Comments by "Matthew Ingerson" (@matthewingerson) on "Secular Talk"
channel.
-
44
-
20
-
18
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
Krystal, Kyle, & Privilege -- that's the name of the show.
It's evident that the inherent, randomized suffering imposed upon working-class people by right-wing politics hasn't affected Krystal nor Kyle enough in their lives to induce a deeper empathy for those who suffer most.
It's not surprising to me why Krystal & Kyle BOTH hold moderate right-wing political beliefs -- their socioeconomic lifestyles exist because of right-wing politics.
Krystal & Kyle were BOTH lucky in the super-random, supernatural, socioeconomic birthing-lottery -- just like Musk, Bezos, Trump, and lowly Joe Biden, were ALL lucky.
Krystal & Kyle are BOTH lucky to have the socioeconomic lifestyles they have -- and their luck stems not only from the birthing-lottery, but also from the right-wing, lottery-style, socioeconomic political system of capitalism.
The lottery-style socioeconomic-political system, known as capitalism, is imposed by BOTH right-wing American political parties -- moderate right-wing Democrats and extremist right-wing Republicans are BOTH capitalist political parties.
The Democrat AND Republic political-parties are BOTH corrupt, right-wing parties, and, together, they work behind the scenes to form a right-wing uni-party -- that uni-party is bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by wealthy right-wingers conservatives.
And why would the wealthy-right-wingers use the Repub and Dem parties to work together behind the scenes? What is the thing that they're trying to conserve?
Answer: They are trying to conserve the right-wing socioeconomic system of neoliberal/neoconservative capitalism.
Because it is through the capitalist system by which the wealthy-right-wingers guarantee the inherency of their elevated socioeconomic status.
And it is the inherent nature of that same capitalist system under which the working-class people are guaranteed to endure varying degrees of suffering.
And, even though I'm not a fan of her, I still have to agree with BJG: I am not afraid of Trump. And nor am I afraid of Joe Biden.
I know that Trump is a right-wing extremist.
I know that Biden is a right-wing moderate.
And I know that the suffering of working-class people will continue to increase under both of them, and under any other candidate that the wealthy-right-wingers use their parties to put forward.
So, I say, bring on the increased suffering for more people. That seems to be the only thing that gets through to the lucky people like Krystal & Kyle: Suffering.
When enough people have finally suffered enough, in real, substantial, and meaningful ways, that is when real, substantial, and meaningful change will occur.
Until more of the lucky working-class(petit-bourgeois) people, like Krystal & Kyle, have suffered, we'll have to continue hearing people like Krystal & Kyle say, "our expectations have been exceeded."
And I'll have to continue to say, "I know people who have suffered enough -- so go f*kc your lucky selves with a wooden-splintered d!ldo."
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
I'd like to see the 'tale of the tape' on it before I make a bet. JC might have some weight on NM, but NM probably learned some hand-to-hand combat skills at The Citadel. NM looks scrawny, but if NM knows how to grapple better than JC, then NC will have the upper hand on JC, even if NM is lighter than JC.
Of course, this is all nonsense, and, in a civilized society, threatening violence would result in automatic removal from office and a special-election planned for that district.
Mace is as dumb as MarkWayne Mullin from Oklahoma, who tried to incite Sean O'Brien in a Senate Hearing. Mace & Mullin are both puppets, like a bunch of ConfedState Reps & Senators.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
A community should be able to initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Under a system like that, my parents could have been divorced for numerous reasons on countless occasions. For examples:
1. After the first of the many times that my mother literally begged my father to hit her. She tried goading him into hitting her for years. He never did hit her though.
But I had to watch her purposefully manipulate him for years, and no kid should have to watch that kind of mind-f*kcing .
2. After the first of many times that my mother tricked me and my siblings into not reporting her to Child Protective Services for abusing us.
She would say things like, "they're just going to come and take you away."
She said it that way on purpose, to make us think it was our fault. Because, as kids, most of us get taught that when bad people do the wrong things, the cops come and take the wrong-doers away.
So, by telling us that "they" were going to "take us away," she tricked us into believing that we were the ones in the wrong.
Then, there was another thing she started doing.
When we would threaten to call CPS on her, she would say the 1-800-number out loud, like she had it memorized. Or, she would write the number on a piece of paper and hand it to us. It was as if she was daring us to call.
Looking back, I don't know if she did that because she believed that we wouldn't call or because she wouldn't have cared if we did call. (It's difficult, and probably futile, to try deciphering the specific and primary motives of consumer-driven socio/psychopathic narcissists.)
But she knew we were more scared of being taken away than we were of her abuse because she had already implanted the fear of "them" taking us away into our minds.
We didn't want to get taken away -- we just wanted the abuse to stop. And we were only scared because we didn't know any better.
Like, sure, for argument's sake, the foster-care system is a gamble. But we didn't know that as young kids in the 1980s.
And, besides, also for the sake of argument, which scenario is actually worse: Staying in an abusive situation or gambling on being moved to a less abusive situation?
Staying in an abusive situation isn't ideal, but neither is gambling. And no kid should have to make that choice.
Anyway. My mother played these manipulative mind-games on us until we stopped threatening to report her abuse. Instead of reporting her, we "learned" to live with the unreasonable and illogical abuse by succumbing to it.
