Comments by "Matthew Ingerson" (@matthewingerson) on "More Perfect Union" channel.

  1. 47
  2. 43
  3. 35
  4. 30
  5. 24
  6. 22
  7. 15
  8. 13
  9. 12
  10. 11
  11. 10
  12. 9
  13. 9
  14. 9
  15. 8
  16. 8
  17. 7
  18. 7
  19. 6
  20. 5
  21. 4
  22. 4
  23. 4
  24. 4
  25. 4
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. You've been living under oligarchy your entire life. You are NOT living under "oligarchy headed toward fascism" -- you're living in Corporatism headed toward Fascism. Oligarchy is a characteristic of MANY political-systems, such as Monarchism, Feudalism,, Capitalism, Republicanism, Corporatism, AND Fascism. Furthermore, most, if not all, of recorded-history has taken place under oligarchic political-systems. And if you must use the word oligarchy to satiate some unnecessary-desire, you would say you're living in a "Corporatist-oligarchy headed toward a Fascist-oligarchy." But adding the word oligarchy to the actual name of the political-system is redundant, since both systems are oligarchic in nature. It is just as maddening to watch the indecent working-class dupes in MAGA as it is to watch the decent working-class dupes who are NOT part of MAGA, as both the dupes & the non-dupes try to stumble through the defining characteristics of the socioeconomic & political hurdles (such as oligarchy) that have existed for millennia. Like, put down the entertainment and pick up the education. Literally -- STOP with the entertainment -- you have decades upon centuries upon millennia of knowledge to catch up on, because your education has been stifled, and you have been stupefied, by oligarchs. Your sentiments are in the right place, but your rhetoric is, just, not helpful or useful. Oh, how I long for the days when ignorant people weren't so proud to prove it publicly in exchange for the dopamine-hits that come from getting "likes".
    2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. 2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. Schultz's willingness to oppress working-class people (like Nazis did), is as disgusting as the African-Americans who are willing to oppress working-class people in their communities (like slave-patrollers did). Schultz is a descendant of the oppressed, working-class, Jewish victims of the enslavement and genocide perpetrated against them by Nazis. People like Schultz enslaved and murdered his ancestors. African-American LEOs are the descendants of the oppressed, working-class, African victims of enslavement and genocide perpetrated against them by Confederate, American and European slave-patrollers. People like African-American LEOs enslaved and murdered their ancestors. The phrase, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em," comes to mind. Schultz is a perfect example of the phrase, "If you can't beat the Nazis, join the Nazis." African-American LEOs are perfect examples of the phrase, "If you can't beat the slave-patrollers, then join the slave-patrollers." If I was a proponent of hyperbole, I might say something like: "The murdered ancestors of Schultz and African-American LEOs are rolling over so fast in their graves, I'm surprised the Earth hasn't spun off its own axis and flung itself out of orbit." But I'm not hyperbolic -- hyperbole is part of the propagandist tool-chest used by wealthy-class right-wingers -- and I'm not a wealthy-class right-winger. So, instead, I'll say something like: "Schultz acts like he's trying to help the Nazis win the war, over a hundred years later. And African-American LEOs act like they're trying to help the Confederates win the war, over 150 years later. But one thing is certain, and that is that both Schultz and African-American LEOs are acting to help right-wing Conservatives to conserve their white-supremacist power under the inequitable system of Capitalism. F*kc 'em all. And f*kc anyone who disagrees."
