russia" cannot be proven or disproven, as it is a hypothetical statement. However, the claim that the US has a history of removing leaders/presidents/etc. they don't like and replacing them with leaders they do like is a matter of historical record. While it is true that the US has intervened in the affairs of other nations in the past, it does not necessarily mean that they will attack Russia.
The example given of Saddam Hussein and Iraq is not a fair comparison to the situation with Russia. The US invaded Iraq under the false pretense of weapons of mass destruction, which were never found. This was a violation of international law and a mistake that the US government has since admitted. However, there is no evidence to suggest that the US is planning to invade Russia or that they have any intention of doing so.
Furthermore, the idea that the US would attack Russia is not only unsupported by any evidence but also goes against the principles of deterrence and mutual assured destruction that have helped prevent major conflicts between nuclear powers. Both the US and Russia possess large nuclear arsenals, and any military action between them could have catastrophic consequences for both nations and the world as a whole. Therefore, it is not in the interest of either country to engage in such actions.
In conclusion, while it is important to be aware of the historical record of US intervention in other nations, it is not fair or accurate to suggest that the US will attack Russia. Such an action is not only unsupported by any evidence but also goes against the principles of deterrence and mutual assured destruction that have helped prevent major conflicts between nuclear powers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1