Youtube comments of Helen Trope (@heliotropezzz333).

  1. 938
  2. 933
  3. 551
  4. 531
  5. 487
  6. 455
  7. 390
  8. 367
  9. 362
  10. 333
  11. 331
  12. 314
  13. 295
  14. 258
  15. 224
  16. 205
  17. 200
  18. 193
  19. 188
  20. 178
  21. 178
  22. 175
  23. 174
  24. 164
  25. 162
  26. 161
  27. 152
  28. 122
  29. 121
  30. 119
  31. 115
  32. 112
  33. 110
  34. 110
  35. 102
  36. 100
  37. 97
  38. 95
  39. 89
  40. 87
  41. 79
  42. 79
  43. 74
  44. 74
  45. 73
  46. 71
  47. 69
  48. 69
  49. 68
  50. 68
  51. 68
  52. 66
  53. 66
  54. 65
  55. 64
  56. 61
  57. 60
  58. 60
  59. 59
  60. 58
  61. 57
  62. 57
  63. 57
  64. 57
  65. 56
  66. 56
  67. 55
  68. 51
  69. 48
  70. 47
  71. 47
  72. 45
  73. 44
  74. 44
  75. 44
  76. 43
  77. 43
  78. 43
  79. 43
  80. 42
  81. 41
  82. 41
  83. 41
  84. 41
  85. 41
  86. 40
  87. 40
  88. 40
  89. 39
  90. 39
  91. 39
  92. 39
  93. 39
  94. 39
  95. 38
  96. 38
  97. 38
  98. 38
  99. 38
  100. 38
  101. 38
  102. 38
  103. 37
  104. 37
  105. 36
  106. 36
  107. 36
  108. 36
  109. 36
  110. 36
  111. 36
  112.  @immortaltyrant2474  You seem to think I'm Irish. I am British with Irish relatives. Actually I remember visiting Ireland as long ago as the 1950s and you would be hard pushed to find any of the things you listed. It was very rural with no advanced agricultural machinery, factories or technology. That might apply to the North but not the rest. What there was of it when Ireland was 'one entity' under Britain certainly wasn't available to the native Irish (and catholic) population. From the beginning when Ireland was invaded by England and the Norman Knight 'Strongbow' would break the limbs of the defeated Irish and throw them in the sea, the quality of British rule was set.In Elizabethan times there were massacres of civilians in Connaught which an ancestor of Lord Lucan boasted about and a scorched earth policy in Munster to starve the population. Then we come on to the massacres of Cromwell, the plantation of protestant English and Scots into Ireland, the removal from the land of the native Irish except for Connaught where they were allowed to go because it was poor land. The Irish language was banned, the Irish were not allowed to own property (houses, land or a horse worth more than £5). The Catholic religion was banned. Priests were hunted and killed. Irish traditional clothing was banned. Schools and education for the native Irish were banned and they were not allowed to take any professional jobs. They were not allowed to have a vote. Most of the native Irish population were tenants, living on subsistence farming. Most of the landlords were British and many were absentee landlords. When the potato blight struck, causing famine, many landlords evicted these tenants to starve to death or emigrate, if they could afford the fares. The lack of a vote and the ban from owning property continued up until the 19th and 20th centuries respectively. I think the damage done far outweighed any benefits. Except in the North, where there was a large Protestant settler population from Scotland and England, I doubt anyone would have noticed any benefits but they would certainly have been adversely affected by being a slave nation subjected to British rule.
    36
  113. 36
  114. 35
  115. 35
  116. 35
  117. 35
  118. 35
  119. 35
  120. 35
  121. 34
  122. 34
  123. 34
  124. 34
  125. 33
  126. 33
  127. 33
  128. 32
  129. 32
  130. 32
  131. 32
  132. 32
  133. 31
  134. 31
  135. 31
  136. 31
  137. 31
  138. 31
  139. 30
  140. 30
  141. 30
  142. 30
  143. 30
  144. 30
  145. 30
  146. 30
  147. 29
  148. 29
  149. 29
  150. 28
  151. 28
  152. 28
  153. 28
  154. 27
  155. 27
  156. 27
  157.  @immortaltyrant2474  No. In summary, they would have developed like any other European country over time if they weren't held back by Britain for centuries. Britain only ever used Ireland to extract wealth which is why cattle were exported during the famine rather than being used to feed the population and rents were exported to absentee landlords. Imagine when the Normans conquered Britain, if they had banned the English language and French became the only language to speak. Imagine if they had ruled Britain from France and kept anyone of Anglo Saxon descent from owning land and houses in their own land for centuries right up to the 20th century, and banned their culture in favour of French culture and didn't allow them to be educated or practise their religion. Would you say they'd been benefitting the English because they built castles and maintained order? Is that what your main views about it would be as one of the people treated as second class citizens in their own land for centuries? Do try to have some imagination. In the North discrimination was practised even in the 1970s which is what the civil rights marches were about, and Ian Paisley (Protstant 'clergyman' and all round bigot) planned and executed violent attacks on the marchers which is what re-animated the IRA again as people felt that there was no democratic avenue to equality or to end to injustices, and protection from violent attacks was needed. (People were evicted from their houses for being Catholics and living in mixed areas, and segregation became even stronger). I am not defending violence as a means of dealing with violence. It just makes things worse, but Britain left that unjust state of affairs to fester for far too long.
    27
  158. 26
  159. 26
  160. 26
  161. 26
  162. 26
  163. 26
  164. 26
  165. 26
  166. 25
  167. 25
  168. 25
  169. 25
  170. 25
  171. 25
  172. 25
  173. 25
  174. 24
  175. 24
  176. 24
  177. 24
  178. 24
  179. 24
  180. 24
  181. 24
  182. 24
  183. 24
  184. 24
  185. 23
  186. 23
  187. 23
  188. 23
  189. 23
  190. 23
  191. 23
  192. 23
  193. 22
  194. 22
  195. 22
  196. 22
  197. 22
  198. 22
  199. 22
  200. 22
  201. 22
  202. 21
  203. 21
  204. 21
  205. 21
  206. 21
  207. 21
  208. 21
  209. 21
  210. 21
  211. 21
  212. 21
  213. 20
  214. 20
  215. 20
  216. 20
  217. 20
  218. 20
  219. 20
  220. 20
  221. 20
  222. 20
  223. 20
  224. 19
  225. 19
  226. 19
  227. 19
  228. 19
  229. 19
  230. 19
  231. 19
  232. 19
  233. 19
  234. 19
  235. 19
  236. 19
  237. 19
  238. 19
  239. 19
  240. 18
  241. 18
  242. 18
  243. 18
  244. 18
  245. 18
  246. 18
  247. 18
  248. 18
  249. 18
  250. 18
  251. 18
  252. 18
  253. 18
  254. 18
  255. 18
  256. 18
  257. 18
  258. 17
  259. 17
  260. 17
  261. 17
  262. 17
  263. 17
  264. 17
  265. 17
  266. 17
  267. 17
  268. 17
  269. 17
  270. 17
  271. 17
  272. 17
  273. 17
  274. 16
  275. 16
  276. 16
  277. 16
  278. 16
  279. 16
  280. 16
  281. 16
  282. 16
  283. 16
  284. 16
  285. 16
  286. 16
  287. 16
  288. 16
  289. 16
  290. 16
  291. 16
  292. 16
  293. 16
  294. 16
  295. 15
  296. 15
  297. 15
  298. 15
  299. 15
  300. 15
  301. 15
  302. 15
  303. 15
  304. 15
  305. 15
  306. 15
  307. 15
  308. 15
  309. 15
  310. 15
  311. 15
  312. 15
  313. 15
  314. 15
  315. 15
  316. 14
  317. 14
  318. 14
  319. 14
  320. 14
  321. 14
  322. 14
  323. 14
  324. 14
  325. 14
  326. 14
  327. 14
  328. 14
  329. 14
  330. 14
  331. 14
  332. 14
  333. 14
  334. 14
  335. 14
  336. 14
  337. 14
  338. 14
  339. 14
  340. 14
  341. 14
  342. 14
  343. 14
  344. 13
  345. 13
  346. 13
  347. 13
  348. 13
  349. 13
  350. 13
  351. 13
  352. 13
  353. 13
  354. 13
  355. 13
  356. 13
  357. 13
  358. 13
  359. 13
  360. 13
  361. 13
  362. 13
  363. 13
  364. 13
  365. 13
  366. 13
  367. 13
  368. 13
  369. 13
  370. 13
  371. 13
  372. 13
  373. 13
  374. 13
  375.  @immortaltyrant2474  Ulster wasn't the only place 'planted' in Ireland. The whole of Ireland was 'planted' apart from the province of Connaught which wasn't thought to be worth having because of the poor and rocky soil and was therefore left to the Irish. The North was heavily planted due to its resistance as you say. It was the last to hold out against the British conquest. It also had some of the best most desirable arable land for farming. People planted included soldiers who had been involved in the subjugation of Ireland and English and Scottish merchants who bought the confiscated lands at auction. They weren't just nobles. There weren't enough nobles to hold all of the land and many nobles didn't want to live there. Dublin and Limerick were founded by the Vikings. The British took over Dublin and developed it, yes. They used it as a fortress area, a safe area for them when there was still resistance to British rule. It's from there we get the expression. 'Beyond the Pale' which was the area round Dublin where the native Irish were kept out from. There were some Catholics in Dublin as servants of the British etc but they did not have the same rights. Yes there were a few Catholic landlords eventually, but mostly Catholics had to convert to Protestantism in order to be given any rights including land ownership. You seem to think there would have been no development over time unless it came from Britain. I'm sure Ireland would not now be sitting without any electricity if it was not for the British. As it happens my Aunt lived in an area where they had no electricity or running water even by the 1970s. They had gas lighting from gas canisters and open fires, so the British didn't instal electricity everywhere and the centuries of impoverishment of the country continued to have its effects after the British left. The British did develop aspects of Ireland and infrastructure but it wasn't done for the benefit of the natives.
    13
  376. 12
  377. 12
  378. 12
  379. 12
  380. 12
  381. 12
  382. 12
  383. 12
  384. 12
  385. 12
  386. 12
  387. 12
  388. 12
  389. 12
  390. 12
  391. 12
  392. 12
  393. 12
  394. 12
  395. 12
  396. 12
  397. 12
  398. 12
  399. 12
  400. 12
  401. 12
  402. 12
  403. 12
  404. 12
  405. 12
  406. 12
  407. 12
  408. I had a cold in the run up to Xmas, and covid in January following attendance at a family funeral. The cold was far worse. Covid symptoms were just a foggy brain and tiredness for about 10 days. I know they were different because I took covid tests both times. I have had all covid vaccinations. I lost 2 sisters and a brother in law in the last 3 months of 2022. My sisters were twins aged 83. One had been ailing for a few months without a proper diagnosis. She ended up in hospital with covid but she also had other infections and they thought she might have stomach cancer as she'd not been able to eat for a while, but she was never tested for that before she died. The death cert said she died of 'old age' and pneumonia. This was in Wales. To my mind there was some neglect or slowness of response to her symptoms. The other sister died of non-hodgkins lymphoma. She had been treated for it previously (about a year or so prior) and thought all was o.k. She went into hospital for some check up and they would not let her leave saying she had 2 weeks to live, and she died 2 weeks later. This was in Birmingham. I am being treated now for a spread of breast cancer. When I noticed a tumour on the site just above where I'd had breast cancer before, I raised it with a GP who, without examining it, said 'it looks like a lump of fat'. I was so humiliated I did not go back to discuss it again for a year. After I did go back another doctor at the GP's surgery thought it wasn't cancer. She was disappointed that she could not book me for a diagnostic check later than 2 weeks. She told me to tell the hospital, when they rang, that my appointment 'was not urgent'. Fortunately the hospital sent me a 2 week appointment by letter and it turned out it was cancer. The operation was delayed for 4 months by covid lockdowns but the tumour was shrunk by medication in that time. The tumour was removed but no further treatment was given other than the tumour shrinking tabs. 3 years later the cancer had spread to my liver and a rib. This was in London. I just wonder whether the financial pressures on the NHS have a lot to do with excess deaths but some GPs could do with some extra training, I think. The GPs I saw had a lot of experience and one was the lead partner in the practice.
    12
  409. 12
  410. 12
  411. 12
  412. 12
  413. 12
  414. 3 books that made a deep impression on me as regards Irish history were 'Hell or Connaught' by Peter Beresford Ellis about the Cromwellian conquests in Ireland and the aftermath in terms of laws passed against the native Irish, the plantations and enforced migrations, and in the 19th century the books by Asenath Nicholson, American methodist social observer and philanthropist who visited Ireland just before the famine to investigate the conditions of the poor and who came back again during the famine to observe, record and help out. The conditions of life for many native Irish even before the famine were dire and unjust, and her travels and observations indicate how this was enforced. The native Irish were blamed for their own conditions but there was no way out for them. Improvements to their properties, land and cultivation merely meant their rents would be increased. They were largely socially shunned, regarded with contempt, discriminated against and exploited by the landowning class and churchmen, who were protestant descendants of planters. Even before the famine, many native Irish lived on the edge of it, relying on potatoes and little else for their meals and unable to get any steady employment. Often animals kept would need to be sold to pay rents. Hers was one of the few, observed and recorded written accounts of that period, and there are no real photographs of the famine period. She came with no particular bias except to bring the truth of the bible (methodist version of that) to Ireland, so it's all the more remarkable that she came to feel so deeply for the native Irish poor and to record the heartlessness, injustice and ignorance in her own kind in the landlord class. Her accounts are very heartbreaking. Periods of violence come and go in history, but it is the grinding awful lived experience from generation to generation that makes the history most tragic in my mind.
    12
  415. 12
  416. 12
  417. 12
  418. 12
  419. 12
  420. 12
  421. 12
  422. 12
  423. 12
  424. 12
  425. 12
  426. 12
  427. 11
  428. 11
  429. 11
  430. 11
  431. 11
  432. 11
  433. 11
  434. 11
  435. 11
  436. 11
  437. 11
  438. 11
  439. 11
  440. 11
  441. 11
  442. 11
  443. 11
  444. 11
  445. 11
  446. 11
  447. 11
  448. 11
  449. 11
  450. 11
  451. 11
  452. 11
  453. 11
  454. 11
  455. 11
  456. 11
  457. 11
  458. 11
  459. 11
  460. 11
  461. 11
  462. 11
  463. 11
  464. 11
  465. 11
  466. 11
  467. 11
  468. 11
  469. 11
  470. 11
  471. 11
  472. 11
  473. 11
  474. 11
  475. 11
  476. 11
  477. 10
  478. 10
  479. 10
  480. 10
  481. 10
  482. 10
  483. 10
  484. 10
  485. 10
  486. 10
  487. 10
  488. 10
  489. 10
  490. 10
  491. 10
  492. 10
  493. 10
  494. 10
  495. 10
  496. 10
  497. 10
  498. 10
  499. 10
  500. 10
  501. 10
  502. 10
  503. 10
  504. 10
  505. 10
  506. 10
  507. 10
  508. 10
  509. 10
  510. 10
  511. 10
  512. 10
  513. 10
  514. 10
  515. 10
  516. 10
  517. 10
  518. 10
  519. 10
  520. 10
  521. 10
  522. 10
  523. 10
  524. 10
  525. 10
  526. 10
  527. 10
  528. 10
  529. 10
  530. 10
  531. 10
  532. 10
  533. 10
  534. 10
  535. 9
  536. 9
  537. 9
  538. 9
  539. 9
  540. 9
  541. 9
  542. 9
  543. 9
  544. 9
  545. 9
  546. 9
  547. 9
  548. 9
  549. 9
  550. 9
  551. 9
  552. 9
  553. 9
  554. 9
  555. 9
  556. 9
  557. 9
  558. 9
  559. 9
  560. 9
  561. 9
  562. 9
  563. 9
  564. 9
  565. 9
  566. 9
  567. 9
  568. 9
  569. 9
  570. 9
  571. 9
  572. 9
  573. 9
  574. 9
  575. 9
  576. 9
  577. 9
  578. 9
  579. 9
  580. 9
  581. 9
  582. 9
  583. 9
  584. 9
  585. 9
  586. 9
  587. 9
  588. 9
  589. 9
  590. 9
  591. 9
  592. 9
  593. 9
  594. 9
  595. 9
  596. 9
  597. 9
  598. 9
  599. 9
  600. 9
  601. 9
  602. 8
  603. 8
  604. 8
  605. 8
  606. 8
  607. 8
  608. 8
  609. 8
  610. 8
  611. 8
  612. 8
  613. 8
  614. 8
  615. 8
  616. 8
  617. 8
  618. 8
  619. 8
  620. 8
  621. 8
  622. 8
  623. 8
  624. 8
  625. 8
  626. 8
  627. 8
  628. 8
  629. 8
  630. 8
  631. 8
  632. 8
  633. 8
  634. 8
  635. 8
  636. 8
  637. 8
  638. 8
  639. 8
  640. 8
  641. 8
  642. 8
  643. 8
  644. 8
  645. 8
  646. 8
  647. 8
  648. 8
  649. 8
  650. 8
  651. 8
  652. 8
  653. 8
  654. 8
  655. 8
  656. 8
  657. 8
  658. 8
  659. 8
  660. 8
  661. 8
  662. 8
  663. 8
  664. 8
  665. 8
  666. 8
  667. 8
  668. 8
  669. 8
  670. 8
  671. 8
  672. 8
  673. 8
  674. 8
  675. 8
  676. 8
  677. 8
  678. 8
  679. 8
  680. 8
  681. 8
  682. 8
  683. 8
  684. 8
  685. 8
  686. 8
  687. 8
  688. 8
  689. 8
  690. 8
  691. 7
  692. 7
  693. 7
  694. 7
  695. 7
  696. 7
  697. 7
  698. 7
  699. 7
  700. 7
  701. 7
  702. 7
  703. 7
  704. 7
  705. 7
  706. 7
  707. 7
  708. 7
  709. 7
  710. 7
  711. 7
  712. 7
  713. 7
  714. 7
  715. 7
  716. 7
  717. 7
  718. 7
  719. 7
  720. 7
  721.  @9418matthew  Do you know what trading on WTO rules (hard Brexit) would mean for the UK? No single country in the world trades solely under WTO rules because it's like being in the trading 4th division instead of the Premier League which is being part of a large trading block of having deals with them. Under WTO rules the UK would have to set a single tariff the same for all trading partners whereas in the EU we trade tariff free. If we set a tariff that will push the prices of all imports up so the cost of living will go up for everyone. If we set a zero tariff (perfectly possible), imports may become cheaper but we will be importing from countries where workers have no rights and are paid a pittance because they will produce the cheapest goods. This will undermine safety standards and wipe out British industry and farming as they won't be able to compete with such countries, as our workers and animals have rights. Also we'd be charging the EU zero tariffs while they could charge us 40% tariffs, making it uncompetitive for us to export. Most countries, like the USA are going down the protectionist route, protecting their home industries and China and Russia make if difficult to impossible for anyone to export to them. It will be a an economic disaster. Even the economist Patrick Minford, who is pro Brexit and pro using WTO terms, admits it will destroy British industry and agriculture. He does not mind about that. Brtain as a member of the EU currently has over 4000 trade deals with other countries. Those will immediately lapse as soon as we go out on a hard Brexit and Liam Fox only has 4 deals to put in their place. Trade deals usually take years to negotiate because of their size and complexity. There's no way there are not going to be massive consequences with a hard Brexit.
    7
  722. 7
  723. 7
  724. 7
  725. 7
  726. 7
  727. 7
  728. 7
  729. 7
  730. 7
  731. 7
  732. 7
  733. 7
  734. 7
  735. 7
  736. 7
  737. 7
  738. 7
  739. 7
  740. 7
  741. 7
  742. 7
  743. 7
  744. 7
  745. 7
  746. 7
  747. 7
  748. 7
  749. 7
  750. 7
  751. 7
  752. 7
  753. 7
  754. 7
  755. 7
  756. 7
  757. 7
  758. 7
  759. 7
  760. 7
  761. 7
  762. 7
  763. 7
  764. 7
  765. 7
  766. 7
  767. 7
  768. 7
  769. 7
  770. 7
  771. 7
  772. 7
  773. 7
  774. 7
  775. 7
  776. 7
  777. 7
  778. 7
  779. 7
  780. 7
  781. 7
  782. 7
  783. 7
  784. 7
  785. 7
  786. 7
  787. 7
  788. 7
  789. 7
  790. 7
  791. 7
  792. 7
  793. 7
  794. 7
  795. 7
  796. 7
  797. 7
  798. 7
  799. 7
  800. 7
  801. 7
  802. 7
  803. 7
  804. 7
  805. 7
  806. 7
  807. 7
  808. 7
  809. 7
  810. 7
  811. 7
  812. 7
  813. 7
  814. 7
  815. 7
  816. 7
  817. 7
  818. 7
  819. 7
  820. 6
  821. 6
  822. 6
  823. 6
  824. 6
  825. 6
  826. 6
  827. 6
  828. 6
  829. 6
  830. 6
  831. 6
  832. 6
  833. 6
  834. 6
  835. 6
  836. 6
  837. 6
  838. 6
  839. 6
  840. 6
  841. 6
  842. 6
  843. 6
  844. 6
  845. 6
  846. 6
  847. 6
  848. 6
  849. 6
  850. 6
  851. 6
  852. 6
  853. 6
  854. 6
  855. 6
  856. 6
  857. 6
  858. 6
  859. 6
  860. 6
  861. 6
  862. 6
  863. 6
  864. 6
  865. 6
  866. 6
  867. 6
  868. 6
  869. 6
  870. 6
  871. 6
  872. 6
  873. 6
  874. 6
  875. 6
  876. 6
  877. 6
  878. 6
  879. 6
  880. 6
  881. 6
  882. 6
  883. 6
  884. 6
  885. 6
  886. 6
  887. 6
  888. 6
  889. 6
  890. 6
  891. 6
  892. 6
  893. 6
  894. 6
  895. 6
  896. 6
  897. 6
  898. 6
  899. 6
  900. 6
  901. 6
  902. 6
  903. 6
  904. 6
  905. 6
  906. 6
  907. 6
  908. 6
  909. 6
  910. 6
  911. 6
  912. 6
  913. 6
  914. 6
  915. 6
  916. 6
  917. 6
  918. 6
  919. 6
  920. 6
  921. 6
  922. 6
  923. 6
  924. 6
  925. 6
  926. 6
  927. 6
  928. 6
  929. 6
  930. 6
  931. 6
  932. 6
  933. 6
  934. 6
  935. 6
  936. 6
  937. 6
  938. 6
  939. 6
  940. 6
  941. 6
  942. 6
  943. 6
  944. 6
  945. 6
  946. 6
  947. 6
  948. 6
  949. 6
  950. 6
  951. 6
  952. 6
  953. 6
  954. 6
  955. 6
  956. 6
  957. 6
  958. 6
  959. 6
  960. 6
  961. 6
  962. 6
  963. 6
  964. 6
  965. 6
  966. 6
  967. 6
  968. 6
  969. 6
  970. 6
  971. 6
  972. 6
  973. 6
  974. 6
  975. 6
  976. 6
  977. 6
  978. 6
  979. 6
  980. 6
  981. 6
  982. 6
  983. 6
  984. 6
  985. 6
  986. 6
  987. 6
  988. 6
  989. 6
  990. 6
  991. 6
  992. 5
  993. 5
  994. 5
  995. 5
  996. 5
  997. 5
  998. 5
  999. 5
  1000. 5
  1001. 5
  1002. 5
  1003. 5
  1004. 5
  1005. 5
  1006. 5
  1007. 5
  1008. 5
  1009. 5
  1010. 5
  1011. 5
  1012. 5
  1013. 5
  1014. 5
  1015. 5
  1016. 5
  1017. 5
  1018. 5
  1019. 5
  1020. 5
  1021. 5
  1022. 5
  1023. 5
  1024. 5
  1025. 5
  1026. 5
  1027. 5
  1028. 5
  1029. 5
  1030. 5
  1031. 5
  1032. 5
  1033. 5
  1034. 5
  1035. 5
  1036. 5
  1037. 5
  1038. 5
  1039. 5
  1040. 5
  1041. 5
  1042. 5
  1043. 5
  1044. 5
  1045. 5
  1046. 5
  1047. 5
  1048. 5
  1049. 5
  1050. 5
  1051. 5
  1052. 5
  1053. 5
  1054. 5
  1055. 5
  1056. 5
  1057. 5
  1058. 5
  1059. 5
  1060. 5
  1061. 5
  1062. 5
  1063. 5
  1064. 5
  1065. 5
  1066. 5
  1067. 5
  1068. 5
  1069. 5
  1070. 5
  1071. 5
  1072. 5
  1073. 5
  1074. 5
  1075. 5
  1076. 5
  1077. 5
  1078. 5
  1079. 5
  1080. 5
  1081. 5
  1082. 5
  1083. 5
  1084. 5
  1085. 5
  1086. 5
  1087. 5
  1088. 5
  1089. 5
  1090. 5
  1091. 5
  1092. 5
  1093. 5
  1094. 5
  1095. 5
  1096. 5
  1097. 5
  1098. 5
  1099. 5
  1100. 5
  1101. 5
  1102. 5
  1103. 5
  1104. 5
  1105. 5
  1106. 5
  1107. 5
  1108. 5
  1109. 5
  1110. 5
  1111. 5
  1112. On 24th April I had my 4th Covid vaccination because I'm considered vulnerable in terms of Covid 19. It was Moderna. Before that, over the years, I'd had Astra Zeneca, Pfizer and Moderna vaccs in that order. The worst was Astra Zeneca, It took me about a month to get over that with the main lingering symptoms being tiredness/weakness and palpitations. I don't recall the others being as bad but my recent Moderna jab seems worse. It started about the time that they said the vaccine would become effective. I got what seemed like a bad cold. I was away on holiday for a few days so didn't test for Covid until I returned. That test was negative. I've been feeling unwell since 13 May. Early symptoms included temperature, worsening asthma/breathing difficulties, sleep disturbance, headaches, runny nose, cough, tiredness. Lingering symptoms include daily headaches, though they don't last all day. They start from the morning, some confusion and inability to concentrate, tiredness, cough, stingy nose. This is complicated though because I can't be sure it's not just a cold that's hanging around too long. I'm being treated for cancer also, which has side effects of weakening the immune system and tiredness, but this seems to be on top of that. My cancer treatment is not chemo but hormones so my immune system is mildly weakened but not severely. I had the vaccine on medical advice but I'm minded not to have any more vaccinations in future. It's hard to take a stand against medical advice though. It feels so risky. I questioned the pharmacist who administered the shot, before he gave it as I'd not seen any stats on the prevalence of Covid currently and did not know anyone who'd had it, unlike the first time I'd had a shot. The pharmacist said that not so many people are getting Covid but those who do are getting worse symptoms and ending up in hospital. He later seemed to contradict himself when he said that most people who had had it, that had spoken to him about it, reported mild symptoms. He said the virus people were getting was still Omicron. I had Omicron in Jan 2023 and it was mild for me. Tiredness and headaches for about 10 days. I'd had worse symptoms from a cold/virus just before Xmas 2022. I don't think we are getting enough information.
    5
  1113. 5
  1114. 5
  1115. 5
  1116. 5
  1117. 5
  1118. 5
  1119. 5
  1120. 5
  1121. 5
  1122. 5
  1123. 5
  1124. 5
  1125. 5
  1126. 5
  1127. 5
  1128.  OneGxxdSpliff Hf  Putin doesn't tolerate any democratic opposition though does he? A list of Putin's opponents who were mysteriously murdered, injured, or imprisoned:  Galina Starovoitova, opposition Duma Deputy killed Sergei Yushenkov, co-chairman of the Liberal Russia political party, shot and killed Mikhail Trepashkin jailed after a secret trial on espionage charges. Yuri Shchekochikhin, poisoned, Russian authorities refused to allow an autopsy Mikhail Trepashkin, a former KGB spy imprisoned Mikhail Khodorkovsky, sent to Siberia Nikolai Girenko, a prominent human rights defender, shot dead in his home Paul Klebnikov, editor Russian edition Forbes magazine, shot and killed in Moscow Viktor Yushchenko, anti-Russian candidate for the presidency of the Ukraine, is poisoned by Dioxin. Andrei Kozlov, shot and killed in Moscow Anna Politkovskaya,journalist, shot and killed in Moscow. Paul M. Joyal, shot in street Stanslav Markelov Russian human rights attorney shot in the back of the head Anastasia Barburova, a young journalism student. Shot in the back of the head. Moscow. Boris Nemtsov, Russian opposition politician, shot in the streets of Moscow near the Kemlin 2015 Natalia Estemirova leading Russian human rights journalist and activist,shot and killed Nikolai Glushkov – Russian businessman in the UK who had been given asylum – strangled in England Sergei Skripal – UK former spy – double agent poisoned with Novichok gas 2018 Yulia Skirpal UK daughter of Sergei Skripal poisoned with Novichok gas 2018 Sergei Magnitsky – Accountant in USSR who was investigating and exposed tax fraud by the Russian state. Imprisoned and died in prison after being beaten up. Prosecuted by the Russian state even after his death. Maxim Borodin – journalist found dying on the ground outside his 5th floor flat Mikhail Beketov – journalist left brain damaged and later died Oleg Kashin journalist left seriously injured after an assault Tatyana Felgengauer – journalist, stabbed in the neck while at work Alexander Litvinenko. KGB defector. Poisoned with Polonium in London Alexander Perepilichnyy Boris Berezovsky 6 Russian Diplomats who have died since Trump's victory Alexander Kadakin – Russia's ambassador to India Andrey Malanan Senior Russian diplomat in Greece Vitaly Churkin Russian ambassador to the UN Denis Voronenkon Russian politician who had fled to Ukraine Migayas Shirinskiy Russia's ambassador to Sudan Pyotr Verzilov. Pussy Riot Founder. Protested with girlfriend and others at World Cup Final against police persecution while Putin was watching from the stand. Poisoned on 11 Feb 2018 after attending girlfriend's court case. Mother was blocked from seeing him. Doctors refused to explain. Alexei Navalny – opposition leader to Putin. Poisoned on a flight within Russia 20.08.20 In the Crimea UN's June 2018 Crimea report accuses the Russian Federation of grave human rights violations in Ukraine. e.g multiple cases of torture e.g. Ibrahim Mirpochchaev Crimean journalist, abducted with his father and 2 brothers. Beaten for hours, asphyxiated with plastic bags, strangled, repeatedly tasered and violated with a hard probe used to electrocute him internally. Renat Paralamov, Crimean Tartar similar tale, forced confession. Server Karametov, 76 year old with Parkinson's disease prosecuted for holding a placard in support of 70 Crimean tartars being tried for multiple simultaneous peaceful lone demonstrations. Ervin Ibragimov, Tartar leader, dragged off by men in uniform May 2016. Not seen since. Oleg Sentsov, Crimean film maker, sentenced to 20 years in gaol. Olexander Kolchenko, his assistant, sentenced to 10 years. Gennady Afanasayev beaten, suffocated, stripped, threatened with rape and jailed, to force him to testify against Oleg Sentsov. He withdrew his testimony at the trial. Nariman Memediminov, Tartar activist, forcibly committed to a psychiatric hospital- a measure described by his lawyer as punitive psychiatry. Nariman Memediminov, Tartar activist, forcibly committed to a psychiatric hospital- a measure described by his lawyer as punitive psychiatry. Show less
    5
  1129. 5
  1130. 5
  1131. 5
  1132. 5
  1133. 5
  1134. 5
  1135. 5
  1136. 5
  1137. 5
  1138. 5
  1139. 5
  1140. 5
  1141. 5
  1142. 5
  1143. 5
  1144. 5
  1145. 5
  1146. 5
  1147. 5
  1148. 5
  1149. 5
  1150. 5
  1151. 5
  1152. 5
  1153. 5
  1154. 5
  1155. 5
  1156. 5
  1157. 5
  1158. 5
  1159. 5
  1160. 5
  1161. 5
  1162. 5
  1163. 5
  1164. 5
  1165. 5
  1166. 5
  1167. 5
  1168. 5
  1169. 5
  1170. 5
  1171. 5
  1172. 5
  1173. 5
  1174. 5
  1175. 5
  1176. 5
  1177. 5
  1178. 5
  1179. 5
  1180. 5
  1181. 5
  1182. 5
  1183. 5
  1184. 5
  1185. 5
  1186. 5
  1187. 5
  1188. 5
  1189. 5
  1190. 5
  1191. 5
  1192. 5
  1193. 5
  1194. 5
  1195. 5
  1196. 5
  1197. 5
  1198. 5
  1199. 5
  1200. 5
  1201. 5
  1202. 5
  1203. 5
  1204. 5
  1205. 5
  1206. 5
  1207. 5
  1208. 5
  1209. 5
  1210. 5
  1211. 5
  1212. 5
  1213. 5
  1214. 5
  1215. 5
  1216. 5
  1217. 5
  1218. 5
  1219. 5
  1220. 5
  1221. 4
  1222. 4
  1223. 4
  1224. 4
  1225. 4
  1226. 4
  1227. 4
  1228. 4
  1229. 4
  1230. 4
  1231. 4
  1232. 4
  1233. 4
  1234. 4
  1235. 4
  1236. 4
  1237. 4
  1238. 4
  1239. 4
  1240. 4
  1241. 4
  1242. 4
  1243. 4
  1244. 4
  1245. 4
  1246. 4
  1247. 4
  1248. 4
  1249. 4
  1250. 4
  1251. 4
  1252. 4
  1253. 4
  1254. 4
  1255. 4
  1256. 4
  1257. 4
  1258. 4
  1259. 4
  1260. 4
  1261. 4
  1262. 4
  1263. 4
  1264. 4
  1265. 4
  1266. 4
  1267. 4
  1268. 4
  1269. 4
  1270. 4
  1271. 4
  1272. 4
  1273. 4
  1274. 4
  1275. 4
  1276. 4
  1277. 4
  1278. 4
  1279. 4
  1280. 4
  1281. 4
  1282. 4
  1283. 4
  1284. 4
  1285. 4
  1286. 4
  1287. 4
  1288. 4
  1289. 4
  1290. 4
  1291. 4
  1292. 4
  1293. 4
  1294. 4
  1295. 4
  1296. 4
  1297. 4
  1298. 4
  1299. 4
  1300. 4
  1301. 4
  1302. 4
  1303. 4
  1304. 4
  1305. 4
  1306. 4
  1307. 4
  1308. 4
  1309. 4
  1310. 4
  1311. 4
  1312. 4
  1313. 4
  1314. 4
  1315. 4
  1316. 4
  1317. 4
  1318. 4
  1319. 4
  1320. 4
  1321. 4
  1322. 4
  1323. 4
  1324. 4
  1325. 4
  1326. 4
  1327. 4
  1328. 4
  1329. 4
  1330. 4
  1331. 4
  1332. 4
  1333. 4
  1334. 4
  1335. 4
  1336. 4
  1337. 4
  1338. 4
  1339. 4
  1340. 4
  1341. 4
  1342. 4
  1343. 4
  1344. 4
  1345. 4
  1346. 4
  1347. 4
  1348. 4
  1349. 4
  1350. 4
  1351. 4
  1352. 4
  1353. 4
  1354. 4
  1355. 4
  1356. 4
  1357. 4
  1358. 4
  1359. 4
  1360. 4
  1361. 4
  1362. 4
  1363. 4
  1364.  @fatfat1877  Explanation: We'll be down the plughole if we try leaving without a deal just on WTO terms. No country in the world trades just on WTO terms because in trading terms it's the 4th division. They all want deals with a big trading block which is the premier division which is where we are now. It's a bit of a myth that the EU controls us. There are some rules of membership but 99% of what the UK spends is determined by the UK government. So what happens if we go to no deal WTO terms? We have to then set a tariff for trading with the world and under WTO terms it has to be the same tariff for everyone we trade with in the same goods. If we set a tariff that will push prices up for UK consumers and we'll be worse off. If we set a zero tariff (possible under the rules) our farming and manufacturing won't be able to compete with cheap imports from countries where workers have no rights and are paid pennies an hour so our farming and manufacturing industries will be destroyed. Don't just take my word for it. Patrick Minford, an economist who is for a hard Brexit says the same about the future of British farming and manufacturing. It will affect other economic sectors also. Wealthy people like ex stockbroker Farage and Jacob Rees Mogg will be raking it in because WTO rules do not regulate financial systems and they will be even more free to squirrel away their profits to tax havens around the world. Also over 80% of our exports are services and 49% of those are to the EU. The day we hard Brexit, those services with lose their 'passport' rights to European EU countries, which is why businesses are talking about moving their headquarters to the Europe. The very people who want Brexit because they are suffering under the present government's austerity programme, will be stuffed even more under no deal Brexit. None of this was explained before the Referendum by a campaign that wasn't even talking about a no deal Brexit. As for getting trade deals, as a member of the EU, we have over 40 trade deals that will no longer apply the day we go out on no deal and there are only a handful lined up to replace them. Trade deals take years to negotiate because they are complex covering everything traded between countries. Trump is protectionist and the US is a larger economy than ours, and if we want a trade deal with the USA it will be very much on his terms, as he doesn't need to deal. His negotiators have already said they want access to NHS funding for their corporations as part of the deal and for us to take their farming products like chlorine washed chicken and hormone fed beef - practices currently banned by the EU. China and Russia are not our friends and in any case they don't allow countries to export freely to theirs. They are protectionist. Asian countries have each other to trade with nearby. The only thing India wants from us is more visas for people to come here. Other countries won't make up for the loss of the big trading area on our doorstep (the EU). The way out of our problems is to vote for a party that will do something about inequality in the UK and protect jobs and trade, and that's not the Tories or the Brexit party. Farage has stated he is for replacing the NHS with an insurance based market system. He is for taking restrictions off the sale of handguns and he has other right wing policies too. If we set a zero tariff, that would be zero for EU trade also, except as outsiders the EU would be placing a tariff on us (could be 40%). That would make us uncompetitive in trading with the EU. You can't just count the cost of trading with the EU in terms of our subscriptions. You have to count the benefits to the economy too and the health and welfare of people to get the whole picture.