I often wonder what could've been different for me if I would've rolled the dice and made the call to CPS.
Oh, goodness. That was quite a digression from my main point. I'll get back to it and conclude.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after my mother was provably neglecting me and after she rendered my father into a perception of powerlessness to do anything about it.
You might be asking yourself, "what, why, how?" Well, then, here are your answers.
3. After I almost lost my tongue was two years old.
I was in the garage alone. (WHAT?) Then I climbed up on the four-foot-tall workbench. (WHY?) Then I fell off the bench and slammed my chin onto the concrete floor, nearly biting my tongue in half. (HOW?)
4. Or, the time I ate mothballs.
5. Or, the time I ate rat poisoning.
6 Or, the time I drank ammonia.
7. Or, the time I drank bleach.
8. Or, the time I ate a bottle of children's aspirin. (Which didn't even happen, because I clearly remember pouring the pills down the drain. But I got caught with the empty bottle by my neglectful biatch-mother, so I got treated as if I had eaten the whole bottle).
9. Or, when I was 7 years old, my doctor admonished my mother for allowing me to become obese, at which point my mother stopped using that doctor to prevent the doctor from recording a paper trail of my mother's nutritional-negligence.
10. Or, when my relatives and neighbors started molesting me.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after one of those instances. Or maybe their divorce should have been required after...
11. ...my mother's first year of doctor-enabled opioid addiction. Maybe that would be a good precursor, indicating that someone would turn into a sh!te-mother and wife.
She's now 40+ years into a doctor-enabled opioid addict. Maybe that's a good clue, explaining why she's still a sh!te-human today.
If you're still asking yourself, "what, why, and how?" The answers are all easy and the same -- because my mother was too busy getting high on opioids to take care of herself and the vulnerable humans she was supposed to protect.
Certainly, there must be something on my list that would incite more than questions, like, what, why, and how"?
Surely, there must be something on my list that would move the better, caring members of the community to seek action, to end my parent's relationship and the misery it brought upon me and others.
There has to be something that will compel the working-class drones into action to protect children.
But, as of today: Nope!
Children are left to suffer without escape.
And these ignorant working-class adults keep pumping out innocent working-class children to continue the suffering. As if there's some magic number of suffering children that, if reached, will make the suffering of working-class adults disappear.
I don't say all these things to get sympathy for me. I don't need it now. But I do say these things to incite empathy for the children who are suffering RIGHT NOW.
I wouldn't change my childhood. My suffering gave me the sense of perception to grasp who is at fault for my suffering. The people at fault are those like J.D. Vance.
And my opening point remains the same:
There should be a system in place whereby the people of a community can initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Until better times, I'll be preaching antinatalism and celibacy.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Your argument is great! Let me know if this one is any good, in regards to Emily saying the drugs could be harmful...
In 2017, right-wingers passed and signed "Right to Try" legislation into law. This allows people to try untested/risky/potentially dangerous treatments for medical purposes. To give people the "Right to Try" to improve the quality of their own lives.
But, now? Suddenly? Right-wingers DON'T want to give people the "Right to Try" to try to improve the quality of their own lives???
Suddenly, right-wingers want to go against and/or take back their own law???
No-no-no-no... Right-wingers just want to prevent "*OTHER*" people from having the "Right to Try" to try to improve the quality of their own lives.
Because right-wingers are cruel hypocrites.
The wealthy right-wingers are intelligent, cruel hypocrites.
The working-class right-wingers are ignorant, cruel hypocrites.
If you think it's a good argument, pass it on.
P.S. This is like the right-wing's book-ban laws that are getting the Bible banned.
Or, like the right-wing's parental-rights laws that are being used by the parents of marginalized children.
Again, not all right-wingers are intelligent. Even the ones who write laws can be dumb. But cruelty is one of their main goals.
And another goal is to incite the ignorant working-class right-wingers into sabotorial, violent, and/or murderous action.
That's what wealthy right-wing conservatives, who are trying to conserve their places in the hierarchies of social-status they've created, are going to do.
They don't even care if their hypocritical, right-wing laws stand. They'll just use their wealth to try again.
Or, they'll use their wealth to leave the country when they've finally instigated a civil or larger war involving the U.S.
That's what the wealthy Nazis/Confederates did when the Allies/Union came calling -- the wealthy used their wealth to flee. And wealthy, right-wing Americans have been doing the same, and increasingly so, as of late.
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@williecatch9 Ha...
Ross said: Maybe we should be more nuanced.
Fact: Being more nuanced would require less laziness.
You, Willie, implied that being more nuanced would be more lazy.
Take Your Meds said they don't think you understand what nuance means.
I tried to explain to you, Willie, how nuance requires a person to be less lazy, because you wrongly claimed being nuanced would be more lazy.
Then you, Willie went on to reply to me, proving that you still don't understand what nuance means.
I'll try again.
Being more lazy would be if I said something un-nuanced, like, "ALL people named Willie are stupid."
Being less lazy would be comprehending and applying the nuances of people named Willie:
1. Not ALL people named Willie are stupid.
2. Only SOME people named Willie are stupid.
3. And SOME people named Willie are geniuses.
So far, no one will be claiming you're the third option.
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@loljk9443 I really don't mean to be rude, either.
But take a little time, think about your situation.
Think about how you get the things you need versus the things you want.
Now think about how you could end up losing the ways to acquire the things you need and want.
