Comments by "Helen Trope" (@heliotropezzz333) on "BBC" channel.

  1. 362
  2. 258
  3. 188
  4. 97
  5. 87
  6. 38
  7. 38
  8. 36
  9. 33
  10. 33
  11. 31
  12. 28
  13. 25
  14. 25
  15. 25
  16. 24
  17. 24
  18. 23
  19. 22
  20. 19
  21. 18
  22. 18
  23. 18
  24. 17
  25. 17
  26. 17
  27. 17
  28. 16
  29. 16
  30. 16
  31. 16
  32. 16
  33. 16
  34. 15
  35. 15
  36. 14
  37. 14
  38. 13
  39. 13
  40. 13
  41. 13
  42. 12
  43. 12
  44. 12
  45. 12
  46. 11
  47. 11
  48. 11
  49. 11
  50. 11
  51. 11
  52. 10
  53. 10
  54. 10
  55. 10
  56. 10
  57. 10
  58. 10
  59. 8
  60. 8
  61. 7
  62. 7
  63. 7
  64. 7
  65. 7
  66. 7
  67. 7
  68. 7
  69. 6
  70. 6
  71. 6
  72. 6
  73. 6
  74. 6
  75. 6
  76. 6
  77. 6
  78. 6
  79. 6
  80. 5
  81. 5
  82. 5
  83. 5
  84. 5
  85. 5
  86. 5
  87. 5
  88. 5
  89. 5
  90. 5
  91. 5
  92. 5
  93. 5
  94. 5
  95. 5
  96. 5
  97. 5
  98. 5
  99. 4
  100. 4
  101. 4
  102. 4
  103. 4
  104. 4
  105. 4
  106. 4
  107. 4
  108. 4
  109.  @fatfat1877  Explanation: We'll be down the plughole if we try leaving without a deal just on WTO terms. No country in the world trades just on WTO terms because in trading terms it's the 4th division. They all want deals with a big trading block which is the premier division which is where we are now. It's a bit of a myth that the EU controls us. There are some rules of membership but 99% of what the UK spends is determined by the UK government. So what happens if we go to no deal WTO terms? We have to then set a tariff for trading with the world and under WTO terms it has to be the same tariff for everyone we trade with in the same goods. If we set a tariff that will push prices up for UK consumers and we'll be worse off. If we set a zero tariff (possible under the rules) our farming and manufacturing won't be able to compete with cheap imports from countries where workers have no rights and are paid pennies an hour so our farming and manufacturing industries will be destroyed. Don't just take my word for it. Patrick Minford, an economist who is for a hard Brexit says the same about the future of British farming and manufacturing. It will affect other economic sectors also. Wealthy people like ex stockbroker Farage and Jacob Rees Mogg will be raking it in because WTO rules do not regulate financial systems and they will be even more free to squirrel away their profits to tax havens around the world. Also over 80% of our exports are services and 49% of those are to the EU. The day we hard Brexit, those services with lose their 'passport' rights to European EU countries, which is why businesses are talking about moving their headquarters to the Europe. The very people who want Brexit because they are suffering under the present government's austerity programme, will be stuffed even more under no deal Brexit. None of this was explained before the Referendum by a campaign that wasn't even talking about a no deal Brexit. As for getting trade deals, as a member of the EU, we have over 40 trade deals that will no longer apply the day we go out on no deal and there are only a handful lined up to replace them. Trade deals take years to negotiate because they are complex covering everything traded between countries. Trump is protectionist and the US is a larger economy than ours, and if we want a trade deal with the USA it will be very much on his terms, as he doesn't need to deal. His negotiators have already said they want access to NHS funding for their corporations as part of the deal and for us to take their farming products like chlorine washed chicken and hormone fed beef - practices currently banned by the EU. China and Russia are not our friends and in any case they don't allow countries to export freely to theirs. They are protectionist. Asian countries have each other to trade with nearby. The only thing India wants from us is more visas for people to come here. Other countries won't make up for the loss of the big trading area on our doorstep (the EU). The way out of our problems is to vote for a party that will do something about inequality in the UK and protect jobs and trade, and that's not the Tories or the Brexit party. Farage has stated he is for replacing the NHS with an insurance based market system. He is for taking restrictions off the sale of handguns and he has other right wing policies too. If we set a zero tariff, that would be zero for EU trade also, except as outsiders the EU would be placing a tariff on us (could be 40%). That would make us uncompetitive in trading with the EU. You can't just count the cost of trading with the EU in terms of our subscriptions. You have to count the benefits to the economy too and the health and welfare of people to get the whole picture.