    4
  1365. 4
  1366. 4
  1367. 4
  1368. 4
  1369. 4
  1370. 4
  1371. 4
  1372. 4
  1373. 4
  1374. 4
  1375. 4
  1376. 4
  1377. 4
  1378. 4
  1379. 4
  1380. 4
  1381. 4
  1382. 4
  1383. 4
  1384. 4
  1385. 4
  1386. 4
  1387. 4
  1388. 4
  1389. 4
  1390. 4
  1391. 4
  1392. 4
  1393. 4
  1394. 4
  1395. 4
  1396. 4
  1397. 4
  1398. 4
  1399. 4
  1400. 4
  1401. 4
  1402. 4
  1403. 4
  1404. 4
  1405. 4
  1406. 4
  1407. 4
  1408. 4
  1409. 4
  1410. 4
  1411. 4
  1412. 4
  1413. 4
  1414. 4
  1415. 4
  1416. 4
  1417. 4
  1418. 4
  1419. 4
  1420. 4
  1421. 4
  1422. 4
  1423. 4
  1424. 4
  1425. 4
  1426. 4
  1427. 4
  1428. 4
  1429. 4
  1430. 4
  1431. 4
  1432. 4
  1433. 4
  1434. 4
  1435. 4
  1436. 4
  1437. 4
  1438. 4
  1439. 4
  1440. 4
  1441. 4
  1442. 4
  1443. 4
  1444. 4
  1445. 4
  1446. 4
  1447. 4
  1448. 4
  1449. 4
  1450. 4
  1451. 4
  1452. 4
  1453. 4
  1454. 4
  1455. 4
  1456. 4
  1457. 4
  1458. 4
  1459. 4
  1460. 4
  1461. 4
  1462. 4
  1463. 4
  1464. 4
  1465. 4
  1466. 4
  1467. 4
  1468. 4
  1469. 4
  1470. 4
  1471. 4
  1472. 4
  1473. 4
  1474. 4
  1475. 4
  1476. 4
  1477. 4
  1478. 4
  1479. 4
  1480. 4
  1481. 4
  1482. 4
  1483. 4
  1484. 4
  1485. 4
  1486. 4
  1487. 4
  1488. 4
  1489. 4
  1490. 4
  1491. 4
  1492. 4
  1493. 4
  1494. 4
  1495. 4
  1496. 4
  1497. 4
  1498. 4
  1499. 4
  1500. 4
  1501. 4
  1502. 4
  1503. 4
  1504. 4
  1505. 4
  1506. 4
  1507. 4
  1508. 4
  1509. 4
  1510. 4
  1511. 4
  1512. 4
  1513. 4
  1514. 4
  1515. 4
  1516. 4
  1517. 4
  1518. 4
  1519. 4
  1520. 4
  1521. 4
  1522. 4
  1523. 4
  1524. 4
  1525. 4
  1526. 4
  1527. 4
  1528. 4
  1529. 4
  1530. 4
  1531. 4
  1532. 4
  1533. 4
  1534. 4
  1535. 4
  1536. 4
  1537. 4
  1538. 4
  1539. 4
  1540. 4
  1541. 4
  1542. 4
  1543. 4
  1544. 4
  1545. 4
  1546. 4
  1547. 4
  1548. 4
  1549. 4
  1550. 4
  1551. 4
  1552. 4
  1553. 4
  1554. 4
  1555. 4
  1556. 4
  1557.  @greeny202ab  How will the EU be an economic powerhouse in 10 years time? Can you map that out for us please. It often takes as much as 10 years to agree a trade deal. Protectionism and protectionist trade blocks are the trend in a globalised world, as the only way to protect living standards and other standards including worker's rights. The vision for the UK becoming a 'powerhouse' is a vision of us becoming like Singapore but that will mean reducing worker's rights so capital can exploit workers more. Even so, we have competitors around us who are not going to stand by while we become this 'powerhouse'. They will be doing all they can to undermine us. Also I wouldn't trust the Tories when they talk about a 'powerhouse'. They've been promising for some years that there would be a northern powerhouse in Britain, but they've done naff all about that. The only thing the Tories and their backers really care about is being able to increase profits and reduce taxes for the wealthy, the corporations and financial speculators and keep allowing them to avoid tax through offshore tax havens and allow money obtained through crime to be laundered through Britain. We will become another tax haven but our citizens will become second class with fewer rights, and smaller public services, (or badly run privatised ones). Life will not get easier for those who place their hope in Brexit.People need to vote here and now for a party that will improve their living standards - not for some pie in the sky promises about a post Brexit glorious future based on no evidence at all. Even if we did succeed outside of the EU, do you think the Tories are the party to allow any wealth created to be fairly shared? The gap between rich and poor will continue to grow with more people becoming poor - just like the USA.
    4
  1558. 4
  1559. 4
  1560. 4
  1561. 4
  1562. 4
  1563. 4
  1564. 4
  1565. 4
  1566. 4
  1567. 4
  1568. 4
  1569. 4
  1570. 4
  1571. 4
  1572. 4
  1573. 4
  1574. 4
  1575. 4
  1576. 4
  1577. 4
  1578. 4
  1579. 4
  1580. 4
  1581. 4
  1582. 4
  1583. 3
  1584. 3
  1585. 3
  1586. 3
  1587. 3
  1588. 3
  1589. 3
  1590. 3
  1591. 3
  1592. 3
  1593. 3
  1594. 3
  1595. 3
  1596. 3
  1597. 3
  1598. 3
  1599. 3
  1600. 3
  1601. 3
  1602. 3
  1603. 3
  1604. 3
  1605. 3
  1606. 3
  1607. 3
  1608. 3
  1609. 3
  1610. 3
  1611. 3
  1612. 3
  1613. 3
  1614. 3
  1615. 3
  1616. 3
  1617. 3
  1618. 3
  1619. 3
  1620. 3
  1621. 3
  1622. 3
  1623. 3
  1624. 3
  1625. 3
  1626. 3
  1627. 3
  1628. 3
  1629. 3
  1630. 3
  1631. 3
  1632. 3
  1633. 3
  1634. 3
  1635. 3
  1636. 3
  1637. 3
  1638. 3
  1639. 3
  1640. 3
  1641. 3
  1642. 3
  1643. 3
  1644.  charlie cheeseface  I didn't study history at University - only up to A level and I just learn about it through reading otherwise because I'm interested. You've decided that I'm elitist because of my interests? I grew up in a working class family. We have more than a couple of friends in France and that's through my husband having spent a year there in his University days. I am currently learning a lot about US history through an online site. I don't think we were 'dominated' by the EU. That's the line governments spin to get out of criticism for things which are their own fault, due to their own decisions. Actually all of our UK governments over time have initiated or voted for 98% of EU directives and I've yet to hear anyone point out one that was harmful to us. The UK government, even within the EU, controlled 99% of its spending and in addition its citizens benefited from lots of aspects of being within the EU. It makes me laugh when those against the EU suddenly appeal against UK court rulings by taking their case to the EU court of Human Rights. EU requirements are not 'perfect' but they protect us against dangerous chemicals and unsafe food production and practices and also enviromnental exploitation and they maintain minimum standards of workers rights. I would not want to be without those. Even if you think I'm 'elitist' for whatever reason, it's certainly the non elites who will suffer more outside of the EU. The elites can switch their investments around the world and avoid tax. They will profit from leaving. Perhaps you are one of those? The workers will be ripe for exploitation by them, with fewer protections.
    3
  1645. 3
  1646. 3
  1647. 3
  1648. 3
  1649. 3
  1650. 3
  1651. 3
  1652. 3
  1653. 3
  1654. 3
  1655. 3
  1656. 3
  1657. 3
  1658. 3
  1659. 3
  1660. 3
  1661. 3
  1662. 3
  1663. 3
  1664. 3
  1665. 3
  1666. 3
  1667. 3
  1668. 3
  1669. 3
  1670. 3
  1671. 3
  1672. 3
  1673. 3
  1674. 3
  1675. 3
  1676. 3
  1677. 3
  1678. 3
  1679. 3
  1680. 3
  1681. 3
  1682. 3
  1683. 3
  1684. 3
  1685. 3
  1686. 3
  1687. 3
  1688. 3
  1689. 3
  1690. 3
  1691. 3
  1692. 3
  1693. 3
  1694. 3
  1695. 3
  1696. 3
  1697. 3
  1698. 3
  1699. 3
  1700. 3
  1701. 3
  1702. 3
  1703. 3
  1704. 3
  1705. 3
  1706. 3
  1707. 3
  1708. 3
  1709. 3
  1710. 3
  1711. 3
  1712. 3
  1713. 3
  1714. 3
  1715. 3
  1716. 3
  1717. 3
  1718. 3
  1719. 3
  1720. 3
  1721. 3
  1722. 3
  1723. 3
  1724. 3
  1725. 3
  1726. 3
  1727. 3
  1728. 3
  1729. 3
  1730. 3
  1731. 3
  1732. 3
  1733. 3
  1734. 3
  1735. 3
  1736. 3
  1737. 3
  1738. 3
  1739. 3
  1740. 3
  1741. 3
  1742. 3
  1743. 3
  1744. 3
  1745. 3
  1746. 3
  1747. 3
  1748. 3
  1749. 3
  1750. 3
  1751. 3
  1752. 3
  1753. 3
  1754. 3
  1755. 3
  1756. 3
  1757. 3
  1758. 3
  1759. 3
  1760. 3
  1761. 3
  1762. 3
  1763. 3
  1764. 3
  1765. 3
  1766. 3
  1767. 3
  1768. 3
  1769. 3
  1770. 3
  1771. 3
  1772. 3
  1773. 3
  1774. 3
  1775. 3
  1776. 3
  1777. 3
  1778. 3
  1779. 3
  1780. 3
  1781. 3
  1782. 3
  1783. 3
  1784. 3
  1785. 3
  1786. 3
  1787. 3
  1788. 3
  1789. 3
  1790. 3
  1791. 3
  1792. 3
  1793. 3
  1794. 3
  1795. 3
  1796. 3
  1797. 3
  1798. 3
  1799. 3
  1800. 3
  1801. 3
  1802. 3
  1803. 3
  1804. 3
  1805. 3
  1806. 3
  1807. 3
  1808. 3
  1809. 3
  1810. 3
  1811. 3
  1812. 3
  1813. 3
  1814. 3
  1815. 3
  1816. 3
  1817. 3
  1818. 3
  1819. 3
  1820.  @casperslaststandme5991  The party under Corbyn is more socialist than it was which means it has policies to make life fairer and more equitable for more people, and to try and reverse some of the gap between rich and poor that's been getting wider in recent years. (See Labour's last Manifesto commitments). Vested interests such as newspaper proprietors who fear losing their wealth through having tax loopholes closed under Labour or being taxed more, fear a Corbyn government and will publish anything to undermine him playing on people's fears. Corbyn has always said he prefers negotiations to achieve peaceful solutions and will talk to all sides in a conflict. To the newspapers that makes him a consorter with terrorists, but in fact the NI good Friday agreement was reached only through talks with both sides. The Tories don't have a plan, not just for Brexit but for anything because they don't believe in government planning. They believe only in the market and see their role as reducing government's size and role and giving as much over to the market as they can by privatising, outsourcing and deregulating. However markets never work well on their own without regulation. They leave many victims in their wake. The success of the Tory party is that they act for the wealthy and they cause chaos and have very dim people in key government Ministries, however they are good at persuading the common man (and woman) that they are the party for them. An area crying out for a plan is national transport, but the Tories won't do it. Areas that don't make sense except when run by the state include The Railways but Grayling will plough ever on with franchises even where they have failed multiple times and cost the taxpayer an arm and a leg.
    3
  1821. 3
  1822. 3
  1823. 3
  1824. 3
  1825. 3
  1826. 3
  1827. 3
  1828. 3
  1829. 3
  1830. 3
  1831. 3
  1832. 3
  1833. 3
  1834. 3
  1835. 3
  1836. 3
  1837. 3
  1838. 3
  1839. 3
  1840. 3
  1841. 3
  1842. 3
  1843. 3
  1844. 3
  1845. 3
  1846. MRWorldGuy. It does matter to me whether you are a Shakespeare fan because I'm sick of every video featuring a black person in public life being full of racist comments from idiots and haters, and that's the only reason they visit the site. If you were a Shakespeare fan you would not react this way because you would realise this is a drama not a history. Shakespeare was never completely accurate about history. He sometimes changed things for dramatic purposes or to please his sponsors. His plays are regarded as having universal themes, for instance here the themes are about conflict and power, and they have been played all over the world in different settings. For instance there's a version of Richard III played in modern uniforms with fascist overtones, but hundreds of fans did not post comments that it was all anachronistic because fascism didn't exist then. No, it's only race that seems to get some people hot under the collar. Genuine Shakespeare fans understand that these plays can be interpreted in different ways under different themes. His plays have been done in modern times with all male actors, all female actors and all black actors. They are not things set in stone for all time. I can understand why she was cast because she's a good actress so was cast on merit and also her race is a kind of metaphor for the fact that Margaret was a despised foreigner. Margaret was of course French but these days we don't hate the French so much, but there are plenty of race haters so it works in that sense.
    3
  1847. 3
  1848. 3
  1849. 3
  1850. 3
  1851. 3
  1852. 3
  1853. 3
  1854. 3
  1855. 3
  1856. 3
  1857. 3
  1858. 3
  1859. 3
  1860. 3
  1861. 3
  1862. 3
  1863. 3
  1864. 3
  1865. 3
  1866. 3
  1867. 3
  1868. 3
  1869. 3
  1870. 3
  1871. 3
  1872. 3
  1873. 3
  1874. 3
  1875. 3
  1876. 3
  1877. 3
  1878. 3
  1879. 3
  1880. 3
  1881. 3
  1882. 3
  1883. 3
  1884. 3
  1885. 3
  1886. 3
  1887. 3
  1888. 3
  1889. 3
  1890. 3
  1891. 3
  1892. 3
  1893. 3
  1894. 3
  1895. 3
  1896. 3
  1897. 3
  1898. 3
  1899. 3
  1900. 3
  1901. 3
  1902. 3
  1903. 3
  1904. 3
  1905. 3
  1906. 3
  1907. 3
  1908. 3
  1909. 3
  1910. 3
  1911. 3
  1912. 3
  1913. 3
  1914. 3
  1915. 3
  1916. 3
  1917. 3
  1918. 3
  1919. 3
  1920. 3
  1921. 3
  1922. 3
  1923. 3
  1924. 3
  1925. 3
  1926. 3
  1927. 3
  1928. 3
  1929. 3
  1930. 3
  1931. 3
  1932. 3
  1933. 3
  1934. 3
  1935. 3
  1936. 3
  1937. 3
  1938. 3
  1939. 3
  1940. 3
  1941. 3
  1942. 3
  1943. 3
  1944. 3
  1945. 3
  1946. 3
  1947. 3
  1948. 3
  1949. 3
  1950. 3
  1951. 3
  1952. 3
  1953. 3
  1954. 3
  1955. 3
  1956. 3
  1957. 3
  1958. 3
  1959. 3
  1960. 3
  1961. 3
  1962. 3
  1963. 3
  1964. 3
  1965. 3
  1966. 3
  1967. 3
  1968. 3
  1969. 3
  1970. 3
  1971. 3
  1972. 3
  1973. 3
  1974. 3
  1975. 3
  1976. 3
  1977. 3
  1978. 3
  1979. 3
  1980. 3
  1981. 3
  1982. 3
  1983. 3
  1984. 3
  1985. 3
  1986. 3
  1987. 3
  1988. 3
  1989. 3
  1990. 3
  1991. 3
  1992. 3
  1993. 3
  1994. 3
  1995. 3
  1996. 3
  1997. 3
  1998. 3
  1999. 3
  2000. 3
  2001. 3
  2002. 3
  2003. 3
  2004. 3
  2005. 3
  2006. 3
  2007. 3
  2008. 3
  2009. 3
  2010. 3
  2011. 3
  2012. 3
  2013. 3
  2014. 3
  2015. 3
  2016. 3
  2017. 3
  2018. 3
  2019. 3
  2020. 3
  2021. 3
  2022. 3
  2023. 3
  2024. 3
  2025. 3
  2026. 3
  2027. 3
  2028. 3
  2029. 3
  2030. 3
  2031. 3
  2032. 3
  2033. 3
  2034. 3
  2035. 3
  2036. 3
  2037. 3
  2038. 3
  2039. 3
  2040. 3
  2041. 3
  2042. 3
  2043. 3
  2044. 3
  2045. 3
  2046. 3
  2047. 3
  2048. 3
  2049. 3
  2050. 3
  2051. 3
  2052. 3
  2053. 3
  2054. 3
  2055. 3
  2056. 3
  2057. 3
  2058. 3
  2059. 3
  2060. 3
  2061. 3
  2062. 3
  2063. 3
  2064. 3
  2065. 3
  2066. 3
  2067. 3
  2068. 3
  2069. 3
  2070. 3
  2071. 3
  2072. 3
  2073. 3
  2074. 3
  2075. 3
  2076. 3
  2077. 3
  2078. 3
  2079. 3
  2080. 3
  2081. 3
  2082. 3
  2083. 3
  2084. 3
  2085. 3
  2086. 3
  2087. 3
  2088. 3
  2089. 3
  2090. 3
  2091. 3
  2092. 3
  2093. 3
  2094. 3
  2095. 3
  2096. 3
  2097. 3
  2098. 3
  2099. 3
  2100. 3
  2101. 3
  2102. 3
  2103. 3
  2104. 3
  2105. 3
  2106. 3
  2107. 3
  2108. 3
  2109. 3
  2110. 3
  2111. 3
  2112. 3
  2113. 3
  2114. 3
  2115. 3
  2116. 3
  2117. 3
  2118. 3
  2119. 3
  2120. 3
  2121. 3
  2122. 3
  2123. 3
  2124. 3
  2125. 3
  2126. 3
  2127. 3
  2128. 3
  2129. 3
  2130. 3
  2131. 3
  2132. 3
  2133. 3
  2134. 3
  2135. 3
  2136. 3
  2137. 3
  2138. 3
  2139. 3
  2140. 3
  2141. 3
  2142. 3
  2143. 3
  2144. 3
  2145. 3
  2146. 3
  2147. 3
  2148. 3
  2149. 3
  2150. 3
  2151. 3
  2152. 3
  2153. 3
  2154. 3
  2155. 3
  2156. 3
  2157. 3
  2158. 3
  2159. 3
  2160. 3
  2161. 3
  2162. 3
  2163. 3
  2164. 3
  2165. 3
  2166. 3
  2167. 3
  2168. 3
  2169. 3
  2170. 3
  2171. 3
  2172. 3
  2173. 3
  2174. 3
  2175. 3
  2176. 3
  2177. 3
  2178. 3
  2179. 3
  2180. 3
  2181. 3
  2182. 3
  2183. 3
  2184. 3
  2185. 3
  2186. 3
  2187. 3
  2188. 3
  2189. 3
  2190. 3
  2191. 3
  2192. 3
  2193. 3
  2194. 3
  2195. 3
  2196. 3
  2197. 3
  2198. 3
  2199. 3
  2200. 3
  2201. I'm not a Tory supporter, far from it, but I support this policy though it would have been fairer to make it an increase on income tax rather than NI. However I understand that income tax in the UK is not wholly under the control of the Westminster government as it's a devolved matter where Wales, Scotland and NI are concerned, so I understand why they chose NI and most people link the term NI with public service benefits. Social Care is not just for the rich. In fact the rich can afford their own social care without relying on state provision. It's the poor that need it most. This has been a problem growing over the years because of an ageing population and the Tories have actually made cuts to funding for social care since 2010. Social care allows elderly people to be cared for at home as far as practicable rather than going into care homes which are not always nice and which are reducing in number anyway. Care homes also take out a profit element. They are expensive and many people can't afford them and are left at home with inadequate care or end up bed blocking in hospitals because there is no one to care for them at home. Successive government have pledged to do something about funding social care but have baulked at the risk this poses from potential voter backlash (Voters don't generally like tax increases, and governments both Labour and Conservative have therefore kicked the can down the road while the problems in social care provision have got steadily worse). People who pay this extra tax now will know that they can rely on better services when they themselves get old and need them and as I understand it though pensioners don't normally pay NI, the government will be introducing this element for working pensioners. Most people don't object to paying tax for the NHS, why should they object to paying it for social care if they know they will benefit? Boris in doing this has broken a Manifesto pledge but he also pledged to solve the issue of funding social care, so he has broken one pledge to fund another. The public finances are in a bad state from Covid and after Brexit and the money has to come from somewhere. It would have helped though if Boris hadn't spaffed over £50bn of public money on ineffective Covid measures (test and trace being the main one) where contracts went largely to Tory friends and supporters, without competition, and they were never published as required by law. Experts reported that this service didn't make much difference to outcomes. This policy still has to get through Parliament.
    3
  2202. 3
  2203. 3
  2204. 3
  2205. 3
  2206. 2
  2207. 2
  2208. 2
  2209. 2
  2210. 2
  2211. 2
  2212. 2
  2213. 2
  2214. Michael Hayes. What he's done for London so far is: increased the London Living Wage, capped many Transport for London fares, also introduced 2 bus journeys for one fare as long as they are taken within an hour, stopped the wasteful and expensive vanity project (London Garden Bridge), ensured bus drivers changing companies have their experience recognised and don't start back on the lowest rate of pay, increased his budget contribution to the police (though he can't match the enormous cuts to that budget by the government which have resulted incuts to youth workers (500) cuts to Sure Start Centres and cuts to projects designed to keep young people away from gangs). He has increased stop and search since the increase in knife crime. He has consulted on ways to cut back air pollution. He has objectives to ensure more affordable house building. He has given considerable sums of money to charities for housing the homeless. What you need to take into account is that the government's plan is to cut central funding to local authorities down to ZERO by 2020 and cuts have been taking place for a year or two now towards that target as well as cuts driven by austerity. Also as a result of government cuts 20,000 police officer jobs have been lost since 2010. I'm not sure whether race relations are at boiling point but certainly any black person in authority appearing on the internet e.g. on youtube tends to attract a lot of racists who like to make racist comments. You could have found this out for yourself if you'd looked it up but you prefer to sit in ignorance shouting "what's he ever done for London?"
    2
  2215. 2
  2216. 2
  2217. 2
  2218. 2
  2219. 2
  2220. 2
  2221. 2
  2222. 2
  2223. 2
  2224. 2
  2225. 2
  2226. 2
  2227. 2
  2228. 2
  2229. 2
  2230. 2
  2231. 2
  2232. 2
  2233. 2
  2234. 2
  2235. 2
  2236. 2
  2237. 2
  2238. 2
  2239. 2
  2240. 2
  2241. 2
  2242. 2
  2243. 2
  2244. 2
  2245. 2
  2246. 2
  2247. 2
  2248. 2
  2249. 2
  2250. 2
  2251. 2
  2252. Marx spent his life on his intellectual work which many people still do today, only they get paid for it these days. His options for support were limited then particularly as his work was controversial but he was the first to pull so many different elements together in his analysis and many academics and others still find his analysis useful although his predictions about what would happen in the future were incorrect. He actually believed that revolution would first happen in "advanced" countries like Britain - not backward ones like Russia. He underestimated the resilience of the capitalist system particularly as it developed into a global system, which it was not then. Now if there's a crash it has worlwide effects but the welfare state supports systems to some extent in the West. Events have shown that people can't do without democracy to provide the best chance of getting a fair system but democratic societies can also no longer do well without some state welfare systems. "True market capitalism" as theorists have it, does not exist in reality. The nearest thing to it was the laissez faire economics of Victorian times but that created many "losers", and poverty from lack of security of employment. People were frequently thrown out of work in that system which ran from boom to slump quite often. These days many socialists would advocate Keynesian economics where the state may intervene to invest for growth at a time of slump. In a democracy the state is the representatives of us taxpayers protecting our interests, unless corporations have been able to "buy" politicians for their own exclusive interests which happens as we know..
    2
  2253. 2
  2254. 2
  2255. 2
  2256. 2
  2257. 2
  2258. 2
  2259. 2
  2260. 2
  2261. 2
  2262. 2
  2263. 2
  2264. 2
  2265. 2
  2266. 2
  2267. 2
  2268. 2
  2269. 2
  2270. 2
  2271. 2
  2272. 2
  2273. 2
  2274. 2
  2275. 2
  2276. 2
  2277. 2
  2278. 2
  2279. 2
  2280. 2
  2281. 2
  2282. 2
  2283. 2
  2284. 2
  2285. 2
  2286. 2
  2287. 2
  2288. 2
  2289. 2
  2290. 2
  2291. 2
  2292. 2
  2293. 2
  2294. 2
  2295.  @firsteerr  He can't push the government for anything. He's tried but they are not prepared to grant him any concessions that might help him because they don't want the Labour party to make any progress that might benefit them electorily. Chris Grayling openly admitted that he wasn't inclined to put failing London rail systems under TfL, to improve them as Khan suggested because he didn't want to 'hand them to Labour'. The Tories think if they punish Londoners enough for voting Labour, they will switch their vote to Tory. Khan has given extra money to the police budget and is raising the Mayor's 'precept' in the London council rates to give extra money to fund the police budgets so they can tackle crime better but he's limited in the amount he can raise and it pales in comparison with the vast amount the government has cut from police budgets since 2010. Since 2010 20,000 police officers jobs have been cut due to government budget cuts to police funding. Increasing the congestion charge to cut pollution is a good idea. It hadn't been raised for years, and there's enough good public transport in London to avoid driving in many cases. I don't drive and none of my family do. I have contracted adult onset asthma though, living near a busy road in London. There are other actions he is taking to cut pollution and I will watch with interest what the outcome of those will be. He's not a dictator so he can't tell councils what to do but he has consulted on affordable housing (end of 2017), issued supplementary planning guidance to encourage it, and secured funds for spending on it. His plan is a decade long plan and he's doing a number of things towards achieving this which you can google https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/london-mayor-raises-grant-rates-for-housing-associations-56827, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-44139669. It takes time from planning, design and approval for homes to be built so give it a chance. Again he can't dictate to TfL but though some fares have risen, others have been capped and he has introduced 2 journeys for one price bus fares, that have benefited some of the poorest people in London, especially workers on low wages. This is more than Tory Boris Johnson achieved as Mayor as he did not have even the intention to try and improve things for ordinary Londoners but concentrated on vanity and useless projects like buying old water cannons for crowd control, which could not be used, highly expensive 'Boris buses' whose windows don't open, stifling people in Summer, and the unnecessary 'Garden Bridge' which thankfully Khan dropped before even more public money was wasted..