Think about the different kinds of things you LIKE that you need.
Now think about having to settle for things you didn't like, but that you still needed.
Remember, these are only thought exercises.
Think about all of the different things in life -- the different kinds of toothpaste, paper towels, canned soups, candies, potatoes (there are dozens), places to live, jobs to do, clothes, writing utensils...
Now let's move on from material possessions.
Think about the negative experiences in life -- think about the worst things you can imagine.
Think about the possible reactions to the worst things you can imagine. Think about the possible choices and remedies.
Now, realize that not everyone has the same access to necessities, choices, actions, and remedies.
There are literally billions, if not trillions of different combinations of needs and wants, experiences, and tragedies.
If you can think up a person, that person likely exists somewhere.
Here's a combination of things to think about:
A 68-year-old opiate addict of 40+ years, working as a school teacher for the past 40 years; hoards of junk filling their basement, but can't build a fire in the fireplace; doesn't use salt but likes pepper, doesn't like parsley but like basil leaves; grew up living in a house with parents and grandparents, but was abused by their uncle; competed in baking competitions at the county fair growing up, goes on vacation every year; cheated on their spouse; has $100,000 in credit card debt, 100,000 dollars in student loan debt; trades up for a newer car every few years; goes out to eat every weekend, buys $5 coffees every day instead of $1 coffees at home; has a $100/month phone bill when a $45 plan is available; complains about their quality of life; sits in their car, in parking lots, scrolling Facebook instead of going home; has zero savings in the bank, but lives in a $200,00 home on 10 acres of land; don't know how to plunge a toilet or turn off the water-main in the house, and has never seen 8 of the ten acres they live on.
The person I described above is just a few misfortunes or a couple of bad decisions away from being homeless, living in their car, with a cell phone, watching Youtube videos.
The wealthy-class has made it nearly impossible to live without a phone or an email address -- having a phone is damn near a necessity if you want to make money in this bullshite society.
You've just been programmed -- by wealthy-class propaganda and indoctrination through the media -- to believe that it doesn't or shouldn't exist, or that the people who end up like that somehow deserve it, or if a person is living in their car, they shouldn't have a cell phone.
Damn near any combination of person you can think of, exists somewhere. People living in their cars, or in the woods, with cell phones is NOT uncommon.
Again, I really don't mean to be rude, either. But get your head out... Just use your head.
There are MILLIONS of people who are suffering. BILLIONS of people live below the median standard of living.
I hope you never have to live in desperation. But, in my experience, living in desperation is the best way to open people's eyes.
Good Luck to you. ✌
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I've lived forty years in northwestern New England, about 1000-feet above sea level, at the base of a 3500-foot tall mountain. The north, east, and south are flanked by 4000 to 5000-foot tall mountains. To the west are the Connecticut River and the Green Mountains.
There is a stream/brook that runs through my property, fed by two other streams/brooks, a natural spring, and snowmelt.
Thirty years ago, the stream running through my property was deep enough to soak your whole body in during the summer, and the water ran fast enough to prevent slime from accumulating on the rocks. It had fish and other aquatic life in it. Now there are none visible.
For the last four years, it has dried up before the end of each summer, sometimes as early as June, which means the two streams/brooks that feed it dry up along with it, and I assume my dried-up stream means that the natural spring is dry too, which is probably the worst part.
We don't get enough snowpack in the higher elevations anymore to last into the summer like it used to. The frequency of mid-winter melting events has increased.
My dad worked for the State Dept of Transportation for thirty-plus years, plowing roads and whatnot, on-call 24/7/365. The amount of overtime he worked during the winter over that thirty-plus years was a trend-line downward.
The swamps on and around my property are dried out. A beaver dam on another part of my property dried up too. They used to be full of cattails and other vegetation. Now they're tinder beds.
The oldest and biggest coniferous trees on my property are dead, and the next sizes down are visibly dying. The youngest trees still look okay. But the middle-aged ones that are dead and dying shouldn't be.
We used to have wildflowers, along with wild raspberry and blackberry bushes: all dead. The wild blueberries are holding on, but the crop yield and berry sizes are much smaller.
The dried-out swamps and streams caused the insect and pest population to decline, which caused certain bird species to leave the area. The birds that still frequent my feeders are fewer in flock-size and species.
That's just what I've noticed.
Anyone in Alaska or Canada feel like adopting? I'm house trained.
2
-
@grittybunny Another interesting FDR question is: What would have happened to the US if the attempt on FDR's life would have been successful, and they swore in his running-mate, John Nance Garner?
Garner wasn't particularly in favor of The New Deal. Garner was a southern Dem from Texas, who was a 'fiscal conservative' and opposed 'debt pending'. Roosevelt got Garner on board with the plan, but they eventually had too many disagreements, and Roosevelt replaced him.
If FDR would have died sooner, and Garner would have taken his place, there is a good chance that Garner wouldn't have pushed for The New Deal. And without The New Deal, the US wouldn't have made it through the Great Depression in the way that it did.
The New Deal (a)provided a social safety net for the most vulnerable people, and it (b)gave a job to anyone and everyone who wanted a job but couldn't find one, and it (c)provided rights for the working-class to stop some of the exploitation by the wealthy-class.
