Comments by "Helen Trope" (@heliotropezzz333) on "Tommy Robinson ordered to pay £100,000 to Syrian schoolboy after libel case loss" video.

@routmaster38 Judges go by the evidence. Robinson can't have produced any evidence to support his case. If the judge was corrupt Robinson could appeal. I doubt he has any grounds for appeal. A man who can't even be truthful about his own name is not to be trusted. In this country you just can't go around making up defamatory nonsense about people without the risk of being sued and having to pay a big price for those lies.
14
@stephan5673 Not really. That's what losing his court case means.
5
@natashabegley1346 Is that how he bought his big house?
2
@useyourbrain.5574 It's corrupt when the verdict doesn't go your way eh? All Mr Yaxley Lennon had to do was provide evidence to support his allegations that would stand up in court and you can't claim that this case was in any way corrupt based on any cases or mistrials in the past. Each case is considered and tried on its own merits.
2
@fatherandyknowles7035 Absolutely.
1
@TheZackkary1 Careful. You could be done for libel like Tommy since the court case ruled against this version of events for lack of evidence.
1
I don't know. I hear Yaxley-Lennon owns an nice big house.
1