    2
  2296. 2
  2297. 2
  2298. 2
  2299. 2
  2300. 2
  2301. 2
  2302. 2
  2303. 2
  2304. 2
  2305. 2
  2306. 2
  2307. 2
  2308. 2
  2309. 2
  2310. 2
  2311. 2
  2312. 2
  2313. 2
  2314. 2
  2315. 2
  2316. 2
  2317. 2
  2318. 2
  2319. 2
  2320. 2
  2321. 2
  2322. 2
  2323. 2
  2324. 2
  2325. 2
  2326. 2
  2327. 2
  2328. 2
  2329. 2
  2330. 2
  2331. 2
  2332. 2
  2333. 2
  2334. 2
  2335. 2
  2336. 2
  2337. 2
  2338. 2
  2339. 2
  2340. 2
  2341. 2
  2342. 2
  2343. 2
  2344. 2
  2345. 2
  2346. 2
  2347. 2
  2348. 2
  2349. 2
  2350. 2
  2351. 2
  2352. 2
  2353. 2
  2354. 2
  2355. 2
  2356. 2
  2357. 2
  2358. 2
  2359. 2
  2360. 2
  2361. 2
  2362. 2
  2363. 2
  2364. 2
  2365. 2
  2366. 2
  2367. 2
  2368. 2
  2369. 2
  2370. 2
  2371. 2
  2372. 2
  2373. 2
  2374. 2
  2375. 2
  2376. 2
  2377. 2
  2378. 2
  2379. 2
  2380. 2
  2381. 2
  2382. 2
  2383. 2
  2384. 2
  2385. 2
  2386. 2
  2387. 2
  2388. 2
  2389. 2
  2390. 2
  2391. 2
  2392. 2
  2393. 2
  2394. 2
  2395. 2
  2396. 2
  2397. 2
  2398. 2
  2399. 2
  2400. 2
  2401. 2
  2402. 2
  2403. 2
  2404. 2
  2405. 2
  2406. 2
  2407. 2
  2408. 2
  2409. 2
  2410. 2
  2411. 2
  2412. 2
  2413. 2
  2414. 2
  2415. 2
  2416. 2
  2417. 2
  2418. 2
  2419. 2
  2420. 2
  2421. 2
  2422. 2
  2423. 2
  2424. 2
  2425. 2
  2426. 2
  2427. 2
  2428. 2
  2429. 2
  2430. 2
  2431. 2
  2432. 2
  2433. 2
  2434. 2
  2435. 2
  2436. 2
  2437. 2
  2438. 2
  2439. 2
  2440. 2
  2441. 2
  2442. 2
  2443. 2
  2444. 2
  2445. 2
  2446. 2
  2447. 2
  2448. 2
  2449. 2
  2450. 2
  2451. 2
  2452. 2
  2453. 2
  2454. 2
  2455. 2
  2456. 2
  2457. 2
  2458. 2
  2459. 2
  2460. 2
  2461. 2
  2462. 2
  2463. 2
  2464. 2
  2465. 2
  2466. 2
  2467. 2
  2468. 2
  2469. 2
  2470. 2
  2471. 2
  2472. 2
  2473. 2
  2474. 2
  2475. 2
  2476. 2
  2477. 2
  2478. 2
  2479. 2
  2480. 2
  2481. 2
  2482. 2
  2483. 2
  2484. 2
  2485. 2
  2486.  @GravityBoy72  They are doing a good job of making Putin look bad. Lol. Galina Starovoitova, opposition Duma Deputy killed Sergei Yushenkov, co-chairman of the Liberal Russia political party, shot and killed Mikhail Trepashkin jailed after a secret trial on espionage charges. Yuri Shchekochikhin, poisoned, Russian authorities refused to allow an autopsy Mikhail Trepashkin, a former KGB spy imprisoned Mikhail Khodorkovsky, sent to Siberia Nikolai Girenko, a prominent human rights defender, shot dead in his home Paul Klebnikov, editor Russian edition Forbes magazine, shot and killed in Moscow Viktor Yushchenko, anti-Russian candidate for the presidency of the Ukraine, is poisoned by Dioxin. Andrei Kozlov, shot and killed in Moscow Anna Politkovskaya,journalist, shot and killed in Moscow. Paul M. Joyal, shot in street Stanslav Markelov Russian human rights attorney shot in the back of the head Anastasia Barburova, a young journalism student. Shot in the back of the head. Moscow. Boris Nemtsov, Russian opposition politician, shot in the streets of Moscow near the Kemlin 2015 Natalia Estemirova leading Russian human rights journalist and activist,shot and killed Nikolai Glushkov – Russian businessman in the UK who had been given asylum – strangled in England Sergei Skripal – UK former spy – double agent poisoned with Novichok gas 2018 Yulia Skirpal UK daughter of Sergei Skripal poisoned with Novichok gas 2018 Sergei Magnitsky – Accountant in USSR who was investigating and exposed tax fraud by the Russian state. Imprisoned and died in prison after being beaten up. Prosecuted by the Russian state even after his death. Maxim Borodin – journalist found dying on the ground outside his 5th floor flat Mikhail Beketov – journalist left brain damaged and later died Oleg Kashin journalist left seriously injured after an assault Tatyana Felgengauer – journalist, stabbed in the neck while at work Alexander Litvinenko. KGB defector. Poisoned with Polonium in London Alexander Perepilichnyy Boris Berezovsky 6 Russian Diplomats who have died since Trump's victory Alexander Kadakin – Russia's ambassador to India Andrey Malanan Senior Russian diplomat in Greece Vitaly Churkin Russian ambassador to the UN Denis Voronenkon Russian politician who had fled to Ukraine Migayas Shirinskiy Russia's ambassador to Sudan Pyotr Verzilov. Pussy Riot Founder. Protested with girlfriend and others at World Cup Final against police persecution while Putin was watching from the stand. Poisoned on 11 Feb 2018 after attending girlfriend's court case. Mother was blocked from seeing him. Doctors refused to explain. Alexei Navalny – opposition leader to Putin. Poisoned on a flight within Russia 20.08.20 In the Crimea UN's June 2018 Crimea report accuses the Russian Federation of grave human rights violations in Ukraine. e.g multiple cases of torture e.g. Ibrahim Mirpochchaev Crimean journalist, abducted with his father and 2 brothers. Beaten for hours, asphyxiated with plastic bags, strangled, repeatedly tasered and violated with a hard probe used to electrocute him internally. Renat Paralamov, Crimean Tartar similar tale, forced confession. Server Karametov, 76 year old with Parkinson's disease prosecuted for holding a placard in support of 70 Crimean tartars being tried for multiple simultaneous peaceful lone demonstrations. Ervin Ibragimov, Tartar leader, dragged off by men in uniform May 2016. Not seen since. Oleg Sentsov, Crimean film maker, sentenced to 20 years in gaol. Olexander Kolchenko, his assistant, sentenced to 10 years. Gennady Afanasayev beaten, suffocated, stripped, threatened with rape and jailed, to force him to testify against Oleg Sentsov. He withdrew his testimony at the trial. Nariman Memediminov, Tartar activist, forcibly committed to a psychiatric hospital- a measure described by his lawyer as punitive psychiatry.
    2
  2487. 2
  2488. 2
  2489. 2
  2490. 2
  2491. 2
  2492. 2
  2493. 2
  2494. 2
  2495. 2
  2496. 2
  2497. 2
  2498. 2
  2499. 2
  2500. 2
  2501. 2
  2502. 2
  2503. 2
  2504. 2
  2505. 2
  2506. 2
  2507. 2
  2508. 2
  2509. 2
  2510. 2
  2511. 2
  2512. 2
  2513. 2
  2514. 2
  2515. 2
  2516. 2
  2517. 2
  2518. 2
  2519. 2
  2520. 2
  2521. 2
  2522. 2
  2523. 2
  2524. 2
  2525. 2
  2526. 2
  2527. 2
  2528. 2
  2529. 2
  2530. 2
  2531. 2
  2532. 2
  2533. 2
  2534. 2
  2535. 2
  2536. 2
  2537. 2
  2538. 2
  2539. 2
  2540. 2
  2541. 2
  2542. 2
  2543. 2
  2544. 2
  2545. 2
  2546. 2
  2547. 2
  2548. 2
  2549. 2
  2550. 2
  2551. 2
  2552. 2
  2553. 2
  2554. 2
  2555. 2
  2556. 2
  2557. 2
  2558. 2
  2559. 2
  2560. 2
  2561. 2
  2562. 2
  2563. 2
  2564. 2
  2565. 2
  2566. 2
  2567. 2
  2568. 2
  2569. 2
  2570. 2
  2571. 2
  2572. 2
  2573. 2
  2574. 2
  2575. 2
  2576. 2
  2577. 2
  2578. 2
  2579. 2
  2580. 2
  2581. 2
  2582. 2
  2583. 2
  2584. 2
  2585. 2
  2586. 2
  2587. 2
  2588. 2
  2589. 2
  2590. 2
  2591. 2
  2592. 2
  2593. 2
  2594. 2
  2595. 2
  2596. 2
  2597. 2
  2598. 2
  2599. 2
  2600. 2
  2601. 2
  2602. 2
  2603. 2
  2604. 2
  2605. 2
  2606. 2
  2607. 2
  2608. 2
  2609. 2
  2610. 2
  2611. 2
  2612. 2
  2613. 2
  2614. 2
  2615. 2
  2616. 2
  2617. 2
  2618. 2
  2619. 2
  2620. 2
  2621. 2
  2622. 2
  2623. 2
  2624. 2
  2625. 2
  2626. 2
  2627. 2
  2628. 2
  2629. 2
  2630. 2
  2631. 2
  2632. 2
  2633. 2
  2634. 2
  2635. 2
  2636. 2
  2637. 2
  2638. 2
  2639. 2
  2640. 2
  2641. 2
  2642. 2
  2643. 2
  2644. 2
  2645. 2
  2646. 2
  2647. 2
  2648. 2
  2649. 2
  2650. 2
  2651. 2
  2652. 2
  2653. 2
  2654. 2
  2655. 2
  2656. 2
  2657. 2
  2658. 2
  2659. 2
  2660. 2
  2661. 2
  2662. 2
  2663. 2
  2664. 2
  2665. 2
  2666. 2
  2667. 2
  2668. 2
  2669. 2
  2670. 2
  2671. 2
  2672. 2
  2673. 2
  2674. 2
  2675. 2
  2676. 2
  2677. 2
  2678. 2
  2679. 2
  2680. 2
  2681. 2
  2682. 2
  2683. 2
  2684. 2
  2685. 2
  2686. 2
  2687. 2
  2688. 2
  2689. 2
  2690. 2
  2691. 2
  2692. 2
  2693. 2
  2694. 2
  2695. 2
  2696. 2
  2697. 2
  2698. 2
  2699. 2
  2700. 2
  2701. 2
  2702. 2
  2703. 2
  2704. 2
  2705. 2
  2706. 2
  2707. 2
  2708. 2
  2709. 2
  2710. 2
  2711. 2
  2712. 2
  2713. 2
  2714. 2
  2715. 2
  2716. 2
  2717. 2
  2718. 2
  2719. 2
  2720. 2
  2721. 2
  2722. 2
  2723. 2
  2724. 2
  2725. 2
  2726. 2
  2727. 2
  2728. 2
  2729. 2
  2730. 2
  2731. 2
  2732. 2
  2733. 2
  2734. 2
  2735. 2
  2736. 2
  2737. 2
  2738. 2
  2739. 2
  2740. 2
  2741. 2
  2742. 2
  2743. 2
  2744. 2
  2745. 2
  2746. 2
  2747. 2
  2748. 2
  2749. 2
  2750. 2
  2751. 2
  2752. 2
  2753. 2
  2754. 2
  2755. 2
  2756. 2
  2757. 2
  2758. 2
  2759. 2
  2760. 2
  2761. 2
  2762. 2
  2763. 2
  2764. 2
  2765. 2
  2766. 2
  2767. 2
  2768. 2
  2769. 2
  2770. 2
  2771. 2
  2772. 2
  2773. 2
  2774. 2
  2775. 2
  2776. 2
  2777. 2
  2778. 2
  2779. 2
  2780. 2
  2781. 2
  2782. 2
  2783. 2
  2784. 2
  2785. 2
  2786. 2
  2787. 2
  2788. 2
  2789. 2
  2790. 2
  2791. 2
  2792. 2
  2793. 2
  2794. 2
  2795. 2
  2796. 2
  2797. 2
  2798. 2
  2799. 2
  2800. 2
  2801.  @fatfat1877  They won't allow us tariff free trade if we're not in the EU. We'd need to be at least in a customs union with the EU which the Tories don't want to be. You make the mistake of thinking that when we're out of the club the EU will allow us to have the privileges of being in the club - like tariff free trade. They won't because others would want to leave if they could get the benefits of being in the EU while not being in it. We'll have to negotiate a deal with them which could take years (deals generally do) and we'll be up against experienced and skillful trade negotiators of the EU while we'll have no experienced trade deal negotiators. What could possibly go wrong? Boris has already given away £7bn of British taxpayers money, lodged in the EU bank, in order to get his current agreement. That's not been publicised. In the meantime, the EU will place tariffs on our exports to the EU making them uncompetitive. We'll have to decide what tariffs to levy on imports. Any tariff will push up prices for British consumers. If we choose to place zero tariffs, it would destroy British industry and agriculture sectors. Also over 80% of our exports are 'services' and about 49% of those are to the EU. The day we leave the EU on hard Brexit terms (no deal) those services would lose their 'passport' to the EU. It saddens me so much that there's so much misunderstanding that I have to console myself by watching videos like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeoT66v4EHg&list=FLGGEn5ziDGQqNRr1m3pwHBg&index=3&t=0s
    2
  2802. 2
  2803. 2
  2804. 2
  2805. 2
  2806. 2
  2807. 2
  2808. 2
  2809. 2
  2810. 2
  2811. 2
  2812. 2
  2813. 2
  2814. 2
  2815. 2
  2816. 2
  2817. 2
  2818. 2
  2819. 2
  2820. 2
  2821. 2
  2822. 2
  2823. 2
  2824. 2
  2825. 2
  2826. 2
  2827. 2
  2828. 2
  2829. 2
  2830. 2
  2831. 2
  2832. 2
  2833. 2
  2834. 2
  2835. 2
  2836. 2
  2837. 2
  2838. 2
  2839. 2
  2840. 2
  2841. 2
  2842. 2
  2843. 2
  2844. 2
  2845. 2
  2846. 2
  2847. 2
  2848. 2
  2849. 2
  2850. 2
  2851. 2
  2852. 2
  2853. 2
  2854. 2
  2855. 2
  2856. 2
  2857. 2
  2858. 2
  2859. 2
  2860. 2
  2861. 2
  2862. 2
  2863. 2
  2864. 2
  2865. 2
  2866. 2
  2867. 2
  2868. 2
  2869. 2
  2870. 2
  2871. 2
  2872. 2
  2873. 2
  2874. 2
  2875. 2
  2876. 2
  2877. 2
  2878. 2
  2879. 2
  2880. 2
  2881. 2
  2882. 2
  2883. 2
  2884. The money we pay to the EU, some of it comes back to the UK in terms of investments in poorer communities and the economic benefits of paying to be a member of that club outweigh the disadvantages. It's the UK government that could do something about those problems if they have the political will. The austerity programme they insist on is theirs not Europe's and the tax cuts that cause a squeeze on public services are a UK government decision not Europe's. (Portugal recovered from the banking crash without any austerity programme) It's convenient for the UK government to let the EU take the blame for everything. You'd find if we came out on a hard Brexit with the Tories in power we'd still have the same crap government that won't do anything about the growing gap between the rich and the poor because basically they represent the rich, though they are careful not to say so. They are sponsored an supported by rich vested interests and they do their bidding in Parliament. They also have their own snouts in the trough. Where do they go when their political careers are over? Director of this, that, and the other company. You have to look at the overall picture, not just one aspect of it. P.S Some of the leadership contenders in the Tory party are connected to companies that have been making a killing out of the current Brexit uncertainty. The EU is not perfect (neither is the UK political system) but there is pressure from inside the EU for reform and we'd be better pressing for that from the inside along with others. On WTO terms the economy would take a hit far larger than anything they would save from EU membership fees.
    2
  2885. 2
  2886. 2
  2887. 2
  2888. 2
  2889. 2
  2890. 2
  2891. 2
  2892. 2
  2893. 2
  2894. 2
  2895. 2
  2896. 2
  2897. 2
  2898. 2
  2899. 2
  2900. 2
  2901. 2
  2902. 2
  2903. 2
  2904. 2
  2905. 2
  2906. 2
  2907. 2
  2908. 2
  2909. 2
  2910. 2
  2911. 2
  2912. 2
  2913. 2
  2914. 2
  2915. 2
  2916. 2
  2917. 2
  2918. 2
  2919. 2
  2920. 2
  2921. 2
  2922. 2
  2923. 2
  2924. 2
  2925. 2
  2926. 2
  2927. 2
  2928. 2
  2929. 2
  2930. 2
  2931. 2
  2932. 2
  2933. 2
  2934. 2
  2935. 2
  2936. 2
  2937. 2
  2938. 2
  2939. 2
  2940. 2
  2941. 2
  2942. 2
  2943. 2
  2944. You want English subtitles for English? It's not difficult to understand if you listen carefully. At least you can get the gist. It starts in the middle of a scene. The Duke of Gloucester (The Lord Protector) says the King is old enough to give a reproof himself, (we don't know to whom) and the Queen should not interfere. The Queen says, if the King's old enough why does he need a protector? Gloucester says he will resign as Protector if the King wants him to. Suffolk or Sussex (can't remember which) intervenes and tells Gloucester to resign. He starts to accuse him of acting as King, and being responsible for the everything that's going wrong in the country. The country is going to the dogs. The heir to the French throne (called the Dauphin) is winning in France where England and France are at war, and Gloucester lords it over the nobles. The Archbishop then accuses Gloucester of over overtaxing the country (via the House of Commons) and overtaxing the clergy. Someone else (we hear but don't see) accuses him of spending too much on buildings and his wife's clothes. The Queen accuses him of corruptly selling official jobs and control of towns in France, and says it's a capital offence. She says the King knows everything. She then goes down and deliberately drops her fan to humiliate the Duchess of Gloucester by getting her to pick it up. The Duchess ignores her request and gets a slap. The Duchess says she would scratch the Queen's face with her nails if she could. The King says the Queen didn't mean any harm (The King is a bit of a weak booby, if you'd not picked up on that). The Duchess threatens the Queen with revenge for the insult. The manipulative Queen pretends to be very distressed and runs off.
    2
  2945. 2
  2946. 2
  2947. 2
  2948. 2
  2949. 2
  2950. 2
  2951. 2
  2952. 2
  2953. 2
  2954. 2
  2955. 2
  2956. 2
  2957. 2
  2958. 2
  2959. 2
  2960. 2
  2961. 2
  2962. 2
  2963. 2
  2964. 2
  2965. 2
  2966. 2
  2967. 2
  2968. 2
  2969. 2
  2970. 2
  2971. 2
  2972. 2
  2973. 2
  2974. 2
  2975. 2
  2976. 2
  2977. 2
  2978. 2
  2979. 2
  2980. 2
  2981. 2
  2982. 2
  2983. 2
  2984. 2
  2985. 2
  2986. 2
  2987. 2
  2988. 2
  2989. 2
  2990. 2
  2991. 2
  2992. 2
  2993. 2
  2994. 2
  2995. 2
  2996. 2
  2997. 2
  2998. 2
  2999. 2
  3000. 2
  3001. 2
  3002. 2
  3003. 2
  3004. 2
  3005. 2
  3006. 2
  3007. 2
  3008. 2
  3009. 2
  3010. 2
  3011. 2
  3012. 2
  3013. 2
  3014. 2
  3015. 2
  3016. 2
  3017. 2
  3018. 2
  3019. 2
  3020. 2
  3021. 2
  3022. 2
  3023. 2
  3024. 2
  3025. 2
  3026. 2
  3027. 2
  3028. 2
  3029. 2
  3030. 2
  3031. 2
  3032. 2
  3033. 2
  3034. 2
  3035. 2
  3036. 2
  3037. 2
  3038. 2
  3039. 2
  3040. 2
  3041. 2
  3042. 2
  3043. 2
  3044. 2
  3045. 2
  3046. 2
  3047. 2
  3048. 2
  3049. 2
  3050. 2
  3051. 2
  3052. 2
  3053. 2
  3054. 2
  3055. 2
  3056. 2
  3057. 2
  3058. 2
  3059. 2
  3060. 2
  3061. 2
  3062. 2
  3063. 2
  3064. 2
  3065. 2
  3066. 2
  3067. 2
  3068. 2
  3069. 2
  3070. 2
  3071. 2
  3072. 2
  3073. 2
  3074. 2
  3075. 2
  3076. 2
  3077. 2
  3078. 2
  3079. 2
  3080. 2
  3081. 2
  3082. 2
  3083. 2
  3084. 2
  3085. 2
  3086. 2
  3087. 2
  3088. 2
  3089. 2
  3090. 2
  3091. 2
  3092. 2
  3093. 2
  3094. 2
  3095. 2
  3096. 2
  3097. 2
  3098. 2
  3099. 2
  3100. 2
  3101. 2
  3102. 2
  3103. 2
  3104. 2
  3105. 2
  3106. 2
  3107. 2
  3108. 2
  3109. 2
  3110. 2
  3111. 2
  3112. 2
  3113. 2
  3114. 2
  3115. 2
  3116. 2
  3117. 2
  3118. 2
  3119. 2
  3120. 2
  3121. 2
  3122. 2
  3123. 2
  3124. 2
  3125. 2
  3126. 2
  3127. 2
  3128. 2
  3129. 2
  3130. 2
  3131. 2
  3132. 2
  3133. 2
  3134. 2
  3135. 2
  3136. 2
  3137. 2
  3138. 2
  3139. 2
  3140. 2
  3141. 2
  3142. 2
  3143. 2
  3144. 2
  3145. 2
  3146. 2
  3147. 2
  3148. 2
  3149. 2
  3150. 2
  3151. 2
  3152. 2
  3153. 2
  3154. 2
  3155. 2
  3156. 2
  3157. 2
  3158. 2
  3159. 2
  3160. 2
  3161. 2
  3162. 2
  3163. 2
  3164. 2
  3165. 2
  3166. 2
  3167. 2
  3168.  @Kraken54321  I don't know why they don't collect data on recovery rates. I wondered myself but often things are not done if it costs money and it's not considered essential. There have been films of hospitals filling up with Covid patients earlier in the epidemic. There are some on youtube if you look but journalists only put themselves at risk and get in the way of medics to be doing too much of that. The government usually pumps extra money into the service to deal with Winter flu but there have been occasions in the past when people were lying in corridors or waiting in ambulances outside the hospital because there weren't enough beds so they have been overwhelmed to the extent that patients were not always getting treatment when they needed it. In the time of Covid hospitals were reluctant to take patients from care homes for fear of being overwhelmed. My brother in law was in hospital with Covid earlier this year. My sister was not allowed to visit for fear of contracting Covid but then the hospital told her they would have to send him home to her as 'the government wanted the beds'. Hospitals can easily become overwhelmed in situations where you have a pandemic and seasonal flu at the same time. There isn't the spare capacity in terms of beds and intensive care beds because of the cuts over the years. To be fair though, health ssystems around the world have been in danger of being overwhelmed. I've seen videos of dead bodies in Mexico stored in lorries in the street because the morgues were full and hearses queueing up for the cemeteries. In the time of Spanish flu, in the USA in some places bodies were abandoned on the streets.
    2
  3169. 2
  3170. 2
  3171. 2
  3172. 2
  3173. 2
  3174. 2
  3175. 2
  3176. 2
  3177. 2
  3178. 2
  3179. 2
  3180. 2
  3181. 2
  3182. 2
  3183. 2
  3184. 2
  3185. 2
  3186. 2
  3187. 2
  3188. 2
  3189. 2
  3190. 2
  3191. 2
  3192. 2
  3193. 2
  3194. 2
  3195. 2
  3196. 2
  3197. 2
  3198. 2
  3199. 2
  3200. 2
  3201. 2
  3202. 2
  3203. 2
  3204. 2
  3205. 2
  3206. 2
  3207. 2
  3208. 2
  3209. 2
  3210. 2
  3211. 2
  3212. 2
  3213. 2
  3214. 2
  3215. 2
  3216. 2
  3217. 2
  3218. 2
  3219. 2
  3220. 2
  3221. 2
  3222. 2
  3223. 2
  3224. 2
  3225. 2
  3226. 2
  3227. 2
  3228. 2
  3229. 2
  3230. 2
  3231. 2
  3232. 2
  3233. 2
  3234. 2
  3235. 2
  3236. 2
  3237. 2
  3238. 2
  3239. 2
  3240. 2
  3241. 2
  3242. 2
  3243. 2
  3244. 2
  3245. 2
  3246. 2
  3247. 2
  3248. 2
  3249. 2
  3250. 2
  3251. 2
  3252. 2
  3253. 2
  3254. 2
  3255. 2
  3256. 2
  3257. 2
  3258. 2
  3259. 2
  3260. 2
  3261. 2
  3262. 2
  3263. 2
  3264. 2
  3265. 2
  3266. 2
  3267. 2
  3268. 2
  3269. 2
  3270. 2
  3271. 2
  3272. 2
  3273. 2
  3274. 2
  3275. 2
  3276. 2
  3277. 2
  3278. 2
  3279. 2
  3280. 2
  3281. 2
  3282. 2
  3283. 2
  3284. 2
  3285. 2
  3286. 2
  3287. 2
  3288. 2
  3289. 2
  3290. 2
  3291. 2
  3292. 2
  3293. 2
  3294. 2
  3295. 2
  3296. 2
  3297. 2
  3298. 2
  3299. 2
  3300. 2
  3301. 2
  3302. 2
  3303. 2
  3304. 2
  3305. 2
  3306. 2
  3307. 2
  3308. 2
  3309. 2
  3310. 2
  3311. 2
  3312. 2
  3313. 2
  3314. 2
  3315. 2
  3316. 2
  3317. 2
  3318. 2
  3319. 2
  3320. 2
  3321. 2
  3322. 2
  3323. 2
  3324. 2
  3325. 2
  3326. 2
  3327. 2
  3328. 2
  3329. 2
  3330. 2
  3331. 2
  3332. 2
  3333. 2
  3334. 2
  3335. 2
  3336. 2
  3337. 2
  3338. 2
  3339. 2
  3340. 2
  3341. 2
  3342. 2
  3343. 2
  3344. 2
  3345. 2
  3346. 2
  3347. 2
  3348. 2
  3349. 2
  3350. 2
  3351. 2
  3352. 2
  3353. 2
  3354. 2
  3355. 2
  3356. 2
  3357. 2
  3358. 2
  3359. 2
  3360. 2
  3361. 2
  3362. 2
  3363. 2
  3364. 2
  3365. 2
  3366. 2
  3367. 2
  3368. 2
  3369. 2
  3370. 2
  3371. 2
  3372. 2
  3373. 2
  3374. 2
  3375. 2
  3376. 2
  3377. 2
  3378. 2
  3379. 2
  3380. 2
  3381. 2
  3382. 2
  3383. 2
  3384. 2
  3385. 2
  3386. 2
  3387. 2
  3388. 2
  3389. 2
  3390. 2
  3391. 2
  3392. 2
  3393. 2
  3394. 2
  3395. 2
  3396. 2
  3397. 2
  3398. 2
  3399. 2
  3400. 2
  3401. 2
  3402. 2
  3403. 2
  3404. 2
  3405. 2
  3406. 2
  3407. 2
  3408. 2
  3409. 2
  3410. 2
  3411. 2
  3412. 2
  3413. 2
  3414. 2
  3415. 2
  3416. 2
  3417. 2
  3418. 2
  3419. 2
  3420. 2
  3421. 2
  3422. 2
  3423. 2
  3424. 2
  3425. 2
  3426. 2
  3427. 2
  3428. 2
  3429. 2
  3430. 2
  3431. 2
  3432.  @rogerwoodhouse7945  The Tories are very good at drawing themselves through the mud. They need no help from me. When we leave the EU we will need trade deals to come up from WTO trade terms (which is like the 4th division of trade). The largest economy outside of the EU is the US but the US will know we need deals more than they do and will expect us to accept goods produced according to their lower standards in treatment of the environment, food, animal welfare and chemical use. They will want us to accept their aggressive foreign policy agenda and assist them in it to reduce their costs. Also the Tories hate regulation and contain a lot of libertarians who will want us to emulate US policies because it suits them and their right wing ideologues and their wealthy sponsors hoping to get even more wealthy. Here's a little video for you. I don't think you will like it though https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HDFegpX5gI&list=FLGGEn5ziDGQqNRr1m3pwHBg&index=18&t=0s and don't forget that at the moment we trade tariff free with the EU but after a no deal Brexit not only will all the deals we have with other countries, as part of the EU, immediately lapse, but the EU will slap tariffs on our exports to them e.g 40% on lamb. We will also have to decide our tariffs and if we place tariffs on imports the cost of living will go up for everyone in the UK but if we choose zero tariffs our manufacturing and agricultural sectors will be unable to compete against cheap imports from countries with low workers rights and poor conditions for them, and our agriculture and manufacturing sectors may be unable to continue to survive.
    2
  3433. 2
  3434. 2
  3435. 2
  3436. 2
  3437. 2
  3438. 2
  3439. 2
  3440. 2
  3441. 2
  3442. 2
  3443. 2
  3444. 2
  3445. 2
  3446. 2
  3447. 2
  3448. 2
  3449. 2
  3450. 2
  3451. 2
  3452. 2
  3453. 2
  3454. 2
  3455. 2
  3456. 2
  3457. 2
  3458. 2
  3459. 2
  3460. 2
  3461. 2
  3462. 2
  3463. 2
  3464. 2
  3465. 2
  3466. 2
  3467. 2
  3468. 2
  3469. 2
  3470. 2
  3471. 2
  3472. 2
  3473. 2
  3474. 2
  3475. 2
  3476. 2
  3477. 2
  3478. 2
  3479. 2
  3480. 2
  3481. 2
  3482. 2
  3483. 2
  3484. 2
  3485. 2
  3486. 2
  3487. 2
  3488. 2
  3489. 2
  3490. 2
  3491. 2
  3492. 2
  3493. 2
  3494. 2
  3495. 2
  3496. 2
  3497. 2
  3498. 2
  3499. 2
  3500. 2
  3501. 2
  3502. 2
  3503. 2
  3504. 2
  3505. 2
  3506. 2
  3507. 2
  3508. 2
  3509. 2
  3510. 2
  3511. 2
  3512.  @yuccatree4298  Strangely enough I read a book called 'Hell or Connaught' and realised there were even worse people than Cromwell in Irish history though he did some terrible things. Some of those who followed him were for genocide. I think people these days have a more nuanced reading of history. It's not all presented as black and white, but it's one of those subjects that the present government and many young people regard as 'useless' so it's less and less popular as a subject to take. Both my parents were Irish but I was born in England. We are all basically the same peoples in these islands. It was the Normans who conquered England and were in control when they also conquered Wales, Ireland, and attempted to conquer Scotland. and they used a tactic of divide and conquer so they allied with some Irish clans and then conquered them after conquering their enemies first. (The Romans did the same thing with the British tribes when they conquered England) After that Britain followed up by trying to consolidate their grip on Ireland and keep control of it. (I've never read a sadder history than Ireland's. There seemed to be no light at the end of the tunnel for century after century). I see no intention in the UK to do Ireland down now,. Things have changed and the attitude to Ireland is a friendly one. However it's true that politically Britain will put her interests first (as other countries do) if they believe there's a clash with the interests of neighbouring countries. It should be possible to avoid a clash with good will on both sides, I hope, though Brexit in the current UK political set up is a bit of a political nightmare apart from the economic damage that will occur. I have listened to JOB on LBC on youtube now and again. He makes some good points though his attitude can be annoying at times.
    2
  3513. 2
  3514. 2
  3515. 2
  3516. 2
  3517. 2
  3518. 2
  3519. 2
  3520. 2
  3521. 2
  3522. 2
  3523. 2
  3524. 2
  3525. 2
  3526. 2
  3527. 2
  3528. 2
  3529. 2
  3530. 2
  3531. 2
  3532. 2
  3533. 2
  3534. 2
  3535. 2
  3536. 2
  3537. 2
  3538. 2
  3539. 2
  3540. 2
  3541. 2
  3542. 2
  3543. 2
  3544. 2
  3545. 2
  3546. 2
  3547. 2
  3548. 2
  3549. 2
  3550. 2
  3551. 2
  3552. 2
  3553. 2
  3554. 2
  3555. 2
  3556. 2
  3557. 2
  3558. 2
  3559. 2
  3560. 2
  3561. 2
  3562. 2
  3563. 2
  3564. 2
  3565. 2
  3566. 2
  3567. 2
  3568. 2
  3569. 2
  3570. 2
  3571. 2
  3572. 2
  3573. 2
  3574. 2
  3575. 2
  3576. 2
  3577. 2
  3578. 2
  3579. 2
  3580. 2
  3581. 2
  3582. 2
  3583. 2
  3584. 2
  3585. 2
  3586. 2
  3587. 2
  3588. 2
  3589. 2
  3590. 2
  3591. 2
  3592. 2
  3593. 2
  3594. 2
  3595. 2
  3596. 2
  3597. 2
  3598. 2
  3599. 2
  3600. 2
  3601. 2
  3602. 2
  3603. 2
  3604. 2
  3605. 2
  3606. 2
  3607. 2
  3608. 2
  3609. 2
  3610. 2
  3611. 2
  3612. 2
  3613. 2
  3614. 2
  3615. 2
  3616. 2
  3617. 2
  3618. 2
  3619. 2
  3620. 2
  3621. 2
  3622. 2
  3623. 2
  3624. 2
  3625. 2
  3626. 2
  3627. 2
  3628. 2
  3629. 2
  3630. 2
  3631. 2
  3632. 2
  3633. 2
  3634. 2
  3635. 2
  3636. 2
  3637. 2
  3638. 2
  3639. 2
  3640. 2
  3641. 2
  3642. 2
  3643. 2
  3644. 2
  3645. 2
  3646. 2
  3647. 2
  3648. 2
  3649. 2
  3650. 2
  3651. 2
  3652. 2
  3653. 2
  3654. 2
  3655. 2
  3656. 2
  3657. 2
  3658. 2
  3659. 2
  3660. 2
  3661. 2
  3662. 2
  3663. 2
  3664. 2
  3665. 2
  3666. 2
  3667. 2
  3668. 2
  3669. 2
  3670. 2
  3671. 2
  3672. 2
  3673. 2
  3674. 2
  3675. 2
  3676. 2
  3677. 2
  3678. 2
  3679. 2
  3680. 2
  3681. 2
  3682. 2
  3683. 2
  3684. 2
  3685. 2
  3686. 2
  3687. 2
  3688. 2
  3689. 2
  3690. 2
  3691. 2
  3692. 2
  3693. 2
  3694. 2
  3695. 2
  3696. 2
  3697. 2
  3698. 2
  3699. 2
  3700. 2
  3701. 2
  3702. 2
  3703. 2
  3704. 2
  3705. 2
  3706. 2
  3707. 2
  3708. 2
  3709. 2
  3710. 2
  3711. 2
  3712. 2
  3713. 2
  3714. 2
  3715. 2
  3716. 2
  3717. 2
  3718. 2
  3719. 2
  3720. 2
  3721. 2
  3722. 2
  3723. 2
  3724. 2
  3725. 2
  3726. 2
  3727. 2
  3728. 2
  3729. 2
  3730. 2
  3731. 2
  3732. 2
  3733. 2
  3734. 2
  3735. 2
  3736. 2
  3737. 2
  3738. 2
  3739. 2
  3740. 2
  3741. 2
  3742. 2
  3743. 2
  3744. 2
  3745. 2
  3746. 2
  3747. 2
  3748. 2
  3749. 2
  3750. 2
  3751. 2
  3752. 2
  3753. 2
  3754. 2
  3755. 2
  3756. 2
  3757. 2
  3758. 2
  3759. 2
  3760. 2
  3761. 2
  3762. 2
  3763. 2
  3764.  @TheListOf  I'm not bashing Russia, only Putin and his cronies. The real circumstances are these. (A list of Putin's opponents who were mysteriously murdered, injured, or imprisoned:  Galina Starovoitova, opposition Duma Deputy killed Sergei Yushenkov, co-chairman of the Liberal Russia political party, shot and killed Mikhail Trepashkin jailed after a secret trial on espionage charges. Yuri Shchekochikhin, poisoned, Russian authorities refused to allow an autopsy Mikhail Trepashkin, a former KGB spy imprisoned Mikhail Khodorkovsky, sent to Siberia Nikolai Girenko, a prominent human rights defender, shot dead in his home Paul Klebnikov, editor Russian edition Forbes magazine, shot and killed in Moscow Viktor Yushchenko, anti-Russian candidate for the presidency of the Ukraine, is poisoned by Dioxin. Andrei Kozlov, shot and killed in Moscow Anna Politkovskaya,journalist, shot and killed in Moscow. Paul M. Joyal, shot in street Stanslav Markelov Russian human rights attorney shot in the back of the head Anastasia Barburova, a young journalism student. Shot in the back of the head. Moscow. Boris Nemtsov, Russian opposition politician, shot in the streets of Moscow near the Kemlin 2015 Natalia Estemirova leading Russian human rights journalist and activist,shot and killed Nikolai Glushkov – Russian businessman in the UK who had been given asylum – strangled in England Sergei Skripal – UK former spy – double agent poisoned with Novichok 2018 Yulia Skirpal UK daughter of Sergei Skripal poisoned with Novichok 2018 Sergei Magnitsky – Accountant in USSR who was investigating and exposed tax fraud by the Russian state. Imprisoned and died in prison after being beaten up. Prosecuted by the Russian state even after his death. Maxim Borodin – journalist found dying on the ground outside his 5th floor flat Mikhail Beketov – journalist left brain damaged and later died Oleg Kashin journalist left seriously injured after an assault Tatyana Felgengauer – journalist, stabbed in the neck while at work Alexander Litvinenko. KGB defector. Poisoned with Polonium in London Alexander Perepilichnyy Boris Berezovsky 6 Russian Diplomats who have died since Trump's victory Alexander Kadakin – Russia's ambassador to India Andrey Malanan Senior Russian diplomat in Greece Vitaly Churkin Russian ambassador to the UN Denis Voronenkon Russian politician who had fled to Ukraine Migayas Shirinskiy Russia's ambassador to Sudan Pyotr Verzilov. Pussy Riot Founder. Protested with girlfriend and others at World Cup Final against police persecution while Putin was watching from the stand. Poisoned on 11 Feb 2018 after attending girlfriend's court case. Mother was blocked from seeing him. Doctors refused to explain. Alexei Navalny – opposition leader to Putin. Poisoned on a flight within Russia 20.08.20 In the Crimea UN's June 2018 Crimea report accuses the Russian Federation of grave human rights violations in Ukraine. e.g multiple cases of torture e.g. Ibrahim Mirpochchaev Crimean journalist, abducted with his father and 2 brothers. Beaten for hours, asphyxiated with plastic bags, strangled, repeatedly tasered and violated with a hard probe used to electrocute him internally. Renat Paralamov, Crimean Tartar similar tale, forced confession. Server Karametov, 76 year old with Parkinson's disease prosecuted for holding a placard in support of 70 Crimean tartars being tried for multiple simultaneous peaceful lone demonstrations. Ervin Ibragimov, Tartar leader, dragged off by men in uniform May 2016. Not seen since. Oleg Sentsov, Crimean film maker, sentenced to 20 years in gaol. Olexander Kolchenko, his assistant, sentenced to 10 years. Gennady Afanasayev beaten, suffocated, stripped, threatened with rape and jailed, to force him to testify against Oleg Sentsov. He withdrew his testimony at the trial. Nariman Memediminov, Tartar activist, forcibly committed to a psychiatric hospital- a measure described by his lawyer as punitive psychiatry. Vladimir Kara-Murza, journalist and opposition activist alleged he was poisoned twice by Russian security services. He nearly died after suffering kidney failure in 2015 and two years later went into a coma for a week. Pyotr Verzilov, another Kremlin critic, accused Russia's intelligence services of poisoning him in 2018, when he fell ill after a court hearing, losing his sight and ability to speak. He too was treated by Berlin's Charité hospital, and asked the Berlin-based Cinema for Peace Foundation to arrange Mr Navalny's airlift there.)