But around the same time that the US got FDR and The New Deal, Germany was getting the opposite. So, if the US would have gotten John Nance Garner & his 'fiscal conservatism' instead of FDR & The New Deal, the US may well have gotten Fascism, right along with Germany, a hundred years ago instead of now.
So, again, the question is: What would have happened to the US if the attempt on FDR's life would have been successful, and they swore in his running-mate, John Nance Garner?
The Lindberg question is also interesting.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Bernie did rethink things. And he decided to give up on the working-class. Bernie has family, and he's more concerned with what could happen to his family after he dies.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
2
-
2
-
@funTimesInTheSun I agree with, basically, all of that, and I would probably add more to the list. Also, if you didn't see my original-reply in this thread, I wrote:
"Life, Liberty, & the Pursuit of Happiness correlate directly with Healthcare, Rehabilitation ("Corrections"), & Education. NONE of those things should EVER be privatized and/or profitized."
And, again, I would probably add more to the list we've come up with.
2
-
@funTimesInTheSun I've been flirting with this idea: all raw-necessities (food, clothes, & shelter) should, at the very least, have a government option. But, at best, the government would have a monopoly on providing those necessities at a consistent price. For example...
I think that fruit & vegetables should be strictly regulated. I think that the cost of an apple should be the same no matter where a person is located. And no one should get to accumulate unlimited-wealthy by selling apples.
However, if people want to take the apples and turn them into apple-pie, and try to sell those apple pies, then I'm open to that (for now).
But no one person or group gets to have a monopoly on apple pies, and no one gets to accumulate unlimited-wealth by making apple pies, either.
If someone creates a kind of apple-pie, and most people like that kind of apple-pie, then the person who created that kind of apple-pie doesn't then get to withhold apple-pies from other people, and they don't get to use apple-pies as a stepping-stone to social and/or governmental control.
If most people like that kind of apple-pie, then the person who created it can get an award, or something.
I know that's not perfectly written or fully thought through, but it's better than what w have now...
Like, the creators of the frozen apple-pies (which are mass-produced and sold at the grocery store) should not be millionaires or billionaires. I'm just not voting for, or participating in, that kind of illogical economic-supremacy.
Anyway...
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
RFK is a RWer economically. Again, RFK is an economic RWer.
RW-politics are pro-wealthy-class politics.
RW-politics are anti-working-class politics.
RFK is a millionaire in the wealthy-class.
His campaign-donors are billionaires in the wealthy-class.
They are all capitalists and Capitalism is a RW-economic system.
RW-politics are anti-working-class politics.
RFK will fold to the demands of the wealthy-class.
Just like Biden, Trump, & Obama folded.
Just like Bush JR&SR, Bill & Hillary folded.
Just like Reagan, Carter, Nixon, and Ford all folded.
Just like most of Congress & Judiciary have folded.
And don't get me wrong; this domination of a populace-majority of working-class people by a populace-minority of wealthy-class people is nothing new -- the wealthy-class has been striving to, and succeeding at, dominating the working-class for millennia.
The wealthy-class has been doing it since the invention of currency; pharaohs, Mongols, Romans, Ottomans, Turks, Brits, Confederates, "Germans," Americans -- they've all done it.
But in our particular era, we'll talk about since FDR died.
FDR was a wealthy-class capitalist, too.
But he wasn't a complete dirt-bag.
He was absolutely concerned with self-preservation, as he saw the greed in the pro-wealthy-class policies of the "Roaring" 1920s were leading to trouble.
The working-class was so angry, they were rising up against the wealthy-class.
This has happened throughout history, and FDR knew it was happening then.
So, FDR implemented some pro-working-class policies to bring the working-class to heel.
But those pro-working-class policies weren't made permanent.
And the wealthy-class has been breaking those policies, and the government, ever since FDR died.
In the 1940s there was WW2.
In the 1950s & 60s, there was the Korean War, McCarthyism, The Red Scare.
In the 60s & 70s, there was The Cold War, Vietnam, and the Space Race.
In the 1980s & 90s, there were constant Central American and Southeast Asian invasions.
All of those situations were manufactured & fabricated by the wealthy-class to incite the working-class into a state of fear and submission, confusion and delusion.
The wealthy-class has used their ownership of the Military Industrial Complex to grow their wealth.
And with that wealth they have put military manufacturing plants in every congressional district.
And the wealthy-class owners then contribute to the campaigns of legislators.
Then, those legislators pass more laws to benefit the owners of military manufacturers.
It's blatant bribery & corruption, and RFK is not against that.
And with that wealth, the wealthy-class-RWers have not only taken over the legislature, they have taken over the judiciary.
Their most recent escalation really begun to ramp up starting in the 1970s with a series of SCOTUS cases.
The SCOTUS decisions in the following cases, all gave disproportionate benefit to the populace-minority of wealthy-class-RWers, and gave disproportionate detriment to the populace-majority of the working-class.
Buckley v. Valeo(1976)
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978)
McConnell V. Federal Election Commission (2003)
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010)
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (2014)
They are pro-wealthy-class, pro-authoritarian and pro-oligarchic decisions.
They are anti-working-class, anti-republic and anti-democracy decisions.
The Republican-party leadership supports the decision because they are an anti-republican, pro-authoritarian and pro-oligarchic political party.
The Democrat-party leadership supports the decision because they are ALSO an anti-democratic, pro-authoritarian and pro-oligarchic political party.
