Comments by "Cultugarve Algarve" (@cultugarvealgarve7380) on "Wrecking Ukraine: The cost of Winning the War with Geopolitics Expert John Mearsheimer" video.

  1. I don t agree, The professor sees still Russia as a world power(maffiacracy) in confilct we have seen Russia(a only regional power now, but with bad maintaned Nukes too) doing this cowardly in Afganistan, Syria, Tsechenia, Georgia, this is the first time they have a stronger opponent. The (east) European countries have very bad memories about Russia.Russiais rather small 140.000.000 people against Europe almost 500.000.000, and against Nato almost 1000.000.000, so what are the big powers now? Bad maintenance of army and nukes. De Russian army is way to small in their infantery, it s a peacetime army, bad organized,(corruption) moral. Not making any advances after almost 4 months. Of course the western millitary, industry can produce faster, and much more, than the Russian. Once Ukraine liberated, it will be an extreme defended fort like Finland or Switserland, Russia would think twice. So did Sweden and Finland, a big blow on the north flank. Close to their nuclear arms. It s right that the world isn t longer impressed by Russia, a local power. Don t forget the energy transition, going much faster and caused by Putin. End of story. The west landlease(convoys Moermansk in the 40 s) supported the Red Army to win, something that Stalin admitted and the same, even better can and will happen now, but now to defend the Ukraine. The real reason for this war is very simple: Russia dominates the energy, but the most pipelines go by the Ukraine,. The Ukraine has enough gas and oil to provide europe for a very long time.......Another blackmail is the food blockage,...... so Russia will never stop to use those means, war or not. Rusia s negotiation or promises never were reliable, it s know for lies, betrayals, murders, corruption, no human rights, no roman rights etc.
    2