Comments by "Matthew Ingerson" (@matthewingerson) on "Status Coup News"
channel.
-
43
-
42
-
26
-
25
-
13
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
My sibling in Christ: Fear not.
This persecution is exactly that which Jesus forewarned us about.
Jesus said, do good to those who hate us.
Jesus said, pray for those who persecute us.
Jesus said, if someone wants your shirt, give them your coat, too.
Jesus said, if someone wants to hit your right side, let them hit your left side, too.
In essence, Jesus was telling us to be non-violent.
When the people in Jesus's hometown wanted Jesus to leave, Jesus left. Jesus didn't stick around and force Himself on anyone.
Then, when Jesus was being arrested, Peter chopped off one of the guard's ears. Jesus told Peter not to do that, and Jesus healed the guard.
When the people wanted Jesus arrested, Jesus allowed the people to arrest Him.
When the people wanted Jesus's life, Jesus allowed the people to it take His life.
When the people wanted Jesus dead, Jesus allowed the people to kill Him.
In practice, Jesus was showing us how to be non-violent, to the very end of our lives.
Jesus knew what His job was, and our job is similar.
Jesus knew that vengeance was not for Him to seek, nor it is for us to seek.
Jesus knew that God would deliver vengeance on behalf of Jesus when God was ready, and we need to remind ourselves that God will deliver vengeance on our behalf when God is ready.
🙏✌🤟✊
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
He's a walking contradiction.
Some of his contradictory statements are listed below.
--------------------
First, he says: 'I want to beat up some fucking commies.'
Then he says: 'We do kind of look aggressive... We're ready to get whomped on...'
Then he says: 'We're not aggressive.'
--------------------
First, he says: 'I wasn't political at all.'
Then he says: 'I was listening to (right-wing extremist) Alex Jones.'
--------------------
First, he says: 'I wasn't political at all.'
Someone asks him: 'You Mexican boys conservatives?'
He replies: 'Yeah!'
--------------------
She asks him: 'What do you say to people who say; "Proud boys are just violent. They just want to murder Antifa."'?
He answers: 'Poor media.'
But previously he said: 'Antifa made me want to join... I just want to beat up some fucking commies.'
--------------------
First says: 'I didn't care about left or right.'
Then says: 'So I joined the (right-wing extremists) Proud-Boys.'
--------------------
He says: 'So there's a group of men...'
But they call themselves boys and have the mindset of children
--------------------
First, he says: 'Fighting Antifa is 10 percent of what the Proud-Boys is about.
Then he says: 'There's 98% of what the media doesn't see about us.'
Sooo, if there's 98% that we don't see, but there is 10% which we do see, doesn't that make 108%?
I know, I'm nitpicking semantics. But who's really the idiot here?
--------------------
First, he says: 'I want to beat up some fucking commies.'
Then he says: 'We're God-fearing men'
But the Bible is anti-violence.
The Bible says: (Psalms 55:11) "The LORD tests the righteous and the wicked; His soul (God's soul) hates the lover of violence."
The Bible also says: (Proverbs 3:31) "Do not envy a violent man or choose any of his ways."
Jesus said: (Matthew 5:38-39) "You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.' But I tell you not to resist an evil person. If someone slaps you on your right cheek, turn to him the other also."
Jesus also said: (Matthew 26:52) "Put your sword back in its place. For all who live by the sword will die by the sword."
--------------------
He says: 'Buy me a beer. You're going to be my friend for the next 30 minutes.'
Then he says: 'We are drinkers. We are brawlers.'
But the Bible is anti-alcohol.
The Bible says: (Proverbs 20:1) 'Wine is a mocker, strong drink is a brawler, and whoever is led astray by them is not wise.'
It also says: (Proverbs 23:31-35) 'Do not gaze at wine while it is red, when it sparkles in the cup and goes down smoothly. In the end it bites like a snake and stings like a viper. Your eyes will see strange things and your mind will utter perversities. You will be like one sleeping on the high seas or lying on the top of a mast: “They struck me, but I feel no pain! They beat me, but I did not know it! When can I wake up to search for another drink?”
It also says: (Ephesians 5:18) 'Do not get drunk on wine, which leads to reckless indiscretion. Instead, be filled with the Spirit.'
--------------------
This kid reminds me of the main characters in the film 'American History X' (played by Edward Norton and Edward Furlong).
I call him a kid because of his child-like demeanor and undeveloped thought process.
He also reminds me of Frank Meeink (https://www.thedailybeast.com/he-was-the-neo-nazi-who-inspired-american-history-x-his-nazi-pals-are-now-cops).
He reminds me of the non-practicing extremists who distort and contort Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, which gives a bad name to decent practicing Christians, Jews, and Muslims.
In the linear progression of ignorance > fear > anger > hate > violence > murder > genocide, as long as a person is one of those things, then the wealthy-class can exploit it to persuade a person to move along to the next level.
This kid is exactly the kind of rube that the wealthy-class loves to mark.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Look up and watch the most recent interview of Thomas Frank by RJ Eskow on The Zero Hour, and you'll get an idea as to why "lefties" recoil and fall in line when they enter "The Big Show" that is controlled by wealthy-class, right-wing, authoritarians.
When anyone to the left of the wealthy-class makes it to The Big Show, they are exposed to the fragility of society.