RFK isn't against any of that -- he's a millionaire who benefits from it.
His campaign is being funded by RW-authoritarian billionaire oligarchs from the wealthy-class.
And it's all because of RW-laws passed by RW-Repub & RW-Dem millionaires.
And all because of cases brought by wealthy-RWers to the wealthy-RW-SCOTUS.
And some of those people may have been elected, but many of them weren't.
RW-politics are the politics of unelected-hierarchies.
Most of the wealthy-class are unelected landowners & shareholders.
They rely on evolving their RW-economic systems to further entrench themselves into government, to further control & delude the working-class.
The greed of the wealthy-class is an addiction that is never satiated.
So they must adapt as their addiction grows.
We've seen this current adaptation a few times in history, already.
Capitalism > Corporatism > Fascism.
The wealthy-class used the legislature to manufacture the "fiduciary responsibility" to justify infinite profit-growth (on a finite planet) at the sake of everything else.
They created the rule in the system without a majority of people voting for it, and the unelected judiciary has decided it's the law.
As the wealthy-class grows their addiction for profits, they need more "help" from the government to maintain their profit-addiction.
So they take over government, evolving Capitalism into Corporatism, and Corporatism into Fascism.
As they take over government, they break it for working-class, and build it to benefit themselves. Basically forming a system of slavery like the Confederacy and the Third Reich, both of which were founded and funded by wealthy-class-RWers.
RFK isn't against that.
RFK is a member of the wealthy-class.
RFK benefits from RW-economic politics.
RFK is a RWer
Vote RW-extremist Repubs&Libertarians, for the fast, open-road to fascism.
Vote moderate-RW Dems&NoLabels, for the slower, disguised-road to fascism.
They were all bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by wealthy-class-RWers.
Just like RFK.
Good day, sir.
...I SAID GOOD DAY! 🎩🧥🍫
1
-
Piers & Destiny are BOTH liberals from the wealthy-class. But the term "liberalism" has different meanings, depending on the context. Economic-liberalism and social-liberalism are not the same thing. It's very important for working-class people to understand this.
1a. Social-liberalism is the ABSENCE of an imposed social-hierarchy.
1b.Economic-liberalism is the PRESENCE of an imposed economic-hierarchy.
2a. Social-liberalism is a LW-ideology, based on a social-system that PROVIDES FREEDOM FROM OPPRESSION by others based on social-hierarchy.
2b.Economic-liberalism is a RW-ideology, based on an economic-system that ALLOWS FREEDOM TO OPPRESS others based on economic-hierarchy.
3a. Social-liberalism implies the freedom for ALL people to be free FROM the hierarchical-oppression of other people based on inborn, unchosen, and immutable social-characteristics. Such as race, sex, gender, ethnicity, nationality, physiology, physicality, and abilities/disabilities.
3b. Economic-liberalism implies the freedom for SOME people to be free TO commit hierarchical-oppression against others based upon inherited, unearned, and exploitative economic-positions. Such as wealth, property, possessions, status, caste, manipulation, and intelligence/ignorance. Pro-oppression and anti-inequality are RW-ideologies.
4a. Economic & Social equality are LW-ideologies.
4b. Economic & Social oppression are RW-idologies.
The RW-idealology of economic-liberalism has different economic-systems under its umbrella, each containing varying degrees of hierarchy, and each involving the wealthy-class enslaving the working-class. Some of those systems include: monarchism, feudalism, capitalism, and fascism.
Within economic-liberalism, there are two underlying terms: Classical-liberalism & Neo-liberalism.
5a. Classical-liberalism refers to the RW-economic system of Capitalism as it existed in the past, BEFORE the implementation of The New Deal.
5b. Neo-liberalism refers to the RW-economic system of Capitalism as it exists in the present, AFTER the implementation of New Deal.
6a. The New Deal was a LW-response by the working-class to DECONSTRUCT the oppressive & inequitable RW-hierarchies that were imposed by the wealthy-class under Classical-liberal Capitalism.
6b. And Neo-liberal Capitalism has been the RW-response by the wealthy-class, in which they have tried to undo The New Deal policies and RECONSTRUCT the oppressive & inequitable hierarchies that existed prior to The New Deal.
To make a long-story short:
1. Piers AND Destiny are BOTH economic-liberals (oppressive hierarchists).
2. Piers AND Destiny are BOTH neo-liberals (alive, now, after The New Deal).
3. Piers AND Destiny are BOTH capitalists (the prominent economic-system now).
4. Piers AND Destiny are BOTH neo-liberal capitalists.
And that brings us to the term "Conservative" as it relates to the broader socioeconomic-political landscape. In the realm of politics, "conservative" just means to "maintain" the current social and/or economic political-structures.
And, so, in that vein, Peirs AND Destiny are BOTH Conservatives:
1. Piers AND Destiny are BOTH trying to conserve economic-liberalism.
2. Piers AND Destiny are BOTH trying to conserve neo-liberalism.
3. Piers AND Destiny are BOTH trying to conserve Capitalism.
Piers AND Destiny are BOTH trying to conserve the oppressive & hierarchical RW-economic-system of Neo-Liberal Capitalism.
All that being said, as it relates to the broader political-landscape:
7a. BOTH the Repub&Dem parties are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by the corrupt wealthy-class & their corrupt RW-politics.
