Comments by "Helen Trope" (@heliotropezzz333) on "See Don Lemon's reaction to Georgia's new voting law" video.

@raymondglaser8481 What right does the governor have to change the law to restrict voting, while the elected representatives are excluded from the process? She wasn't being disruptive. She was just seeking entrance as she is entitled to, as an elected representative. Tough that he's on TV. He shouldn't be doing it like that in the first place.
2
@greghendershot6126 No, I'm not going to conspiracy sites. That's a waste of my time. You can go to independent fact check sites, but I guess you wouldn't want to read something you disagreed with. I'm not wasting any more time on this now.
2
@davidtorres1300 There are just more barriers now in Georgia.
1
@greghendershot6126 Here, you can read them for yourself. It includes new ID requirements, to vote absentee by mail, new time limits to apply for those mail ballots. It restricts the location of ballot boxes and times when they can be accessed. Poor and less literate people are less likely to be able to meet these requirements e.g. if they have no car and fail to apply for mail ballots within the new limits.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/georgia-voting-law-naacp-lawsuit/
1
@greghendershot6126 What car can you buy and afford the running costs for, for the price of a phone and some Nike shoes? In any case how do you know the poorest all have these? No significant voter fraud was found in the recent election. No evidence of fraud that would stand up in court was provided, so this is a 'solution' for a problem that doesn't exist, and if it's such a good thing, why did Kemp shut out elected representatives while he was doing it?
1
@greghendershot6126 The MSM has got more to lose by lying than the conspiracy sites you probably visit. Are you saying that the MSM is misreporting what the courts have said? Then name a court case where election fraud has successfully been proved?
1
@greghendershot6126 Post up the evidence relating to the court that said that. Courts consider evidence, not political implications.
1
@greghendershot6126 You're saying all the mainstream media is corrupt. Where's the evidence of that? In fact there's a wide spectrum of views on the MSM. Where is the evidence that the courts are corrupt. Sadly it's just what you want to believe.
1
@greghendershot6126 Well he's certainly corrupt. He must be referring to himself.
1
@greghendershot6126 I don't watch much TV but I do lots of research.
1
@raymondglaser8481 I think the difference is that the vote for the stimulus bill did not prevent the Republicans from voting, whereas Kemp shut out elected representatives. She was an elected representative and had the right to be there. What right did he have to shut her out? Of course she protested. Isn't that what the Americans did at the time of the Boston Tea Party - protested at no taxation without representation? As for what I have against the bill, you can read my comments in this trail as I have already explained in detail to someone else.
1
@raymondglaser8481 Of course she was protesting. She had a right to be in there. It was Kemp who was breaking the law by excluding her. The point is the Republicans as elected representatives, had the right to vote against the stimulus bill and did so, before it was passed and signed. She as an elected representative was given no right to consider or vote on the bill. Kemp did it all in secret apart from the inclusion of a few of his cronies. That's not democracy. That's corruption.
1
@corryburton9834 Which fact checker's are biased and where does the evidence for that come from, conspiracy sites? If you are prepared to ignore all evidence except those conspiracy ones that fit your conspiracy theories there's no helping you. I hope you never have to do jury service as you would come loaded with preconceived prejudices.
1
@corryburton9834 No. Fox news is owned by Rupert Murdoch who is as right wing as they come. That's what you prefer to believe. Just because something's left wing doesn't mean it's wrong. In fact the right wing are the biggest liars. They are protecting the interests of powerful wealthy men who own them. Democracy doesn't help that so they seek to undermine it.
1
@corryburton9834 Oh for goodness sake. All they can fall back on all the time is Hunter Biden. That's pathetic. Trump has criticised the USA for supporting the Ukrainian resistance to Putin hasn't he? Trump was much more complimentary about Putin and Kim Jong Un than any democratic leaders. He considers democratic leaders to be weak and admires dictators. That's what you'd get with Trump if he got back into power. He'd dismantle democratic procedures and protections. He has no respect for the US Constitution if it doesn't serve his purposes. He just wants to be able to be criminal and corrupt in his own interests with no comeback. That's why he wants to be President again.
1
@corryburton9834 Well the Supreme court members are appointed by Presidents and Trump appointments gave it a conservative majority. Those are political appointments but judges of integrity would consider evidence and legal points rather than ignoring them in favour of political judgements. I don't think I understand your last sentence. It's not intelligible English. I'm not shaming anyone. There are times when people want to change laws and can demonstrate to show their support for change, which is allowed, but rioting is illegal.
1