Comments by "Helen Trope" (@heliotropezzz333) on "Dr David Starkey's Brutal Analysis On Supreme Court Prorogation Ruling" video.

  1. It is for judges of the Supreme Court to interpret the law and the constitution. If there were no limits to a prorogation process, what's to stop the government from proroguing frequently or even permanently to get rid of democratic opposition which would turn us into a dictatorship. There have to be some limits and some justifications. I don't rate Sharkey that much. As a historian, he makes mistakes in his history programmes - elementary errors.
    4
  2. It is for judges of the Supreme Court to interpret the law and the constitution. If there were no limits to a prorogation process, what's to stop the government from proroguing frequently or even permanently to get rid of democratic opposition which would turn us into a dictatorship. There have to be some limits. I don't rate Sharkey that much. As a historian, he makes mistakes in his history programmes, elementary errors.
    1
  3.  @chinogambino9375  They're not docile serfs but they respect the law because if you have no law you have chaos with the strongest most violent bully prevailing. We've been through that already in history and learned from it. There are democratic ways to change the law if enough people vote to do so.
    1