    4
  110. 4
  111. 4
  112. 4
  113. 4
  114. 4
  115. 4
  116. 4
  117. 4
  118. 4
  119. 4
  120. 4
  121. 4
  122. 4
  123. 4
  124. 4
  125. 4
  126. 4
  127. 3
  128. 3
  129. 3
  130. 3
  131. 3
  132. 3
  133. 3
  134. 3
  135. 3
  136. 3
  137. 3
  138. 3
  139. 3
  140. 3
  141. 3
  142. 3
  143. 3
  144. 3
  145. 3
  146. 3
  147. 3
  148. 3
  149. 3
  150. 3
  151. MRWorldGuy. It does matter to me whether you are a Shakespeare fan because I'm sick of every video featuring a black person in public life being full of racist comments from idiots and haters, and that's the only reason they visit the site. If you were a Shakespeare fan you would not react this way because you would realise this is a drama not a history. Shakespeare was never completely accurate about history. He sometimes changed things for dramatic purposes or to please his sponsors. His plays are regarded as having universal themes, for instance here the themes are about conflict and power, and they have been played all over the world in different settings. For instance there's a version of Richard III played in modern uniforms with fascist overtones, but hundreds of fans did not post comments that it was all anachronistic because fascism didn't exist then. No, it's only race that seems to get some people hot under the collar. Genuine Shakespeare fans understand that these plays can be interpreted in different ways under different themes. His plays have been done in modern times with all male actors, all female actors and all black actors. They are not things set in stone for all time. I can understand why she was cast because she's a good actress so was cast on merit and also her race is a kind of metaphor for the fact that Margaret was a despised foreigner. Margaret was of course French but these days we don't hate the French so much, but there are plenty of race haters so it works in that sense.
    3
  152. 3
  153. 3
  154. 3
  155. 3
  156. 3
  157. 3
  158. 3
  159. 3
  160. 3
  161. 3
  162. 3
  163. 3
  164. 3
  165. 3
  166. 3
  167. 3
  168. 3
  169. 2
  170. 2
  171. 2
  172. 2
  173. 2
  174. 2
  175. 2
  176. 2
  177. 2
  178. 2
  179. 2
  180. 2
  181. 2
  182. 2
  183. 2
  184. 2
  185. 2
  186. 2
  187. 2
  188. 2
  189. 2
  190. 2
  191. 2
  192. 2
  193. 2
  194. 2
  195. 2
  196. 2
  197. 2
  198. 2
  199. 2
  200. 2
  201. 2
  202. 2
  203. 2
  204. 2
  205. 2
  206. 2
  207. 2
  208. 2
  209. 2
  210. 2
  211. 2
  212. 2
  213. 2
  214. 2
  215. 2
  216. 2
  217. 2
  218. 2
  219. 2
  220. 2
  221. 2
  222. 2
  223. 2
  224. 2
  225. 2
  226. 2
  227. 2
  228. 2
  229.  @fatfat1877  They won't allow us tariff free trade if we're not in the EU. We'd need to be at least in a customs union with the EU which the Tories don't want to be. You make the mistake of thinking that when we're out of the club the EU will allow us to have the privileges of being in the club - like tariff free trade. They won't because others would want to leave if they could get the benefits of being in the EU while not being in it. We'll have to negotiate a deal with them which could take years (deals generally do) and we'll be up against experienced and skillful trade negotiators of the EU while we'll have no experienced trade deal negotiators. What could possibly go wrong? Boris has already given away £7bn of British taxpayers money, lodged in the EU bank, in order to get his current agreement. That's not been publicised. In the meantime, the EU will place tariffs on our exports to the EU making them uncompetitive. We'll have to decide what tariffs to levy on imports. Any tariff will push up prices for British consumers. If we choose to place zero tariffs, it would destroy British industry and agriculture sectors. Also over 80% of our exports are 'services' and about 49% of those are to the EU. The day we leave the EU on hard Brexit terms (no deal) those services would lose their 'passport' to the EU. It saddens me so much that there's so much misunderstanding that I have to console myself by watching videos like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeoT66v4EHg&list=FLGGEn5ziDGQqNRr1m3pwHBg&index=3&t=0s
    2
  230. 2
  231. 2
  232. 2
  233. 2
  234. 2
  235. 2
  236. 2
  237. 2
  238. 2
  239. 2
  240. 2
  241. 2
  242. 2
  243. 2
  244. 2
  245. 2
  246. 2
  247. 2
  248. You want English subtitles for English? It's not difficult to understand if you listen carefully. At least you can get the gist. It starts in the middle of a scene. The Duke of Gloucester (The Lord Protector) says the King is old enough to give a reproof himself, (we don't know to whom) and the Queen should not interfere. The Queen says, if the King's old enough why does he need a protector? Gloucester says he will resign as Protector if the King wants him to. Suffolk or Sussex (can't remember which) intervenes and tells Gloucester to resign. He starts to accuse him of acting as King, and being responsible for the everything that's going wrong in the country. The country is going to the dogs. The heir to the French throne (called the Dauphin) is winning in France where England and France are at war, and Gloucester lords it over the nobles. The Archbishop then accuses Gloucester of over overtaxing the country (via the House of Commons) and overtaxing the clergy. Someone else (we hear but don't see) accuses him of spending too much on buildings and his wife's clothes. The Queen accuses him of corruptly selling official jobs and control of towns in France, and says it's a capital offence. She says the King knows everything. She then goes down and deliberately drops her fan to humiliate the Duchess of Gloucester by getting her to pick it up. The Duchess ignores her request and gets a slap. The Duchess says she would scratch the Queen's face with her nails if she could. The King says the Queen didn't mean any harm (The King is a bit of a weak booby, if you'd not picked up on that). The Duchess threatens the Queen with revenge for the insult. The manipulative Queen pretends to be very distressed and runs off.