    2
  3765. 2
  3766. 2
  3767. 2
  3768. 2
  3769. 2
  3770. 2
  3771. 2
  3772. 2
  3773. 2
  3774. 2
  3775. 2
  3776. 2
  3777. 2
  3778. 2
  3779. 2
  3780. 2
  3781. 2
  3782. 2
  3783. 2
  3784. 2
  3785. 2
  3786. 2
  3787. 2
  3788. 2
  3789. 2
  3790. 2
  3791. 2
  3792. 2
  3793. 2
  3794. 2
  3795. 2
  3796. 2
  3797. 2
  3798. 2
  3799. 2
  3800. 2
  3801. 2
  3802. 2
  3803. 2
  3804. 2
  3805. 2
  3806. 2
  3807. 2
  3808. 2
  3809. 2
  3810. 2
  3811. 2
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. 1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. There's no evidence that the UK can't support its welfare state. You are not paying for Labour's disaster but for the worldwide collapse of the banking system in 2008. Labour's Gordon Brown, for all his faults, saved people's savings by bailing out the UK banks after the crash, but it cost the country dear. Gordon Brown also persuaded Europe and the US that they should also bailout their banks. Corbyn is not relying on a "money tree" but on more tax from wealthier citizens and corporations and also from economic growth from greater government investment. He was going to create a state investment bank. Germany's banks invest a lot more in their economy but our banks are too short sighted and risk averse when it comes to investing in the economy so all our thriving small companies and all our good inventions are bought by foreign investors these days. We don't get the benefit. Yes there are more jobs, partly because the population has increased so demand has increased but also these jobs are often part time, or zero hours, poorly paid. The rich don't always provide work. Some inherit their wealth and live on the income from investments. Also under the Conservatives a lot more money laundering from foreign crooks has gone on and much of it has gone into central London properties which are then left empty but they are now buying properties outside of London. Donald Trump gave the Carrier company in the US millions to invest in a new plant but that did not produce jobs as intended by Trump, because the company used the money to create an automated plant and they exported 1000 jobs to Mexico..
    1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. princeofexcess You say "correlation does not equal causation" That's true of all assertions about social sciences including economics and politics because it's not possible to do controlled experiments as with pure sciences. So it's just as true about the assertions you are making about "pure capitalism". However what distinguishes scandinavian countries is their taxation regimes which are designed to reduce inequalities of income and these fund a greater welfare system, than say in the USA or China. The fact that there is such a correlation between those types of regimes and higher positions on the happiness index is something to take account of. In fact there's a correlation in the wider world too, in that democracies that have less inequality are generally happier than those that have greater inequality. Inequality is increasing in capitalist countries whose governments are not acting to stem or reduce it. For instance it has been said that in the USA workers generally have not had a real terms increase in wages since the 1970s. In the UK, since the advent of a governments whose policies have been to reduce the state welfare system and the public sector generally and be less interventionist, the gap between rich and poor has been growing and wages for the poorest have been pretty stagnant. You have to take into account globalisation of the economy also. The competition for richer countries now, is from countries that pay their workers very low wages in first world terms. It's hard for national governments to isolate their countries from these effects because capital investment can be moved around the world to wherever costs are lowest and profits highest. It's interesting that Trump is trying to do something about this in the USA (or says he is) because his stated proposals are "interventionist".
    1
  3945. 1
  3946. Your example of the middle ages is not a good one. In the middle ages capitalism was just beginning in a small way. The middle ages is categorised more by feudalism rather than capitalism. You say life was miserable because "life was miserable back in the day" ? That's no explanation at all. You say it would be even more miserable "if the economic system would not be so capitalistic" . Well, no. There were non capitalistic countries that were not as miserable as capitalist ones as Gaughin and Robert Louis Stevenson found when they visited places like Tahiti and Samoa which they liked so much they decided to stay. Capitalism starts out allowing social mobility but it has a tendency towards monopoly and the accumulation of most of the capital in fewer and fewer hands so it does increase inequality eventually unless deliberate state intervention acts to reduce that tendency. There's no reason why happiness should be a "dumb goal" once societies have reached a certain level of development and sophistication. Your example of "democracy" is quoting something illegal. I never advocated illegality and I'm not talking about democracy on a micro scale, but the right of everyone in a society to vote for their government. The best thing about capitalism, to my mind, is that it involves a growth and rapid spread of technology which has resulted in great advances in such areas as healthcare, but it needs democratic control by governments otherwise all the benefits end up unevenly distributed. For instance in the USA there are many people who have no healthcare cover. Though Obamacare reduced the number of those without, it still didn't cover everyone and now Trump is trying to reverse that, or, failing that, work towards ensuring it will fail over time.
    1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. 1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. 1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278.  @pauld5723  You could actually look it up. He has a house building programme (he has begun building over 56,000 homes), funded an anti-pollution programme, which will help to protect schoolchildren from toxic air https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/schools-benefit-from-mayors-air-quality-audits, he has a tree planting programme He has an anti crime programme https://sadiq.london/campaign/crime/ https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/mayor-announces-thousands-of-new-street-trees he capped some tube fares and introduced 2 bus journey for the price of one . This helped low paid workers in the city. He stopped the wasteful spending on Bojo's unnecessary vanity project 'The Garden Bridge' which was running into financial trouble and threatening to soak up ever more taxpayers money when the project had not even secured the land on the south side of the bridge to build that end of it. These are further promises for 2021 https://labourlist.org/2021/04/5-policy-pledges-in-sadiq-khans-2021-election-labour-manifesto-for-london/ London's crime increased as a result of the Tory government making huge cuts to funding of local authorities and police budgets resulting in 20,000 fewer police officers since 2010. Khan put some London money back into police budgets but he didn't have enough spare to make up for the huge government cuts. He pushed the Metropolitan police to do more stop and search to combat knife crime. His Tory opponent, Shaun Bailey, was against that as he said it was racist. The Tory government has cut its funding to local authorities by 80% since 2010 and local councils had to cut funding for leisure centres, your centres and day care centres as a result as well as other projects aimed at young people. The government probably hoped that people will blame local authorities/Mayors for the consequences of that. Some people blame him for TfL's debt but he actually paid off more of it than when Boris Johnson was Mayor. However Covid lockdowns have since affected its income stream.
    1
  4279. This is what he has done and what he has promised to do in his next term: He has a house building programme (he has begun building over 56,000 homes), funded an anti-pollution programme, which will help to protect schoolchildren from toxic air https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/schools-benefit-from-mayors-air-quality-audits, he has a tree planting programme He has an anti crime programme https://sadiq.london/campaign/crime/ https://www.london.gov.uk/press-releases/mayoral/mayor-announces-thousands-of-new-street-trees he capped some tube fares and introduced 2 bus journey for the price of one . This helped low paid workers in the city. He stopped the wasteful spending on Bojo's unnecessary vanity project 'The Garden Bridge' which was running into financial trouble and threatening to soak up ever more taxpayers money when the project had not even secured the land on the south side of the bridge to build that end of it. These are further promises for 2021 https://labourlist.org/2021/04/5-policy-pledges-in-sadiq-khans-2021-election-labour-manifesto-for-london/ London's crime increased as a result of the Tory government making huge cuts to funding of local authorities and police budgets resulting in 20,000 fewer police officers since 2010. Khan put some London money back into police budgets but he didn't have enough spare to make up for the huge government cuts. He pushed the Metropolitan police to do more stop and search to combat knife crime. His Tory opponent, Shaun Bailey, was against that as he said it was racist. The Tory government has cut its funding to local authorities by 80% since 2010 and local councils had to cut funding for leisure centres, your centres and day care centres as a result as well as other projects aimed at young people. The government probably hoped that people will blame local authorities/Mayors for the consequences of that. Some people blame him for TfL's debt but he actually paid off more of it than when Boris Johnson was Mayor. However Covid lockdowns have since affected its income stream.
    1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300. 1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325.  @ruedigerpreiss9307  From The New Yorker' But one irony is easy to discern: Assange clearly believed that a Donald J. Trump Presidency would benefit him, and yet it was the Trump Administration that sought to redefine WikiLeaks as a “non-state hostile intelligence service”—an organization that did not belong within the ambit of journalism. Assange, a devoted opponent of what he describes as American imperial power, has welcomed Trump’s degradation of U.S. norms and institutions.' From The Guardian. 'Trump celebrated WikiLeaks on the election trail, giving them shout-outs 164 times in the last month of the campaign alone. “WikiLeaks – I love WikiLeaks,” he told one rally. He told another “This WikiLeaks is like a treasure trove.” After the election, Trump continued to cite Assange approvingly. “The dishonest media likes saying that I am in agreement with Julian Assange – wrong,” he tweeted during the presidential transition in January 2017. “I simply state what he states, it is for the people ... to make up their own minds as to the truth.” From Salon.com n a twist worthy of an O. Henry story — or possibly a classic Greek tragedy — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's own hubris is what led ultimately to his arrest. For, without Assange, we would likely not have a President Donald Trump, and without a President Trump, Assange would likely not have been hauled out of the Ecuadorian embassy on Thursday, under arrest by British authorities responding to an extradition request from the Trump administration that Assange himself worked so tirelessly to elect. Etc etc. There are lots of similar articles.
    1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397.  @mattstuart2550  Ken Livingstone introduced the Oyster travel card and the congestion zones. Sadiq Khan increased the London Living Wage, froze tube fares and introduced 2 journeys for one price bus fares. He is taking measures to cut down on road pollution, has increased stop and search and poured more money into policing after the Tories cut police budgets which led to a loss of 20,000 police officers. He didn't have the funds to make up for the enormous government cuts though. They have all tried to build affordable houses. Boris Johnson's promise to fund 20,000 more police officers is just undoing Tory damage although if you read the small print, the funding won't all be used on police officers. Some of it will go on Admin. If Boris has done anything other Mayors 'could not', don't forget he had the backing of a Tory government which always did their best to work against Labour Mayors so as not to allow them to be seen as too successful. There were failing rail services that TfL offered to take over in London but Failing Grayling Tory Transport Minister admitted he didn't allow it because he didn't want them to come under the control of a Labour Mayor - nothing to do with the sense or efficiency of the proposal which was supported by everyone else (outside of the Tory government). Corbyn would do what he says but he won't get the chance because the Tories though performing poorly in office, are good at propaganda and destroying the credibility of any significant opponents.
    1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. You may not be a millennial but you can't spell 'instantaneously'. This is the 'alienation' created by unrestrained capitalism. It's not totally the parents' fault when the parents have less and less time with their kids while they are working long hours or at several jobs in order to keep their heads above water and when the parents are fighting an uphill battle against all the messages coming to kids from other sources in the media. It's the same as trying to teach kids 1940s values when they grew up in the 1960s. In the past people may have suffered stress but at least they suffered it in a more humane atmosphere. More and more now people are treated like robots. I saw things getting worse and worse over the years. More and more cuts to jobs without the work being cut and so the remaining workers have more and more to deal with. Pay falling below inflation levels. Employers not caring whether you do a good job any more, only whether you make maximum money for the shareholders. Knowledge and experience is not valued. There's a checklist you can follow instead and don't deviate from that no matter what. More and more senior people don't know what they are doing. They are just good talkers and good presenters but it's all superficial. They are often rewarded purely for cutting costs and jobs . The people who do know what they are doing are not listened to and leave or retire. Maybe adults and schools don't teach millennials this because they don't want to depress them too early in their childhood.
    1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. 1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524.  @VladimirOnOccasion  That's from someone who doesn't understand the significance of the information they have. Here is the answer to that putting it in context:.'There has been a lot of talk on social media about "false positive" test results after several commentators suggested they might be seriously skewing the coronavirus figures - but that is based on a misunderstanding of the impact of false positives. Talk Radio host Julia Hartley-Brewer has claimed that "nine out of 10 of the positive cases of Covid we are finding in the community when we do random testing, when anyone just puts themselves forward, will be wrong. They will not be people who have got coronavirus." Could it be true that 90% of positive results from tests in the community - that means tests not carried out in hospitals - are false? The answer is "no" - there is no way that so-called false positives have had such an impact on the figures. Hartley-Brewer referred to both "random testing" and "anyone [who] just puts themselves forward", which are different things, and the difference between them is important. Also, there are many other signs that the rising number of positive tests is truly reflecting the virus spreading, for example a subsequent rise in Covid hospitalisations. What is a false positive? A false positive is when someone who does not have coronavirus, tests positive for it. No test is 100% accurate - there will always be some people who test positive when they do not have the disease, or test negative when they do have it. False positives in any testing programme are important - especially when there is low prevalence of a disease - because they could potentially make us think there are significantly more cases of something than there really are. The false positive rate usually refers to the number of people who are not infected but get positive results, as a proportion of all the people tested who really don't have the virus. We do not know what the precise rate is though. Dr Paul Birrell, a statistician at the Medical Research Council's Biostatistics Unit at the University of Cambridge, says: "The false positive rate is not well understood and could potentially vary according to where and why the test is being taken. A figure of 0.5% for the false positive rate is often assumed." Randomness is the key The most important thing to know about the impact of false positives is that it varies hugely depending on who is being tested. What Hartley-Brewer said confused the idea of random testing with community testing for Covid. Those are two different situations, and false positives have a very different impact in each case. If you tested 1,000 people at random for Covid-19 in early September, for example, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) infection study suggests you should have expected one of them to actually have the virus. With a false positive rate of 0.8% - a figure used by Ms Hartley-Brewer and within the broad range of what we think might be the actual rate for community testing - you would get eight false positives. So in that context, it's true that roughly 90% of positives would be false. But - crucially - the people going for community testing for Covid-19 (at places such as drive-through centres) are not a random sample of the public. They are people who have symptoms, are in care homes or are in hot-spot areas. PA MEDIA Figures for late September from Public Health England show that 7% of community tests were positive. That means if 1,000 people were tested with a false positive rate of 0.8%, eight would be false positives, but 70 would be true positives - the vast majority. So the daily case count is not being skewed significantly by false positives. There will also be some false negatives, meaning that some people who actually have Covid are not being counted. When we put it to Hartley-Brewer that she had misinterpreted explanations of the impact of false positives, she pointed us to other articles that also discussed the impact on random samples of the population, rather than on people who are much more likely to have the virus. There are other signs of real positive results People do not get admitted to hospital by false positives, so if more people are in hospital with Covid, then you can be pretty sure that is due to genuine cases. The same is true of the number of deaths. Dr Birrell says that to be certain cases really are increasing, the daily case count "should always be considered alongside other information sources, such as the hospitalisations or deaths, or the community surveys run by the ONS or REACT".
    1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. 1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630. 1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642. 1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650. 1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654. 1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666. 1
  4667. 1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672. 1
  4673. 1
  4674. 1
  4675. 1
  4676. 1
  4677. 1
  4678. 1
  4679. 1
  4680. 1
  4681. 1
  4682. 1
  4683. 1
  4684. 1
  4685. 1
  4686. 1
  4687. 1
  4688. 1
  4689. 1
  4690. 1
  4691. 1
  4692. 1
  4693. 1
  4694. 1
  4695. 1
  4696. 1
  4697. 1
  4698. 1
  4699. This is one reason for problems In early 2021, Operose Health, a UK subsidiary of Centene (a US company), took over a group of London practices, AT Medics. They run 32 practices in London and 70 nationwide. Panorama analysed NHS data for 6,500 practices across England. It found: For every 2,000 registered patients, there are on average the equivalent of 1.2 full-time GPs But at Operose practices the average is half that, at a little over 0.6 full time equivalent GPs Operose employs six times as many physician associates as the NHS average, according to NHS data While undercover, Panorama was also told about a backlog of important patient referral documents, often unread by doctors or pharmacists for months. Here's more' A BMA survey has revealed that four out of five locum GPs in England (84%) cannot find work, despite patients waiting weeks for appointments. An overwhelming number of those who responded to the survey said they could not find suitable positions and because of that, more than 50% are expecting to make changes to their work or career plans in the next year. More worryingly, many (33%) have already made definite plans to change work or career paths, and the BMA fears patient access will worsen in England as one-third of respondents (31%) who are planning for change say the lack of suitable shifts is forcing them to leave the NHS entirely. Last year, BMA warned the government that the current ARRS model, which only funds non-GP roles, would exacerbate the GP employment crisis. 71% of respondents blame the ARRS for GP unemployment.'
    1
  4700. 1
  4701. 1
  4702. 1
  4703. 1
  4704. 1
  4705. 1
  4706. 1
  4707. 1
  4708. 1
  4709. 1
  4710. 1
  4711. 1
  4712. 1
  4713. 1
  4714. 1
  4715. 1
  4716. 1
  4717. 1
  4718. 1
  4719. 1
  4720. 1
  4721. 1
  4722. 1
  4723. 1
  4724. 1
  4725. 1
  4726. 1
  4727. 1
  4728. 1
  4729. 1
  4730. 1
  4731. 1
  4732. 1
  4733. 1
  4734. 1
  4735. 1
  4736. 1
  4737. 1
  4738. 1
  4739. The mayor has put more money into policing but can't make up for massive cuts to police funds from central (Tory) government. He has prompted the police to do more stop and search but the police are under great pressure since the Tory budget cuts mean the loss of 20,000 police officers and knife crime, and the causes of it go further back than Khan's time, to Tory austerity cuts in youth services. Knife crime was building up under Boris Johnson. Also the Tories have done very little about gang crime since it first started years ago, probably on the basis that it wasn't affecting Tory voters and was mainly black on black crime. I'm surprised at George Galloway spouting Tory views but Galloway's a bit of a tart. He's never criticised Russia's criminal regime and the number of political opponents the Russian regime has eliminated. He wouldn't be able to speak against the government in Russia as he does here but he's paid to appear on Russia Today TV station, so I don't suppose he wants to bite the hand that feeds him. Boris Johnson wasn't a better mayor. He did nothing worthwhile - just a few useless vanity projects which cost and lost millions. Galloway claims he's not being racist so why does he use the term 'failed experiment'. In what sense is this an experiment? Having a muslim as mayor? If he means that, it sounds racist. For mayor, you have to choose someone who can win as well as someone who is capable. Khan won in the teeth of his opponent, rich man Goldsmith's racist campaign. It's hard to get affordable houses in a year as Galloway well knows because you have to go through procedures and get developers to co-operate. The picture is not as bad as Galloway maintains: https://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/news/sadiq-khan-falling-short-on-affordable-housing-promises-says-scathing-report-59285. He is at least doing more than previous Mayors including Boris Johnson. What does George Galloway do other than spout his mouth off in the media? He's a failed MP. The British government refused a visa to the Russian cousin of the Skripals because it was feared that the Russian government would try to get to them through her. The cousin was starting to talk as if on behalf of the Skripals, and they said only they could speak for themselves, and they did not want to see their cousin. What nonsense Galloway talks when he's in attack mode. He's an apologist for Putin. The Skripals did not go back to Russia and did not want to go back to Russia. The Skripals did not want the cousin giving away their whereabouts in case a further assassination attempt was tried.
    1
  4740. 1
  4741. 1
  4742. 1
  4743. 1
  4744. 1
  4745. 1
  4746. 1
  4747. 1
  4748. 1
  4749. 1
  4750. 1
  4751. 1
  4752. 1
  4753. 1
  4754. 1
  4755. 1
  4756. 1
  4757. 1
  4758. 1
  4759. 1
  4760. 1
  4761. 1
  4762. 1
  4763. 1
  4764. 1
  4765. 1
  4766. 1
  4767. 1
  4768. 1
  4769. 1
  4770. 1
  4771. 1
  4772. 1
  4773. 1
  4774. 1
  4775. 1
  4776. 1
  4777. 1
  4778. 1
  4779. 1
  4780. 1
  4781. 1
  4782. 1
  4783. 1
  4784. 1
  4785. 1
  4786. 1
  4787. 1
  4788. 1
  4789. 1
  4790. 1
  4791. 1
  4792. 1
  4793. 1
  4794. 1
  4795. 1
  4796. 1
  4797. 1
  4798. 1
  4799. 1
  4800. 1
  4801. 1
  4802. 1
  4803. 1
  4804. 1
  4805. 1
  4806. 1
  4807. 1
  4808. 1
  4809. 1
  4810. 1
  4811. 1
  4812. 1
  4813. 1
  4814. 1
  4815. 1
  4816. @Darren-pq5oc I don't think that's really it. Councils have certain financial legal duties and they have other areas of need which are legal requirements such as providing social services. If they don't manage the funding properly the councils can be kicked out by voters or matters taken out of their control, out of local control, as the government can appoint government commissioners to come and take over and make cuts to bring the councils within budgets. Part of the problem is the gradual and sustained centralisation of control under various Tory governments. They have restricted how councils can raise funds and what they can spend those funds on. The government has also reduced the central grants to councils by up to 80% since 2010 while an ageing population has seen demand for social services grow. At the same time councils have been encouraged to take risks to raise new revenue, by the government and the government abolished the independent audit function and left councils to appoint their own. All of this has led to the mess some of them are in now. I hope a new government will start to invest in areas of the country that have been neglected to create more jobs. Investment is a large part of Labour's manifesto but where and what they invest in remains to be seen. Countries all over the world are in ever greater debt now, in Singapore that has not affected their excellent credit ratings because they only borrow to invest and their assets are worth more than their liabilities. I'm wondering if Labour are thinking along the same lines.
    1
  4817. 1
  4818. 1
  4819. 1
  4820. 1
  4821. 1
  4822. 1
  4823. 1
  4824. 1
  4825. 1
  4826. 1
  4827. 1
  4828. 1
  4829. 1
  4830. 1
  4831. 1
  4832. 1
  4833. 1
  4834. 1
  4835. 1
  4836. 1
  4837. 1
  4838. 1
  4839. 1
  4840. 1
  4841. 1
  4842. 1
  4843. 1
  4844. 1
  4845. 1
  4846. 1
  4847. 1
  4848. 1
  4849. 1
  4850. 1
  4851. 1
  4852. 1
  4853. 1
  4854. 1
  4855. 1
  4856. 1
  4857. 1
  4858. 1
  4859. 1
  4860. 1
  4861. 1
  4862. 1
  4863. 1
  4864. 1
  4865. 1
  4866. 1
  4867. 1
  4868. 1
  4869. 1
  4870. 1
  4871. 1
  4872. 1
  4873. 1
  4874. 1
  4875. 1
  4876. 1
  4877. 1
  4878. 1
  4879. 1
  4880. 1
  4881. 1
  4882. 1
  4883. 1
  4884. 1
  4885. 1
  4886. 1
  4887. 1
  4888. 1
  4889. 1
  4890. 1
  4891. 1
  4892. 1
  4893. 1
  4894. 1
  4895. 1
  4896. 1
  4897. 1
  4898. 1
  4899. 1
  4900. 1
  4901. 1
  4902. 1
  4903. 1
  4904. 1
  4905. 1
  4906. 1
  4907. 1
  4908. 1
  4909. 1
  4910. 1
  4911. 1
  4912. 1
  4913. 1
  4914. 1
  4915. 1
  4916. 1
  4917. 1
  4918. 1
  4919. 1
  4920. 1
  4921. 1
  4922. 1
  4923. 1
  4924. 1
  4925. 1
  4926. 1
  4927. 1
  4928. 1
  4929. 1
  4930. 1
  4931. 1
  4932. 1
  4933. 1
  4934. 1
  4935. 1
  4936. 1
  4937. 1
  4938. 1
  4939. 1
  4940. 1
  4941. 1
  4942. 1
  4943. 1
  4944. 1
  4945. 1
  4946. 1
  4947. 1
  4948.  @andrewcheshire4762  That's rubbish. No one has ever lied as much as this government. They are the Olympic Champions of liars. In the past if a Minister was caught lying to Parliament or breaking the Ministerial code that was an automatic resignation matter and people did resign. Now no one resigns no matter how mendacious or corrupt they are and Boris keeps them in power. He even hangs on to Ministers he himself has called f*cking useless. The Civil Service is not in control. They do what Ministers want. They have no choice. They can draw Ministers' attention to possible downsides of their policies but in the end Ministers make the final decisions. They have changed a lot of Civil Servants. First of all they cut the civil service by 500,000 posts since 2011. Then, as there were not enough to deal with Brexit and the Pandemic they paid outside consultants to do much of the extra work and those consultants are paid at rates way way over civil service rates. If you don't do what Ministers want in the Civil Service you don't get on, and you can be put on a procedure leading to dismissal. I worked for a government department and 2 years after I retired there was not one person in charge at director level and above who was the same as when I retired. They had all gone. I don't think Brexit would necessarily have been the same if other parties were in power. For instance there were other Brexit options such as staying in the customs union which would have eliminated all the bureaucratic problems and the NI border problems. The Labour Party did offer a choice like that and a further Referendum as the implications of Brexit had become clearer. The Lib Dems always stuck with a Remain policy. There were options which meant it would not necessarily have been the same situation as we have now.
    1
  4949. 1
  4950. 1
  4951. 1
  4952. 1
  4953. 1
  4954. 1
  4955. 1
  4956. 1
  4957. 1
  4958. 1
  4959. 1
  4960. 1
  4961. 1
  4962. 1
  4963. 1
  4964. 1
  4965. 1
  4966. 1
  4967. 1
  4968. 1
  4969. 1
  4970. 1
  4971. 1
  4972. 1
  4973. 1
  4974. 1
  4975. 1
  4976. 1
  4977. 1
  4978. 1
  4979. 1
  4980. 1
  4981. 1
  4982. 1
  4983. 1
  4984. 1
  4985. 1
  4986. 1
  4987. 1
  4988. 1
  4989. 1
  4990. 1
  4991. 1
  4992. 1
  4993. 1
  4994. 1
  4995. 1
  4996. 1
  4997. 1
  4998. 1
  4999. 1
  5000. 1
  5001. 1
  5002. 1
  5003. 1
  5004. 1
  5005. 1
  5006. 1
  5007. 1
  5008. 1
  5009. 1
  5010. 1
  5011. 1
  5012. 1
  5013. 1
  5014. 1
  5015. 1
  5016. 1
  5017. 1
  5018. 1
  5019. 1
  5020. 1
  5021. 1
  5022. 1
  5023. 1
  5024. 1
  5025. 1
  5026. 1
  5027. 1
  5028. 1
  5029. 1
  5030. 1
  5031. 1
  5032. 1
  5033. 1
  5034. 1
  5035. It is in English. It starts in the middle of a scene. The Duke of Gloucester (The Lord Protector) says the King is old enough to give a reproof himself, (we don't know to whom) and the Queen should not interfere. The Queen says, if the King's old enough why does he need a protector? Gloucester says he will resign as Protector if the King wants him to. Suffolk or Sussex (can't remember which) intervenes and tells Gloucester to resign. He starts to accuse him of acting as King, and being responsible for the everything that's going wrong in the country. The country is going to the dogs. The heir to the French throne (called the Dauphin) is winning in France where England and France are at war, and Gloucester lords it over the nobles. The Archbishop then accuses Gloucester of over overtaxing the country (via the House of Commons) and overtaxing the clergy. Someone else (we hear but don't see) accuses him of spending too much on buildings and his wife's clothes. The Queen accuses him of corruptly selling official jobs and control of towns in France, and says it's a capital offence. She says the King knows everything. She then goes down and deliberately drops her fan to humiliate the Duchess of Gloucester by getting her to pick it up. The Duchess ignores her request and gets a slap. The Duchess says she would scratch the Queen's face with her nails if she could. The King says the Queen didn't mean any harm (The King is a bit of a weak booby, if you'd not picked up on that). The Duchess threatens the Queen with revenge for the insult. The manipulative Queen pretends to be very distressed and runs off.
    1
  5036. 1
  5037. 1
  5038. 1
  5039. 1
  5040. 1
  5041. 1
  5042. 1
  5043. 1
  5044. 1
  5045. 1
  5046. 1
  5047. 1
  5048. 1
  5049. 1
  5050. 1
  5051. 1
  5052. 1
  5053. 1
  5054. 1
  5055. 1
  5056. 1
  5057. 1
  5058. 1
  5059. 1
  5060. 1
  5061. 1
  5062. 1
  5063. 1
  5064. 1
  5065. 1
  5066. 1
  5067. 1
  5068. 1
  5069. 1
  5070. 1
  5071. 1
  5072. 1
  5073. 1
  5074. 1
  5075. 1
  5076. 1
  5077. 1
  5078. 1
  5079. 1
  5080. 1
  5081. 1
  5082. 1
  5083. 1
  5084. 1
  5085. 1
  5086. 1
  5087. 1
  5088. 1
  5089. 1
  5090. 1
  5091. 1
  5092. 1
  5093. 1
  5094. I watched the interview and I can sympathise with Meghan not coping and needing help, also with having to suffer the racist attitudes, particularly of the attack dog British press. However there seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding of who and what can be paid for from the Sovereign grant and what duties those in receipt of such pay are expected to carry out. Minor royals have fought to get their children paid for from the grant. Prince Andrew's daughters are not on paid from it, much to Prince Andrew's displeasure. That was said to be Prince Charles's decision. Princess Anne's children do not have royal titles and are not on paid from it. So it's hard for Charles to justify paying his own children from the grant unless they are fully working Royals which you can't really be without living in the UK. Also I'm not clear why Meghan thinks a great grandchild of the Queen could ever be called a Prince. The connection to the throne is too remote to have titles like that. Why does Harry not understand this? Why did no one explain it to him and he explain it to Meghan before they were married so she knew what to expect? Where I do have some sympathy is that they were working royals in the UK but having to put up constantly with a lot of hurtful crap from the press and trolling in the media and not being able to correct the false stories, or have someone from the Palace correct, them must have been difficult, and it seems no one prepared her for that, nor did she bother to do any research to find out what life would be like - astonishing that the Palace could let that happen in view of past experience with Diana. As a Royal you also can't go around expressing your opinions about everything. Meghan clearly wasn't able to cope with the pressure and the restrictions and didn't get help. Where I'm less sympathetic is that they could have paid for things themselves like help for her and extra security for Archie, if they thought he needed it. Harry has his own income from Diana. They had their own security while they were working royals which should have been enough to cover Archie while he was so young.