    1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. Right-wing politics are anti-working-class politics and pro-wealthy-class politics. And corporations are owned by wealthy-class right-wingers. And BOTH American political parties are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by wealthy-class right-wingers. The point of the Libertarian party, and the subsequent Tea Party, was to mobilize the right-wing extremist Republicans from the working-class toward anti-working-class/pro-wealthy-class causes. And the point of the No Labels party is to mobilize the right-wing moderate Democrats in the working-class toward the same anti-working-class/pro-wealthy-class causes. The wealthy-class right-wingers founded and funded the Libertarian and Tea Parties as a way to trick working-class dupes into voting against their own self-interests. The wealthy-class right-wingers founded and funded the No Labels Party as a way to trick working-class dupes into voting against their own self-interests. Not to mention the way the wealthy-class right-wingers have corrupted the Green Party and the DSA, or the way they demonized and murdered non-right-wingers with McCarthyism and The Red Scare. This new affinity for multi-party politics, as opposed to the normal duopoly-party politics, is just another way that the wealthy-class right-wingers are using their wealth to expand their grasp on power. Profits don't only go toward an elevated standard of living for the wealthy-class, right-wing owners. Profits also go toward manipulating politics and people, in an effort to maintain the systems of greed that increase profits for wealthy-class right-wingers. Greed is a mental illness, associated with addiction. And wealthy-class right-wingers will NEVER seek help for their mental illness. And they will NEVER willingly give up their addictions. EVER.
    1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84.  @Window4503  Sooo, by speaking specifically, directly, and literally, while encouraging others to do the same, you're saying that I'M the one who is mincing words? ...🤨... ...🤔... That's some blissfully-ignorant or abhorrently-deplorable thinking you've got there. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 With that kind of talk, I can't tell if you're a center-right-wing lib-servative, like the ones who run this channel, or a moderate-right-wing conserva-lib like the ones who run CNN, MSNBC, and FauxNews. Don't worry, you haven't sunken too far into the right-wing indoctrination(yet) -- I can tell that you're not(yet) a right-wing-extremist regressive-con like the ones who run OAN, NewsMax, and PragerU. Working-class people need to stop speaking/writing in the style of the right-wing-propagandists. STOP using hyperbole, misdirection, or vagueness, or vagary. START using conciseness, directness, specificity, and reality. Take the title of this video, for example: "Legal Weed Is Being Ruined By Corporate Greed" Legal weed is NOT being ruined by corporate greed -- that's hyperbolic, at best. A majority of the citizens decide they wanted something. And, now, that something is being ruined by a minority of citizens. The working-class majority made a decision. And, now, the wealthy-class is going against the decision. Weed was legalized by a vote of a majority-population of the citizens. And, now, a minority-population of citizens are trying to exploit the majority-population of citizens. Now, those might not be a useful video titles, but I could think of a dozen better titles that are more truthful and accurate than the title they decided on. Working-class dupes like you don't even comprehend what I'm saying, which you made evident with your comment. Working-class dupes, like you, have been so dumbed-down by right-wing tactics, you don't even realize that you expose your ignorance when you try to communicate. I soundly and roundly reject your comment. Go have intercourse with yourself.
    1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. Schultz's willingness to oppress working-class people (like Nazis did), is as disgusting as the African-Americans who are willing to oppress working-class people in their communities (like slave-patrollers did). Schultz is a descendant of the oppressed, working-class, Jewish victims of the enslavement and genocide perpetrated against them by Nazis. People like Schultz enslaved and murdered his ancestors. African-American LEOs are the descendants of the oppressed, working-class, African victims of enslavement and genocide perpetrated against them by Confederate, American and European slave-patrollers. People like African-American LEOs enslaved and murdered their ancestors. The phrase, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em," comes to mind. Schultz is a perfect example of the phrase, "If you can't beat the Nazis, join the Nazis." African-American LEOs are perfect examples of the phrase, "If you can't beat the slave-patrollers, then join the slave-patrollers." If I was a proponent of hyperbole, I might say something like: "The murdered ancestors of Schultz and African-American LEOs are rolling over so fast in their graves, I'm surprised the Earth hasn't spun off its own axis and flung itself out of orbit." But I'm not hyperbolic -- hyperbole is part of the propagandist tool-chest used by wealthy-class right-wingers -- and I'm not a wealthy-class right-winger. So, instead, I'll say something like: "Schultz acts like he's trying to help the Nazis win the war, over a hundred years later. And African-American LEOs act like they're trying to help the Confederates win the war, over 150 years later. But one thing is certain, and that is that both Schultz and African-American LEOs are acting to help right-wing Conservatives to conserve their white-supremacist power under the inequitable system of Capitalism. F*kc 'em all. And f*kc anyone who disagrees."