From now on, they will be reminded about the fragility that was displayed in the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and how close some of them came to being made public examples of.
They are educated about what has happened to leftists in the past in this country -- the assassination of character, the imprisonment of bodies, the deportation of citizens, the disappearance of humans, and the forced separation of souls from their consciousness.
Then, they are asked if they want to become the first/next victim(s) of the fragility, if and when the wealthy-class decides to fabricate and allow the collapse of the systems that have been infiltrated and corrupted by the wealthy-class.
For most people, self-preservation of life, even though it benefits the wealthy-class minority, is paramount to self-sacrifice for liberty, even if it would benefit the working-class majority.
The reason these self-proclaimed leftists seem so feckless and ignorant is that they are preventing the demise of themselves and their families.
At the same time, they are avoiding the kind of collapse that is imposed upon foreign countries by the US when those foreign countries democratically elect actual leftist governments.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
RFK is a right-winger. He'll govern like a right-winger, just like Clinton, Obama, and Biden.
*Start Scene
RFK: "I am a Capitalist, in favor of Capitalism!!!"
The wealthy-class: "OooOOOhhh!!! WE are also Capitalists in favor of Capitalism! AND we're anti-working-class!!!"
Capitalism: "WELLLLLL!!! I just happen to be an anti-working-class, right-wing economic ideology that favors the wealthy-class to the detriment of the working-class."
Narrator: "The wealthy-class, right-wing Capitalist, RFK, laughed. 😁
Then the wealthy-class, right-wing Capitalists laughed. 😅
Then Capitalism laughed. 😂
Then they all went out for chocolate milkshakes. 🤣
And they laughed and laughed, as they reminisced about how 150+ million of the Overton-stunted, politically-shallow, historically-ignorant, internationally-shielded, working-class American fools voted for the right-wing, Capitalist Red-team and the right-wing, Capitalist Blue-team in the 2020 POTUS election." 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
*End Scene
The pro-working-class American Leftists -- the ones who are the opposite of the Overton-stunted, politically-shallow, historically-ignorant, internationally-shielded, working-class American fools -- who know that the system of Capitalism, and Capitalists are the problem: 🙄
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@flychomperfly Yup, you get a like. A labor-strike is only viable for a small portion of working-class people who don't need a paycheck during the strike. But a consumer-strike would be viable for all working-class people to participate in.
If a working-class person can't get food, clothes, shelter, & transpiration, then they can't participate in the strike.
A labor strike is only reasonable for a couple-few groups of working-class people to participate in:
1. Unionized working-class people who are lucky enough to be in unions that offer direct support, and won't let their union members lose their homes to foreclosure, or vehicles to repossession for the duration of the strike. I don't think this exists in any union, but I could be wrong.
2. Non-unionized working-class people who (a)have their mortgages & vehicles paid off AND (b)have some savings stored up to buy necessities for the duration of the strike.
3. Upper working-class people who have support from family members who are in the wealthy-class, or adjacent to the wealthy-class, who will help their upper working-class family members during a strike. Most of these upper working-class people side with the wealthy-class owners anyway.
Now, a consumer-strike, on the other hand, could be participated in by many more working-class people, and also have desired effects.
But that would entail working-class people to give up some of their addictions. Only buy necessities. Stop purchasing out-of-home entertainment. Stop going out to eat. FFS, stop going out for anything, except necessities.
Working-class people need to stay home, shut up -- pretend it's COVID again if they have to -- and wait for the wealthy-class to panic. And wait for the prices of things to drop.
Sure, a consumer-strike will also have ripple-effects throughout the working-class, but a consumer-strike is much more viable for a much larger percentage of the working-class population to participate in than a labor-strike.
If most lower & middle working-class people stopped working, especially those who are non-unionized, they wouldn't have to worry about purchasing out-of-home entertainment, because most of them would end up without a home.
And a lot of those working-class people are so dumb, they've already been duped into blaming the wrong people for their struggles, and they've already been primed for violence by their RW-masters.
So, for that reason, i'd prefer to mitigate the speed of the ripple-effects as much as possible.
However, it's possible that a labor-strike, a consumption-strike, or a strike of any kind, might cause all the ripple-effects necessary to cause chaos.
The ripple-effects of any strike could end up being the sparks that ignite the tinder-box of socioeconomic political-kindling that the corrupt wealthy-class has built, with their corrupt RW-politics, under the feet and over the heads of working-class people over the last 50-100 years.
So, that would really suck.
I've been under-employed for 3 out of the last 10 years, and unemployed (acting as a quasi/neo indentured-servant) for 7 out of those 10. So, yeah, I would kind of like some things to change (understatement of the decade). But I'm not an accelerationist.
I've been living a "strike" lifestyle for a decade. I even spent some time homeless. So I'm prepared to handle tough times, and worse. But most working-class people are not.
I heard one RW-extremist political pundit has publicly say that there are some working-class people who are ready to "eat their neighbors." I don't want it to come to that.
But don't get me wrong, I know that mass action is the only way to get out of the RW-extremist sh!tehole that the wealthy-class is driving the working-class into. So, I'm all for a strike of ANY kind.
Perhaps, better yet, do BOTH a labor-strike AND a consumer-strike at the same time.
Do whatever is most effective while taking any, every, and all measures to preserve human-life.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3