    1
  5095. 1
  5096. 1
  5097. 1
  5098. 1
  5099. 1
  5100. 1
  5101. 1
  5102. 1
  5103. 1
  5104. 1
  5105. 1
  5106. 1
  5107. 1
  5108. 1
  5109. 1
  5110.  @DavidSmith-vx1hj  Just because a woman happens to be in power does not mean her gender was the thing that governed her polices. I could say Hitler was a man and so was Genghis Khan, Attila and Napoleon, Ropespierre, Stalin and Vlad the Impaler but it would be crass to say there should be no men in politics because of them. Theresa May didn't take 'no deal' off the table as far as I'm aware. She was certainly against doing that whenever she responded to that request in Parliament. I'm not a supporter of May but let's get the facts right. I can't go through economic factors one by one but for example, take farming and manufacturing. Under WTO terms we have to set tariffs for nations we trade with and they have to be the same for all countries we trade with. Currently within the EU we trade tariff free. If we set a tariff on imported goods that means prices will go up for UK consumers, so everything will cost us more but it will protect British farming and industry from unfair competition from countries running sweatshops with no protections for workers, paying them 2p an hour, say. Our industries can't compete with that unless they treat British workers the same way. If we set zero tariffs, which we could do, that would protect British consumers from price rises, as a result of hard Brexit, but it would offer no protection to British industry and farming from the unfair competition. Some people would still buy British as a matter of principle but most consumers will buy on price alone and go for the cheapest goods. That will wipe out British farming and manufacturing. In WTO British exporters will have to pay tariffs too, and they are likely to be set by other countries at a level to protect their own industries.
    1
  5111. 1
  5112.  @DavidSmith-vx1hj  Well, I can't spend my life solving the world's problems. wish I could but I don't have the time or the power. Knife crime has been on the rise for a while. I remember seeing this trend coming across with gang culture from America years ago and being very frustrated that the governments of the time were not giving priority to tackling it in the early stages. You could see that it would grow if not tackled. It has more recently been fuelled by factors such as austerity, large expulsions from schools leading to lack of skills and opportunity, lack of social mobility, a growing gap between rich and poor, pressures on the poor, breakdown of families under pressure, closures of leisure activities for youths such as leisure centres and youth clubs and youthworker projects massive cuts by this government to police budgets which has resulted in a loss of over 20,000 police officers at a time when other pressures on the police are growing, such as from cybercrime, terrorism, modern slavery and paedophile activities and domestic violence on top of the usual crimes. What I would do is restore the funding to the police and to those projects and youth facilities it was taken from and actually increase the funding to police and youth projects. I would hope that it's not too late to reverse this trend after years of neglect. I've just been reading an article about military drones and how the services have crashed and wrecked quite a few of them at a cost of £15 million a piece because of a lack of training an inability to understand what error messages mean. We have our priorities wrong and short terms cuts (to training) can have costly consequences in the longer term. This government prides itself on 'cutting waste' but it cuts money to public services while wasting it in quite a number of other areas. By what I've said above, I don't mean to exonerate individuals from blame for their crimes. Not everyone who is poor or under pressure commits crimes. Some will and some won't but alleviating some of those pressures and putting more resources into young people worked in the past and are a worthwhile investment to help turn things around.
    1
  5113. 1
  5114. 1
  5115. 1
  5116. 1
  5117. 1
  5118. 1
  5119. 1
  5120. 1
  5121. 1
  5122. 1
  5123. 1
  5124. 1
  5125. 1
  5126. 1
  5127. 1
  5128. This is wrong. It's setting up a straw man. As they stated the document proves that the NHS is not 'off the table' when it comes to US trade talks and any US trade deal post Brexit, and they could also have a secret agreement aside from any deal if they so choose. It also indicates that US drug companies are keen to increase the price of drugs to the NHS and the government is not telling them no. There's a myth peddled by the government and this video about how they are not 'selling off of the NHS'. However Boris can keep the NHS 'brand' and the 'free at the point of use element whilst allowing more and more health services to be sold off to private companies. He will hope because it will still be called the NHS and still free to use (in the short or medium term anyway), that people won't notice the gradual privatisation of health services. Health services that come under the Department of Health include social services and public health services as well as the NHS. Already 26% of funding goes to private companies. This is somewhat hidden by the fact that some of it goes to voluntary groups and local authorities who merely pass it on to private companies. Because it goes to the former bodies first, the government still classifies the funding as going to public services. You might think what does it matter who provides the services, but it does matter because: staff terms and conditions are often worse; if the private firm fails the taxpayer picks up the tab; money is unnecessarily siphoned out of the system in the form of profit; and private firms who are competitors and competing for contracts don't co-operate and share information in a way that provides for the best (seamless) patient care. The regular contracting round and process is complex and time consuming for those medical staff who need to input to it. It costs a lot to achieve and monitor and may become an inflexible and costly burden if circumstances change or the contract is not watertight. The way has also been opened for private companies to sue the NHS if they fail to win contracts. It requires a lot more accountants and consultants to run and maintain the system. If the NHS becomes predominantly privatised that could change the whole ethos of the NHS (that the patient comes first). The funding of the NHS is in the public domain at the moment but when Hunt was Secretary of State, an attempt was made to sneakily change the structure of funding bodies to align them with the format of those in the USA which would have made it easy for private companies to take this over, so private companies would be deciding how the money is spent. If that happened there would not be much of the NHS as we know it left - mainly the brand and the fact that it's free at the point of use, until a worsening of service would mean the Tories could gain enough support for changing it to an insurance based system and bingo, long term objective achieved. If you don't think the NHS is being gradually privatised, speak to anyone who works in it.
    1
  5129. 1
  5130. 1
  5131. 1
  5132. 1
  5133. 1
  5134. 1
  5135. 1
  5136. 1
  5137. 1
  5138. 1
  5139. 1
  5140. 1
  5141. 1
  5142. 1
  5143. 1
  5144. 1
  5145. 1
  5146. 1
  5147. 1
  5148. 1
  5149. 1
  5150. 1
  5151. 1
  5152. 1
  5153. 1
  5154. 1
  5155. 1
  5156. 1
  5157. 1
  5158. 1
  5159. 1
  5160. 1
  5161. 1
  5162. 1
  5163. 1
  5164. 1
  5165. 1
  5166. 1
  5167. 1
  5168. 1
  5169. 1
  5170. 1
  5171. 1
  5172. 1
  5173. 1
  5174. 1
  5175. 1
  5176. 1
  5177. 1
  5178. 1
  5179. 1
  5180. 1
  5181. 1
  5182. 1
  5183. 1
  5184. 1
  5185. 1
  5186. 1
  5187. 1
  5188. 1
  5189. 1
  5190. 1
  5191. 1
  5192. 1
  5193. 1
  5194. 1
  5195. 1
  5196. 1
  5197. 1
  5198. 1
  5199. 1
  5200. 1
  5201. 1
  5202. 1
  5203. 1
  5204. 1
  5205. 1
  5206. 1
  5207. 1
  5208. 1
  5209. 1
  5210. 1
  5211. 1
  5212. 1
  5213. 1
  5214. 1
  5215. 1
  5216. 1
  5217. 1
  5218. 1
  5219. 1
  5220. 1
  5221. 1
  5222. 1
  5223. 1
  5224. 1
  5225. 1
  5226. 1
  5227. 1
  5228. 1
  5229. 1
  5230. 1
  5231. 1
  5232. 1
  5233. 1
  5234. 1
  5235. 1
  5236. 1
  5237. 1
  5238. 1
  5239. 1
  5240. 1
  5241. 1
  5242. 1
  5243. 1
  5244. 1
  5245. 1
  5246. 1
  5247. 1
  5248. 1
  5249. 1
  5250. 1
  5251. 1
  5252. 1
  5253. 1
  5254. 1
  5255. 1
  5256. 1
  5257. 1
  5258. 1
  5259. 1
  5260. 1
  5261. 1
  5262. 1
  5263. 1
  5264. 1
  5265. 1
  5266. 1
  5267. 1
  5268. 1
  5269. 1
  5270. 1
  5271. 1
  5272. 1
  5273. 1
  5274. 1
  5275. 1
  5276. 1
  5277. 1
  5278. 1
  5279. 1
  5280. 1
  5281. 1
  5282. 1
  5283. 1
  5284. 1
  5285. 1
  5286. 1
  5287. 1
  5288. 1
  5289. 1
  5290. 1
  5291. 1
  5292. 1
  5293. 1
  5294. 1
  5295. 1
  5296. 1
  5297. 1
  5298. 1
  5299. 1
  5300. 1
  5301. 1
  5302. 1
  5303. 1
  5304. 1
  5305. 1
  5306. 1
  5307. 1
  5308. 1
  5309. 1
  5310. 1
  5311. 1
  5312. 1
  5313. 1
  5314. 1
  5315. 1
  5316. 1
  5317. 1
  5318. 1
  5319. 1
  5320. 1
  5321. 1
  5322. 1
  5323. 1
  5324. 1
  5325. 1
  5326. 1
  5327. 1
  5328. 1
  5329. 1
  5330. 1
  5331. 1
  5332. 1
  5333. 1
  5334. 1
  5335. 1
  5336. 1
  5337. 1
  5338. 1
  5339. 1
  5340. 1
  5341. 1
  5342. 1
  5343. 1
  5344. 1
  5345. 1
  5346. 1
  5347. 1
  5348. 1
  5349. 1
  5350. 1
  5351. 1
  5352. 1
  5353. 1
  5354. 1
  5355. 1
  5356. 1
  5357. So he doesn't disagree with Liz Truss's direction. He just thinks she went too hard and fast so we're in for a slower car crash rather than a fast one. Time for a General Election. Based on his track record, this man's judgement about economic policies is not the best and I'd doubt his political judgement too. He says the only successful policy that can be carried forward on NI 'is the one that we have' (which should be adhering to the signed agreement, the protocol, not reneging on it). Giving into DUP blackmail is atrocious but not surprising. Throughout history, British governments have given in to unionist blackmail, but the DUP's position on Brexit (pro Brexit) is different from the way NI as a whole voted (which was to remain in the EU), the DUP never agreed to the GFI and is now the minority party in NI and is losing votes, but thanks to this Tory government their chaotic policy on NI will continue. Supporting the prejudiced agenda and nonsensical position of the DUP, as time goes on, will find the Tory government on the wrong side of history with NI. 'The jurisdiction of EU law in NI' as he terms it, allows NI the privileged position of free trade in goods with the EU as well as with mainland Britain and it's only some trade rules. It's a privileged position which is allowing the NI economy to thrive. The Tories don't like it for ideological reasons and because it shows up the difference in performance between a part of the UK with access to the EU and the rest of the UK which has bureaucratic trade barriers as a result of leaving the EU.
    1
  5358. 1
  5359. 1
  5360. 1
  5361. 1
  5362. 1
  5363. 1
  5364. 1
  5365. 1
  5366. 1
  5367. 1
  5368. 1
  5369. 1
  5370. 1
  5371. 1
  5372.  @dnciskkk9037  The US will be a dominant partner in a trade deal. I don't see Trump giving any ground to us as we will need a deal more than he will. This is from a Metro report on the leaked trade discussions document with the USA. 'The notes detail six preliminary meetings between British and American trade negotiators between July 2017 and July 2019, a few weeks before Johnson became Prime Minister. UK Officials describe the discussions as ‘the first lap’ of talks on a wide range of policy areas they ‘might expect to feature’ in a post Brexit trade deal. The health service is mentioned a few times along with US negotiators talking about the cost of medicine and the possibility of lengthening patents. Once patents expire the NHS is able to buy generic rather than branded versions of the same drug. They are typically shorter in the UK which is one of the reasons why medicine is much cheaper than in the US. American negotiators said there is ‘a lot of conversation’ in the states about drug prices and that ‘looking at what other countries pay is causing angst’. But fact-checkers say there is nothing to suggest the UK have agreed with US demands (Picture: Getty Images) They have concerns the US is ‘not getting a good deal in pharmaceutical industries.’ It echoes American trade objectives published in February which say they ‘full market access’ for pharmaceutical products. This would limit the control the UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has over which drugs can be given to patients. ' Read more: https://metro.co.uk/2019/11/28/labours-nhs-sale-document-leak-fact-checked-11232546/?ito=cbshare Twitter: https://twitter.com/MetroUK | Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MetroUK/ That's it now. I'm not wasting any more time on a blockhead.
    1
  5373. 1
  5374. 1
  5375. 1
  5376. 1
  5377. 1
  5378. 1
  5379. 1
  5380. 1
  5381. 1
  5382. 1
  5383. 1
  5384. 1
  5385. 1
  5386. 1
  5387. 1
  5388. 1
  5389. 1
  5390. 1
  5391. 1
  5392. 1
  5393. 1
  5394. 1
  5395. 1
  5396. 1
  5397. 1
  5398. 1
  5399. 1
  5400. 1
  5401. 1
  5402. 1
  5403. 1
  5404. 1
  5405. 1
  5406. 1
  5407. 1
  5408. 1
  5409. 1
  5410. 1
  5411. 1
  5412. 1
  5413. 1
  5414. 1
  5415. 1
  5416. 1
  5417. 1
  5418. 1
  5419. 1
  5420. 1
  5421. 1
  5422. 1
  5423. 1
  5424. 1
  5425. 1
  5426. 1
  5427. 1
  5428. 1
  5429. 1
  5430. 1
  5431. 1
  5432. 1
  5433. 1
  5434. 1
  5435. 1
  5436. 1
  5437. 1
  5438. 1
  5439. 1
  5440. 1
  5441. 1
  5442. 1
  5443. 1
  5444. 1
  5445. 1
  5446. 1
  5447. 1
  5448. 1
  5449. 1
  5450. 1
  5451. 1
  5452. 1
  5453. 1
  5454. 1
  5455. 1
  5456. 1
  5457. 1
  5458. 1
  5459. 1
  5460. 1
  5461. 1
  5462. 1
  5463. 1
  5464. 1
  5465. 1
  5466. 1
  5467. 1
  5468. 1
  5469. Because they all know that no deal would be disastrous for the UK economy. No one is discussing what will happen in a no deal scenario. In the run up to the Referendum, the leave campaign was to leave with a deal, the implications of leaving without a deal were never explored. It will deliver a powerful shock to the UK economy, if we try leaving without a deal just on WTO terms. No country in the world trades just on WTO terms because in trading terms it's the 4th division. They all want deals with a big trading block which is the premier division which is where we are now. It's a bit of a myth that the EU controls us. There are some rules of membership but 99% of what the UK spends is determined by the UK government not the EU. So what happens if we go to no deal WTO terms? We have to then set a tariff for trading with the world and under WTO terms it has to be the same tariff for everyone we trade with. If we set a tariff that will push prices up for UK consumers and we'll be worse off. If we set a zero tariff (possible under the rules) our farming and manufacturing won't be able to compete with cheap imports from countries where workers have no rights and are paid pennies an hour so our farming and manufacturing industries will be destroyed. Patrick Minford, an economist who is in favour of a hard Brexit (a brexit without a deal) says the same about the future of British farming and manufacturing. It will affect other economic sectors also. a hard Brexit means dropping off the cliff from day one. There will be no transition period without a deal. Wealthy people like ex stockbroker Farage and Jacob Rees Mogg will profit from a hard Brexit because WTO rules do not regulate financial systems and they will be even more free to transfer their profits to tax havens around the world. The very people who want Brexit because they are suffering under the present government's austerity programme, will suffer even more under no deal Brexit. None of this was explained before the Referendum by a campaign that wasn't even talking about a no deal Brexit. As for getting trade deals, as a member of the EU, we have over 4000 trade deals that will no longer apply the day we go out on no deal and Liam Fox only has a handful lined up to replace them. Trade deals take years to negotiate because they are complex covering everything traded between countries. Trump is protectionist and the US is a larger economy than ours, and if we want a trade deal with the USA it will be very much on his terms, as he doesn't need to deal. His negotiators have already said they want access to NHS funding for their corporations as part of the deal and for us to take their farming products like chlorine washed chicken and hormone fed beef - practices currently banned by the EU. China and Russia are not our friends and in any case they don't allow countries to export freely to theirs. They are also protectionist. Asian countries have each other to trade with nearby. The only thing India wants from us is more visas for people to come here. Other countries won't make up for the loss of the big trading area on our doorstep (the EU). The way out of our problems is to vote for a party that will do something about inequality in the UK and protect jobs and trade, and that's not the Tories or the Brexit party. Farage has stated he is for replacing the NHS with an insurance based market system. He is for taking restrictions off the sale of handguns and he has other right wing policies too. If we set a zero tariff, that would be zero for EU trade also, except as outsiders the EU would be placing a tariff on us (could be 40%). That would make us uncompetitive in trading with the EU. You can't just count the cost of trading with the EU in terms of our subscriptions. You have to count the benefits to the economy too and the health and welfare of people to get the whole picture.
    1
  5470. 1
  5471. 1
  5472. 1
  5473. 1
  5474. 1
  5475. 1
  5476. 1
  5477. 1
  5478. 1
  5479. 1
  5480. 1
  5481. 1
  5482. 1
  5483. 1
  5484. 1
  5485. 1
  5486. 1
  5487. 1
  5488. 1
  5489. 1
  5490. 1
  5491. 1
  5492. 1
  5493. 1
  5494. 1
  5495. 1
  5496. 1
  5497. 1
  5498. 1
  5499. 1
  5500. 1
  5501. 1
  5502. 1
  5503. 1
  5504. 1
  5505. 1
  5506. 1
  5507. 1
  5508. 1
  5509. 1
  5510. 1
  5511. 1
  5512. 1
  5513. 1
  5514. 1
  5515. 1
  5516. 1
  5517. 1
  5518. 1
  5519. 1
  5520. 1
  5521. 1
  5522. 1
  5523. 1
  5524. 1
  5525. 1
  5526. 1
  5527. 1
  5528. 1
  5529. 1
  5530. 1
  5531. 1
  5532. 1
  5533. 1
  5534. 1
  5535. 1
  5536. 1
  5537. 1
  5538. 1
  5539. 1
  5540. 1
  5541. 1
  5542. 1
  5543. 1
  5544. 1
  5545. 1
  5546. 1
  5547. 1
  5548. 1
  5549. 1
  5550. 1
  5551. 1
  5552. 1
  5553. 1
  5554. 1
  5555. 1
  5556. 1
  5557. 1
  5558. 1
  5559. 1
  5560. 1
  5561. 1
  5562. 1
  5563. 1
  5564. 1
  5565. 1
  5566. 1
  5567. 1
  5568. 1
  5569. 1
  5570. 1
  5571. 1
  5572. 1
  5573. 1
  5574. 1
  5575. 1
  5576. 1
  5577. 1
  5578. 1
  5579. 1
  5580. 1
  5581. 1
  5582. 1
  5583. 1
  5584. 1
  5585. 1
  5586. 1
  5587. 1
  5588. 1
  5589. 1
  5590. 1
  5591. 1
  5592. 1
  5593. 1
  5594. 1
  5595. 1
  5596. 1
  5597. 1
  5598. 1
  5599. 1
  5600. 1
  5601.  @colinbaker3916  I don't know where you are getting your information from but in the last election (2017) overall the Tories lost 13 seats and Labour gained 30 seats. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_United_Kingdom_general_election . It's a tricky time at the moment with Brexit coming up. Both Labour and Conservatives support Brexit though they have different ideas on how to go about it. For that reason the public doesn't see clear water between them on that issue. I suspect that party support won't change significantly until after the fallout from Brexit, by which I mean, once people can see what the effect on them is, and once the parties start tackling other issues again because they have very different ideas on other issues. The government benefits by how much they can shift the blame for society's ills onto other groups (who are not in power) such as liberals, leftists, immigrants, workers and benefits claimants etc and the largely Tory supporting press helps them to do that. That makes people blame Labour even when they are not in power. For instance the latest rail fare rises are being blamed on the Unions, but I don't see any blame being attached to the costs of the complicated, expensive and utterly daft privatised system we have, or the amount that shareholders take out of the system or the complete mess that was made of the timetabling system in the last year which the Transport Secretary washed his hands of. The government and news media seem quiet on all but the timetable mess.
    1
  5602. 1
  5603. 1
  5604. 1
  5605. 1
  5606. 1
  5607. 1
  5608. 1
  5609. 1
  5610. 1
  5611. 1
  5612. 1
  5613. 1
  5614. 1
  5615. 1
  5616. 1
  5617. 1
  5618. 1
  5619. 1
  5620. 1
  5621. 1
  5622. 1
  5623. 1
  5624. 1
  5625. 1
  5626. 1
  5627. 1
  5628. 1
  5629. 1
  5630. 1
  5631. 1
  5632. 1
  5633. 1
  5634. 1
  5635. 1
  5636. 1
  5637. 1
  5638. 1
  5639. 1
  5640. 1
  5641. 1
  5642. 1
  5643. 1
  5644. 1
  5645. 1
  5646. 1
  5647. 1
  5648. 1
  5649. 1
  5650. 1
  5651. 1
  5652. 1
  5653. 1
  5654. 1
  5655. 1
  5656. 1
  5657. 1
  5658. 1
  5659. 1
  5660. 1
  5661. 1
  5662. 1
  5663. 1
  5664. 1
  5665. 1
  5666. 1
  5667. 1
  5668. 1
  5669. 1
  5670. 1
  5671. 1
  5672. 1
  5673. 1
  5674. 1
  5675. 1
  5676. 1
  5677. 1
  5678. 1
  5679. 1
  5680. 1
  5681. 1
  5682. 1
  5683. 1
  5684. 1
  5685. 1
  5686. 1
  5687. 1
  5688. 1
  5689. 1
  5690. 1
  5691. 1
  5692. 1
  5693. 1
  5694. 1
  5695. 1
  5696. 1
  5697. 1
  5698. 1
  5699. 1
  5700. 1
  5701. 1
  5702. 1
  5703. 1
  5704. 1
  5705. 1
  5706. 1
  5707. 1
  5708. 1
  5709.  @rapid8748  It doesn't matter what the source of the document is. The Tories have never denied that it's a genuine document, (and why won't Boris publish the report on Russian interference in British politics if he's concerned about it). Boris and the Americans may deny interest in selling off the NHS to the British public in an election but it's not what the Americans are saying to American audiences. Anyway you have to understand that the NHS and the care system is not a thing that will be sold off lock stock and barrel. The Tories will keep the NHS brand and keep it free at the point of use in the hope that the public won't notice that more and more services provided are being taken over by private companies via contracting systems. Greater privatisation of services is provided for in the Health and Social Care Act of 2012 which the Tories introduced, if you read that. Talk to any healthcare workers. Jeremy Hunt, the longtime Tory Secretary of State for Health, wrote a policy paper advocating privatisation of the health service before he was appointed to that post. Not only that, but while in office he sneakily tried to reformat funding bodies so that they matched US ones to make it easier for private firms to take over the funding decisions in the NHS. This he tried to sneak through in a Statutory Instrument (SI). SIs are normally used for finance matters and are passed through Parliament without debate. Fortunately his sneaky scheme was noticed. You can't trust Boris and Trump. They are liars with form and Boris is already presiding over a NHS whose services are more privatised than ever before. If Trump extends drug patents, as he intends to, the NHS will have to pay much higher prices for drugs for longer before they become 'generic' and therefore cheaper to buy. He will winkle more money out of the NHS in one way or another, by hook or by crook (and he's the crook).
    1
  5710. 1
  5711. 1
  5712. 1
  5713. 1
  5714. 1
  5715. 1
  5716. 1
  5717. 1
  5718. 1
  5719. 1
  5720. 1
  5721. 1
  5722. 1
  5723. 1
  5724. 1
  5725. 1
  5726. 1
  5727. 1
  5728. 1
  5729. 1
  5730. 1
  5731. 1
  5732. 1
  5733. 1
  5734. 1
  5735. 1
  5736. 1
  5737. 1
  5738. 1
  5739. 1
  5740. 1
  5741. 1
  5742. 1
  5743. 1
  5744. 1
  5745. 1
  5746. 1
  5747. 1
  5748. 1
  5749. 1
  5750. 1
  5751. 1
  5752. 1
  5753. 1
  5754. 1
  5755. 1
  5756. 1
  5757. 1
  5758. 1
  5759. 1
  5760. 1
  5761. 1
  5762. 1
  5763. 1
  5764. 1
  5765. 1
  5766. 1
  5767. 1
  5768. 1
  5769. 1
  5770. 1
  5771. 1
  5772. 1
  5773. 1
  5774. 1
  5775. 1
  5776. 1
  5777. 1
  5778. 1
  5779. 1
  5780. 1
  5781. 1
  5782. 1
  5783. 1
  5784. 1
  5785. 1
  5786. 1
  5787. 1
  5788. 1
  5789. I don't like ugly modern buildings but I have to say that post war buildings were built cheaply because there was a lot of wartime bomb damage to repair at a time when Britain was bankrupt and the intentions were good, to give people who'd lived in pre-war slums a warm place to live with indoor bathrooms. There's less excuse now for ugly buildings. Modern planning laws (relaxation of, or lack of enforcement of) must bear more of the blame. My favourite houses are Georgian ones - the space, the light, the symmetry, the materials, the decor, the domestic comfort. In modern times there were some very fine houses built in the 1930s but they weren't affordable by most people. Don't forget that in medieval times most people lived in muddy insanitary and cramped conditions. London architecture did not survive the plague and the great fire. The architecture you refer to to was built after the great fire I'd love to have seen and experienced medieval London but when most of it burned down in the great fire in 1666, London ceased to suffer from the plague and the rebuilt London was also beautiful in a different way and more solid. One problem in London is that tall buildings are often built with gulf oil money by nations that have different architectural tastes and no feeling for the traditional beauty of English style architecture that already exists there. Tower blocks are not suitable for families to live in and most of them will eventually lose value and be a 'hard sell' but by then the developers will have walked off with their profits and the environment will have been uglified.
    1
  5790. 1
  5791. 1
  5792. 1
  5793. 1
  5794. 1
  5795. 1
  5796. 1
  5797. 1
  5798. 1
  5799. 1
  5800. 1
  5801. 1
  5802. 1
  5803. 1
  5804. 1
  5805. 1
  5806. 1
  5807. 1
  5808. 1
  5809. 1
  5810. 1
  5811. 1
  5812. 1
  5813. 1
  5814. 1
  5815. 1
  5816. 1
  5817. 1
  5818. 1
  5819. 1
  5820. 1
  5821. 1
  5822. 1
  5823. 1
  5824. 1
  5825. 1
  5826. 1
  5827. 1
  5828. 1
  5829. 1
  5830. 1
  5831. 1
  5832. 1
  5833. 1
  5834. 1
  5835. 1
  5836. 1
  5837. 1
  5838. 1
  5839. 1
  5840.  @JK-ux9du  Ha Ha. What EXACTLY do you expect to gain? Don't talk in abstract terms about sovereignty etc. What in concrete terms do you expect to gain? Even the hard pro Brexit economist, Patrick Minford, who wants zero tariffs under a hard Brexit admits that will kill British manufacturing and British agriculture and don't forget that would mean we weren't placing tariffs on the EU either (under WTO rules you can't pick and choose different tariffs for different customers for the same goods) but the EU will be placing tariffs on us -over 40% on British lamb and beef. Apart from imposing zero tariffs, the only way to avoid tariffs is to have deals with trading blocks, but those typically take years to negotiate and because other countries have trade deals and we don't, we'll be at a massive disadvantage both in trading and in negotiating trade deals, and we'll immediately lose the 40 or so trade deals we are already in as part of the EU, the second we hard Brexit. We also export a lot in services - over 80% of our exports and about 49% of those go to the EU but these services will lose their 'passport' to the EU the second we hard Brexit. So I hope you've done your homework and are clear where in all this, the average person stands to gain anything. Farage is all sloganising, but fine words butter no parsnips. I forgot to say that Britain has no experienced trade negotiators because all that was done by the EU. They have all the experienced trade negotiators as do other countries with deals and trade deals are very complex things to negotiate because of their comprehensive nature, and we'll be outdone on any negotiations after a hard Brexit by those experienced and skilled trade negotiatiors. If we do decide to put tariffs on our trade with other countries, that will put the prices up for consumers in the UK.
    1
  5841. 1
  5842. 1
  5843. 1
  5844. 1
  5845. 1
  5846. 1
  5847. 1
  5848. 1
  5849. 1
  5850. 1
  5851. 1
  5852. 1
  5853. 1
  5854. 1
  5855. 1
  5856. 1
  5857. 1
  5858. 1
  5859. 1
  5860. 1
  5861. 1
  5862. 1
  5863. 1
  5864. 1
  5865. 1
  5866. 1
  5867. 1
  5868. 1
  5869. 1
  5870. 1
  5871. 1
  5872. 1
  5873. 1
  5874. 1
  5875. 1
  5876. 1
  5877. 1
  5878. 1
  5879. 1
  5880. 1
  5881. 1
  5882. 1
  5883. 1
  5884.  @keystothekingdom6610  Ah, so internet trolling is now your hobby since ceasing to be the Prime Minister of Australia. I don't think the plan is to say. Politicians know that would be political suicide, but the truth is that a hard Brexit won't get through the Commons as currently constituted. It was the least popular option in the indicative votes. The most popular option was a softer Brexit with some kind of customs union to protect the UK economy and trade. Although it is the most popular option, it would require Labour and Conservatives to vote for it and since our system is very adversarial rather than co-operative, it's not clear whether that will be do-able. It will require compromise on both sides. The extremes of hard Brexit and Remain won't like that option and will vote against it. The House is divided as is the country and no one really knows what kind of Brexit leavers voted for, because they were never asked. They simply voted to leave at a time when the consequences of different types of leaving or leaving at all were not fully known. What is interesting is that some leavers voted on principle and even though they now see that the consequences would destroy their businesses they would still vote the same again on principle. I've seen people interviewed on TV who are like that including a strawberry farmer who knows that he will not be able to get enough foreign workers (or any workers) to pick his strawberries when they are ripe. Indeed he is already struggling to get them in the run up to Brexit.
    1
  5885. 1
  5886. 1
  5887. 1
  5888. 1
  5889. 1
  5890. 1
  5891. 1
  5892. 1
  5893. 1
  5894. 1
  5895. 1
  5896. 1
  5897. 1
  5898. 1
  5899. 1
  5900. 1
  5901. 1
  5902. 1
  5903. 1
  5904. 1
  5905. 1
  5906. 1
  5907. 1
  5908. 1
  5909. 1
  5910. 1
  5911. 1
  5912. 1
  5913. 1
  5914. 1
  5915. 1
  5916. 1
  5917. 1
  5918. 1
  5919. 1
  5920. 1
  5921.  @irishandscottish1829  No I don't believe everything I read. I look carefully into the facts. I have done plenty of research. I can tell you're not much of a reader or fact checker from your inability to spell naively. Here is a list of Putin's political opponents or just those investigating corruption who were mysteriously murdered, injured, or imprisoned:  Galina Starovoitova, opposition Duma Deputy killed Sergei Yushenkov, co-chairman of the Liberal Russia political party, shot and killed Mikhail Trepashkin jailed after a secret trial on espionage charges. Yuri Shchekochikhin, poisoned, Russian authorities refused to allow an autopsy Mikhail Trepashkin, a former KGB spy imprisoned Mikhail Khodorkovsky, sent to Siberia Nikolai Girenko, a prominent human rights defender, shot dead in his home Paul Klebnikov, editor Russian edition Forbes magazine, shot and killed in Moscow Viktor Yushchenko, anti-Russian candidate for the presidency of the Ukraine, is poisoned by Dioxin. Andrei Kozlov, shot and killed in Moscow Anna Politkovskaya,journalist, shot and killed in Moscow. Paul M. Joyal, shot in street Stanslav Markelov Russian human rights attorney shot in the back of the head Anastasia Barburova, a young journalism student. Shot in the back of the head. Moscow. Boris Nemtsov, Russian opposition politician, shot in the streets of Moscow near the Kemlin 2015 Natalia Estemirova leading Russian human rights journalist and activist,shot and killed Nikolai Glushkov – Russian businessman in the UK who had been given asylum – strangled in England Sergei Skripal – UK former spy – double agent poisoned with Novichok 2018 Yulia Skirpal UK daughter of Sergei Skripal poisoned with Novichok 2018 Sergei Magnitsky – Accountant in USSR who was investigating and exposed tax fraud by the Russian state. Imprisoned and died in prison after being beaten up. Prosecuted by the Russian state even after his death. Maxim Borodin – journalist found dying on the ground outside his 5th floor flat Mikhail Beketov – journalist left brain damaged and later died Oleg Kashin journalist left seriously injured after an assault Tatyana Felgengauer – journalist, stabbed in the neck while at work Alexander Litvinenko. KGB defector. Poisoned with Polonium in London Alexander Perepilichnyy Boris Berezovsky 6 Russian Diplomats who have died since Trump's victory Alexander Kadakin – Russia's ambassador to India Andrey Malanan Senior Russian diplomat in Greece Vitaly Churkin Russian ambassador to the UN Denis Voronenkon Russian politician who had fled to Ukraine Migayas Shirinskiy Russia's ambassador to Sudan Pyotr Verzilov. Pussy Riot Founder. Protested with girlfriend and others at World Cup Final against police persecution while Putin was watching from the stand. Poisoned on 11 Feb 2018 after attending girlfriend's court case. Mother was blocked from seeing him. Doctors refused to explain. Alexei Navalny – opposition leader to Putin. Poisoned on a flight within Russia 20.08.20 In the Crimea UN's June 2018 Crimea report accuses the Russian Federation of grave human rights violations in Ukraine. e.g multiple cases of torture e.g. Ibrahim Mirpochchaev Crimean journalist, abducted with his father and 2 brothers. Beaten for hours, asphyxiated with plastic bags, strangled, repeatedly tasered and violated with a hard probe used to electrocute him internally. Renat Paralamov, Crimean Tartar similar tale, forced confession. Server Karametov, 76 year old with Parkinson's disease prosecuted for holding a placard in support of 70 Crimean tartars being tried for multiple simultaneous peaceful lone demonstrations. Ervin Ibragimov, Tartar leader, dragged off by men in uniform May 2016. Not seen since. Oleg Sentsov, Crimean film maker, sentenced to 20 years in gaol. Olexander Kolchenko, his assistant, sentenced to 10 years. Gennady Afanasayev beaten, suffocated, stripped, threatened with rape and jailed, to force him to testify against Oleg Sentsov. He withdrew his testimony at the trial. Nariman Memediminov, Tartar activist, forcibly committed to a psychiatric hospital- a measure described by his lawyer as punitive psychiatry. Vladimir Kara-Murza, journalist and opposition activist alleged he was poisoned twice by Russian security services. He nearly died after suffering kidney failure in 2015 and two years later went into a coma for a week. Pyotr Verzilov, another Kremlin critic, accused Russia's intelligence services of poisoning him in 2018, when he fell ill after a court hearing, losing his sight and ability to speak. He too was treated by Berlin's Charité hospital, and asked the Berlin-based Cinema for Peace Foundation to arrange Mr Navalny's airlift there.