    1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. 1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102.  @JuggaloNY  It's been a series of SCOTUS decisions that put inequitable power into the hands of the wealthy-class-RWers and basically turned the entire working-class into a state of permanent slavery. I'll list the cases below: Buckley v. Valeo (1976): This decision ruled that the government putting limitations on election expenditures by individual-citizens is unconstitutional -- so the government can no longer limit how much money an individual can spend on elections. So, now, the wealthy-class-RWers can spend as much money as they want, to produce as much propaganda as they want, for electoral purposes. Basically, the Court ruled that "money is speech" (and there are no laws against telling lies). So, now, the wealthy-class-RWers can use as much of their money as they want to promote lies on TV, on the internet, and in publications, and no one can stop them. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978): This decision basically ruled that everything about the Buckley v. Valeo decision that applied to individual-citizens now also applies to private-corporations, too. So, now, not only can the individual wealthy-class-RW citizens use their own personal money to engage in unlimited deception in campaigns & elections, but, the same wealthy-class-RWers who own & control the businesses & corporations in the country, can also use the money that belongs to the business-entity to produce deceptive-propaganda as well. This decision basically gave free-speech/money-is-speech rights to business & corporate entities. McConnell V. Federal Election Commission (2003): This is a case with lots of "moving-parts." But the wealthy-class-RWers came out on top again. It's worth understanding the decision(s) in this case, because it shaped how we've gotten to where we are. And, where we are, is right on the cusp of fascism. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014): The decision in this case expanded on the rulings in the Buckley & First National Bank of Boston. The decisions in those previous cases allowed unlimited money to be spent on propaganda regarding policies and elections. But the decision in McCutcheon ruled that limitations directly to the campaigns of candidates were also unconstitutional. It basically expanded on the idea that money is speech, and that the government passing laws to limit wealthy-class-RW people from spending their money on bribing candidates who are running for electoral offices, is a violation of the First Amendment. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010): One of the most consequential cases/decisions in US history, and absolutely important to know. It expanded on most/all of the unfair rulings/decisions on the cases above. Solidified the power of the wealthy-class in society. To use an analogy: if the previous cases & decisions paved the roadway for fascism, the decision in this case paved the runway for fascism. Or, rather, it built the rocketship to fascism. The decisions in all of these cases disproportionately benefited the populace-minority made up of wealthy-class-RWers, and they disproportionately burdened the populace-majority made up of working-class people. Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, and those SCOTUS cases and their decisions did more than just what I've written. And I may not have even adequately described the things I tried to describe. But you can definitely find plenty of information on the cases above. ✌🤟✊🙏
    1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. Schultz's willingness to oppress working-class people (like Nazis did), is as disgusting as the African-Americans who are willing to oppress working-class people in their communities (like slave-patrollers did). Schultz is a descendant of the oppressed, working-class, Jewish victims of the enslavement and genocide perpetrated against them by Nazis. People like Schultz enslaved and murdered his ancestors. African-American LEOs are the descendants of the oppressed, working-class, African victims of enslavement and genocide perpetrated against them by Confederate, American and European slave-patrollers. People like African-American LEOs enslaved and murdered their ancestors. The phrase, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em," comes to mind. Schultz is a perfect example of the phrase, "If you can't beat the Nazis, join the Nazis." African-American LEOs are perfect examples of the phrase, "If you can't beat the slave-patrollers, then join the slave-patrollers." If I was a proponent of hyperbole, I might say something like: "The murdered ancestors of Schultz and African-American LEOs are rolling over so fast in their graves, I'm surprised the Earth hasn't spun off its own axis and flung itself out of orbit." But I'm not hyperbolic -- hyperbole is part of the propagandist tool-chest used by wealthy-class right-wingers -- and I'm not a wealthy-class right-winger. So, instead, I'll say something like: "Schultz acts like he's trying to help the Nazis win the war, over a hundred years later. And African-American LEOs act like they're trying to help the Confederates win the war, over 150 years later. But one thing is certain, and that is that both Schultz and African-American LEOs are acting to help right-wing Conservatives to conserve their white-supremacist power under the inequitable system of Capitalism. F*kc 'em all. And f*kc anyone who disagrees."