    2
  249. 2
  250. 2
  251. 2
  252. 2
  253. 2
  254. 2
  255. 2
  256. 2
  257. 2
  258. 2
  259. 2
  260. 2
  261. 2
  262. 2
  263. 2
  264. 2
  265. 2
  266. 2
  267. 2
  268. 2
  269. 2
  270. 2
  271. 2
  272. 2
  273. 2
  274. 2
  275. 2
  276. 2
  277. 2
  278. 2
  279. 2
  280. 2
  281. 2
  282. 2
  283. 2
  284. 2
  285. 2
  286. 2
  287. 2
  288. 2
  289. 2
  290. 2
  291. 2
  292. 2
  293. 2
  294. 2
  295. 2
  296. 2
  297. 2
  298. 2
  299. 2
  300. 2
  301. 2
  302. 2
  303. 2
  304. 2
  305. 2
  306. 2
  307. 2
  308. 2
  309. 2
  310. 2
  311. 2
  312. 2
  313. 2
  314. 2
  315. 1
  316. 1
  317. 1
  318. 1
  319. 1
  320. 1
  321. 1
  322. 1
  323. 1
  324. 1
  325. 1
  326. 1
  327. 1
  328. 1
  329. 1
  330. 1
  331. 1
  332. 1
  333. 1
  334. 1
  335. 1
  336. 1
  337. 1
  338. 1
  339. 1
  340. 1
  341. 1
  342. 1
  343. 1
  344. 1
  345. 1
  346. 1
  347. 1
  348. 1
  349. 1
  350. 1
  351. 1
  352. 1
  353. 1
  354. 1
  355. 1
  356. 1
  357. 1
  358. 1
  359. 1
  360. 1
  361. 1
  362. 1
  363. 1
  364. 1
  365. 1
  366. 1
  367. 1
  368. 1
  369. 1
  370. 1
  371. 1
  372. 1
  373. 1
  374. 1
  375. 1
  376. 1
  377. 1
  378. 1
  379. 1
  380. 1
  381. 1
  382. 1
  383. 1
  384. 1
  385. 1
  386. 1
  387. 1
  388. 1
  389. 1
  390. 1
  391. 1
  392. 1
  393. 1
  394. 1
  395. 1
  396. 1
  397. 1
  398. 1
  399. 1
  400. 1
  401. 1
  402. 1
  403. 1
  404. 1
  405. 1
  406. 1
  407. 1
  408. 1
  409. 1
  410. 1
  411. 1
  412. 1
  413. 1
  414. 1
  415. 1
  416. 1
  417. 1
  418. 1
  419. It is in English. It starts in the middle of a scene. The Duke of Gloucester (The Lord Protector) says the King is old enough to give a reproof himself, (we don't know to whom) and the Queen should not interfere. The Queen says, if the King's old enough why does he need a protector? Gloucester says he will resign as Protector if the King wants him to. Suffolk or Sussex (can't remember which) intervenes and tells Gloucester to resign. He starts to accuse him of acting as King, and being responsible for the everything that's going wrong in the country. The country is going to the dogs. The heir to the French throne (called the Dauphin) is winning in France where England and France are at war, and Gloucester lords it over the nobles. The Archbishop then accuses Gloucester of over overtaxing the country (via the House of Commons) and overtaxing the clergy. Someone else (we hear but don't see) accuses him of spending too much on buildings and his wife's clothes. The Queen accuses him of corruptly selling official jobs and control of towns in France, and says it's a capital offence. She says the King knows everything. She then goes down and deliberately drops her fan to humiliate the Duchess of Gloucester by getting her to pick it up. The Duchess ignores her request and gets a slap. The Duchess says she would scratch the Queen's face with her nails if she could. The King says the Queen didn't mean any harm (The King is a bit of a weak booby, if you'd not picked up on that). The Duchess threatens the Queen with revenge for the insult. The manipulative Queen pretends to be very distressed and runs off.