7b. The Democrat-party is a moderate-RW economic party, and they are ALSO conservatives who are trying to conserve the oppressive & hierarchical economic-system of Neo-Liberal Capitalism.
7c. And, the Republc-party is a RW-extremist economic party. They would be okay with conserving the oppressive & hierarchical economic-system of Neo-Liberal Capitalism, but they really want to go further.
7d. But, the Republic-party would prefer to advance the oppressive & hierarchical economic-structures by implementing the system of Fascism. So, they aren't really conservatives.
Vote for the wealthy, RW-extremist Repubs, for the fast, open-road from RW-Capitalism to RW-Fascism, for the continued enslavement of the working-class by the wealthy-class.
Vote for the wealthy, moderate-RW Dems, for the slower, disguised-road from RW-Capitalism to RW-Fascism, for the continued enslavement of the working-class by the wealthy-class..
The corrupt wealthy-class will take whichever politically oppressive & hierarchical RW-system they can get, whether it be monarchism, feudalism, capitalism, or fascism.
But ALL RW-political-systems involve the corrupt wealthy-class enslaving the working-class.
And the corrupt wealthy-class will take whichever kinds of working-class slaves they can get, whether they be chattel-slaves, debt-slaves, or wage-slaves.
Piers AND Destiny, along with Biden AND Trump, are ALL members of the corrupt wealthy-class and they ALL promote corrupt RW-politics.
If you made it this far, I'm thankful for your attention.
✌🤟✊🙏
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
1
-
Some stupid people don't realize that they already have a mild or moderate broken leg. So they go out and mess around on the broken leg and end up with a severely broken leg, or they break their other leg.
Sometimes the stupid people need to end up immobile before they realize something is broken. But unfortunate people have no choice but to walk on a broken leg, even though they know it's already broken.
Some selfish people don't care that other unfortunate people have mild or moderate broken legs. So the selfish people let the unfortunate people suffer and limp around on a bad leg, and then unfortunate people end up with more severely broken legs, or they end up with two broken legs.
The unfortunate people are unfortunate whether they have two broken legs or no broken legs, and the selfish people don't care. Sometimes, selfish people need to end up with a couple of broken legs AND become part of the unfortunate before they start to care about other people.
I, for one, can't wait for more of the stupid people to realize they are also selfish people and to become part of the unfortunate people.
When you care more about broad equity than singular superiority, it becomes easier to care less if things get worse for selfish people.
When you care more about what comes after this "life" than you do about this life, it becomes easier to care less about what you can accumulate and more about what you can give to others in this life
For some people, this life can't get any worse. They don't see "the end" as anything but a sweet release.
I, for one, say bring on the broken legs.
Something like that.
1
-
1
-
@earwicker7 This didn't start as a "bigger-book" contest (what a childish endeavor you're turning this into), it started with @gregbutler's factual claim that, '...in the 1970's the MAJORITY of Americans were much more autodidactically educated and at a significantly higher level than people are today.'
Furthermore, back then, educational expectations & standards were more equally applied & held in high esteem. Of course, that all changed (in it's most-recent iteration) starting in the 1980s, with the support of BOTH corrupt right[wrong] polit-parties.
Since the 1980s, education expectations & standards have been segregated by socioeconomic-class (kind of like it was in a past iteration known as the Confedrate-south).
If you can't comprehend that more TV and video games has equated to [a]less reading and [b]more-ignorant citiznes, then you're the kind of product that the right[wrong] polit-parties have been striving to turn citizens into.
And if you think I'm going to waste my time writing out the titles of the thousands of non-fiction books I have in my possession, just to placate you and your child-brained, "bigger-book" contest, then you are EXACTLY the kind of product that the right[wrong] polit-parties have been striving to turn you into.
More time spent on TV and video games has resulted in less time spent reading, which has resulted in dumber citizens and more-ignorant society. Now, stop-moving the goal-posts, child. You're just wrong.
Take the "L" and move on.
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is why the voting-age should be periodically adjusted, to account for the deficiencies of a generation that have been bred by wealthy-class, right-wing, fascist extremists and the propaganda they produce to confuse child-brains.
Those child-brains have obviously never heard, or they are incapable of comprehending, the history of the Republic-party over the past 100 years.
I say raise the voting age to 25 for the foreseeable future -- the average age when the consensus of medical professionals agree that the nervous system and the brain are mostly finished developing.
That will give the adults in the room/communities some time to remove the wealthy-class, right-wing, fascist extremists from their addictions and positions of power, without being hampered by the electoral-sabotage committed by child-brains who have been duped into becoming soldiers by and for those wealthy-class, right-wing, fascist extremists.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The whole American $ystem is corrupted by incestuously nepotistic right-winger$ from the wealthy-cla$$. Krystal and Kyle are BOTH part of the wealthy-cla$$ and, thus, are BOTH right-wingers. Hence, their unwillingness to truthfully and adequately explain the $ystem-corruption for their listeners and viewers.
Right-wing politics = Anti-working-class politics.
Right-wing politics = Pro-wealthy-class politics
Media businesses (Fox, MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, PBS & YouTube) are ALL OWNED by wealthy right-wing stockholders.
Politicians (Repubs and Dems) are BRIBED by the SAME wealthy right-wing stockholders who also fund the campaigns of politicians.