    1
  5922. 1
  5923. 1
  5924. 1
  5925. 1
  5926. 1
  5927. 1
  5928. 1
  5929. 1
  5930. 1
  5931. 1
  5932. 1
  5933.  @fatfat1877  You don't seem to understand that there are certain consequences of Brexit. It's not the EU choosing to be difficult. It's that you've left a club with privileges. You are not longer paying the fee to be in that club so you no longer get the privileges. I direct you to a very pro hard Brexit economist that Jacob Rees Mogg says 'is always right' - Patrick Minford, and even he admits that a hard Brexit will destroy British manufacturing and agriculture but he does not care about that because other aspects of a hard Brexit matter to him more. We are no longer in the 18th century. World trade is no much more globalised and we no longer have an Empire to exploit. Trade is never entirely free. Countries are protectionist, and want to gain an advantage. There are trade offs and compromise that have to be made. Trade with the rest of the world is no more 'moral' than trade with the EU. Mark Rutte, the Netherlands P.M has said that no one of significance in the EU is now pushing for greater Union. WTO rules mean that if you place tariffs on the EU for certain goods, for instance, you have to place the same tariffs on those goods for all countries you trade with. If you place no tariffs, you have to have no tariffs on those goods for all countries you trade with. If Britain seeks to break the rules, it will be a treated as a pariah in world trade by many countries who won't want to deal with us, and won't feel they have to either. The US and China have to come to some arrangement because they are dependent on each other in many ways. That's not true of a small country like the UK and we'll be even smaller if Scotland goes independent and stays in the EU. You are naive about what's possible - just like Boris who lost so many votes in Parliament when he sought to ignore the rules. He could probably have got his deal through. It had been approved but he pulled it back. Why? Because what he really wants is to crash out with a no deal which would suit his rich backers more. Do you know that financial speculators are making millions and stand to make millions more, after a hard Brexit from betting against UK economic performance. It's a practice called 'shorting'. Also may of his rich tax avoiding backers want to avoid tighter rules being introduced by the EU to prevent offshore tax avoidance and money laundering. There's no benefit to the average or ordinary person from Brexit. The Tories' success is that they've persuaded so many people that there will be some benefit.
    1
  5934.  @fatfat1877  Yes the EU has trade deals with nations but these deals took many years to agree. We will lose those deals the moment we leave the EU and it will take years to replace them if we ever can. Other countries prefer deals with a big trading block like the EU rather than with small countries outside of the EU, as we will be. When we are competitors of the EU we won't be competing on a level playing field. They will be the existing and preferred deal partner for many nations outside of the EU - not Britain. The EU is protectionist but not against those countries within the EU. It's protectionist against those outside of the EU. That's the whole point of the EU to protect living standards and other standards including human rights and workers rights. (( Treated as a pariah by who? Do you really think foriegn nations will care about a trade conflict between the EU and UK? )) You miss the point here. Nations won't want to deal with a trading partner who doesn't observe any trade rules or agreements and may undercut them or switch trading partners at a moment's notice ((they wont, especially if they have tariff free access to the UK))You miss the point again. If they have free tariff access to the UK, British Industry and Agriculture will die off. Also if they have free tariff access then we'll have to give that to the EU also under WTO rules but the EU will be able to apply tariffs to us under those same rules. If we don't abide by the rules, the EU, the largest consumer trade area on our doorstep will simply not trade with us but will get their imports from elsewhere such as Ireland or Scotland, if Scotland joins the EU after voting for independence, or from elsewhere inside the EU. When the UK car industry fails there will be plenty of German cars for the EU to buy instead.
    1
  5935. 1
  5936. 1
  5937. 1
  5938. 1
  5939. 1
  5940. 1
  5941. 1
  5942. 1
  5943. 1
  5944. 1
  5945. 1
  5946. 1
  5947. 1
  5948. 1
  5949. 1
  5950. 1
  5951. 1
  5952. 1
  5953. 1
  5954. 1
  5955. 1
  5956. 1
  5957. 1
  5958. 1
  5959. 1
  5960. 1
  5961. 1
  5962. 1
  5963. 1
  5964. 1
  5965. 1
  5966. 1
  5967. 1
  5968. 1
  5969. 1
  5970. 1
  5971. 1
  5972. 1
  5973. 1
  5974. 1
  5975. 1
  5976. 1
  5977. 1
  5978. 1
  5979. 1
  5980. 1
  5981. 1
  5982. 1
  5983. 1
  5984. 1
  5985. 1
  5986. 1
  5987. 1
  5988. 1
  5989. 1
  5990. 1
  5991. 1
  5992. 1
  5993. 1
  5994. 1
  5995. 1
  5996. 1
  5997. 1
  5998. 1
  5999. Some people have been killed by Novichok and some have survived it (.e.g the Skripals). Russia does have a bad track record when it comes to dealing with any opposition. Galina Starovoitova, opposition Duma Deputy killed Sergei Yushenkov, co-chairman of the Liberal Russia political party, shot and killed Mikhail Trepashkin jailed after a secret trial on espionage charges. Yuri Shchekochikhin, poisoned, Russian authorities refused to allow an autopsy Mikhail Trepashkin, a former KGB spy imprisoned Mikhail Khodorkovsky, sent to Siberia Nikolai Girenko, a prominent human rights defender, shot dead in his home Paul Klebnikov, editor Russian edition Forbes magazine, shot and killed in Moscow Viktor Yushchenko, anti-Russian candidate for the presidency of the Ukraine, is poisoned by Dioxin. Andrei Kozlov, shot and killed in Moscow Anna Politkovskaya,journalist, shot and killed in Moscow. Paul M. Joyal, shot in street Stanslav Markelov Russian human rights attorney shot in the back of the head Anastasia Barburova, a young journalism student. Shot in the back of the head. Moscow. Boris Nemtsov, Russian opposition politician, shot in the streets of Moscow near the Kemlin 2015 Natalia Estemirova leading Russian human rights journalist and activist,shot and killed Nikolai Glushkov – Russian businessman in the UK who had been given asylum – strangled in England Sergei Skripal – UK former spy – double agent poisoned with Novichok gas 2018 Yulia Skirpal UK daughter of Sergei Skripal poisoned with Novichok gas 2018 Sergei Magnitsky – Accountant in USSR who was investigating and exposed tax fraud by the Russian state. Imprisoned and died in prison after being beaten up. Prosecuted by the Russian state even after his death. Maxim Borodin – journalist found dying on the ground outside his 5th floor flat Mikhail Beketov – journalist left brain damaged and later died Oleg Kashin journalist left seriously injured after an assault Tatyana Felgengauer – journalist, stabbed in the neck while at work Alexander Litvinenko. KGB defector. Poisoned with Polonium in London Alexander Perepilichnyy Boris Berezovsky 6 Russian Diplomats who have died since Trump's victory Alexander Kadakin – Russia's ambassador to India Andrey Malanan Senior Russian diplomat in Greece Vitaly Churkin Russian ambassador to the UN Denis Voronenkon Russian politician who had fled to Ukraine Migayas Shirinskiy Russia's ambassador to Sudan Pyotr Verzilov. Pussy Riot Founder. Protested with girlfriend and others at World Cup Final against police persecution while Putin was watching from the stand. Poisoned on 11 Feb 2018 after attending girlfriend's court case. Mother was blocked from seeing him. Doctors refused to explain. Alexei Navalny – opposition leader to Putin. Poisoned on a flight within Russia 20.08.20 In the Crimea UN's June 2018 Crimea report accuses the Russian Federation of grave human rights violations in Ukraine. e.g multiple cases of torture e.g. Ibrahim Mirpochchaev Crimean journalist, abducted with his father and 2 brothers. Beaten for hours, asphyxiated with plastic bags, strangled, repeatedly tasered and violated with a hard probe used to electrocute him internally. Renat Paralamov, Crimean Tartar similar tale, forced confession. Server Karametov, 76 year old with Parkinson's disease prosecuted for holding a placard in support of 70 Crimean tartars being tried for multiple simultaneous peaceful lone demonstrations. Ervin Ibragimov, Tartar leader, dragged off by men in uniform May 2016. Not seen since. Oleg Sentsov, Crimean film maker, sentenced to 20 years in gaol. Olexander Kolchenko, his assistant, sentenced to 10 years. Gennady Afanasayev beaten, suffocated, stripped, threatened with rape and jailed, to force him to testify against Oleg Sentsov. He withdrew his testimony at the trial. Nariman Memediminov, Tartar activist, forcibly committed to a psychiatric hospital- a measure described by his lawyer as punitive psychiatry.
    1
  6000. 1
  6001. 1
  6002. 1
  6003. 1
  6004. 1
  6005. 1
  6006. 1
  6007. 1
  6008. 1
  6009. 1
  6010. 1
  6011. 1
  6012. 1
  6013. 1
  6014. 1
  6015. 1
  6016. 1
  6017. 1
  6018. 1
  6019. 1
  6020. 1
  6021. 1
  6022. 1
  6023. 1
  6024. 1
  6025. 1
  6026. 1
  6027. 1
  6028. 1
  6029. 1
  6030. 1
  6031. 1
  6032. 1
  6033. 1
  6034. 1
  6035. 1
  6036. 1
  6037. 1
  6038. 1
  6039. 1
  6040. 1
  6041. 1
  6042. 1
  6043. 1
  6044. 1
  6045. 1
  6046. 1
  6047. 1
  6048. 1
  6049. 1
  6050. 1
  6051. 1
  6052. 1
  6053. 1
  6054. 1
  6055. 1
  6056. 1
  6057. 1
  6058. 1
  6059. 1
  6060. 1
  6061. 1
  6062. 1
  6063. 1
  6064. 1
  6065. 1
  6066. 1
  6067. 1
  6068. 1
  6069. 1
  6070. 1
  6071. 1
  6072. 1
  6073. 1
  6074. 1
  6075. 1
  6076. 1
  6077. 1
  6078. 1
  6079. 1
  6080. 1
  6081. 1
  6082. 1
  6083. 1
  6084. 1
  6085. 1
  6086. 1
  6087. 1
  6088. 1
  6089. 1
  6090. 1
  6091. 1
  6092. 1
  6093. 1
  6094. 1
  6095. 1
  6096. 1
  6097. 1
  6098. 1
  6099. 1
  6100. 1
  6101. 1
  6102. 1
  6103. 1
  6104. 1
  6105. 1
  6106. 1
  6107. 1
  6108. 1
  6109. 1
  6110. 1
  6111. 1
  6112. 1
  6113. 1
  6114. 1
  6115. 1
  6116. 1
  6117. 1
  6118. 1
  6119. 1
  6120. 1
  6121. 1
  6122. 1
  6123. 1
  6124. 1
  6125. 1
  6126. 1
  6127. 1
  6128. 1
  6129. 1
  6130. 1
  6131. 1
  6132. 1
  6133. 1
  6134. 1
  6135. 1
  6136. 1
  6137. 1
  6138. 1
  6139. 1
  6140. 1
  6141. 1
  6142. 1
  6143. 1
  6144. 1
  6145. 1
  6146. 1
  6147. 1
  6148. 1
  6149. 1
  6150. 1
  6151. 1
  6152. 1
  6153. 1
  6154. 1
  6155. 1
  6156. 1
  6157. 1
  6158. 1
  6159. 1
  6160. 1
  6161. 1
  6162. 1
  6163. 1
  6164. 1
  6165. 1
  6166. 1
  6167. 1
  6168. 1
  6169. 1
  6170. 1
  6171. 1
  6172. 1
  6173. 1
  6174. 1
  6175. 1
  6176. 1
  6177. 1
  6178. 1
  6179. 1
  6180. 1
  6181. 1
  6182. 1
  6183. 1
  6184. 1
  6185. 1
  6186. 1
  6187. 1
  6188.  @angrybrit7331  It's not the UK government that decides how to spend the money that comes back from the EU. It goes to projects and places in the UK that qualify under EU rules. If our government had the chance they would not spend it to rejuvanate poorer areas, as they haven't done so with the 99% of UK spending that comes under their own controls. Some of these places don't seem to realise where much of the investment comes from and they will lose it once we leave the EU. It shouldn't be looked at narrowly as a monetary transaction. We gain a lot economically by being in the EU as our economy prospers from it, more than if we were out, with no contributions to make. It's just that our government chooses not to share that prosperity fairly. The UK contributions saved from being out would more than be swallowed up by trying to shore up the areas hit by being out of that market. That's if the government were minded to use ithe money that way. They are not known for being too generous our government, because the Tories believe in 'shrinking the state' and that means not putting so much money into it as well as selling parts off or privatising services. It's not the rich that rely on public services and the jobs they provide so much so it's not the rich who will take a hit from coming out of the EU. Private sector businesses will also be hit, but rich investors don't care as they will be able to move their investments to parts of the word that are more booming and park their profits more in tax avoidance areas. There's nothing patriotic about a hard Brexit. It will hit the country hard, but rich Brexiteers hide true motives behind the fig leaf that it will somehow be better for Britain. Voters need to evict bad governments and vote in people who believe in creating a fairer society. That's the way to start to mend the situation. It's quite impressive really how Brexiteers manage to focus voters wrath on particular elements, in order to gain their support, whilst not letting them see the overall picture.
    1
  6189. 1
  6190. 1
  6191. 1
  6192. 1
  6193. 1
  6194. 1
  6195. 1
  6196. 1
  6197. What do you expect? It's their club and their rules and there are 27 of them in that club. A person requesting to leave a club cannot be treated with the same favouritism as a member, otherwise there is no point in having a club. I don't think they would have given better terms to anyone else, because the backstop, which is a sticking point for many MPs, is a key element for Europe. Her problem was fourfold I think. 1) Holding an unnecessary election in 2017 which lost her overall majority in the House of Commons, because she mistakenly thought she would have a great victory over the opposition, and 2) putting party interests before the country's. She should have consulted MPs earlier about what sort of deal or Brexit they would support.3) She has terrible judgement in people. Appointing Boris Johnson, David Davies and later Dominic Raab to key positions regarding Brexit negotiations, was appointing people with very limited abilities, strong prejudices and little knowledge - not people who are on top of their briefs 4) Once she makes her mind up it's difficult to get her to change it. She's inflexible. Not so good in the situation she is in. In her defence, if she'd done 2) the likelihood is that her party would have ejected her as leader, and also until the Brexit implications became clearer I don't think many MPs were clear about what type of Brexit they would support. Is Theresa pronounced Terayza or is it pronounced Tereeza? I'm inclined to think that only pretentious folk pronounce it Terayza.
    1
  6198. 1
  6199. 1
  6200. 1
  6201. 1
  6202. 1
  6203. 1
  6204. 1
  6205. 1
  6206. 1
  6207. 1
  6208. 1
  6209. 1
  6210. 1
  6211. 1
  6212. 1
  6213. 1
  6214. 1
  6215. 1
  6216. 1
  6217. 1
  6218. 1
  6219. 1
  6220. 1
  6221. 1
  6222. 1
  6223. 1
  6224. 1
  6225. 1
  6226. 1
  6227. 1
  6228. 1
  6229. 1
  6230. 1
  6231. 1
  6232. 1
  6233. 1
  6234. 1
  6235. 1
  6236. 1
  6237. 1
  6238. 1
  6239. 1
  6240. 1
  6241. 1
  6242. 1
  6243. 1
  6244. 1
  6245. 1
  6246. 1
  6247. 1
  6248. 1
  6249. 1
  6250. 1
  6251. 1
  6252. 1
  6253. 1
  6254. 1
  6255. 1
  6256. 1
  6257. 1
  6258. 1
  6259. 1
  6260. 1
  6261. 1
  6262. 1
  6263. 1
  6264. 1
  6265. 1
  6266. 1
  6267. 1
  6268. 1
  6269. 1
  6270. 1
  6271. 1
  6272. 1
  6273. 1
  6274. 1
  6275. 1
  6276. 1
  6277. 1
  6278. 1
  6279. 1
  6280. 1
  6281. 1
  6282. 1
  6283. 1
  6284. 1
  6285. 1
  6286. 1
  6287. 1
  6288. 1
  6289. 1
  6290. 1
  6291. 1
  6292. 1
  6293. 1
  6294. 1
  6295. 1
  6296. 1
  6297. 1
  6298. 1
  6299. 1
  6300. 1
  6301. 1
  6302. 1
  6303. 1
  6304. 1
  6305. 1
  6306. 1
  6307. 1
  6308. 1
  6309. 1
  6310. 1
  6311. 1
  6312. 1
  6313. 1
  6314. 1
  6315. 1
  6316. 1
  6317. 1
  6318. 1
  6319. 1
  6320. 1
  6321. 1
  6322. 1
  6323. 1
  6324. 1
  6325. 1
  6326. 1
  6327. 1
  6328. 1
  6329. 1
  6330. 1
  6331. 1
  6332. 1
  6333. 1
  6334. 1
  6335. 1
  6336. 1
  6337. 1
  6338. 1
  6339. 1
  6340. 1
  6341. 1
  6342. 1
  6343. 1
  6344. 1
  6345. 1
  6346. 1
  6347. 1
  6348. 1
  6349. 1
  6350. 1
  6351. 1
  6352. 1
  6353. 1
  6354. 1
  6355. 1
  6356. 1
  6357. 1
  6358. 1
  6359. 1
  6360. 1
  6361. 1
  6362. 1
  6363. 1
  6364. 1
  6365. 1
  6366. 1
  6367. 1
  6368. 1
  6369. 1
  6370. 1
  6371. 1
  6372. 1
  6373. 1
  6374. 1
  6375. 1
  6376. 1
  6377. 1
  6378.  @Drifty40  First of all the NI protocol has no bearing on anyone's nationality culture or currency as Tory Ministers have confirmed. It's about trade. The government was offered it by the EU in Brexit withdrawal negotiations and accepted it. It was approved through the UK Parliament and the DUP supported the government in that vote. Once the UK overall had voted to leave the EU in the 2016 Referendum, we were going to be treated the same as other third countries and that meant there had to be border controls. The GFA ruled out having those on the island of Ireland. NI's economy is doing better under the NI protocol than any other UK country since Brexit. It offered NI the best of both worlds. The DUP don't like it because they feel a United Ireland might make more sense to people now. They were hoping for a border in Ireland that would make a United Ireland less likely. In other words their objection is political not economic but they voted for it so they got themselves into their own pickle. Sinn Fein removed themselves from the NI Assembly because of a financial fraud scandal that the DUP and Assembly leader, Arlene Foster, refused to investigate, most likely because colleagues and supporters were implicated. The NI Executive should not be subject to stop, start, stop like that because the members are paid to represent the people on a much wider range of issues. There is no majority clamour in NI over the protocol. Most people are content and want it fully implemented. Some tweaking may be possible if the parties take a reasonable attitude to the EU in negotiations and stop grandstanding for political reasons. Time for the UK side to grow up.
    1
  6379. 1
  6380. 1
  6381. 1
  6382. 1
  6383. 1
  6384. 1
  6385. 1
  6386. 1
  6387. 1
  6388. 1
  6389. 1
  6390. 1
  6391. 1
  6392. 1
  6393. 1
  6394. 1
  6395. 1
  6396. 1
  6397. 1
  6398. 1
  6399. 1
  6400. 1
  6401. 1
  6402. 1
  6403. 1
  6404. 1
  6405. 1
  6406. 1
  6407. 1
  6408. 1
  6409. 1
  6410. 1
  6411. 1
  6412. 1
  6413. 1
  6414. 1
  6415. 1
  6416. 1
  6417. 1
  6418. 1
  6419. 1
  6420. 1
  6421. 1
  6422. 1
  6423. 1
  6424. 1
  6425. 1
  6426. 1
  6427. 1
  6428. 1
  6429. 1
  6430. 1
  6431. 1
  6432. 1
  6433. 1
  6434. 1
  6435. 1
  6436. 1
  6437. 1
  6438. 1
  6439. 1
  6440. 1
  6441. 1
  6442. 1
  6443. 1
  6444. 1
  6445. 1
  6446. 1
  6447. 1
  6448. 1
  6449. 1
  6450. 1
  6451. 1
  6452. 1
  6453. 1
  6454. 1
  6455. 1
  6456. 1
  6457. 1
  6458. 1
  6459. 1
  6460. 1
  6461. 1
  6462.  @Kay-gw6vw  I don't use those taxi companies you mention. I use a local one that is cheaper. I've used them for years but more so for local hospital appointments during the Covid lockdowns. I don't go more than a mile or two in taxis, unless I'm off to a train station. If you are talking about Uber, it's well known for breaking local laws and Germany banned it from offering rides. The judge in the UK was not asked to rule whether TfL's decision was right but to judge whether Uber now met the conditions to be licensed again. The judge thought that as Uber used an App which TfL could monitor, it was now o.k for them to operate their taxi service again. He allowed it for 18 months. They had to pay TfL £374k though as part of the judgement. I think Khan's policy is trying to unclog roads in London by deterring traffic that doesn't really need to be using London's roads. However Covid lockdowns have meant far more delivery traffic is on the roads now as more people order goods online. I live on a main road so funnelling traffic onto main roads doesn't help me except that I'm told that it will eventually reduce traffic so that traffic will flow faster on those roads and not hang around pumping so much pollution. The other thing is that traffic will eventually all be electric. I'm sorry you are adversely affected by this. Your employer should really be bearing the cost but un-unionised labour suffers the worst and allowing so much competition in delivery services also does. Maybe if there was a Labour government in future there would be a rationalised delivery service with decent pay and involving less traffic on the roads. We can only hope. P.S I used to cycle but my asthma put an end to that.
    1
  6463. 1
  6464. 1
  6465. 1
  6466. 1
  6467. 1
  6468. 1
  6469. 1
  6470. 1
  6471. 1
  6472. 1
  6473. 1
  6474. 1
  6475. 1
  6476. 1
  6477. 1
  6478. 1
  6479. 1
  6480. 1
  6481. 1
  6482. 1
  6483. 1
  6484. 1
  6485. 1
  6486. 1
  6487. 1
  6488. 1
  6489. 1
  6490. 1
  6491. 1
  6492. 1
  6493. 1
  6494. 1
  6495. 1
  6496. 1
  6497. 1
  6498. 1
  6499. 1
  6500. 1
  6501. 1
  6502. 1
  6503. 1
  6504. 1
  6505. 1
  6506. 1
  6507. 1
  6508. 1
  6509. 1
  6510. 1
  6511. 1
  6512. 1
  6513. 1
  6514. 1
  6515. 1
  6516. 1
  6517. 1
  6518. 1
  6519. 1
  6520. 1
  6521. 1
  6522. 1
  6523. 1
  6524. 1
  6525. 1
  6526. 1
  6527. 1
  6528. 1
  6529. 1
  6530. 1
  6531. 1
  6532. 1
  6533. 1
  6534. 1
  6535. 1
  6536. 1
  6537. 1
  6538. 1
  6539. 1
  6540. 1
  6541. 1
  6542. 1
  6543. 1
  6544. 1
  6545. 1
  6546. 1
  6547. 1
  6548. 1
  6549. 1
  6550. 1
  6551. 1
  6552. 1
  6553. 1
  6554. 1
  6555. 1
  6556. 1
  6557. 1
  6558. 1
  6559. 1
  6560. 1
  6561. 1
  6562. 1
  6563. 1
  6564. 1
  6565. 1
  6566. 1
  6567. 1
  6568. 1
  6569. 1
  6570. 1
  6571. 1
  6572. 1
  6573. 1
  6574. 1
  6575. 1
  6576. 1
  6577. 1
  6578. 1
  6579. 1
  6580. 1
  6581. 1
  6582. 1
  6583. 1
  6584.  @cameronneff6002  There is no pure capitalist country. If there was there would be a revolution because of the conditions it would cause. Capitalist countries to a greater or lesser extent already have some welfare or social democratic policies to prop them up. There are people willing to work who can't find jobs or can't find them quickly enough to manage financially in the interim and there are people who can't work because they are sick or disabled through no fault of their own. People can have children before disaster strikes them. Scandinavian countries manage to have good economies as well as good welfare systems and come high up on happiness surveys. Going down the route of leaving people to starve is barbaric but I understand there are plenty of Americans who would be quite content with such a system. There will be people who try to 'play the system' but it's quite a tough system in the UK already. If you don't apply for jobs every day on benefits, you are sanctioned by losing benefits for weeks and if you don't accept a job offer you are sanctioned by losing benefits. There are even targets for sanctioning by benefits offices. One poor guy who was an ex-soldier with mental health problems and type one diabetes was sanctioned by having his benefits cut off because he didn't attend a meeting he wasn't notified of (and that's not unusual). Unable to pay his electricity bills or buy food, he was unable to keep his insulin cool (as required) in a fridge and lack of food played havoc with his diabetes and he died from poorly controlled diabetes. There are lots of cases like that. It's no easy life for anyone claiming benefits.
    1
  6585.  @cameronneff6002  We have the benefit of the NHS (National Health Service) because people are willing to pay for it through taxation, and it's not just about you paying for other people. It's about others also paying for you if you should need help. It's a social insurance system really where all the admin is done for you and the worry about being able to afford treatment if you need it is taken away. That is really worth having. There will always be some people who try to cheat a welfare system but that doesn't mean that overall it isn't worth doing. Basic education is free (primary and secondary (high school), paid for by taxpayers and that's worth doing too. Imagine what society would be like if only a small percentage of people were educated. Cuba doesn't operate in any level playing field because the USA has kept up a trade embargo against it for many decades now. Nevertheless they have achieved remarkable results in education and healthcare considering that, and when you compare it to some other countries in the region, and it wouldn't leave you to die without treatment as in the US if you have no insurance and no means of paying. Greece only voted in a socialist government after they got into financial difficulty - partly their own fault - the Greeks are big tax avoiders, so they could not afford their welfare state, and there was no efficient enforcement of tax collection, and it was partly a result of being in the EU which forces countries to meet certain financial requirements that suit some countries more than others. Hard working people supporting themselves are the backbone of society and families, I agree, but that doesn't mean there can't be sensible arrangements to improve life and society for all, without being too much of a burden on working individuals. You don't mention that the US keeps spending billions of taxpayers money on wars, without asking you whether that's how you want your money spent. There are choices to be made when it comes to what to spend taxpayers money on.
    1
  6586. 1
  6587. 1
  6588. 1
  6589. 1
  6590. 1
  6591. 1
  6592. 1
  6593. 1
  6594. 1
  6595. 1
  6596. 1
  6597. 1
  6598. 1
  6599. 1
  6600. 1
  6601. 1
  6602. 1
  6603. 1
  6604. 1
  6605. 1
  6606. 1
  6607. 1
  6608. 1
  6609. 1
  6610. 1
  6611. 1
  6612. 1
  6613. 1
  6614. 1
  6615. 1
  6616. 1
  6617. 1
  6618. 1
  6619. 1
  6620. 1
  6621. 1
  6622. 1
  6623. 1
  6624. 1
  6625. 1
  6626. 1
  6627. 1
  6628. 1
  6629. 1
  6630. 1
  6631. 1
  6632. 1
  6633. 1
  6634. 1
  6635. 1
  6636. 1
  6637. 1
  6638. 1
  6639. 1
  6640. 1
  6641. 1
  6642. 1
  6643. 1
  6644. 1
  6645. 1
  6646. 1
  6647. 1
  6648. 1
  6649. 1
  6650. 1
  6651. 1
  6652. 1
  6653. 1
  6654. 1
  6655. 1
  6656. 1
  6657. 1
  6658. 1
  6659. 1
  6660. 1
  6661. 1
  6662. 1
  6663. 1
  6664. 1
  6665. 1
  6666. 1
  6667. 1
  6668. 1
  6669. 1
  6670. 1
  6671. 1
  6672. 1
  6673. 1
  6674. 1
  6675. 1
  6676. 1
  6677. 1
  6678. 1
  6679. 1
  6680. 1
  6681. 1
  6682. 1
  6683. 1
  6684. 1
  6685. 1
  6686. 1
  6687. 1
  6688. 1
  6689. 1
  6690. 1
  6691. 1
  6692. 1
  6693. 1
  6694. To be fair to Keir Starmer, the Tories and their media supporters have over the years successfully divided the working class against each other. Starmer is trying to appear like the person who wants a negotiated solution so as not to alienate other sections of the working class and the middle class. However he knows, and the Union knows that the people who want to prolong this strike are the government, and they won't negotiate because they want to break the RMT union. They have a cuts agenda for the railways including cuts in safety areas such as maintenance. The government is controlling the negotiations but not negotiating directly and pretending it's not down to them but down to the rail companies who are the ones negotiating directly with the unions, when the government allows them to, but it doesn't allow them to compromise in order to settle the dispute. Starmer does attack the government for their lack of willingness to negotiate to end the strike. The reason the government can control the rail companies is that the government took over control of the railways during Covid times, because it was not profitable for the rail companies to continue and they would have walked away from their contracts. Now the government collects all the rail revenue and pays the companies flat fees for managing the railways. Mick Lynch says the companies are willing to settle with him to end the strike but the government has told them not to. You can see in media interviews that whenever the Union reps (including Mick's Assistant) try to explain the detail, the interviewers often talk over them to try and block their message.
    1
  6695. 1
  6696. 1
  6697. 1
  6698. 1
  6699. 1
  6700. 1
  6701. 1
  6702. 1
  6703. 1
  6704. 1
  6705. 1
  6706. 1
  6707. 1
  6708. 1
  6709. 1
  6710. 1
  6711. 1
  6712. 1
  6713. 1
  6714. 1
  6715. 1
  6716. 1
  6717. 1
  6718. 1
  6719. 1
  6720. 1
  6721. 1
  6722. 1
  6723. 1
  6724. 1
  6725. 1
  6726. 1
  6727. 1
  6728. 1
  6729. 1
  6730. 1
  6731. 1
  6732. 1
  6733. 1
  6734. 1
  6735. 1
  6736. 1
  6737. 1
  6738. 1
  6739. 1
  6740. 1
  6741. 1
  6742. 1
  6743. 1
  6744. 1
  6745. 1
  6746. 1
  6747. 1
  6748. 1
  6749. 1
  6750. 1
  6751. 1
  6752. 1
  6753. 1
  6754. 1
  6755. 1
  6756. 1
  6757. 1
  6758. 1
  6759. 1
  6760. 1
  6761. 1
  6762. 1
  6763. 1
  6764. 1
  6765. 1
  6766. 1
  6767. 1
  6768. 1
  6769. 1
  6770. 1
  6771. 1
  6772. 1
  6773. 1
  6774. 1
  6775. 1
  6776. 1
  6777. 1
  6778. 1
  6779. 1
  6780. 1
  6781. 1
  6782. 1
  6783. 1
  6784. 1
  6785. 1
  6786. 1
  6787. 1
  6788. 1
  6789. 1
  6790. 1
  6791. 1
  6792. 1
  6793. 1
  6794. 1
  6795. 1
  6796. 1
  6797. 1
  6798. 1
  6799. 1
  6800. 1
  6801. 1
  6802. 1
  6803. 1
  6804. 1
  6805. 1
  6806. 1
  6807. 1
  6808. 1
  6809. 1
  6810. 1
  6811. 1
  6812. 1
  6813. 1
  6814. 1
  6815. 1
  6816. 1
  6817. 1
  6818. 1
  6819. 1
  6820. 1
  6821. 1
  6822. 1
  6823. 1
  6824. 1
  6825. 1
  6826. 1
  6827. 1
  6828. 1
  6829. 1
  6830. 1
  6831. 1
  6832. 1
  6833. 1
  6834. 1
  6835. 1
  6836. 1
  6837. 1
  6838. 1
  6839. 1
  6840. 1
  6841. 1
  6842. 1
  6843. 1
  6844. 1
  6845. 1
  6846. 1
  6847. 1
  6848. 1
  6849. 1
  6850. 1
  6851. 1
  6852. 1
  6853. 1
  6854. 1
  6855. 1
  6856. 1
  6857. 1
  6858.  @genericusername3212  You know nothing do you? We'll be down the plughole if we try leaving without a deal just on WTO terms. No country in the world trades just on WTO terms because in trading terms it's the 4th division. They all want deals with a big trading block which is the premier division which is where we are now. So what happens if we go to no deal WTO terms? We have to then set a tariff for trading with the world and under WTO terms it has to be the same tariff for everyone we trade with in the same goods. If we set a tariff that will push prices up for UK consumers and we'll be worse off. If we set a zero tariff (possible under the rules) our farming and manufacturing won't be able to compete with cheap imports from countries where workers have no rights and are paid pennies an hour so our farming and manufacturing industries will be destroyed. Patrick Minford, an economist who is for a hard Brexit says the same about the future of British farming and manufacturing. It will affect other economic sectors also. Wealthy people like ex stockbroker Farage and Jacob Rees Mogg will be raking it in because WTO rules do not regulate financial systems and they will be even more free to squirrel away their profits to tax havens around the world. Also over 80% of our exports are services and 49% of those are to the EU. The day we hard Brexit, those services with lose their 'passport' rights to European EU countries, which is why businesses are talking about moving their headquarters to the Europe. The very people who want Brexit because they are suffering under the present government's austerity programme, will be stuffed even more under no deal Brexit. None of this was explained before the Referendum by a campaign that wasn't even talking about a no deal Brexit. As for getting trade deals, as a member of the EU, we have over 40 trade deals that will no longer apply the day we go out on no deal and Liam Fox only had a handful lined up to replace them. Trade deals take years to negotiate because they are complex covering everything traded between countries. Trump is protectionist and the US is a larger economy than ours, and if we want a trade deal with the USA it will be very much on his terms, as he doesn't need to deal. His negotiators have already said they want access to NHS funding for their corporations as part of the deal and for us to take their farming products like chlorine washed chicken and hormone fed beef, and contaminated baby food- practices currently banned by the EU. China and Russia are not our friends and in any case they don't allow countries to export freely to theirs. They are protectionist. Asian countries have each other to trade with nearby. The only thing India wants from us is more visas for people to come here. Other countries won't make up for the loss of the big trading area on our doorstep (the EU). The way out of our problems is to vote for a party that will do something about inequality in the UK and protect jobs and trade, and that's not the Tories or the Brexit party. Farage has stated he is for replacing the NHS with an insurance based market system. He is for taking restrictions off the sale of handguns and he has other right wing policies too. If we set a zero tariff, that would be zero for EU trade also, except as outsiders the EU would be placing a tariff on us (could be 40%). That would make us uncompetitive in trading with the EU. You can't just count the cost of trading with the EU in terms of our subscriptions. You have to count the benefits to the economy too and the health and welfare of people to get the whole picture.