    1
  420. 1
  421. 1
  422. 1
  423. 1
  424. 1
  425. 1
  426. 1
  427. 1
  428. 1
  429. 1
  430. 1
  431. 1
  432. 1
  433. 1
  434. 1
  435. 1
  436. 1
  437. 1
  438. 1
  439. 1
  440. 1
  441. 1
  442. 1
  443. 1
  444. 1
  445. 1
  446. 1
  447. 1
  448. 1
  449. 1
  450. 1
  451. 1
  452. 1
  453. 1
  454. 1
  455. 1
  456.  @dnciskkk9037  The US will be a dominant partner in a trade deal. I don't see Trump giving any ground to us as we will need a deal more than he will. This is from a Metro report on the leaked trade discussions document with the USA. 'The notes detail six preliminary meetings between British and American trade negotiators between July 2017 and July 2019, a few weeks before Johnson became Prime Minister. UK Officials describe the discussions as ‘the first lap’ of talks on a wide range of policy areas they ‘might expect to feature’ in a post Brexit trade deal. The health service is mentioned a few times along with US negotiators talking about the cost of medicine and the possibility of lengthening patents. Once patents expire the NHS is able to buy generic rather than branded versions of the same drug. They are typically shorter in the UK which is one of the reasons why medicine is much cheaper than in the US. American negotiators said there is ‘a lot of conversation’ in the states about drug prices and that ‘looking at what other countries pay is causing angst’. But fact-checkers say there is nothing to suggest the UK have agreed with US demands (Picture: Getty Images) They have concerns the US is ‘not getting a good deal in pharmaceutical industries.’ It echoes American trade objectives published in February which say they ‘full market access’ for pharmaceutical products. This would limit the control the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has over which drugs can be given to patients. ' Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/28/labours-nhs-sale-document-leak-fact-checked-11232546/?ito=cbshare Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/ That's it now. I'm not wasting any more time on a blockhead.
    1
  457. 1
  458. 1
  459. 1
  460. 1
  461. 1
  462. 1
  463. 1
  464. 1
  465. 1
  466. 1
  467. 1
  468. 1
  469. 1
  470. 1
  471. 1
  472. 1
  473. 1
  474. 1
  475. 1
  476. 1
  477. 1
  478. 1
  479. 1
  480. 1
  481. 1
  482. 1
  483. 1
  484. 1
  485. 1
  486. 1
  487. 1
  488. 1
  489. 1
  490. 1
  491. 1
  492. 1
  493. 1
  494. 1
  495. 1
  496. 1
  497. 1
  498. 1
  499. 1
  500. 1
  501. 1
  502. 1
  503. 1
  504. 1
  505.  @fatfat1877  You don't seem to understand that there are certain consequences of Brexit. It's not the EU choosing to be difficult. It's that you've left a club with privileges. You are not longer paying the fee to be in that club so you no longer get the privileges. I direct you to a very pro hard Brexit economist that Jacob Rees Mogg says 'is always right' - Patrick Minford, and even he admits that a hard Brexit will destroy British manufacturing and agriculture but he does not care about that because other aspects of a hard Brexit matter to him more. We are no longer in the 18th century. World trade is no much more globalised and we no longer have an Empire to exploit. Trade is never entirely free. Countries are protectionist, and want to gain an advantage. There are trade offs and compromise that have to be made. Trade with the rest of the world is no more 'moral' than trade with the EU. Mark Rutte, the Netherlands P.M has said that no one of significance in the EU is now pushing for greater Union. WTO rules mean that if you place tariffs on the EU for certain goods, for instance, you have to place the same tariffs on those goods for all countries you trade with. If you place no tariffs, you have to have no tariffs on those goods for all countries you trade with. If Britain seeks to break the rules, it will be a treated as a pariah in world trade by many countries who won't want to deal with us, and won't feel they have to either. The US and China have to come to some arrangement because they are dependent on each other in many ways. That's not true of a small country like the UK and we'll be even smaller if Scotland goes independent and stays in the EU. You are naive about what's possible - just like Boris who lost so many votes in Parliament when he sought to ignore the rules. He could probably have got his deal through. It had been approved but he pulled it back. Why? Because what he really wants is to crash out with a no deal which would suit his rich backers more. Do you know that financial speculators are making millions and stand to make millions more, after a hard Brexit from betting against UK economic performance. It's a practice called 'shorting'. Also may of his rich tax avoiding backers want to avoid tighter rules being introduced by the EU to prevent offshore tax avoidance and money laundering. There's no benefit to the average or ordinary person from Brexit. The Tories' success is that they've persuaded so many people that there will be some benefit.
