Comments by "Tim Trewyn" (@timtrewyn453) on "Forbes Breaking News"
channel.
-
45
-
23
-
20
-
19
-
15
-
15
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
From Webster's Dictionary of 1828:
1. A rising against civil or political authority; the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state. It is equivalent to sedition, except that sedition expresses a less extensive rising of citizens. It differs from rebellion, for the latter expresses a revolt, or an attempt to overthrow the government, to establish a different one or to place the country under another jurisdiction. It differs from mutiny, as it respects the civil or political government; whereas a mutiny is an open opposition to law in the army or navy. insurrection is however used with such latitude as to comprehend either sedition or rebellion.
Example: It is found that this city of old time hath made insurrection against kings, and that rebellion and sedition have been made therein. Ezra 4:19.
It follows reasonably that the writers of the 14th Amendment defined "insurrection" in the manner above. Indeed, the last sentence indicates "insurrection" to be a slightly more general and encompassing term that includes sedition or rebellion as explained in the definition. When a piece of legislation does not define all its terms, legislative rules typically resort to a recognized dictionary definition. Or is the legislature required to establish an official state definition of every word to be used in its documents? Well yes, and that is why they adopt a recognized, publicly dictionary. It is legislative and legal negligence not to do so. And how are people to better understand each other without some reliance on a common language of well-defined words.
4
-
4
-
4
-
While the Senator makes some good points, I think he mischaracterizes the destination of $60 billion for Ukraine. The great majority of that money goes to the US defense industry to manufacture new weaponry for US inventory, while inventory about to expire and scheduled for decommissioning is instead sent to Ukraine. It is aid to Ukraine, but it is not cash to Ukraine. It is material to Ukraine. He also mischaracterizes the motivation of his fellow Senators. Stopping Russia in Ukraine means US troops will not have to stop them in Moldova or Romania or the Baltics or Poland or Finland. Also, delaying munitions deliveries to Taiwan increases the likelihood of a Chinese invasion. Would Putin have invaded Ukraine if Ukraine had a potent air force with several hundred F-16s and the munitions and services that go with them? He would be hurting a lot more if that had been in place. Senator, we are trying to head off foreign leaders who have publicly declared their intentions.
The Senator is also incomplete in his characterization of strategy. He made no mention of sanctions and the realignment of the European economy away from Russia. Sanctions do not themselves end a war and they take time to produce effects. But effects are being felt. The Russian economy is being reorganized into a top heavy defense economy in the style of the Soviet economy. History shows how that worked for them. The strategy is to weaken Russia, discredit Russia, raise Chinese doubt as to its own strategy, solidify NATO, and improve the security of free Europe, Taiwan, and the United States global economy. That strategy is working. It's plain to see. Russia, like its Soviet predecessor, has put itself into a self-defeating level of stress.
The Senator lays out no strategy for bringing the conflict to a diplomatic resolution. Russia is pressing its attack. Russia is not stopping. Russia's terms for settlement involve Ukraine surrendering land Russia does not currently occupy, Ukraine staying out of NATO and the EU, and Ukraine demilitarizing. It just tees up Ukraine for future losses. If he wants a fast, diplomatic solution, I am afraid the only way to achieve that is a significant Ukrainian capitulation, OR, a form of Western escalation that convinces Putin that he is on a steady trend of losing Ukrainian territory. The latter is perhaps too dangerous for the Senator's temperament. The Senator also, in making his case on Russian oil and gas sales, ignores Ukraine's agency to significantly damage Russia's oil and gas infrastructure, a program it has already begun, perhaps as far back as Nordstream 2.
The Senator sees expanding the "industrial base" as not helpful if we send all the munitions made to Ukraine. Who were we going to use the munitions on? And is it not an improvement in capacity if a larger industrial base can make more munitions? More munitions can bring the war to a more favorable end for Ukraine. The Senator is indirectly advocating capitulation.