    1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. 1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. RW-politics = enslavement politics. Monarchism, Feudalism, Capitalism, Republicanism,* Corporatism, Oligarchism, & Fascism are ALL systems in which the populace-minority of wealthy-class people enslaves the populace-majority of working-class people. Democracy & socialism are two of the antidotes to the inequality & enslavement that are perpetuated by the corrupt wealthy-class & their corrupt RW-politics. All of the problems in the world can be traced back to two main sources: (1)to the corrupt wealthy-class knaves & their corrupt RW-politics, and (2)to the few working-class dupes who support the corrupt wealthy-class knaves & their corrupt RW-politics. For example: The Confederates & Nazis were both RW-political parties that were founded & funded by (1)the corrupt wealthy-class, and were supported by (2)a few working-class dupes. The Repubs & Dems are both RW-political parties that were founded, and are still funded, by (1)the corrupt wealthy-class, and supported by (2)a BUNCH of working-class dupes. BOTH parties have enabled & legalized bribery. BOTH parties engaged in Gerrymandering & voter-suppression. BOTH parties have made it harder to vote. BOTH parties have decreased the ease of voting. Question: Why have BOTH parties worked together on those things? Answer: Because BOTH parties are bought, owned, bribed & controlled by the same corrupt wealthy-class and their corrupt RW-politics. Footnotes: *Republicanism includes BOTH the Republic-party AND the Democrat-party in the US. BOTH parties adhere to, and promote, the system of a Republic over the system of Democracy. Although, the US is barely even a Republic anymore -- it's closer to a Technocratic/Theocratic Fascist Kakistocracy, just like the Confederate-South and Nazi-Germany were, just like Zionist-Israel is.
    1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. 1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. 1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177.  @kurtis_schmurtis  I've never heard of Snyder v. U.S., but I've heard of Citizen's United. It seems that you care enough to know, so you should also check out: 1. Buckley v. Valeo(1976) 2. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti(1978) 3. McCutcheon v. FEC(2012) The rulings in ALL of those cases, including Citizens United, essentially give the corrupt wealthy-class the right to corrupt campaigns and elections. They have legalized bribery. The rulings in ALL of those cases were decided by RW-Justices on RW-courts. ALL of those cases impose a disproportionate disadvantage upon the working-class.people who make up the populace-majority -- the rulings are Anti-Democracy in nature. ALL of those cases give a disproportionate advantage to the populace-minority of the corrupt wealthy-class knaves and their corrupt RW-politics -- the rulings are Pro-Authoritarian in nature. Honestly, though, this is really nothing new. The people in the wealthy-class have been on a quest to remain in the wealthy-class since the invention of currency. They become like the worst addicts -- they will NEVER willingly give up their addictions. They become addicted to their lifestyles -- they'll do ANYTHING to maintain their lifestyle-addictions. They will purchase or bribe anyone, and they'll lie to, cheat, and steal from anyone, just to maintain their lifestyle-addictions. They'll incite sabotage, violence, murder, and genocide just to maintain their lifestyle-addictions. And they've even devised a way, via their corrupt RW-politics, to extract endless-wealth from the sabotage, violence, murder, and genocide: Endless Wars. Endless Wars need endless supplies. Those endless supplies come from private-businesses. Those private-businesses are owned by the corrupt wealthy-class. And it is that very same wealthy-class that benefits from the rulings by the RW-justices in those court cases above -- Those rulings, which essentially say that the wealthy-class has the Constitutional Right to corrupt elections and campaigns, thus corrupting politicians and the government. So, then, those corrupted politicians use their positions in government to vote for the military-legislation that authorizes war, and then they vote for the budget-legislation that pays for the supplies that come from the private-businesses which are owned by the corrupt wealthy-class. Then the wealthy-class uses some of the profits from their private-businesses to give to the campaigns of