    1
  506.  @fatfat1877  Yes the EU has trade deals with nations but these deals took many years to agree. We will lose those deals the moment we leave the EU and it will take years to replace them if we ever can. Other countries prefer deals with a big trading block like the EU rather than with small countries outside of the EU, as we will be. When we are competitors of the EU we won't be competing on a level playing field. They will be the existing and preferred deal partner for many nations outside of the EU - not Britain. The EU is protectionist but not against those countries within the EU. It's protectionist against those outside of the EU. That's the whole point of the EU to protect living standards and other standards including human rights and workers rights. (( Treated as a pariah by who? Do you really think foriegn nations will care about a trade conflict between the EU and UK? )) You miss the point here. Nations won't want to deal with a trading partner who doesn't observe any trade rules or agreements and may undercut them or switch trading partners at a moment's notice ((they wont, especially if they have tariff free access to the UK))You miss the point again. If they have free tariff access to the UK, British Industry and Agriculture will die off. Also if they have free tariff access then we'll have to give that to the EU also under WTO rules but the EU will be able to apply tariffs to us under those same rules. If we don't abide by the rules, the EU, the largest consumer trade area on our doorstep will simply not trade with us but will get their imports from elsewhere such as Ireland or Scotland, if Scotland joins the EU after voting for independence, or from elsewhere inside the EU. When the UK car industry fails there will be plenty of German cars for the EU to buy instead.
    1
  507. 1
  508. 1
  509. 1
  510. 1
  511. 1
  512. 1
  513. 1
  514. 1
  515. 1
  516. 1
  517. 1
  518. 1
  519. 1
  520. 1
  521. 1
  522. 1
  523. 1
  524. 1
  525. 1
  526. 1
  527. 1
  528. 1
  529. 1
  530. 1
  531. 1
  532. 1
  533. 1
  534. 1
  535. 1
  536. 1
  537. 1
  538. 1
  539. 1
  540. 1
  541. 1
  542. 1
  543. 1
  544. 1
  545. 1
  546. 1
  547. 1
  548. 1
  549. 1
  550. 1
  551. 1
  552. 1
  553. 1
  554. 1
  555. 1
  556. 1
  557. 1
  558. 1
  559. 1
  560. 1
  561. 1
  562. 1
  563. 1
  564. 1
  565. 1
  566. 1
  567. 1
  568. 1
  569. 1
  570. 1
  571. 1
  572. 1
  573. 1
  574. 1
  575. 1
  576. 1
  577. 1
  578. 1
  579. 1
  580. 1
  581. 1
  582. 1
  583. 1
  584. 1
  585. 1
  586. 1
  587. 1
  588. 1
  589. 1
  590. 1
  591. 1
  592. 1
  593. 1
  594. 1
  595. 1
  596. 1
  597. 1
  598. 1
  599. 1
  600. 1
  601. 1
  602. 1
  603. 1
  604. 1
  605. 1
  606. 1
  607. 1
  608. 1
  609. 1
  610. 1
  611. 1
  612. 1
  613. 1
  614. 1
  615. 1
  616. 1
  617. 1
  618. 1
  619. 1
  620. 1
  621. 1
  622. 1
  623. 1
  624. 1
  625. 1
  626. 1
  627. 1
  628. 1
  629. 1
  630. 1
  631. 1
  632. 1
  633. 1
  634. 1
  635. 1
  636. 1
  637. 1
  638. 1
  639. 1
  640. 1
  641. 1
  642. 1
  643. 1
  644. 1
  645. 1
  646. 1
  647. 1
  648. 1
  649. 1
  650. 1
  651. 1
  652. 1
  653. 1
  654. 1
  655. 1
  656. 1
  657. 1
  658. 1
  659. 1
  660. 1
  661. 1
  662. 1
  663. 1
  664. 1
  665. 1
  666. 1
  667. 1
  668. 1
  669. 1
  670. 1
  671. 1
  672. 1
  673. 1
  674. 1
  675. 1
  676. 1
  677. 1
  678. 1
  679. 1
  680. 1
  681. 1
  682. 1
  683. 1
  684. 1
  685. 1
  686. 1
  687. 1
  688. 1
  689. 1
  690. 1
  691. 1