    1
  6859. 1
  6860. 1
  6861. 1
  6862. 1
  6863. 1
  6864. 1
  6865. 1
  6866. 1
  6867. 1
  6868. 1
  6869. 1
  6870. 1
  6871. 1
  6872. 1
  6873. 1
  6874. 1
  6875. 1
  6876. 1
  6877. 1
  6878. 1
  6879. 1
  6880. 1
  6881. 1
  6882. 1
  6883. 1
  6884. 1
  6885. 1
  6886. 1
  6887. 1
  6888. 1
  6889. 1
  6890. 1
  6891. 1
  6892. 1
  6893. 1
  6894. 1
  6895. 1
  6896. 1
  6897. 1
  6898. 1
  6899. 1
  6900. 1
  6901. 1
  6902. 1
  6903. 1
  6904. 1
  6905. 1
  6906. 1
  6907. 1
  6908. 1
  6909. 1
  6910. 1
  6911. 1
  6912. 1
  6913. 1
  6914. 1
  6915. 1
  6916. 1
  6917. 1
  6918. 1
  6919. 1
  6920. 1
  6921. 1
  6922. 1
  6923. 1
  6924. 1
  6925. 1
  6926. 1
  6927. 1
  6928. 1
  6929. 1
  6930. 1
  6931. 1
  6932. 1
  6933. 1
  6934. 1
  6935. 1
  6936. 1
  6937. jon smith. Look at Russia's track record on political murders, torture and imprisonment and the fact that Putin is on record as saying he can't ever forgive 'traitors' such as defectors. Here is some of their 'track record': Galina Starovoitova, opposition Duma Deputy killed Sergei Yushenkov, co-chairman of the Liberal Russia political party, shot and killed Mikhail Trepashkin jailed after a secret trial on espionage charges. Yuri Shchekochikhin, poisoned, Russian authorities refused to allow an autopsy Mikhail Trepashkin, a former KGB spy imprisoned Mikhail Khodorkovsky, sent to Siberia Nikolai Girenko, a prominent human rights defender, shot dead in his home Paul Klebnikov, editor Russian edition Forbes magazine, shot and killed in Moscow Viktor Yushchenko, anti-Russian candidate for the presidency of the Ukraine, is poisoned by Dioxin. Andrei Kozlov, shot and killed in Moscow Anna Politkovskaya, journalist, shot and killed in Moscow. Paul M. Joyal, shot in street Stanslav Markelov Russian human rights attorney shot in the back of the head Anastasia Barburova, a young journalism student. Shot in the back of the head. Moscow. Boris Nemtsov, Russian opposition politician, shot in the streets of Moscow near the Kremlin 2015 Natalia Estemirova leading Russian human rights journalist and activist,shot and killed Nikolai Glushkov – Russian businessman in the UK who had been given asylum – strangled in England Sergei Skripal – UK former spy – double agent poisoned with Novichok gas 2018 Yulia Skirpal UK daughter of Sergei Skripal poisoned with Novichok gas 2018 Sergei Magnitsky – Accountant in USSR who was investigating and exposed tax fraud by the Russian state. Imprisoned and died in prison after being beaten up. Prosecuted by the Russian state even after his death. Maxim Borodin – journalist found dying on the ground outside his 5th floor flat Mikhail Beketov – journalist left brain damaged and later died Oleg Kashin journalist left seriously injured after an assault Tatyana Felgengauer – journalist, stabbed in the neck while at work Alexander Perepilichnyy Boris Berezovsky 6 Russian Diplomats who have died since Trump's victory Alexander Kadakin – Russia's ambassador to India Andrey Malanan Senior Russian diplomat in Greece Vitaly Churkin Russian ambassador to the UN Denis Voronenkon Russian politician who had fled to Ukraine Migayas Shirinskiy Russia's ambassador to Sudan Alexander Litvinenko. KGB defector. Poisoned with Polonium. In the Crimea UN's June 2018 Crimea report accuses the Russian Federation of grave human rights violations in Ukraine. e.g multiple cases of torture e.g. Ibrahim Mirpochchaev (sic?) Crimean journalist, abducted with his father and 2 brothers. Beaten for hours, asphyxiated with plastic bags, strangled, repeatedly tasered and violated with a hard probe used to electrocute him internally. Renat Paralamov, Crimean Tartar similar tale, forced confession. Server Karametov, 76 year old with Parkinson's disease prosecuted for holding a placard in support of 70 Crimean tartars being tried for multiple simultaneous peaceful lone demonstrations. Ervin Ibragimov, Tartar leader, dragged off by men in uniform May 2016. Not seen since. Oleg Sentsov, Crimean film maker, sentenced to 20 years in gaol. Olexander Kolchenko, his assistant, sentenced to 10 years. Gennady Afanasayev beaten, suffocated, stripped, threatened with rape and jailed, to force him to testify against Oleg Sentsov. He withdrew his testimony at the trial. Nariman Memediminov, Tartar activist, forcibly committed to a psychiatric hospital- a measure described by his lawyer as punitive psychiatry.
    1
  6938. 1
  6939. 1
  6940. 1
  6941. 1
  6942. 1
  6943. 1
  6944. 1
  6945. 1
  6946. 1
  6947. 1
  6948. 1
  6949. 1
  6950. 1
  6951. 1
  6952. 1
  6953. 1
  6954. 1
  6955. 1
  6956. 1
  6957. 1
  6958. 1
  6959. 1
  6960. 1
  6961. 1
  6962. 1
  6963. 1
  6964. 1
  6965. 1
  6966. 1
  6967. 1
  6968. 1
  6969. 1
  6970. 1
  6971. 1
  6972. 1
  6973. 1
  6974. 1
  6975. 1
  6976. 1
  6977. 1
  6978. 1
  6979. 1
  6980. 1
  6981. 1
  6982. 1
  6983. 1
  6984. 1
  6985. 1
  6986. 1
  6987. 1
  6988. 1
  6989. 1
  6990. 1
  6991. 1
  6992. 1
  6993. 1
  6994. 1
  6995. 1
  6996. 1
  6997. 1
  6998. 1
  6999. 1
  7000. 1
  7001. 1
  7002. 1
  7003. 1
  7004. 1
  7005. 1
  7006. 1
  7007. 1
  7008. 1
  7009. 1
  7010. 1
  7011. 1
  7012. 1
  7013. 1
  7014. 1
  7015. 1
  7016. 1
  7017. 1
  7018. 1
  7019. 1
  7020. 1
  7021. 1
  7022. 1
  7023. 1
  7024. 1
  7025. 1
  7026. 1
  7027. 1
  7028. 1
  7029. 1
  7030. 1
  7031. 1
  7032. 1
  7033. 1
  7034. 1
  7035. 1
  7036. 1
  7037. 1
  7038. 1
  7039. 1
  7040. 1
  7041. 1
  7042. 1
  7043. 1
  7044. 1
  7045. 1
  7046. 1
  7047. 1
  7048. 1
  7049. 1
  7050. 1
  7051. 1
  7052. 1
  7053. 1
  7054. 1
  7055.  @Trancedd  I do believe there are conspiracies from time to time (or I would categorise many of them as balls ups followed by cover ups) but not global ones. Globally the nations of the world can't seem to agree on anything, let alone agree a global conspiracy and make it lasting and keep it secret. There's no evidence of that and people who latch on to those ideas seem to be those who are not educated enough to understand how world economies work. Most of the world lives in a capitalist system and that has certain pressures and ways of working that will play out worldwide. They are pressures inherent in how the sytem works - not a load of worldwide shady characters plotting in some indefinable way. I don't know why you think I think that corporate narratives are always valid. That's not the case. Corporate business will cover up when it can but you seem to think there's a whole conspiracy level which includes corporations, governments, scientists, the public sector and I don't know what. You do not seem to recognise when information is honest and valid.It's like when people lose trust in what they are being told, in the end they can no longer tell truth from lies,and that's the real damage of all the lies that now pervade governments and corporations, but the truth is still there to be found. It's just not recognised by many, when it's seen. Democracy is an important thing which allows us to kick out government and express our views. Distrust anyone who takes measures to decrease democracy, to make it difficult to vote, or to pack the judiciary and the executive with government friends and supporters. A certain amount of that will always happen but there are checks and balances which should not be removed. In the end voters choose who they will listen to and the less educated they are the more they can be persuaded to blame scapegoats for the problems of the country or the economy. That's a sad fact. I wish it wasn't so,
    1
  7056. 1
  7057. 1
  7058. 1
  7059. 1
  7060. 1
  7061. 1
  7062. 1
  7063. 1
  7064. 1
  7065. 1
  7066. 1
  7067. 1
  7068. 1
  7069. 1
  7070. 1
  7071. 1
  7072. 1
  7073. 1
  7074. 1
  7075. 1
  7076. 1
  7077. 1
  7078. 1
  7079. 1
  7080. 1
  7081. 1
  7082. 1
  7083. 1
  7084. 1
  7085. 1
  7086. 1
  7087. 1
  7088. 1
  7089. 1
  7090. 1
  7091. 1
  7092. 1
  7093. 1
  7094. 1
  7095. 1
  7096. 1
  7097. 1
  7098. 1
  7099. 1
  7100. 1
  7101. 1
  7102. 1
  7103. 1
  7104. 1
  7105. 1
  7106. 1
  7107. 1
  7108. 1
  7109. 1
  7110. 1
  7111. 1
  7112. 1
  7113. 1
  7114. 1
  7115. 1
  7116. 1
  7117. 1
  7118. 1
  7119. 1
  7120. 1
  7121. 1
  7122. 1
  7123. 1
  7124. 1
  7125. 1
  7126. 1
  7127. 1
  7128. 1
  7129. 1
  7130. 1
  7131. 1
  7132. 1
  7133. 1
  7134. 1
  7135. 1
  7136. 1
  7137. 1
  7138. 1
  7139. 1
  7140. 1
  7141. 1
  7142. 1
  7143. 1
  7144. 1
  7145. 1
  7146. 1
  7147. 1
  7148. 1
  7149. 1
  7150. 1
  7151. 1
  7152. 1
  7153. 1
  7154. 1
  7155. 1
  7156. 1
  7157. 1
  7158. 1
  7159. 1
  7160. 1
  7161. 1
  7162. 1
  7163. 1
  7164. 1
  7165. 1
  7166. 1
  7167. 1
  7168. 1
  7169. 1
  7170. 1
  7171. 1
  7172. 1
  7173. 1
  7174. 1
  7175. 1
  7176. 1
  7177. 1
  7178. 1
  7179. 1
  7180. 1
  7181. 1
  7182. 1
  7183. 1
  7184. 1
  7185. 1
  7186. 1
  7187. 1
  7188. 1
  7189. 1
  7190. 1
  7191. 1
  7192. 1
  7193. 1
  7194. 1
  7195. 1
  7196. 1
  7197. 1
  7198. 1
  7199. 1
  7200. 1
  7201. 1
  7202. 1
  7203. 1
  7204. 1
  7205. 1
  7206. 1
  7207. 1
  7208. 1
  7209. 1
  7210. 1
  7211. 1
  7212. 1
  7213. 1
  7214. 1
  7215. 1
  7216. 1
  7217. 1
  7218. 1
  7219. 1
  7220. 1
  7221. 1
  7222. 1
  7223. 1
  7224. 1
  7225. 1
  7226. 1
  7227. 1
  7228. 1
  7229. 1
  7230. 1
  7231. 1
  7232. 1
  7233. 1
  7234. 1
  7235. 1
  7236. 1
  7237. 1
  7238. 1
  7239. 1
  7240. 1
  7241. 1
  7242. 1
  7243. 1
  7244. 1
  7245. 1
  7246. 1
  7247. 1
  7248. 1
  7249. 1
  7250. 1
  7251. 1
  7252. 1
  7253. 1
  7254. 1
  7255. 1
  7256. 1
  7257. 1
  7258. 1
  7259. 1
  7260. 1
  7261. 1
  7262. 1
  7263. 1
  7264. 1
  7265. 1
  7266. 1
  7267. 1
  7268. 1
  7269. 1
  7270. 1
  7271. 1
  7272. 1
  7273. 1
  7274. 1
  7275. 1
  7276. 1
  7277. 1
  7278. 1
  7279. 1
  7280. 1
  7281. 1
  7282. 1
  7283. 1
  7284. 1
  7285. 1
  7286. 1
  7287. 1
  7288. 1
  7289. 1
  7290. 1
  7291. 1
  7292. 1
  7293. 1
  7294. 1
  7295. 1
  7296. 1
  7297. 1
  7298. 1
  7299. 1
  7300. 1
  7301. 1
  7302. 1
  7303. 1
  7304. 1
  7305. 1
  7306. 1
  7307. 1
  7308. 1
  7309. 1
  7310. 1
  7311. 1
  7312. 1
  7313. 1
  7314. 1
  7315. 1
  7316. 1
  7317. 1
  7318. 1
  7319. 1
  7320. 1
  7321. 1
  7322. 1
  7323. 1
  7324. 1
  7325. 1
  7326. 1
  7327. 1
  7328. 1
  7329. 1
  7330. 1
  7331. 1
  7332. 1
  7333. 1
  7334. 1
  7335. 1
  7336. 1
  7337. 1
  7338. 1
  7339. 1
  7340. 1
  7341. 1
  7342. 1
  7343. 1
  7344. 1
  7345. 1
  7346. 1
  7347. 1
  7348. 1
  7349. 1
  7350. 1
  7351. 1
  7352. 1
  7353. 1
  7354. 1
  7355. 1
  7356. 1
  7357. 1
  7358. 1
  7359. 1
  7360. 1
  7361. 1
  7362. 1
  7363. 1
  7364. 1
  7365. 1
  7366. 1
  7367. 1
  7368. 1
  7369. 1
  7370. 1
  7371. 1
  7372. 1
  7373. 1
  7374. 1
  7375. 1
  7376. 1
  7377. 1
  7378. 1
  7379. 1
  7380. 1
  7381. 1
  7382. 1
  7383. 1
  7384. 1
  7385. 1
  7386. 1
  7387. 1
  7388. 1
  7389. 1
  7390. 1
  7391. 1
  7392. 1
  7393. 1
  7394. 1
  7395. 1
  7396. 1
  7397. 1
  7398. 1
  7399. 1
  7400. 1
  7401. 1
  7402. 1
  7403. 1
  7404. 1
  7405. 1
  7406. 1
  7407. 1
  7408. 1
  7409. 1
  7410. 1
  7411. 1
  7412. 1
  7413. 1
  7414. 1
  7415. 1
  7416. 1
  7417. 1
  7418. 1
  7419. 1
  7420. 1
  7421. 1
  7422. 1
  7423. 1
  7424. 1
  7425. 1
  7426. 1
  7427. 1
  7428. 1
  7429. 1
  7430. 1
  7431. 1
  7432. 1
  7433. 1
  7434. 1
  7435. 1
  7436. 1
  7437. 1
  7438. 1
  7439. 1
  7440. 1
  7441. 1
  7442. 1
  7443. 1
  7444. 1
  7445. 1
  7446. 1
  7447. 1
  7448. 1
  7449. 1
  7450. 1
  7451. 1
  7452. 1
  7453. 1
  7454. 1
  7455. 1
  7456. 1
  7457. 1
  7458. 1
  7459. 1
  7460. 1
  7461. 1
  7462. 1
  7463. 1
  7464. 1
  7465. 1
  7466. 1
  7467. 1
  7468. 1
  7469. 1
  7470. 1
  7471. 1
  7472. 1
  7473. 1
  7474. 1
  7475. 1
  7476. 1
  7477. 1
  7478. 1
  7479. 1
  7480. 1
  7481. 1
  7482. 1
  7483. 1
  7484. 1
  7485. 1
  7486. 1
  7487. 1
  7488. 1
  7489. 1
  7490. 1
  7491. 1
  7492. 1
  7493. 1
  7494. 1
  7495. 1
  7496. 1
  7497. 1
  7498. 1
  7499. 1
  7500. 1
  7501. 1
  7502. 1
  7503. 1
  7504. 1
  7505. 1
  7506. 1
  7507. 1
  7508. 1
  7509. I'm sure he doesn't consciously use a formula. It's just part of his natural response based on his personality. He has said he tries to make people feel comfortable and his object is to be entertaining and get his guests to be entertaining, not to rip them apart. People like him but I don't think that's an objective of his. His objective is to produce an entertaining and fun show. A lot of Irish presenters in the UK have been successful. Irish charm? They seem much more comfortable in interviewing roles and able to put people at their ease. By the way, Robert De Niro has been on the show several times and doesn't say much but seems happy to be there. Graham has said he doesn't mind that Robert De Niro doesn't say much. He's happy to have him there along with other guests who will say a lot. The other thing is that Graham also seems nice and sincere. He doesn't seem to be manipulating people for his own ends to make himself look good. Occasionally people do react to Graham by getting upset or seeming to, and having a go back at him. He does not react defensively but takes the attack in his stride, and then skillfully moves on to defuse the person's upset feelings. People do seem to realise that if they were to get seriously angry with Graham, it would be like getting angry with a puppy. They are the ones who would come off looking bad in the eyes of the audience so no one really goes there. Another thing he does is allow people to drink alcohol if they want to. That usually relaxes them, and allows them to open up a bit more. It creates a party atmosphere and expectations of a fun time. However, it has backfired occasionally with the occasional guest getting too drunk and talking too much, not making much sense, or falling asleep. The trick is that he always has about 3 or 4 people on the couch by the end of the show, and gambles that not all 4 conversations will fail. He also has a rare combination of having a thick skin (personally) while being quite sensitive to other people and the signals they are giving off and being quick witted himself and able to give funny and apt responses to the unexpected revelations from his guests. Oh, and another thing, if guests are talking to each other and being entertaining he does not interrupt and doesn't necessarily stick rigidly to his script, recognising that something special is happening that should be allowed to continue. He facilitates conversations and is able to guide them skillfully if necessary. Conversations are not censored it seems, and Graham seems genuinely unshockable though he can act shocked in a comical and exaggerated way sometimes, but never seems truly uncomfortable, always seeming very accepting of his guests.
    1
  7510. 1
  7511. 1
  7512. 1
  7513. 1
  7514. 1
  7515. 1
  7516. 1
  7517. 1
  7518. 1
  7519. 1
  7520. 1
  7521. 1
  7522. 1
  7523. 1
  7524. 1
  7525. 1
  7526. 1
  7527. 1
  7528. 1
  7529. 1
  7530. 1
  7531. 1
  7532. 1
  7533. 1
  7534. 1
  7535. 1
  7536. 1
  7537. 1
  7538. 1
  7539. 1
  7540. 1
  7541. 1
  7542. 1
  7543. 1
  7544. 1
  7545. 1
  7546. 1
  7547. 1
  7548. 1
  7549. 1
  7550. 1
  7551. 1
  7552. 1
  7553. 1
  7554. 1
  7555. 1
  7556. 1
  7557. 1
  7558. 1
  7559. 1
  7560. 1
  7561. 1
  7562. 1
  7563. 1
  7564. 1
  7565. 1
  7566. 1
  7567. 1
  7568. 1
  7569. 1
  7570. 1
  7571. 1
  7572. 1
  7573. 1
  7574. 1
  7575. 1
  7576. 1
  7577. 1
  7578. 1
  7579. 1
  7580. 1
  7581. 1
  7582. 1
  7583. 1
  7584. 1
  7585. 1
  7586. 1
  7587. 1
  7588. 1
  7589. 1
  7590. 1
  7591. 1
  7592. 1
  7593. 1
  7594. 1
  7595. 1
  7596. 1
  7597. 1
  7598. 1
  7599. 1
  7600. 1
  7601. 1
  7602. 1
  7603. 1
  7604. 1
  7605. 1
  7606. 1
  7607. 1
  7608. 1
  7609. 1
  7610. 1
  7611. 1
  7612. 1
  7613. 1
  7614. 1
  7615. 1
  7616. 1
  7617. 1
  7618. 1
  7619. 1
  7620. 1
  7621. 1
  7622. 1
  7623. 1
  7624. 1
  7625. 1
  7626. 1
  7627. 1
  7628. 1
  7629. 1
  7630. 1
  7631. 1
  7632. 1
  7633. 1
  7634. 1
  7635. 1
  7636. 1
  7637. 1
  7638. 1
  7639. 1
  7640. 1
  7641. 1
  7642. 1
  7643. 1
  7644. 1
  7645. 1
  7646. 1
  7647. 1
  7648. 1
  7649. 1
  7650. 1
  7651. 1
  7652. 1
  7653. 1
  7654. 1
  7655. 1
  7656. 1
  7657. 1
  7658. 1
  7659. 1
  7660. 1
  7661. 1
  7662. 1
  7663. 1
  7664. 1
  7665. 1
  7666. 1
  7667. 1
  7668. 1
  7669. 1
  7670. 1
  7671. 1
  7672. 1
  7673. 1
  7674. 1
  7675. 1
  7676. 1
  7677. 1
  7678. 1
  7679. 1
  7680. 1
  7681. 1
  7682. 1
  7683. 1
  7684. 1
  7685. 1
  7686. 1
  7687. 1
  7688. 1
  7689. 1
  7690. 1
  7691. 1
  7692. 1
  7693. 1
  7694. 1
  7695. The British never refer to the NHS as 'socialized medicine'. That's very much a US term. Private Healthcare in the UK relies on staff whose training has been paid for by the NHS. Also if anything goes wrong with private healthcare, the patient will be transferred to the NHS because Private Hospitals don't have Accident and Emergency Departments. The NHS tends to be a political football with various governments having different beliefs and political stances on it and it has been subjected to many 'reforms', often for political reasons, which can be expensive. This is sometimes reflected in the length of 'waiting lists' for non urgent operations for instance. Under the last Labour government (ending 2010) the NHS had the shortest ever waiting lists and the highest satisfaction survey results. When the Conservatives came to power they abolished a number of treatment targets, and for a number of years gave NHS staff no pay increases, not even to keep up with inflation, and staff vacancies and waiting lists grew. Funding was also tightly restricted during the times of 'austerity'. The Conservatives have usually favoured private medicine and privatisation of the NHS (The Conservative Health Secretary for many years after 2010 was Jeremy Hunt and he had written a paper on privatising the NHS before being appointed). The Conservative government spent £3billion on a 'reform' that created many quangos, all to push for many NHS services to be put out to contract so private providers could get an increasing share of the pie. In the current Coronavirus crisis, the government would have been lost without a national service that can rapidly pull together and co-ordinate its response but the underfunding of the service over a decade has come back to bite the government. I hope that's a lesson learned.
    1
  7696. 1
  7697. 1
  7698. 1
  7699. 1
  7700. 1
  7701. 1
  7702. 1
  7703. 1
  7704. 1
  7705. 1
  7706. 1
  7707. 1
  7708. 1
  7709. 1
  7710. 1
  7711. 1
  7712. 1
  7713. 1
  7714. 1
  7715. 1
  7716. 1
  7717. 1
  7718. 1
  7719. 1
  7720. 1
  7721. 1
  7722. 1
  7723. 1
  7724. 1
  7725. 1
  7726. 1
  7727. 1
  7728. 1
  7729. 1
  7730. 1
  7731. 1
  7732. 1
  7733. 1
  7734. 1
  7735. 1
  7736. 1
  7737. 1
  7738. 1
  7739. 1
  7740. 1
  7741. 1
  7742. 1
  7743. 1
  7744. 1
  7745. 1
  7746. 1
  7747. 1
  7748. 1
  7749. 1
  7750. 1
  7751. 1
  7752. 1
  7753. 1
  7754. 1
  7755. 1
  7756. 1
  7757. 1
  7758. 1
  7759. 1
  7760. 1
  7761. 1
  7762. 1
  7763. 1
  7764. 1
  7765. 1
  7766. 1
  7767. 1
  7768. 1
  7769. 1
  7770. 1
  7771. 1
  7772. 1
  7773. 1
  7774. 1
  7775. 1
  7776. 1
  7777. 1
  7778. 1
  7779. 1
  7780. 1
  7781. 1
  7782. 1
  7783. 1
  7784. 1
  7785. 1
  7786. 1
  7787. 1
  7788. 1
  7789. 1
  7790. 1
  7791. 1
  7792. 1
  7793. 1
  7794. 1
  7795. 1
  7796. 1
  7797. 1
  7798. 1
  7799. 1
  7800. 1
  7801. 1
  7802. 1
  7803. 1
  7804. 1
  7805. 1
  7806. 1
  7807. 1
  7808. 1
  7809. 1
  7810. 1
  7811. 1
  7812. 1
  7813. 1
  7814. 1
  7815. 1
  7816. 1
  7817. 1
  7818. 1
  7819. 1
  7820. 1
  7821. 1
  7822. 1
  7823. 1
  7824. 1
  7825. 1
  7826. 1
  7827. 1
  7828. 1
  7829. 1
  7830. 1
  7831. 1
  7832. 1
  7833. 1
  7834. 1
  7835. 1
  7836. 1
  7837. 1
  7838. 1
  7839. 1
  7840. 1
  7841. 1
  7842. 1
  7843. 1
  7844. 1
  7845. 1
  7846. 1
  7847. 1
  7848. 1
  7849. 1
  7850. 1
  7851. 1
  7852. 1
  7853. 1
  7854. 1
  7855. 1
  7856. 1
  7857. 1
  7858. 1
  7859. 1
  7860. 1
  7861. 1
  7862. 1
  7863. 1
  7864. 1
  7865. 1
  7866. 1
  7867. 1
  7868. 1
  7869. 1
  7870. 1
  7871. 1
  7872. 1
  7873. 1
  7874. 1
  7875. 1
  7876. 1
  7877. 1
  7878. 1
  7879. 1
  7880. 1
  7881. 1
  7882. 1
  7883. 1
  7884. 1
  7885. 1
  7886. 1
  7887. 1
  7888. 1
  7889. 1
  7890. 1
  7891. 1
  7892. 1
  7893. 1
  7894. 1
  7895. 1
  7896. 1
  7897. 1
  7898. 1
  7899. 1
  7900. 1
  7901. 1
  7902. 1
  7903. 1
  7904. 1
  7905. 1
  7906. 1
  7907. 1
  7908. 1
  7909. 1
  7910. 1
  7911. 1
  7912. 1
  7913. 1
  7914. 1
  7915. 1
  7916. 1
  7917. 1
  7918. 1
  7919. 1
  7920. 1
  7921. 1
  7922. 1
  7923. 1
  7924. 1
  7925. 1
  7926.  @philippayne4951  I can tell you've been listening to the spin rather than looking at any facts. We'll be down the plughole if we try leaving without a deal just on WTO terms. No country in the world trades just on WTO terms because in trading terms it's the 4th division. They all want deals with a big trading block which is the premier division which is where we are now. It's a bit of a myth that the EU controls us. There are some rules of membership but 99% of what the UK spends is determined by the UK government. So what happens if we go to no deal WTO terms? We have to then set a tariff for trading with the world and under WTO terms it has to be the same tariff for everyone we trade with in the same goods. If we set a tariff that will push prices up for UK consumers and we'll be worse off. If we set a zero tariff (possible under the rules) our farming and manufacturing won't be able to compete with cheap imports from countries where workers have no rights and are paid pennies an hour so our farming and manufacturing industries will be destroyed. Don't just take my word for it. Patrick Minford, an economist who is for a hard Brexit says the same about the future of British farming and manufacturing. It will affect other economic sectors also. Wealthy people like ex stockbroker Farage and Jacob Rees Mogg will be raking it in because WTO rules do not regulate financial systems and they will be even more free to squirrel away their profits to tax havens around the world. Also over 80% of our exports are services and 49% of those are to the EU. The day we hard Brexit, those services with lose their 'passport' rights to European EU countries, which is why businesses are talking about moving their headquarters to the Europe. The very people who want Brexit because they are suffering under the present government's austerity programme, will be stuffed even more under no deal Brexit. None of this was explained before the Referendum by a campaign that wasn't even talking about a no deal Brexit. As for getting trade deals, as a member of the EU, we have over 40 trade deals that will no longer apply the day we go out on no deal and after 3 years there are only has a handful lined up to replace them. Trade deals take years to negotiate because they are complex covering everything traded between countries. Trump is protectionist and the US is a larger economy than ours, and if we want a trade deal with the USA it will be very much on his terms, as he doesn't need to deal. His negotiators have already said they want access to NHS funding for their corporations as part of the deal and for us to take their farming products like chlorine washed chicken, hormone fed beef and contaminated baby food- practices currently banned by the EU. China and Russia are not our friends and in any case they don't allow countries to export freely to theirs. They are protectionist. Asian countries have each other to trade with nearby. The only thing India wants from us is more visas for people to come here. Other countries won't make up for the loss of the big trading area on our doorstep (the EU). The way out of our problems is to vote for a party that will do something about inequality in the UK and protect jobs and trade, and that's not the Tories or the Brexit party. Farage has stated he is for replacing the NHS with an insurance based market system. He is for taking restrictions off the sale of handguns and he has other right wing policies too. If we set a zero tariff, that would be zero for EU trade also, except as outsiders the EU would be placing a tariff on us (could be 40%). That would make us uncompetitive in trading with the EU. You can't just count the cost of trading with the EU in terms of our subscriptions. You have to count the benefits to the economy too and the health and welfare of people to get the whole picture. Here's the article about USA baby food. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/17/health/baby-foods-arsenic-lead-toxic-metals-wellness/index.html Moreover, the Tories will want to follow the US or Singapore model of economy where workers don't have such good terms or as many rights as in the EU. US workers haven't had a pay rise in real terms since the 1970s. Boris, in his leave agreement with the EU, has removed workers rights from the mandatory part of the agreement and placed them in the non mandatory part (the political statement) which means the government can drop them at any time.
    1
  7927. 1
  7928. 1
  7929. 1
  7930. 1
  7931. 1
  7932. 1
  7933. 1
  7934. 1
  7935. 1
  7936. 1
  7937. 1
  7938. 1
  7939. 1
  7940. 1
  7941. 1
  7942. 1
  7943. 1
  7944. 1
  7945. 1
  7946. 1
  7947. 1
  7948. 1
  7949. 1
  7950. 1
  7951. 1
  7952. 1
  7953. 1
  7954. 1
  7955. 1
  7956. 1
  7957. 1
  7958. 1
  7959. 1
  7960. 1
  7961. 1
  7962. 1
  7963. 1
  7964. 1
  7965. 1
  7966. 1
  7967. 1
  7968. 1
  7969. 1
  7970. 1
  7971. 1
  7972. 1
  7973. 1
  7974. 1
  7975. 1
  7976. 1
  7977. 1
  7978. 1
  7979. 1
  7980. 1
  7981. 1
  7982. @Stalin The things you mention are downsides but there are many more downsides to Brexit. Name any economic benefits to Brexit for the working class? There are lists of economic downsides that could be mentioned. The EU was often blamed by the UK government when it messed up itself and it was often invoked as a block on doing something which the government actually didn't want to do itself, but would have been able to. It was a convenient scapegoat. The EU didn't control us that much. 99% of UK spending was under UK control and over 95% of EU directives were either initiated or voted for by UK governments including Conservative governments. I'm not an uncritical fan of the EU and have no great enthusiasm for it, but it's not possible now to go back to the way we were before we joined the EU. The world global trade scene has changed and we have not negotiated a single contract with any country that has better terms than those we had with them as part of the EU, though the government likes to pretend that we have. It's just spin. The people at the bottom of society have seen their living conditions worsen not because of the EU but because of years of austerity and cuts by the Conservative government after the worldwide banking crisis of 2008. They've also used that period to privatise and cut public services they don't agree with on an ideological basis. I don't see it getting better because Boris has legislated to enable him to remove some of the minimal workers protections that the EU did impose.
