Comments by "Bacon Overlord" (@baconoverlord7982) on "Reuters" channel.

  1. 2
  2. 2
  3. 2
  4. 2
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29.  @jenniferjackson2507  Your post: "first of all, you literally stated the definition of a figure slur. "an insinuation or allegation about someone that is likely to insult them or damage their reputation." which is used as a figure of speech to insinuate a damaging, insulting, or untrue statement made against someone. So, think again, I'm not the moron here. Now, a true slur is one that has history and is used to degrade minorities or those that aren't of the speaker, used with prejudice. If you weren't getting your information from the first google result, you would know that a white person calling another white person an insulting word is not a slur in any form of the word. Especially racial. "Cracker" has nothing to do with race, disability, gender, ethnicity, etc. Therefore, it cant be classed as a slur. Do your research." That's.. not at all what the definition says, nor what I pasted directly out of Merriam-Webster, moron. In fact, that doesn't even come close to fitting here at all. Did you get that from Wikipedia or something? hahahaha. Here.. I'll try again. Definition of SLUR: 1a: an insulting or disparaging remark or innuendo : ASPERSION b: a shaming or degrading effect : STAIN, STIGMA It says nothing about which race uses it, whether or not someone gets butthurt about it.. it doesn't even (GASP) say that they need to be insulted. It just says INSULTING. Which is pretty obvious when it's a RACIAL SLUR, moron. And no, slurs don't have to be from history.. where are you even pulling this utter BS from? Uranus? Hahaha. Moron. You utter idiot... to even insinuate that a white person wouldn't be insulted by another white person calling them a racial slur is the most idiotic and RACIST thing you've said so far. First.. look up racism. Then look up "slur". Then look up "racial slur". Then slap yourself for being stupid. Maybe it'll knock some sense into you, moron. Don't forget.. I'm only calling you a moron because you've exhibited moron-ish behavior on almost all the posts you've directed toward me. You're either trying WAY too hard to somehow be right or you're absolutely an idiot. I mean.. how many budget-level websites did you have to go to in order to try to find a definition that even SORT OF matched what you THINK might support your stupidity? Try a published dictionary.. you know, that are licensed to actually make dictionaries that are maintained and accurate. Once again, I have to do it... you're a moron.
    2
  30. ​ @jenniferjackson2507  Your post: "so, you're saying, that because i call you a "sponge" because its insulting and i think you look like a sponge- i'm calling you a slur? no, i'm not, but that's your logic. because you say the definitions but you literally say the complete opposite of what they mean or say utter nonsense that wasn't even mentioned. I've study this for years, it's not only my career but its my passion and my degree. I spent time in dictionaries, books, everything to find as much information as some with my title should and can. So, don't call me a moron when I've tried multiple times to educate and inform you when you're constantly ignorant and repeat the same exact things. Get over yourself, you're WRONG." Oh.. wow.. Since when is "sponge" a racial slur? Does it say "sponge" is a slur in the dictionary? If this is what you've studied... and you don't have the first clue what a "slur" is... then you really, really need to reexamine your life. I've pasted to you TWICE now, what a "slur" is. In the dictionary (yes I keep referencing the dictionary since it explains what our language means) it says that the Nword is a racial slur. It says that "cracker" is a racial slur. What more do you want? I don't even know what you're trying to argue about anymore. Go argue with the people that write dictionaries? I guess? Idiot. Yes, you are a moron. Now more than ever. You're saying you spend all this time and effort on.. something ambiguously related to what we're discussing, yet you have NO CONCEPT of the meaning of the simple words we're using. So, really.. you're either trolling or you suck at your life's work.
    2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2