In essence the Senator dismisses the superior population numbers and industrial capacity of Ukraine's friends vs. Russia and its friends. He acknowledges Russia's team, but is dismissive of Ukraine's team. He projects the same fatalism that is used in Russian propaganda. Are you ready to absorb millions of Ukrainians, Senator?
As for time for debate, the selection of specific materials to be shipped to Ukraine has been the subject of months of dialogue between the Ukrainian military and NATO defense ministers. I don't think the Senator's expertise exceeds theirs. To the extent that there are certain clauses affecting the execution of the funded programs and monitoring the integrity of those programs, proper objects of the Senate's attention, again I would think that long ago standard language and procedures were formulated and should be found in the bill. How long does it take to confirm that? Time is of the essence on the battlefield. Yes, Senator, people are dying out there. Could we expect you to be keeping up on this for their sake?
3
-
3
-
3
-
From Webster's Dictionary of 1828:
1. A rising against civil or political authority; the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state. It is equivalent to sedition, except that sedition expresses a less extensive rising of citizens. It differs from rebellion, for the latter expresses a revolt, or an attempt to overthrow the government, to establish a different one or to place the country under another jurisdiction. It differs from mutiny, as it respects the civil or political government; whereas a mutiny is an open opposition to law in the army or navy. insurrection is however used with such latitude as to comprehend either sedition or rebellion.
Example: It is found that this city of old time hath made insurrection against kings, and that rebellion and sedition have been made therein. Ezra 4:19.
It follows reasonably that the writers of the 14th Amendment defined "insurrection" in the manner above. Indeed, the last sentence indicates "insurrection" to be a slightly more general and encompassing term that includes sedition or rebellion as explained in the definition. When a piece of legislation does not define all its terms, legislative rules typically resort to a recognized dictionary definition. Or is the legislature required to establish an official state definition of every word to be used in its documents? Well yes, and that is why they adopt a recognized, publicly dictionary. It is legislative and legal negligence not to do so. And how are people to better understand each other without some reliance on a common language of well-defined words.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The Senator makes many valid points about incentives and the increased likelihood of overuse of asylum. It is an argument for relocating applications to enter the U.S. to large U.S. Consulates in sending nations. Part of the solution needs to include removing incentives for trafficking.
But the majority of the Federal budget is spent on domestic issues, Senator, and the sense of the American people is not just that the border is a problem, but child care is a problem, health care and drug costs are a problem, domestic gun violence is a problem, Florida property insurance costs are a problem, etc. Our role in Ukraine is to be a consistent team member among many team members in proportion to our ability and in the context of our overall global trade and strategic situation. I know you study all this. It is inaccurate to equate the armed and violent Russian invasion of Ukraine with the economically and safety driven migration into America. On immigration, again, we should be a team member with migrant sending nations to improve the lot of people feeling it necessary to do something so profound as to leave their own home for the United States. It is a compliment by them of us in a way, but it needs to happen decently and in order.
So Senator, you did or did not provide a letter with your preferences on immigration to the Lankford committee early in their negotiating process? The United States Senate could not organize itself to do a proper job on this issue? That committee needed a statement of views and proposals from every Senator in its first week if not sooner.
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
From Webster's Dictionary of 1828:
1. A rising against civil or political authority; the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of a law in a city or state. It is equivalent to sedition, except that sedition expresses a less extensive rising of citizens. It differs from rebellion, for the latter expresses a revolt, or an attempt to overthrow the government, to establish a different one or to place the country under another jurisdiction. It differs from mutiny, as it respects the civil or political government; whereas a mutiny is an open opposition to law in the army or navy. insurrection is however used with such latitude as to comprehend either sedition or rebellion.
Example: It is found that this city of old time hath made insurrection against kings, and that rebellion and sedition have been made therein. Ezra 4:19.
