Comments by "Steve Parker" (@steveparker8065) on "Home office failure" video.

The only way to look at what the Tories are doing is to ignore the tabloid perception and Tory PR and just analyse the information. Who benefits? Does this effectively challenge the problem? Is this related to other recent stories? what are the consequences? When we answer these questions we inevitably realise that the truth is often the polar opposite of what is actually suggested. Thanks for the vid Tim!
15
lol, love the way my comment gets likes and then they disappear. It's hard enough to get a comment through the filtering as it is. Having a voice on the internet is becoming a simple display of which content is preferred by the host of the social media platform.
6
@mossychops The Tories are just trying to increase the cost and paperwork so they can continue to use this as a diversion from their other failings. The increase in anti-migrant rhetoric in the tabloids will give the Tories a break from scrutiny as it always does, Hence why they never implement effective solutions.
6
@indivisible4835 lol not a chance m8, I get 80% or more of perfectly reasonable comments filtered. I see many vile comments allowed even on my thread and when I post a rebuttal it's filtered out. Most of my comments, replies and material is filtered it has been happening for months, even on simple reaction videos where I post a thank you.
2
@indivisible4835 Why do people have to make comments about experiences they don't have? I have posted on a variety of sites today and received no likes on comments that usually get the most likes on that particular story. I don't need to be patronised. I use a separate device to view the comments, they are not there unless logged into my account, as is the case when a comment is filtered, only the commenter can see it. Empirical data is used to determine my statement, not paranoid guesswork. I give up on the left, they're almost as bad as the right trying to gaslight people regarding things they haven't experienced...
2
@indivisible4835 I can take screenshots of the same post from two different devices and show the empirical data to you or anyone else for their observation. So no empirical data isn't subjective, empirical is objective by definition. I'm a programmer and have worked with AI and algorithms, I also accept I have trolls marking down my comments as I see likes go down. These are two separate issues. As I said I use factual analysis and empirical data to determine my views. Your denial of my facts seems pedantic and I have no idea of your motivation, although right now it seems pride as you've been proven wrong. Either way, I don't care to be patronised or slighted by inference by someone who then denies their inference as if they're suddenly being victimised. You are simply wrong and I can use Empirical data to prove so! Now please it's annoying as hell to be filtered, silenced and deleted on social media I don't need to be patronised to add insult to injury...
2
@indivisible4835 Dear god, I don't want or need to argue pedantic nonsense. When my likes are at 2 and go down to 0 it's obvious people are down-marking my comment, I'm followed by trolls but can't get rid of them I can only block them from commenting on my videos, as I'm commenting on news and other channels videos I have no control under the YT system. I have not blamed malign actors, and I have not suggested some undefined agency, those are misinterpretations of my comments. I have simply stated it is YT filtering. I have proven I use empirical data and given you the method, there is no discussion it is fact! You are still debating me over some petty misinterpretation of facts and your misunderstanding of the word Empirical (verified through repeatable observation and not based on theory or logic IE how we determine scientific fact) and you ask me how you are inferring I'm wrong? I've already proven my point, I've already proven your misunderstanding of words used and suggested your hurt pride is the reason for your continual pedantry. You can misinterpret my comment to continue this pointless sealioning as much as you like, but I've given you the tools to prove it. I'm simply pointing out that the more you upset the status quo, the more you get filtered and silenced. I don't want to debate allies over petty nonsense, I choose my words carefully as I've been forced to, to avoid censorship...
2
@indivisible4835 lol last two replies went missing... Take your inferences and pedantry away from me. You're part of the problem!
2
@indivisible4835 PS I took screenshots of the two replies I just had filtered and of the two replies missing on a different device, tell me where to send them and I'll happily do so! Then you'll have the proof and I can stop being pedantically sealioned and subtly insulted...
2
@indivisible4835 I have the proof and your misinterpretations of my comments are yours to justify not mine. If you read into my replies then that is your misunderstanding not my fault! Give me a location to upload the screenshots and then you can stop this absolute nonsense!
2
@indivisible4835 The staus quo? It's a statement of general belief systems not a body of individuals. It's Latin for "existing state". Your misinterpretation and made-up arguments are not mine to justify!
2
@indivisible4835 I don't have 'concerns' I have proof of my statements and will gladly give them to you. You're reading into my statements and drawing unfounded conclusions to justify your erroneous understanding, then inferring faults on my part. That is not my problem! Now admit you are wrong and that all I'm pointing out is a simple truth as you said "you enjoy being wrong". Or prove yourself to be a pendant and a liar...