the politicians who will then use their positions in government to vote for their corrupt RW-politics. That whole "Endless War" scheme -- being fueled by a corrupt, authoritarian wealthy-class and their corrupt RW-politics, and being funded by corrupted, authoritarian politicians in a corrupted government -- is now called the military-industrial-complex. They really started kicking the scheme into high-gear in the U.S. after WW2. General Smedly Butler warned that the wealthy-class was trying to take over the government via coup. But, luckily the coup failed. Then, in the 1950s, Eisenhower warned that the wealthy-class was trying to take over the government via the "military-congressional-industrial-complex" -- essentially a slower coup. And each of those RW-SCOTUS rulings, mentioned above, have been small steps towards the slower coup. The RW-SCOTUS ruling, from the other day, on Immunity for POTUS was another step towards the slower coup. Add in Project2025 and the U.S. will be many, many steps closer. The wealthy-class has been using that RW-political scheme of "Endless War" for millennia: the Roman Empire, the British Empire, the Confedrates, the N@z!s. And if the U.S. continues to elect the corrupt, RW-extremist Repubs and the corrupt, moderate RW-Dems, then the U.S. is eventually going to meet the same results... The wealthy-class will start a war INSIDE the U.S., and while the working-class dupes are fighting in the war, the wealthy-class will sneak out the backdoor with their wealth. It's not just getting worse -- It's getting dire.
    1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193.  @davidepling724  Words have meanings. And I'll try to explain. But, if you're anti-education and anti-intellectualism, you might as well stop reading right now. And even if you are pro-education and pro-intellectualism, I won't be surprised if, in one YT comment, you can't comprehend that which took me years of formal & informal education to learn. But here we go. Right-wing social politics are pro-autocracy and anti-democracy politics. Right-wing economic politics are pro-wealthy-class and anti-working-class politics. Right-wing socioeconomic politics are pro-hierarchical-inequality and anti-anarchical-equality politics. Capitalism -- like feudalism and monarchism -- is a right-wing, autocratic, hierarchical economic system. Right-wing political systems have been the metaphorical-vehicles in which wealthy-class right-wingers have been the drivers of manipulation and exploitation into society throughout recorded history -- all to the detriment of the chattel-slaves, debt-slaves, and wage-slaves in the working-class who are nothing more than pedestrians to be aimed at by the wealthy, right-wing psycho/sociopaths behind the wheel. The world has had a right-wing bent throughout most of recorded history, ESPECIALLY since the invention of currencies. And, by that vein, the USA has ALWAYS been a right-wing country. Wealthy right-wing monarchs funded the exploration of the American-landscape. Wealthy right-wing landlords stole the American-landscape from, and then committed genocide against, the rightful-owners. Wealthy right-wing landholders, property-owners, and enslavers wrote and signed the inequitable and corrupt government documents. Wealthy right-wingers have ruled the world for millennia. But wealthy right-wingers have been corrupting the American-landscape since before they arrived on its shores, and they've been doing so ever since. Wealthy right-wingers wrote the 13th Amendment to The US Constitution. The 13th Amendment enshrines slavery into the already-inequitable, already-corrupt Constitution. And, now, because of the 13th Amendment, the wealthy right-wingers can continue to increase their wealth through the enslaving-incarceration of the working-class in prisons -- just like the wealthy right-wingers increased their wealth through the enslaving-incarceration of the working-class, kidnapped Africans on plantations. Additionally, wealthy right-wingers have used the corrupted government to sabotage the working-class in modern times. In the same way that wealthy right-wingers were mad after The Civil War, they were also mad after FDR worked on behalf of the working-class. FDR wasn't perfect. But he wasn't a psycho/sociopathic addict. He didn't want another civil war. In fact, FDR was a wealthy right-winger himself. But the other wealthy right-wingers hated FDR because he didn't allow them to pursue their addictions to their psycho/sociopathic heart's content. FDR didn't