It follows reasonably that the writers of the 14th Amendment defined "insurrection" in the manner above. Indeed, the last sentence indicates "insurrection" to be a slightly more general and encompassing term that includes sedition or rebellion as explained in the definition. When a piece of legislation does not define all its terms, legislative rules typically resort to a recognized dictionary definition. Or is the legislature required to establish an official state definition of every word to be used in its documents? Well yes, and that is why they adopt a recognized, publicly dictionary. It is legislative and legal negligence not to do so. And how are people to better understand each other without some reliance on a common language of well-defined words.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Alwayscatlike And why would someone stay in teaching when they can make twice or more the money in the trades? You don't need a degree to do the trades. OK, some people, like my wife, actually like teaching kids, and will even substitute teach for minimum wage sometimes. But why dodge the administrator salary Deborah? Hey, why not take a business degree and make six figures heading up a charter school? Staff turnover? Hey, just enough salary to fill the slots with people too scared to question if a kid really earned that diploma. Charters are about the people who stay in the business long term. Teachers are secondary and expendable. If my kid said he wanted to be a business man, I would tell them to go to a charter school and study the principal, how they talk, how they behave, because that's where the money is. Follow the money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The danger of what Senator Rubio touches upon is that the inertia in American leadership's adjustment to the flow of intelligence could significantly contribute to a Chinese calculation to take Taiwan by force. Russia, likewise, can see that the US may not be agile enough to successfully intervene to rescue a border state. The Russians have already proved this under the watch of earlier administrations. e.g. Ukraine. Missing from the Senator's speech is any mention of human intelligence awareness of the state of Afghan government forces. One remembers quotes of numbers and equipment provided, but no mention of much awareness of specific Afghan military leadership actions or fighting spirit as it was evolving in real time. That we have so many SIV's is an indication that even after 20 years of involvement, foreign language skill within the Departments of State and Defense is wanting. We did not know what was happening because we lacked an ability to listen and understand. A few voices did predict a re-enactment of rapid changes in Afghan soldier perspective that had been seen before, e.g. Carter Malkasian. It seems his input was "averaged" into the analysis, if considered at all. And such round units of time "end of the year." Doesn't sound like much of a forward looking model of the battlespace was being used anymore. Whoever contributed to Taliban strategic planning, seems to have taken the change of administration into account. The GW Bush administration was still getting up to speed when 9/11 happened. We'll see how military leadership gets questioned about all this. I do very much appreciate that there seemed to be little, if any, partisanship in the Senator's remarks. He used his time well to focus the American people on the capability of its leadership to deal with a very difficult situation. Unique situations also lie ahead of us. This is not something a President resigns over, and VP Harris is not ready to assume that office. Changes in the Cabinet could be on the table.
1
-
I"ve visited Central America. It's fine for some people. I could also see why some could want to get out. I've made a friend from Honduras who has come to America, legally. They speak both English and Spanish and have a productive job. They have two daughters that are doing very well. They say most people they know come here to build a better life for their family. So I think Senator Rubio is right, there are mostly good migrants, but there is also a lot of bad ones. We catch the bad ones and send them back, where they become gang members, which just incentivizes poor people who can't afford to live in a gated and barbed wire protected community to get away from them even more. If you want to call this an invasion, then you have to admit that we are in a fight, in a war with every migrant sending nation. We could say those nations would like us to bear the cost of maintaining their criminals in our prisons. This is an argument for the United States to, forcibly if need be, establish very large consulates, in effect, military bases, in the migrant sending nations. Its a consulate with a prison, but also with training areas to prepare native born forces to put pressure on the migrant sending nation's government to work on making their country a better place to live. This could all cost a lot of money. I've also been to our southern border. It's a very longer border that takes a lot of effort to monitor, much less close. This could all cost a lot of money.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@legaleeblonde4310 Everybody is biased. "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." Only God can be objective, anyone else who claims objectivity is a "know it all." That doesn't mean I stop debating.
