Comments by "Dan" (@Dan-ud8hz) on "Styxhexenhammer666"
channel.
-
Amused Fewer than the number of innocent women, children, and old people murdered by right-wing domestic- terrorist vanilla-ISIS cowards in the US in the past year, I'm sure.
But the Revolution was pre-industrial revolution, genius, and you can thank Capitalism for making more powerful incendiaries.
Why don't you look up exactly how many Tory-loyalist buildings were burned down by the earliest anarchists in the US, the "Founding Fathers", for everybody who reads this?
"White supremacist violent extremism, one type of racially- and ethnically-motivated violent extremism, is one of the most potent forces driving domestic terrorism. Lone attackers, as opposed to cells or organizations, generally perpetrate these kinds of attacks. But they are also part of a broader movement. White supremacist violent extremists’ outlook can generally be characterized by hatred for immigrants and ethnic minorities, often combining these prejudices with virulent anti-Semitism or anti-Muslim views." https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/19_0920_plcy_strategic-framework-countering-terrorism-targeted-violence.pdf
"Right-Wing Extremists Killed 38 People in 2019, Far Surpassing All Other Murderous Extremists"
https://www.adl.org/news/press-releases/adl-report-right-wing-extremists-killed-38-people-in-2019-far-surpassing-all
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
lol right-wingers can't do math, and when they can, they never understand how to use correctly!
High school math competency check:
To reduce its inventory, a warehouse runs a sale on silicon ingots. The sales rate (ingots sold per day) on day t of the sale is predicted to be 40/t (for t ≥ 1), where t = 1 corresponds to the beginning of the sale, at which time none of the inventory of 200 ingots had been sold.
Find a formula for the total number of ingots sold up to day t.
C(t) =
?
"Political scientists traditionally have analyzed the effect of politics on subjective well-being (SWB) at the collective level, finding that more liberal countries report greater SWB. Conversely, psychologists have focused primarily on SWB at the individual level and shown that being more conservative corresponds in greater SWB. We integrate the theoretical foundations of these two literatures (e.g., livability and system justification theories) to compare and contrast the effects of country- and individual-level political orientation on SWB simultaneously. Using a panel of 16 West European countries representative of 1,134,384 individuals from 1970 to 2002, we demonstrated this SWB political paradox: more liberal countries and more conservative individuals had higher levels of SWB. More importantly, we explored measurement as a moderator of the political orientation-SWB relationship to shed some light on why this paradox exists. When orientation is measured in terms of enacted values (i.e., what the government actually does), liberalism corresponds in higher SWB, but when politics is measured in terms of espoused values (i.e., what individuals believe), greater conservatism (whether at the individual or country level) coincided in higher SWB." (The Subjective Well-Being Political Paradox: Happy Welfare States and Unhappy Liberals ) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263889192_The_Subjective_Well-Being_Political_Paradox_Happy_Welfare_States_and_Unhappy_Liberals
1
-
1
-
1
-
1