2
@indivisible4835 Here we go again, I have to check each reply so you can see why this is doubly annoying. " I don't have 'concerns' I have proof of my statements and will gladly give them to you. You're reading into my statements and drawing unfounded conclusions to justify your erroneous understanding, then inferring faults on my part."
2
@indivisible4835 lol still at it? You thought Status Quo was some inference to a shadowy body, rather than the accepted views or existing state within society. Anyone can read this thread. They will see you admit that at least two of my comments were filtered and that because you pointed that out, you prove that I can indeed tell when being filtered. They will see your many references/subtle insults. If you feel patronised when being corrected that is your ego...
2
@indivisible4835 lol again with the reading into my comment to infer statements I haven't made. Thank you for the endless pedantry and misinterpretation. But I'm off to teach a whale to fly or talk Jelly into self-awareness as both of those things appeal to me more than listening to your fantastical nonsense... Please don't comment on my posts in future, I've given multiple opportunities to end this pedantic misrepresentation of my comments and keep you as an ally, but that isn't possible obviously...
2
@indivisible4835 No, that's your claim. Again you fail to read and put your own interpretation on my words, What I said was: "I'm simply pointing out that the more you upset the status quo, the more you get filtered and silenced." The interpretation of this is that if you challenge the 'existing state' of things, you will be more likely to be filtered. I have explained your misinterpretations again and again. I haven't concocted offence, but despite offering legitimate evidence you keep maligning me with suggestion and inferring statements I haven't made. I won't defend your misinterpretations, they only exist in your head! Feel free to reread the whole thread and analyse the consistent logic I've used. I'm not interested in your erroneous interpretations. Feel to free to come unarmed to a battle of wits anytime!
2
@indivisible4835 lol because it wasn't pertinent. What can you possibly interpret that basic statement to mean? It seems obvious that the basic meaning is that I choose my words because I've experienced filtering more often on certain words or phrases. Things like cronyism, dystopian corporatocracy, autocracy, theft, corporate greed and corruption. I've also noticed that comments in the main story are more often filtered than comments in a sub-thread. My observational skills are not flaws... Seriously just stop digging yourself deeper. I don't have time to correct your distortions constantly, get a life!
2
@indivisible4835 You fail to interpret language and invert the truth to suit a pedantic argument of your own creation. I've already defeated your arguments. Your lame sealioning and circular debate only serve to prove your own flaws. Your pop psychology 101 is as naive as your baseless comments. I pity you and the life that is so deeply pathetic that you waste my time on this contrivance of your own imagination. I won't explain the obvious to someone who fails to understand basic interpretations of words and fails to construct logical arguments without misconception at their heart. I hope your day is as nice as you are :) I won't reply again, claim victory, make more baseless accusations based on your inability to interpret sentences, I care not...
2
@indivisible4835 lol pathetic. As I predicted. Give you enough rope... Childlike and impossibly thick... Your only argument is based around your own inability to interpret language, how could I lose a debate when the premise is imaginary? You smile and claim victory and are too naive to understand what a fool you look. You lost before you started to type. Witless wonder unable to perceive his own misconceptions, inferences and misunderstanding of basic language. I've had a wonderful, enlightening, intelligent, thought-provoking debate... But this wasn't it! ;-)
2
@indivisible4835 You keep suggesting or inferring some paranoia, conspiracy, malignant actors, undefined organisation, self-importance/persecution complex etc when I've proven it's a simple logical experiment that proves this to be the case and even said it is YT filtering. Now you're suggesting my imagination despite me pointing out a simple screenshot from different devices will prove it. How would you expect me to respond? I'm not interested in your justifications and I've been sealioned for decades. Pedantry is a pandemic on social media and my precise use of language and accuracy is logically consistent. I'm not wasting my time with your erroneous inferences and subtle insults any longer. I've proven my point logically, you've proven your pedantry, pride and lack of understanding. End of debate, you are wrong by definition, interpretation and understanding...
1
@indivisible4835 lol my last comment was filtered, although as the recipient you may have seen it, but as I've just checked I can assure you no one else can. "You keep suggesting or inferring some paranoia, malignant actors, undefined organisation, self-importance/persecution complex etc when I've proven it's a simple logical experiment that proves this to be the case and even said it is YT filtering. Now you're suggesting my imagination despite me pointing out a simple screenshot from different devices will prove it. How would you expect me to respond? I'm not interested in your justifications and I've been sealioned for decades. Pedantry is a pandemic on social media and my precise use of language and accuracy is logically consistent. I'm not wasting my time with your erroneous inferences and subtle insults any longer. I've proven my point logically, you've proven your pedantry, pride and lack of understanding. End of debate, you are wrong by definition, interpretation and understanding..."
1