permit the wealthy right-wingers to continue their unfettered manipulation and exploitation of the working-class. And, so, after FDR died, the corrupt, wealthy right-wingers used the government, which they corruptly invented, to impose term limits on future presidents to prevent the harnessing of their wealthy right-wing addictions to corruption and greed. After the wealthy right-wingers imposed presidential term limits, they set out to undo all of the working-class benefits put into place by FDR. They are still working towards undoing those working-class benefits today. For example, they are trying to undo the Social Security program. Then, after World War Two, came the era of McCarthyism and the Second Red Scare. During that time, working-class people were detained, deported, disappeared(kidnapped), and dispatched(killed) -- all at the behest of wealthy right-wingers. The detaining, deporting, kidnapping, and killing were committed by the working-class dupes who were dumb enough to "jUsT FoLLoW ThE OrDeRs." of wealthy right-wingers -- just like the working-class fools who followed the orders of wealthy right-wing Confederates and Nazis. That, by the way, has been one of the biggest problems for the working-class majority throughout history; there are so many ignorant dupes in the ranks, and that is by the design of wealthy right-wingers. Wealthy right-wingers knew then, in the past, what they know now, in the present -- they know that stupid working-class people make better slaves. That's why wealthy right-wing slaveowners prevented their working-class slaves from learning in the past. That's why wealthy right-wingers don't want an educated working-class in the present -- they know that stupid working-class people make better slaves. That's why wealthy right-wingers are trying so hard to defund public education. The wealthy right-wingers know that ignorant working-class people are easily manipulated and convinced to sabotage communities of their own working-class friends and families and those of working-class strangers abroad. And broken working-class homes and communities anywhere are to the benefit of wealthy right-wingers everywhere. Wealthy right-wingers want their kids to go to overfunded schools where they learn to become manipulators, exploiters, and enslavers. Wealthy right-wingers want working-class kids to go to underfunded schools where they learn to be wage-slave soldiers, debt-slave workers, and chattel-slave prisoners. Whether you're a chattel-slave on a prison-plantation, a debt-slave on a battlefield, or wage-slave on a factory floor, the wealthy right-wingers do not care. They'll take whichever kind of ignorant slave they can get. Now, moving forward a few decades away from McCarthyism, we see the continued corruption of the wealthy right-wingers in their efforts to re-infiltrate and resolidify their control over the judicial systems. Knowing and understanding the decisions from a few Supreme Court cases from the last four-plus decades will help any working-class person better comprehend wealthy right-wing corruption. To ease the intake of the information, I'll chronologically list the cases below: 1. Buckley v. Valeo (1976) 2. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellott (1978) 3. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) 4. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014) All of those cases, decided by right-wing jurists in a right-wing country, were to the benefit of the wealthy right-wing minority to the detriment of the working-class majority. I could go on. And on. And on. But I've given you the beginnings of an education rooted in socioeconomic politics in international & historical contexts. You know, honestly, I'm a Christian -- a real one. I'm not one of those right-wing, mammon-worshipping, violently-theocratic authoritarians. And I don't vote. So I've really got no skin in this game. Because, personally, I'll die willingly, like Christ did, before I commit violence against anyone just so I, or some wealthy right-winger, can sh!t more comfortably than someone else. But something tells me you're a right-wing Republican, right-wing Democrat, right-wing Libertarian, or a right-wing NoLables voter. And ALL of those parties are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by wealthy right-wingers. (Side note: There aren't any wealthy-elitists who are economically-left-wing, by the way -- because to be wealthy is to be a right-winger, because right-wing politics are wealthy-class politics That's. There might be some