Then, those bribed politicians pass laws to benefit the wealthy right-wing minority of business-stockholders and campaign-funders, all at the expense of the working-class majority.
Meanwhile, in this video, Krystal & Kyle (BOTH of whom are wealthy right-wingers), are complaining about ONE wealthy right-winger (Biden), instead of explaining the whole corrupt $ystem in detail for their listeners and viewers.
Krystal sold-out to the right-wing when they embarrassed her by leaking her college photos. And she sold-out even further when she teamed up with right-wing extremist, Saagar 'The saggy-brained Clown' Enjeti. Take notice of how she has toned down her critical rhetoric of corrupt, wealthy right-wingers.
Kyle sold-out to the right-wing when he allowed his subscriber-number dictate the context of his content. And he sold out even further when he succumbed to his mommy-issues and got into bed with right-wing Krystal. Take notice of how Kyle's show has devolved into a soap-opera/gossip-column, rather than the critical, educationally-informative program it once was.
F*kc 'em -- both right-wing Krystal and right-wing Kyle.
F*kc ALL the right-wingers -- the right-wing extremist Repubs and the right-wing moderate Dems.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A community should be able to initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Under a system like that, my parents could have been divorced for numerous reasons on countless occasions. For examples:
1. After the first of the many times that my mother literally begged my father to hit her. She tried goading him into hitting her for years. He never did hit her though.
But I had to watch her purposefully manipulate him for years, and no kid should have to watch that kind of mind-f*kcing .
2. After the first of many times that my mother tricked me and my siblings into not reporting her to Child Protective Services for abusing us.
She would say things like, "they're just going to come and take you away."
She said it that way on purpose, to make us think it was our fault. Because, as kids, most of us get taught that when bad people do the wrong things, the cops come and take the wrong-doers away.
So, by telling us that "they" were going to "take us away," she tricked us into believing that we were the ones in the wrong.
Then, there was another thing she started doing.
When we would threaten to call CPS on her, she would say the 1-800-number out loud, like she had it memorized. Or, she would write the number on a piece of paper and hand it to us. It was as if she was daring us to call.
Looking back, I don't know if she did that because she believed that we wouldn't call or because she wouldn't have cared if we did call. (It's difficult, and probably futile, to try deciphering the specific and primary motives of consumer-driven socio/psychopathic narcissists.)
But she knew we were more scared of being taken away than we were of her abuse because she had already implanted the fear of "them" taking us away into our minds.
We didn't want to get taken away -- we just wanted the abuse to stop. And we were only scared because we didn't know any better.
Like, sure, for argument's sake, the foster-care system is a gamble. But we didn't know that as young kids in the 1980s.
And, besides, also for the sake of argument, which scenario is actually worse: Staying in an abusive situation or gambling on being moved to a less abusive situation?
Staying in an abusive situation isn't ideal, but neither is gambling. And no kid should have to make that choice.
Anyway. My mother played these manipulative mind-games on us until we stopped threatening to report her abuse. Instead of reporting her, we "learned" to live with the unreasonable and illogical abuse by succumbing to it.
I often wonder what could've been different for me if I would've rolled the dice and made the call to CPS.
Oh, goodness. That was quite a digression from my main point. I'll get back to it and conclude.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after my mother was provably neglecting me and after she rendered my father into a perception of powerlessness to do anything about it.
You might be asking yourself, "what, why, how?" Well, then, here are your answers.
3. After I almost lost my tongue was two years old.
I was in the garage alone. (WHAT?) Then I climbed up on the four-foot-tall workbench. (WHY?) Then I fell off the bench and slammed my chin onto the concrete floor, nearly biting my tongue in half. (HOW?)
4. Or, the time I ate mothballs.
5. Or, the time I ate rat poisoning.
6 Or, the time I drank ammonia.
7. Or, the time I drank bleach.
8. Or, the time I ate a bottle of children's aspirin. (Which didn't even happen, because I clearly remember pouring the pills down the drain. But I got caught with the empty bottle by my neglectful biatch-mother, so I got treated as if I had eaten the whole bottle).
9. Or, when I was 7 years old, my doctor admonished my mother for allowing me to become obese, at which point my mother stopped using that doctor to prevent the doctor from recording a paper trail of my mother's nutritional-negligence.
10. Or, when my relatives and neighbors started molesting me.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after one of those instances. Or maybe their divorce should have been required after...
11. ...my mother's first year of doctor-enabled opioid addiction. Maybe that would be a good precursor, indicating that someone would turn into a sh!te-mother and wife.
She's now 40+ years into a doctor-enabled opioid addict. Maybe that's a good clue, explaining why she's still a sh!te-human today.
If you're still asking yourself, "what, why, and how?" The answers are all easy and the same -- because my mother was too busy getting high on opioids to take care of herself and the vulnerable humans she was supposed to protect.
Certainly, there must be something on my list that would incite more than questions, like, what, why, and how"?
Surely, there must be something on my list that would move the better, caring members of the community to seek action, to end my parent's relationship and the misery it brought upon me and others.
There has to be something that will compel the working-class drones into action to protect children.
But, as of today: Nope!
Children are left to suffer without escape.
And these ignorant working-class adults keep pumping out innocent working-class children to continue the suffering. As if there's some magic number of suffering children that, if reached, will make the suffering of working-class adults disappear.