    1
  7983. 1
  7984. 1
  7985. 1
  7986. @Stalin The Labour party is providing opposition but voters have previously voted Boris an 80 seat majority which means the other combined parties can do nothing to prevent him doing what he wants, and today people have given him even more power. You won't hear about the Labour Party's challenges to Boris by reading Tory supporting papers, but the fact is you have a P.M who is not ashamed to lie or break the law and unless he has a conscience and chooses to resign, or his party kick him out , he will do what he likes. I don't understand your point about the EU and your non EU exports. Are you talking about when the UK was in the EU or since we've come out? There wasn't actually a UK 2000 years ago. There were just different local tribes and there was not the global capitalist market there is now, so it's not relevant to compare the situation now to the situation 2000 years ago or even 100 years ago. We no longer have an empire to exploit. We are a relatively small player in an international market of large trading blocs. As I've said, freedom of movement only brings problems if the government allows those problems to happen. With the extra tax it gets from immigrant workers, it could spend that to ensure there are no shortages of facilities for people. There are ways they could protect workers living standards if they have the will to do so by legislating to protect them. There was a demand from workers from abroad because there weren't enough to fill all the jobs here as the economy expanded. If there were no jobs they would not have come and they are not necessarily competing with the national traditional workforce. The heavy industry jobs that used to provide lots of work in the north have gone and nothing much has replaced them.
    1
  7987. 1
  7988. 1
  7989. 1
  7990. 1
  7991. 1
  7992. 1
  7993. 1
  7994. 1
  7995. 1
  7996. 1
  7997. 1
  7998. 1
  7999. 1
  8000. 1
  8001. 1
  8002. 1
  8003. 1
  8004. 1
  8005. 1
  8006. 1
  8007. 1
  8008. 1
  8009. 1
  8010. 1
  8011. 1
  8012. 1
  8013. 1
  8014. 1
  8015. 1
  8016. 1
  8017.  @BlackPrimeMinister  In my personal experience, men's health outcomes are often bad because they won't go and see a doctor unless they are desperate and they pay no attention to healthy lifestyles. The women I know do go to the doctor more but have often been ignored. My nephew's wife was being treated for depression. He did not believe that was a correct diagnosis. He refused to leave the hospital until she was scanned. It turned out she had brain tumours. One of my sisters was feeling really ill and was turned away from the doctors without diagnosis several times. She was only diagnosed when her husband said 'I think you have jaundice'. She told the doctor that and he tested her and confirmed it was jaundice. The same sister was in a road accident but was not X-rayed at hospital. She was complaining to her GP about pain for some time without effect. The GP eventually got fed up with her and sent her to hospital for an X-ray. There they saw that she had several broken ribs. The same sister had a growth on her hand. The doctor kept giving her cream and telling her to keep using it even though she said it wasn't working. Her daughter in law, a nurse, told her to get it checked out at a hospital. It turned out to be cancer. Luckily it was then successfully operated on. I've had cancer twice. Both times the doctor didn't think it was cancer but the first time at least I was sent for a test. The second time I was dismissed for a year and then had to push for a test. I do care about men's health, but the men I know don't seem to want to listen. They prefer to bury their heads in the sand rather than find out something is wrong. I think it's fear of things medical.
    1
  8018. 1
  8019. 1
  8020. 1
  8021. 1
  8022. 1
  8023. 1
  8024. 1
  8025. 1
  8026. 1
  8027. 1
  8028. 1
  8029. 1
  8030. 1
  8031. 1
  8032. 1
  8033. 1
  8034. 1
  8035. 1
  8036. 1
  8037. 1
  8038. 1
  8039. 1
  8040. 1
  8041. 1
  8042. 1
  8043. 1
  8044. 1
  8045. 1
  8046. 1
  8047. 1
  8048. 1
  8049. 1
  8050. 1
  8051. 1
  8052. 1
  8053. 1
  8054. 1
  8055. 1
  8056. 1
  8057. 1
  8058. 1
  8059. 1
  8060. 1
  8061. 1
  8062. 1
  8063. 1
  8064. 1
  8065. 1
  8066. 1
  8067. 1
  8068. 1
  8069. 1
  8070. 1
  8071. 1
  8072. 1
  8073. 1
  8074. 1
  8075. 1
  8076. 1
  8077. 1
  8078. 1
  8079. 1
  8080. 1
  8081. 1
  8082. 1
  8083. 1
  8084. 1
  8085. 1
  8086. 1
  8087. 1
  8088. 1
  8089. 1
  8090. 1
  8091. 1
  8092. 1
  8093. 1
  8094. 1
  8095. 1
  8096. 1
  8097. 1
  8098. 1
  8099. 1
  8100. 1
  8101. 1
  8102. 1
  8103. 1
  8104. 1
  8105. 1
  8106. 1
  8107. 1
  8108. 1
  8109. 1
  8110. 1
  8111. 1
  8112. 1
  8113. 1
  8114. 1
  8115. 1
  8116. 1
  8117. 1
  8118. 1
  8119. 1
  8120. 1
  8121. 1
  8122. 1
  8123. 1
  8124. 1
  8125. 1
  8126. 1
  8127. 1
  8128. 1
  8129. 1
  8130. 1
  8131. 1
  8132. 1
  8133. 1
  8134. 1
  8135. 1
  8136. 1
  8137. 1
  8138. 1
  8139. 1
  8140. 1
  8141. 1
  8142. 1
  8143. 1
  8144. 1
  8145. 1
  8146. 1
  8147. 1
  8148. 1
  8149. 1
  8150. 1
  8151. 1
  8152. 1
  8153. 1
  8154. 1
  8155. 1
  8156. 1
  8157. 1
  8158. 1
  8159. 1
  8160. 1
  8161. 1
  8162. 1
  8163. 1
  8164. 1
  8165. 1
  8166. 1
  8167.  littlebighorn  Listen to Americans themselves. They are under financial pressure because the value of their pay hasn't risen in real terms since the 1970s and they fear going bankrupt if they have a disease that their health insurance won't cover. Also many are not covered by any health insurance, or weren't until Obama expanded Medicare but Trump has said he wants to do away with Obama's reforms. He failed to get his measures through congress or the senate (I forget which) so now he's undermining the Medicare system through funding measures designed to make it too expensive for Federal governments to afford, and to push up the price of insurance for everyone else, in the hope that they will eventually capitulate to his demands. His technique is called bullying. He's tried it with various foreign governments too - being all nice and friendly at first, then making unreasonable demands and if they don't give in, applying sanctions or trade tariffs until they do. He's already bullying Europe over Iran. Europe and the USA had a deal with Iran to prevent nuclear weapons being developed. Trump pulled out of the deal for no good reason as there was no evidence Iran wasn't sticking to the deal. He then applied sanctions to Iran for no good reason. Europe wanted to stick with the deal but Trump said he would not trade with and would apply sanctions to any country sticking with the deal - more bullying, and all it's caused is conflict in the region and attacks on oil tankers travelling through the Gulf of Hormuz.
    1
  8168. 1
  8169. 1
  8170. 1
  8171. 1
  8172. 1
  8173. 1
  8174. 1
  8175. 1
  8176. 1
  8177. 1
  8178. 1
  8179. 1
  8180. 1
  8181. 1
  8182. 1
  8183. 1
  8184. 1
  8185. 1
  8186. 1
  8187. 1
  8188. 1
  8189. 1
  8190. 1
  8191. 1
  8192. 1
  8193. 1
  8194. 1
  8195. 1
  8196. 1
  8197. 1
  8198. 1
  8199. 1
  8200. 1
  8201. 1
  8202. 1
  8203. 1
  8204. 1
  8205. 1
  8206. 1
  8207. 1
  8208. 1
  8209. 1
  8210. 1
  8211. 1
  8212. 1
  8213. 1
  8214. 1
  8215. 1
  8216. 1
  8217. 1
  8218. 1
  8219. 1
  8220. 1
  8221. 1
  8222. 1
  8223. 1
  8224. 1
  8225. 1
  8226. 1
  8227. 1
  8228. 1
  8229. 1
  8230. 1
  8231. 1
  8232. 1
  8233. 1
  8234. 1
  8235. 1
  8236. 1
  8237. 1
  8238. 1
  8239. 1
  8240. 1
  8241. 1
  8242. 1
  8243. 1
  8244. 1
  8245. 1
  8246. 1
  8247. 1
  8248. 1
  8249. 1
  8250. 1
  8251. 1
  8252. 1
  8253. 1
  8254. 1
  8255. 1
  8256. 1
  8257. 1
  8258. 1
  8259. 1
  8260. 1
  8261. 1
  8262. 1
  8263. 1
  8264. 1
  8265. 1
  8266. 1
  8267. 1
  8268. 1
  8269. 1
  8270. 1
  8271. 1
  8272. 1
  8273. 1
  8274. 1
  8275. 1
  8276. 1
  8277. 1
  8278. 1
  8279. 1
  8280. 1
  8281. 1
  8282. 1
  8283. 1
  8284. 1
  8285. 1
  8286. 1
  8287. 1
  8288. 1
  8289. 1
  8290. 1
  8291. 1
  8292. 1
  8293. 1
  8294. 1
  8295. 1
  8296. 1
  8297. 1
  8298. 1
  8299. 1
  8300. 1
  8301. 1
  8302. 1
  8303. 1
  8304. 1
  8305. 1
  8306. 1
  8307. 1
  8308. 1
  8309. 1
  8310. 1
  8311. 1
  8312. 1
  8313. 1
  8314. 1
  8315. 1
  8316. 1
  8317. 1
  8318. 1
  8319. 1
  8320. 1
  8321. 1
  8322. 1
  8323. 1
  8324. 1
  8325. 1
  8326. 1
  8327. 1
  8328. 1
  8329. 1
  8330. 1
  8331. 1
  8332. 1
  8333. 1
  8334. 1
  8335. 1
  8336. 1
  8337. 1
  8338. 1
  8339. 1
  8340. 1
  8341. 1
  8342. 1
  8343. 1
  8344. 1
  8345. 1
  8346. 1
  8347. 1
  8348. 1
  8349. 1
  8350. 1
  8351. 1
  8352. 1
  8353. 1
  8354. 1
  8355. 1
  8356. 1
  8357. 1
  8358. 1
  8359. 1
  8360. 1
  8361. 1
  8362. 1
  8363. 1
  8364. 1
  8365. 1
  8366. 1
  8367. 1
  8368. 1
  8369. 1
  8370. 1
  8371. 1
  8372. 1
  8373. 1
  8374. 1
  8375. 1
  8376. 1
  8377. 1
  8378. 1
  8379. 1
  8380. 1
  8381. 1
  8382. 1
  8383. 1
  8384. 1
  8385. 1
  8386. 1
  8387. 1
  8388. 1
  8389. 1
  8390. 1
  8391. 1
  8392. 1
  8393. 1
  8394. 1
  8395. 1
  8396. 1
  8397. 1
  8398. 1
  8399. 1
  8400. 1
  8401. 1
  8402. 1
  8403. 1
  8404. 1
  8405. 1
  8406. 1
  8407. 1
  8408. 1
  8409. 1
  8410. 1
  8411. 1
  8412. 1
  8413. 1
  8414. 1
  8415. 1
  8416. 1
  8417. 1
  8418. 1
  8419. 1
  8420. 1
  8421. 1
  8422. 1
  8423. 1
  8424. 1
  8425. 1
  8426. 1
  8427. 1
  8428. 1
  8429. 1
  8430. 1
  8431. 1
  8432. 1
  8433. 1
  8434. 1
  8435. 1
  8436. 1
  8437. 1
  8438. 1
  8439. 1
  8440. 1
  8441. 1
  8442. 1
  8443. 1
  8444. 1
  8445. 1
  8446. 1
  8447. 1
  8448. 1
  8449. 1
  8450. 1
  8451. 1
  8452. 1
  8453. 1
  8454. 1
  8455. 1
  8456. 1
  8457. 1
  8458. 1
  8459. 1
  8460. 1
  8461. 1
  8462. 1
  8463. 1
  8464. 1
  8465. 1
  8466. 1
  8467. 1
  8468. 1
  8469. 1
  8470. 1
  8471. 1
  8472. 1
  8473. 1
  8474. 1
  8475. 1
  8476. 1
  8477. 1
  8478. 1
  8479. 1
  8480. 1
  8481. 1
  8482. 1
  8483. 1
  8484. 1
  8485. 1
  8486. 1
  8487. 1
  8488. 1
  8489. 1
  8490. 1
  8491. 1
  8492. 1
  8493. 1
  8494. 1
  8495. 1
  8496. 1
  8497. 1
  8498. 1
  8499. 1
  8500. 1
  8501. 1
  8502. 1
  8503. 1
  8504. 1
  8505. 1
  8506. 1
  8507. 1
  8508. 1
  8509. 1
  8510. 1
  8511. 1
  8512. 1
  8513. 1
  8514. 1
  8515. 1
  8516. 1
  8517. 1
  8518. 1
  8519. 1
  8520. 1
  8521. 1
  8522. 1
  8523. 1
  8524. 1
  8525. 1
  8526. 1
  8527. 1
  8528. 1
  8529. 1
  8530. 1
  8531. 1
  8532. 1
  8533. 1
  8534. 1
  8535. 1
  8536. 1
  8537. 1
  8538. 1
  8539. 1
  8540. 1
  8541. 1
  8542. 1
  8543. 1
  8544. 1
  8545. 1
  8546. 1
  8547. 1
  8548. 1
  8549. 1
  8550. 1
  8551. 1
  8552. 1
  8553. 1
  8554. 1
  8555. 1
  8556. 1
  8557. 1
  8558. 1
  8559. 1
  8560. 1
  8561. 1
  8562. 1
  8563. 1
  8564. 1
  8565. 1
  8566. 1
  8567. 1
  8568. 1
  8569. 1
  8570. 1
  8571. 1
  8572. 1
  8573. 1
  8574. 1
  8575. 1
  8576. 1
  8577. 1
  8578. 1
  8579. 1
  8580. 1
  8581. 1
  8582. 1
  8583. 1
  8584. 1
  8585. 1
  8586. 1
  8587. 1
  8588. 1
  8589. 1
  8590. 1
  8591. 1
  8592. 1
  8593. 1
  8594. 1
  8595. 1
  8596. 1
  8597. 1
  8598. 1
  8599. 1
  8600. 1
  8601. 1
  8602. 1
  8603. 1
  8604. 1
  8605. 1
  8606. 1
  8607. 1
  8608. 1
  8609. 1
  8610. 1
  8611. 1
  8612. 1
  8613. 1
  8614. 1
  8615. 1
  8616. 1
  8617. 1
  8618. 1
  8619. 1
  8620. 1
  8621. 1
  8622. 1
  8623. 1
  8624. 1
  8625. 1
  8626. 1
  8627. 1
  8628. 1
  8629. 1
  8630. 1
  8631. 1
  8632. 1
  8633. 1
  8634. 1
  8635. 1
  8636. 1
  8637. 1
  8638. 1
  8639. 1
  8640. 1
  8641. 1
  8642. 1
  8643. 1
  8644. 1
  8645. 1
  8646. 1
  8647. 1
  8648. 1
  8649. 1
  8650. 1
  8651. 1
  8652. 1
  8653. 1
  8654. 1
  8655. 1
  8656. 1
  8657. 1
  8658. 1
  8659. 1
  8660. 1
  8661. 1
  8662. 1
  8663. 1
  8664. 1
  8665. 1
  8666. 1
  8667. 1
  8668. 1
  8669. 1
  8670. 1
  8671. 1
  8672. 1
  8673. 1
  8674. 1
  8675. 1
  8676. 1
  8677. 1
  8678. 1
  8679. 1
  8680. 1
  8681. 1
  8682. 1
  8683. 1
  8684. 1
  8685. 1
  8686. 1
  8687. 1
  8688. 1
  8689. 1
  8690. 1
  8691. 1
  8692. 1
  8693. 1
  8694. 1
  8695. 1
  8696. 1
  8697. 1
  8698. 1
  8699. 1
  8700. 1
  8701. 1
  8702. 1
  8703. 1
  8704. 1
  8705. 1
  8706. 1
  8707. 1
  8708. 1
  8709. 1
  8710. 1
  8711. 1
  8712. 1
  8713. 1
  8714. 1
  8715. 1
  8716. 1
  8717. 1
  8718. 1
  8719. 1
  8720. 1
  8721. 1
  8722. 1
  8723. 1
  8724. 1
  8725. 1
  8726. 1
  8727. 1
  8728. 1
  8729. 1
  8730. 1
  8731. 1
  8732. 1
  8733. 1
  8734. 1
  8735. 1
  8736. 1
  8737. 1
  8738. 1
  8739. 1
  8740. 1
  8741. 1
  8742. 1
  8743. 1
  8744. 1
  8745. 1
  8746. 1
  8747. 1
  8748. 1
  8749. 1
  8750. 1
  8751. 1
  8752. 1
  8753. 1
  8754. 1
  8755. 1
  8756. 1
  8757. 1
  8758. 1
  8759. 1
  8760. 1
  8761. 1
  8762. 1
  8763. 1
  8764. 1
  8765. 1
  8766. 1
  8767. 1
  8768. 1
  8769. 1
  8770. 1
  8771. 1
  8772. 1
  8773. 1
  8774. 1
  8775. 1
  8776. 1
  8777. 1
  8778. 1
  8779. 1
  8780. 1
  8781. 1
  8782. 1
  8783. 1
  8784. 1
  8785. 1
  8786. 1
  8787. 1
  8788. 1
  8789. 1
  8790. 1
  8791. 1
  8792. 1
  8793. 1
  8794. 1
  8795. 1
  8796. 1
  8797. 1
  8798. 1
  8799. 1
  8800. 1
  8801. 1
  8802. 1
  8803. 1
  8804. 1
  8805. 1
  8806. 1
  8807. 1
  8808. 1
  8809. 1
  8810. 1
  8811. 1
  8812. 1
  8813. 1
  8814. 1
  8815. 1
  8816. 1
  8817. 1
  8818. 1
  8819. 1
  8820. 1
  8821. 1
  8822. 1
  8823. 1
  8824. 1
  8825. 1
  8826. 1
  8827. 1
  8828. 1
  8829. 1
  8830. 1
  8831. 1
  8832. 1
  8833. 1
  8834. 1
  8835. 1
  8836. 1
  8837. 1
  8838. 1
  8839. 1
  8840. 1
  8841. 1
  8842. 1
  8843. 1
  8844. 1
  8845. 1
  8846. 1
  8847. 1
  8848. 1
  8849. 1
  8850. 1
  8851. 1
  8852. 1
  8853. 1
  8854. 1
  8855. 1
  8856. 1
  8857. 1
  8858. 1
  8859. 1
  8860. 1
  8861. 1
  8862. 1
  8863. 1
  8864. 1
  8865. 1
  8866. 1
  8867. 1
  8868. 1
  8869. 1
  8870. 1
  8871. 1
  8872. 1
  8873. 1
  8874. 1
  8875. 1
  8876. 1
  8877. 1
  8878. 1
  8879. 1
  8880. 1
  8881. 1
  8882. 1
  8883. 1
  8884. 1
  8885. 1
  8886. 1
  8887. 1
  8888. 1
  8889. 1
  8890. 1
  8891. 1
  8892. 1
  8893. 1
  8894. 1
  8895. 1
  8896. 1
  8897. 1
  8898. 1
  8899. 1
  8900. 1
  8901. 1
  8902. 1
  8903. 1
  8904. 1
  8905. 1
  8906. 1
  8907. 1
  8908. 1
  8909. 1
  8910. 1
  8911. 1
  8912. 1
  8913. 1
  8914. 1
  8915. 1
  8916. 1
  8917. 1
  8918. 1
  8919. 1
  8920. 1
  8921. 1
  8922. 1
  8923. 1
  8924. 1
  8925. 1
  8926. 1
  8927. 1
  8928. 1
  8929. 1
  8930. 1
  8931. 1
  8932. 1
  8933. 1
  8934. 1
  8935. 1
  8936. 1
  8937. 1
  8938. 1
  8939. 1
  8940. 1
  8941. 1
  8942. 1
  8943. 1
  8944. 1
  8945. 1
  8946. 1
  8947. 1
  8948. 1
  8949. 1
  8950. 1
  8951. 1
  8952. 1
  8953. 1
  8954. 1
  8955. 1
  8956. 1
  8957. 1
  8958. 1
  8959. 1
  8960. 1
  8961. 1
  8962. 1
  8963. 1
  8964. 1
  8965. 1
  8966. 1
  8967. 1
  8968. 1
  8969. 1
  8970. 1
  8971. 1
  8972. 1
  8973. 1
  8974. 1
  8975. 1
  8976. 1
  8977. 1
  8978. 1
  8979. 1
  8980. 1
  8981. 1
  8982. 1
  8983. 1
  8984. 1
  8985. 1
  8986. 1
  8987. 1
  8988. 1
  8989. 1
  8990. 1
  8991. 1
  8992. 1
  8993. 1
  8994. 1
  8995. 1
  8996. 1
  8997. 1
  8998. 1
  8999. 1
  9000. 1
  9001. 1
  9002. 1
  9003. 1
  9004. 1
  9005. 1
  9006. 1
  9007. 1
  9008. 1
  9009. 1
  9010. 1
  9011. 1
  9012. 1
  9013. 1
  9014. 1
  9015. 1
  9016. 1
  9017. 1
  9018. 1
  9019. 1
  9020. 1
  9021. 1
  9022. 1
  9023. 1
  9024. 1
  9025. 1
  9026. 1
  9027. 1
  9028. 1
  9029. 1
  9030. 1
  9031.  @greeny202ab  .Political union is no longer something being discussed by the EU. It's being quietly shelved. The world is moving to protectionism and power blocks. Britain would be starting off with no deals and having to negotiate them which could take years. We will be at a disadvantage as we will be more desperate for deals than any country we want them with. Other countries will have their trading deals and arrangements already established. We'll be down the plughole if we try leaving without a deal just on WTO terms. No country in the world trades just on WTO terms because in trading terms it's the 4th division. They all want deals with a big trading block which is the premier division which is where we are now. It's a bit of a myth that the EU controls us. There are some rules of membership but 99% of what the UK spends is determined by the UK government. So what happens if we go to no deal WTO terms? We have to then set a tariff for trading with the world and under WTO terms it has to be the same tariff for everyone we trade with in the same goods. If we set a tariff that will push prices up for UK consumers and we'll be worse off. If we set a zero tariff (possible under the rules) our farming and manufacturing won't be able to compete with cheap imports from countries where workers have no rights and are paid pennies an hour so our farming and manufacturing industries will be destroyed. Don't just take my word for it. Patrick Minford, an economist who is for a hard Brexit says the same about the future of British farming and manufacturing. It will affect other economic sectors also. Wealthy people like ex stockbroker Farage and Jacob Rees Mogg will be raking it in because WTO rules do not regulate financial systems and they will be even more free to squirrel away their profits to tax havens around the world. Also over 80% of our exports are services and 49% of those are to the EU. The day we hard Brexit, those services with lose their 'passport' rights to European EU countries, which is why businesses are talking about moving their headquarters to the Europe. The very people who want Brexit because they are suffering under the present government's austerity programme, will be stuffed even more under no deal Brexit. None of this was explained before the Referendum by a campaign that wasn't even talking about a no deal Brexit. As for getting trade deals, as a member of the EU, we have over 40 trade deals that will no longer apply the day we go out on no deal and the government only has a handful lined up to replace them. Trade deals take years to negotiate because they are complex covering everything traded between countries. Trump is protectionist and the US is a larger economy than ours, and if we want a trade deal with the USA it will be very much on his terms, as he doesn't need to deal. His negotiators have already said they want access to NHS funding for their corporations as part of the deal and for us to take their farming products like chlorine washed chicken and hormone fed beef - practices currently banned by the EU. China and Russia are not our friends and in any case they don't allow countries to export freely to theirs. They are protectionist. Asian countries have each other to trade with nearby. The only thing India wants from us is more visas for people to come here. Other countries won't make up for the loss of the big trading area on our doorstep (the EU). The way out of our problems is to vote for a party that will do something about inequality in the UK and protect jobs and trade, and that's not the Tories or the Brexit party. Farage has stated he is for replacing the NHS with an insurance based market system. He is for taking restrictions off the sale of handguns and he has other right wing policies too. If we set a zero tariff, that would be zero for EU trade also, except as outsiders the EU would be placing a tariff on us (could be 40%). That would make us uncompetitive in trading with the EU. You can't just count the cost of trading with the EU in terms of our subscriptions. You have to count the benefits to the economy too and the health and welfare of people to get the whole picture. Here's a little taste of what low standards in relation to health and safety are like in the USA - the kind of standards we'll be pressed to accept. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/10/17/health/baby-foods-arsenic-lead-toxic-metals-wellness/index.html
    1
  9032. 1
  9033. 1
  9034. 1
  9035. 1
  9036. 1
  9037. 1
  9038. 1
  9039. 1
  9040. 1
  9041. 1
  9042. 1
  9043. 1
  9044. 1
  9045. 1
  9046. 1
  9047. 1
  9048. 1
  9049. 1
  9050. 1
  9051. 1
  9052. 1
  9053. 1
  9054. 1
  9055. 1
  9056. 1
  9057. 1
  9058. 1
  9059. 1
  9060. 1
  9061. 1
  9062. 1
  9063. 1
  9064. 1
  9065. 1
  9066. 1
  9067. 1
  9068. 1
  9069. 1
  9070. 1
  9071. 1
  9072. 1
  9073. 1
  9074. 1
  9075. 1
  9076. 1
  9077. 1
  9078. 1
  9079. 1
  9080. 1
  9081. 1
  9082. 1
  9083. 1
  9084. 1
  9085. 1
  9086. 1
  9087. 1
  9088. 1
  9089. 1
  9090. 1
  9091. 1
  9092. 1
  9093. 1
  9094. 1
  9095. 1
  9096. 1
  9097. 1
  9098. 1
  9099. 1
  9100. 1
  9101. 1
  9102. 1
  9103. 1
  9104. 1
  9105. 1
  9106. 1
  9107. 1
  9108. 1
  9109. 1
  9110. 1
  9111. 1
  9112. 1
  9113. 1
  9114. 1
  9115. 1
  9116. 1
  9117. 1
  9118. 1
  9119. 1
  9120. 1
  9121. 1
  9122. 1
  9123. 1
  9124. 1
  9125. 1
  9126. 1
  9127. 1
  9128. 1
  9129. 1
  9130. 1
  9131. 1
  9132. 1
  9133. 1
  9134. 1
  9135. 1
  9136. 1
  9137. 1
  9138. 1
  9139. 1
  9140. 1
  9141. 1
  9142. 1
  9143. 1
  9144. 1
  9145. 1
  9146. 1
  9147. 1
  9148. 1
  9149. 1
  9150. 1
  9151. 1
  9152. 1
  9153. 1
  9154. 1
  9155. 1
  9156. 1
  9157. 1
  9158. 1
  9159. 1
  9160. 1
  9161. 1
  9162. 1
  9163. 1
  9164. 1
  9165. 1
  9166. 1
  9167. 1
  9168. 1
  9169. 1
  9170. 1
  9171. 1
  9172. 1
  9173. 1
  9174. 1
  9175. 1
  9176. 1
  9177. 1
  9178. 1
  9179. 1
  9180. 1
  9181. 1
  9182. 1
  9183. 1
  9184. 1
  9185. 1
  9186. 1
  9187. 1
  9188. 1
  9189. 1
  9190. 1
  9191. 1
  9192. 1
  9193. 1
  9194. 1
  9195. 1
  9196. 1
  9197. 1
  9198. 1
  9199. 1
  9200. 1
  9201. 1
  9202. 1
  9203. 1
  9204. 1
  9205. 1
  9206. 1
  9207. 1
  9208. 1
  9209. 1
  9210. 1
  9211. 1
  9212. 1
  9213. 1
  9214. 1
  9215. 1
  9216. 1
  9217. 1
  9218. 1
  9219. 1
  9220. 1
  9221. 1
  9222. 1
  9223. 1
  9224. 1
  9225. 1
  9226. 1
  9227. 1
  9228. 1
  9229. 1
  9230. 1
  9231. 1
  9232. 1
  9233. 1
  9234. 1
  9235. 1
  9236. 1
  9237. 1
  9238. 1
  9239. 1
  9240. 1
  9241. 1
  9242. 1
  9243. 1
  9244. 1
  9245. 1
  9246. 1
  9247. 1
  9248. 1
  9249. 1
  9250. 1
  9251. 1
  9252. 1
  9253. 1
  9254. 1
  9255. 1
  9256. 1
  9257. 1
  9258. 1
  9259. 1
  9260. 1
  9261. 1
  9262. 1
  9263. 1
  9264. 1
  9265. 1
  9266. 1
  9267. 1
  9268. 1
  9269. 1
  9270.  @monicawarner4091  Most people don't read Manifestos. The Labour one unlike the Tory one was costed. A lot of the projects were investment ones, just like people borrow to invest in a house which they expect to increase in value in the long run, but again most people don't understand economics do they? The Labour manifesto was about investment for growth and actually covered a period longer than 5 years. Spending would not have happened all in one Parliament. Now this government has spent far more than Labour's manifesto would have cost, but not for any investment or growth. The Tories always say Labour's plans are unaffordable and they they steal some of them and find the money tree themselves, especially for their supporters, friends and lobbyists. They still haven't published the £37bn of no competition contracts, in spite of a legal requirement to do so. I don't think Labour would have made such a bad job of handling the pandemic as they would have prepared for it as many reports had advised the government, followed the science early on, and closed borders and air travel when necessary. The Tory policies are resulting in not enough health workers or care workers, and not enough HGV drivers or not enough people to pick crops in the fields. I watched a BBC report today about how the British economy hasn't bounced back since Covid, unlike the USA, and unlike other European countries. The obvious reason is Brexit which is a horrendous mess but you don't read about it much in the media and the BBC didn't mention it. They seem to be protecting the government now that they have a conservative appointed as Chairman and one as Director General. The last Labour government's financial problems were due to a global banking crisis with the government spending billions to bail out the banks. The regulation of banks was too light but Tories had wanted even lighter regulation, and if they'd not bailed out the banks there would have been a crisis of confidence in capitalism and people's savings would have been lost too.
    1
  9271. 1
  9272. 1
  9273. 1
  9274. 1
  9275. 1
  9276. 1
  9277. 1
  9278. 1
  9279. 1
  9280. 1
  9281. 1
  9282. 1
  9283. 1
  9284. 1
  9285. 1
  9286. 1
  9287. 1
  9288. 1
  9289. 1
  9290. 1
  9291. 1
  9292. 1
  9293. 1
  9294. 1
  9295. 1
  9296. 1
  9297. 1
  9298. 1
  9299. 1
  9300. 1
  9301. 1
  9302. 1
  9303. 1
  9304. 1
  9305. 1
  9306. 1
  9307. 1
  9308. 1
  9309. 1
  9310. 1
  9311. 1
  9312. 1
  9313. 1
  9314. 1
  9315. 1
  9316. 1
  9317. 1
  9318. 1
  9319. 1
  9320. 1
  9321. 1
  9322. 1
  9323. 1
  9324. 1
  9325. 1
  9326. 1
  9327. 1
  9328. 1
  9329. 1
  9330. 1
  9331. 1
  9332. 1
  9333. 1
  9334. 1
  9335. 1
  9336. 1
  9337. 1
  9338. 1
  9339. 1
  9340. 1
  9341. 1
  9342. 1
  9343. 1
  9344. 1
  9345. 1
  9346. 1
  9347. 1
  9348. 1
  9349. 1
  9350. 1
  9351. 1
  9352. 1
  9353. 1
  9354. 1
  9355. 1
  9356. 1
  9357. 1
  9358. 1
  9359. 1
  9360. 1
  9361. 1
  9362. 1
  9363. 1
  9364. 1
  9365. 1
  9366. 1
  9367. 1
  9368. 1
  9369. 1
  9370. 1
  9371. 1
  9372. 1
  9373. 1
  9374. 1
  9375. 1
  9376. 1
  9377. 1
  9378. 1
  9379. 1
  9380. 1
  9381. 1
  9382. 1
  9383. 1
  9384. 1
  9385. 1
  9386. 1
  9387. 1
  9388. 1
  9389. 1
  9390. 1
  9391. 1
  9392. 1
  9393. 1
  9394. 1
  9395. 1
  9396. 1
  9397. 1
  9398. 1
  9399. 1
  9400. 1
  9401. 1
  9402. 1
  9403. 1
  9404. 1
  9405. 1
  9406. 1
  9407. 1
  9408. 1
  9409. 1
  9410. 1
  9411. 1
  9412. 1
  9413. 1
  9414. 1
  9415. 1
  9416. 1
  9417. 1
  9418. 1
  9419. 1
  9420. 1
  9421. 1
  9422. 1
  9423. 1
  9424. 1
  9425. 1
  9426. 1
  9427. 1
  9428. 1
  9429. 1
  9430. 1
  9431. 1
  9432. 1
  9433. 1
  9434. 1
  9435. 1
  9436. 1
  9437. 1
  9438. 1
  9439. 1
  9440. 1
  9441. 1
  9442. 1
  9443. 1
  9444. 1
  9445. 1
  9446. 1
  9447. 1
  9448. 1
  9449. 1
  9450. 1
  9451. 1
  9452. 1
  9453. 1
  9454. 1
  9455. 1
  9456. 1
  9457. 1
  9458. 1
  9459. 1
  9460. 1
  9461. 1
  9462. 1
  9463. 1
  9464. 1
  9465. 1
  9466. 1
  9467. 1
  9468. 1
  9469. 1
  9470. 1
  9471. 1
  9472. 1
  9473. 1
  9474. 1
  9475. 1
  9476. 1
  9477. 1
  9478. 1
  9479. 1
  9480. 1
  9481. 1