Comments by "D. R. Stewart" (@drstewart) on "Pete Judo"
channel.
-
6
-
5
-
@DoctorBiobrain What would you do if there were no one to accuse of things based on your own bias and your own assumption? My, things might be a bit clearer for you then. How weird that for people who only have the limited toolset of a single hammer, everything is a nail.
Your trope of "unconscious bias" which you like to use to discredit anyone disagreeing with you assumes several things, none of which you can substantiate. It assumes bias as the default, for people who have literally grown up in a female-empowered context. It assumes that until you've descended from the heavens to scold the poor and unwitting about their own consciousness, no one has dared plumb the depths of their motivations and place in society. In a contemporary social setting where currency is comprised of social labels, the intersections of such, and how they can be used to advance while silencing others.
Not only was girlboss an identity (and still is), it's an ongoing source of pride and empowerment. Trying to cast it as a slur is really only because it exposes too much of the genuine dynamics at work for the subject. No, it's not an insult because it upsets you. That's not how that works. Perhaps you should examine your own unconscious bias about why you jump on that term but have no qualms about other gendered terms that are objectively detracting, such as toxic masculinity and mansplaining.
Basically, find some integrity and stop trying to be a girlboss.
5
-
@DoctorBiobrain No, you referenced yourself in the context of girlboss twice, so there's your trope of unconscious bias defeated. Also I didn't say that you were a girl nor a boss. You can have a girlboss mentality, which you're clearly exhibiting, without having the requisite chromosomes or parts. That's identity, right? It's all a spectrum and whatever we want it to be!
I know what you've shown me and commented. Your go to is "unconscious bias" because it's yet another term that means whatever one wants it to mean in the moment, and is an excuse to invalidate and dismiss while pushing a narrative of someone else's life. Like you've tried over and over in this discussion. You've projected it in every comment under this video.
I don't particularly care about your dreams, but I can quite clearly see your biases. You don't get to define the discussion, and what you want the discussion to be isn't particularly important. A woman was caught being dishonest, she tried to claim sex-based victimhood to avoid responsibility, and was criticized for doing so. The rest of your narrative isn't particularly relevant. We're talking about it because she made her sex an issue with false accusations. Otherwise known as a pink pass. That's why it's an issue, and your whiteknighting is getting in the way of you understanding that.
Despite you reaching for offense on behalf of others, and your limited perception of the term, girlboss is not an insult, not a slur, and not a detraction. But it's amazing that you're hinging your entire argument on that because if you can cast it as an inequality or identity-based offense, you can share in the social currency of offense and victimhood. Even more amazing is that you're totally blind to it, and see yourself as punching up and fighting against the big bad evil of sexism.
There's some real unconscious bias for you. But yeah, you won't be examining that while accusing others of it.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
@johnkean6852 Heaven forfend a homophone is passed in online discourse, you've won a great victory there. Celebrate immediately, and for an extended period.
While you're correcting my spelling of the little island, the word is prominent . You know that, yes? Nota bene, protesting lady.
It may come as a shock to you regarding Turkish universities in CYPRUS as well as prominent universities in the US and UK, that cheating not only happens, but sometimes isn't caught. Not a surprise. But no university, be it in CYPRUS, the US, the UK, Russia, Iran, or even India allows academic dishonesty. So asking me if it's acceptable is a false premise and an absurd one.
It's not controversial to correct a mistaken notion that one's little island university is somehow the only one to enforce academic integrity. However, if you don't want controversy, have a little honor and don't attempt sly insults, particularly ones based in nationalism.
1
-
1
-
1