Why was there no uproar when thousands of Ukrainians entered the United States? I hosted a Ukrainian family that came over the southern border. Nice people. Good parents. Well behaved kids. Visited our church more than once. I have a friend from Honduras, hardworking in a profitable business. Smart. Do we have to weed out the spies and criminals? Yes, that's been an ongoing task for decades.
Why were there, twice, recently and long ago, Spanish speaking young men putting a new roof on my house, a process plainly visible to aerial surveillance, but no official came by to deport them and fine, much less prosecute, the citizen contractor who hired them? Tell me Republican businessmen do not like cheap labor. We have had that southern border for over a century to work on. Ukraine didn't start fighting for its life until 2014. Time is of the essence for Ukraine. We have decades ahead of us to scale up control of our borders. Take a look at the history of staffing of the Border Patrol. Looks like it plateaued. I hear they have a recruiting problem. Know anything about that?
Yes, both Republicans and Democrats have been in a race to see which party could use up America's credit for its own policies since Reagan cut taxes and raised defense spending at the same time. There was that blip when Gingrich and Clinton balanced the budget, but then W fixed that with another tax cut and more defense spending. You are right and wrong, because the only way out of a looming debt crisis is Ronnie Reagan's way out, grow the economy. Part of how you do that is grow the population with energetic young people from abroad. They made quick work of my roof. I say the crisis at the border is manufactured for political purposes, and the purpose of politics these days is who gets the government's borrowed money.
Dig for better premises for your short arguments if you want to be persuasive. Or just be a venting YouTube commenter. It's a free country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Florida has done well on COVID compared to most other States because we have the highest average age of persons and the wisdom that goes with that. Vulnerable elders and the acutely compliant understand there will always be incorrigible people who will refuse to do the right thing, be it wash their hands, stay home when sick, wear a mask inside assembly spaces, observe social distance, or get a vaccination if their doctor says it is safe to do so. Of course don't get the shot if your doctor tells you not to get it.
But this speech is an indication that the eradication of polio and small pox and tuberculosis has been so thorough in the United States that no one has any memory of what a blessing the polio and small pox and tuberculosis vaccines were and are. I had an aunt who spent her life in a wheelchair after getting polio. The guy who helped me start my business died of COVID. Now we have a culture of politicians and their supporters who do not understand public health nor really care. We, of all nations, with an abundance of vaccines and economic power, had a chance to snuff out or very significantly suppress COVID and get this disruption over with and our lives in a better place. Others seem to have found a new cause for disrupting the nation and dragging this ordeal out for political gain. If you can, get the shot, keep up on the other virus countermeasures, and let's get this over with.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@theallseeingeye9388 The fact that Germany is in NATO did not prevent Germany from purchasing Russian oil and gas for billions of euros every year. Let that sink in. Why would Ukraine in NATO necessarily mean that Russia would not have had access to Ukrainian markets? The obvious reason for Russian opposition to NATO is that NATO limits Russian control of markets and resources in adjacent nations. That is, they cannot over time be brought under a greater degree of Russian influence, control, or ultimately jurisdiction. The security of any small nation bordering Russia without being in a sufficient security alliance is, demonstrably via the war in Ukraine, precarious, whatever has been said on paper. It is a chronic feature of comments in support of Russia that they evade Russian responsibility for anything. Neurotypical human beings see this to varying degrees as a failure of the Russian psyche. To quote the text held dear by the Russian Orthodox Church, "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." Christians are, or should be, honest about their mistakes. America has made plenty of mistakes (U-2, Bay of Pigs, Zaire, My Lai, derivatives, OIF, too many years in Afghanistan, etc.). But the success of our economy, our space and military technology, and our culture indicates that we sometimes learn from our mistakes. The Russian psyche seems so terrified of the shame of error that they do anything to evade dealing honestly with error and honestly with other nations. That is a nation that is very uncomfortable to live next to, a nation led by the "perfect" wielding nuclear weapons and a clear willingness to callously spend the lives of its lesser residents. Any sane person is going to seek help protecting themselves from such a mentality. And Russians can keep proving that point by continuing to assert Russian innocence, Russian infallibility, Russian expansion, and Russian infinite capability. The Western ideal is the conversation, and here we are on YouTube.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@dede4004 So your husband has a PhD in education. So he knows that Donald Trump probably had Conduct Disorder as a child and graduated into full blown ASPD as an adult. And so, knowing that, your husband is recommending to us all that we always elect a sociopath for President? I prefer a President with a conscience, thank you. In a free country I get to vote for that, although I voted for Brian Carroll, American Solidarity Party.