socially-left-wing wealthy-elitists, but only in so far as they want to allow their slaves to be whatever religion/gender the slave chooses -- because that helps to sustain the pro-wealthy-class/anti-working-class system by preventing another civil war. End side note.) And something tells me that you WOULD commit violence if they told you to -- just like the working-class, right-wing Confederates and Nazis who did what their wealthy right-wing masters told them to do. So, I don't expect anything I've written to turn you into a non-violent, anti-violence Christian -- I'll leave the conversions to God, Christ, and The Holy Spirit. But, hopefully, you've learned something new from what I've written, or you have been compelled to learn something new from somewhere else. And, hopefully, you've had a revelation to the class-war being waged against the working-class majority by the wealthy-class right-wing minority. And, hopefully, that revelation drives you to solidarity with the working-class people with whom you have more in common than you do with the wealthy right-wing tyrants. P.S. Learn about austerity and neoliberalism. Neoliberalism is a right-wing political ideology in line with the capitalist economic system. Austerity and neoliberalism benefit the wealthy-class to the detriment of the working-class. Neoliberal-austerity policies are the current economic-policies that capitalist/conservative Repub&Dem right-wingers are trying to conserve. Also, learn about Modern Monetary Theory. Currencies are, and should be, created by one entity, and that entity is the government. Just because most of the governments in the world are corrupted by wealthy right-wingers, that doesn't mean it has to be that way. If a government can print money to manufacture the bombs and bullets that kill working-class people abroad, then a government can also print money to create domestic jobs that ensure all citizens have food, clothes, and shelter in their own countries. And no autocratic person or company should be able to create their own currency -- and certainly not the corrupt, wealthy, right-wing addicts -- f*kc this crypto-currency bullsh!t. Anyone who says otherwise is a fool who doesn't comprehend corruption, or a knave who pretends not to comprehend corruption because they benefit from corruption.
    1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. Schultz's willingness to oppress working-class people (like Nazis did), is as disgusting as the African-Americans who are willing to oppress working-class people in their communities (like slave-patrollers did). Schultz is a descendant of the oppressed, working-class, Jewish victims of the enslavement and genocide perpetrated against them by Nazis. People like Schultz enslaved and murdered his ancestors. African-American LEOs are the descendants of the oppressed, working-class, African victims of enslavement and genocide perpetrated against them by Confederate, American and European slave-patrollers. People like African-American LEOs enslaved and murdered their ancestors. The phrase, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em," comes to mind. Schultz is a perfect example of the phrase, "If you can't beat the Nazis, join the Nazis." African-American LEOs are perfect examples of the phrase, "If you can't beat the slave-patrollers, then join the slave-patrollers." If I was a proponent of hyperbole, I might say something like: "The murdered ancestors of Schultz and African-American LEOs are rolling over so fast in their graves, I'm surprised the Earth hasn't spun off its own axis and flung itself out of orbit." But I'm not hyperbolic -- hyperbole is part of the propagandist tool-chest used by wealthy-class right-wingers -- and I'm not a wealthy-class right-winger. So, instead, I'll say something like: "Schultz acts like he's trying to help the Nazis win the war, over a hundred years later. And African-American LEOs act like they're trying to help the Confederates win the war, over 150 years later. But one thing is certain, and that is that both Schultz and African-American LEOs are acting to help right-wing Conservatives to conserve their white-supremacist power under the inequitable system of Capitalism. F*kc 'em all. And f*kc anyone who disagrees."
    1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. 1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1
  232. 1
  233. 1
  234. 1
  235. 1
  236. 1
  237. 1
  238. 1
  239. 1
  240. 1
  241. 1
  242. 1
  243. 1
  244. 1
  245. 1
  246. 1
  247. 1
  248. 1
  249. 1
  250. 1