And what, exactly, is Common Core in your mind? Jeb Bush advocated for it. I thought the most developed part of it was what math kids needed to know, wherever they live, because money exists in most places in the United States. Math is also a way to learn the basics of logic, which is a part of common sense. A = A. If A = B and B = C, then A = C. Not all conclusions are self-evident. False premises do not produce valid or sound arguments.
"Still, it's the math component that has drawn the most criticism. In order to help students develop problem solving skills useful in many areas of life, the Core's focus on "conceptual" math requires students to understand the reasoning behind the correct answers to math problems. It's a major shift, and many parents are finding it near impossible to help their children do their homework." -- Harvard Ed. Magazine. What does this mean? It means many parents are unable to express to their children how to reason, which means many parents do not themselves possess common sense. Which to me, explains why so many people would vote for a sociopath for President. Makes sense.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@billbeeb1803 I do too, Bill. Earlier, this year, my wife told our daughter not to drive on a particularly dangerous undivided highway, even though its posted speed limit of 35 MPH was also posted as being "strictly enforced". She did what she pleased anyway. A 19 year old man, doing as he pleased, and who later tested DUI, drove his 4 door F150 over the double yellow line at over 70 MPH straight on into our daughter's car. She was dead within an hour, leaving behind a one year daughter of her own. He's in jail. I suppose that is dramatic, Bill, but it is true. Love your kids while you can.
1
-
@billbeeb1803 He said ""Parents should be making those decisions." It's the last thing he says and where I feel he is wrong. And he talks about data, but neither he nor anyone has time in the context of a press conference to quote it sufficiently to support their propositions. This is why you don't bet your child's health on what the Governor says, because he is an attorney by profession, a busy man with a wide set of responsibilities, and we should not defer to him over a child's pediatrician as to that child's medical history and their vulnerability to a serious reaction to COVID. I've seen enough people who refused vaccination, contracted COVID, had their survival instinct overcome their reticence to go to the hospital, and admit it would have been prudent to get vaccinated. As a parent, I want to know if my child has a low risk of long-term consequences if they catch COVID at school, because they probably are going to catch it while not being vaccinated. If you think that is over sensitive, perhaps it has to do with my experience as a foster parent, when I was taking care of children of parents with a criminal background. Not a good situation in which to commit a serious parenting error.
1
-
@billbeeb1803 A parent does have jurisdiction over what their kids do on their own property and when in their direct custody. A man's home is his castle. Neighbors who both have kids who are friends who play together can come to an agreement on shared rules, or they cannot, but there needs to be at least a one-time conversation. They are public property, subject to the jurisdiction of a combination of the elected school board and the State and the Nation per the laws. Schools can have dress codes to enforce decency and the common good, in this case, public health. School districts might consider setting up mask free school spaces for teachers and students who are OK with that. I am concerned for them, but clearly some want that choice accommodated, and we should do that when we reasonably can. But likewise, schools can also set up school spaces with strict public health rules for those who can agree with that. The Governor should restrain himself and let parents and local districts work this out. That approach is called subsidiarity, a principle of Catholic Social Teaching, something the Governor, as a Catholic, should take seriously. He draws undue attention to himself on this matter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1