I don't say all these things to get sympathy for me. I don't need it now. But I do say these things to incite empathy for the children who are suffering RIGHT NOW.
I wouldn't change my childhood. My suffering gave me the sense of perception to grasp who is at fault for my suffering. The people at fault are those like J.D. Vance.
And my opening point remains the same:
There should be a system in place whereby the people of a community can initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Until better times, I'll be preaching antinatalism and celibacy.
1
-
1
-
@TheEclecticSinger I did not forget. A popular-advocate does not an effective-servant make. A comedian does not a statesman make. A proctologist is NOT a neurologist.
I've said the same thing about many of these people who haven't studied politics, government, and the intricacies that make up the few safeguards left on the modicum of government that still remains to protect the working-class from the wealthy-class.
Without an adequate understanding of The Office of the Presidency and The Executive Branch, the president is a puppet at best and road-cone to be steamrolled at worst.
Trump is exactly that, and they got barely anything done in his first term.
Executively, the ignorant staff he hired deregulated the wealthy-class, and broke safeguards that protected the working-class. They did as much harm as they could with the little knowledge they had, but it was a slop show.
Judicially, he nominated judges that were selected by the wealthy-class owners of The Heritage Foundation.
Legislatively, he signed tax cuts for the wealthy-class & COVID stuff. But the legislature confirmed the judges selected by the wealthy-class owners of the Heritage Foundation.
His term in office was a giveaway to the wealthy-class.
He got steamrolled by smarter members of the wealthy-class in his first term, and the only reason his second term will be worse is because he has found the most vile members of the wealthy-class and let them in the backdoor.
Jon Stewart will NOT be able to do anything but go along to get along.
We don't need another celebrity.
We need someone who already has a working & practical comprehension of the entrenched corruption of wealthy-class & their corrupt RW-politics.
We need someone with the knowledge to wield the power of The Constitution to combat the corrupt wealthy-class & their corrupt RW-politics.
We need someone who understands how to re-institute the working-class protections that were removed by the previous wealthy-class administration.
Maybe two or three people in the world have all the makings of a working-class President who is capable of meaningfully combating the wealthy-class.
The real choices are INCREDIBLY slim.
Jon Stewart is NOT it.
Grow up. Wise up.
1
-
1
-
Authoritarianism = gov't by Minority-rule = Right-wing politics
Democracy = gov't by Majority-rule = Left-wing politics
Right-wing politics = Pro-wealthy-class, pro-autocracy, pro-minority-rule.
Right-wing politics = Anti-working-class, anti-democracy, anti-majority-rule.
The working-class = the majority.
The wealthy-class = the minority.
YOU are a member of the working-class majority. But...
YOU'RE acting as a mouthpiece for the wealthy-class minority.
THAT makes you one of two things for speculation, and one thing for certain.
For speculation, you're either one of the two following things:
1. A fool;
(A) you don't comprehend the international & historical contexts of left-wing versus right-wing politics;
(B) you don't understand the inherent corruption in right-wing politics;
(C) you have no idea what you're saying or doing;
(D) any inkling of the ramifications thereof.
OR
2. A knave; a fraud. a liar, a deceiver, a pretender...
Perhaps you PRETEND not to understand a, b, c, and d from up above. Perhaps you DO know, but you PRETEND not to know.
And why would you PRETEND to be stupid? The easy answer is because you benefit from it.
You know, I don't think you're entirely foolish. In fact, maybe you DO indeed comprehend some of a, b, c, and d up above.
Maybe you understand some of the contrasts between left-right politics -- maybe not in historical and international contexts -- to some degree.
But there isn't much to gain by pretending you don't know those things. So, what else might you be pretending that you don't know?
Perhaps, with you, it is that you comprehend the corruption of right-wing politics. But why would you pretend not to comprehend that?
The easy answer is that you benefit from the corruption. That's what it is with many working-class dupes who shill for the wealthy-class and right-wing politics.
Perhaps you've been lucky enough to devise a way to benefit from the corruption of right-wing politics, and that's why you pretend not to comprehend the corruption therein.
Perhaps you comprehend the corruption, and you comprehend how you benefit from the corruption, and you don't want to give up the corruption.
So you stick with the right-wing political apparatus. And it is through that right-wing apparatus by which corrupt people like you perpetuate your authoritarian, minority-rule of corruption.
And let's just say that you DO indeed comprehend any of that, and let's just that, at the same time, you're simultaneously pretending that you DON'T comprehend any of it, then that would make you a knave.
BUT, whether you're an unknowing-fool or a knowing-knave, neither of those things is anything to be proud of.
That would make you exactly the kind of uneducated slave whom the wealthy right-wing owners would want you to be.
And no matter how shiny you lick their boots, and no matter how deep you can get the brown on your nose, they will never let you into their club.
To believe otherwise would make you the kind of working-class mark whom the wealthy-class aims for.
Because they will use you and anyone they can to satisfy their addictions, and they will never willingly give up their addictions, no matter how many working-class lives it costs.
And when you spew their corrupt right-wing vitriol, it makes it seem like you might be just like them -- that you'll use anyone else's suffering to satisfy your own addictions.
That wouldn't be anything to be proud of either.
But, if that's what you want to be like, then whether you're a fool or a knave, you're a saboteur AND a class-traitor.
Congratulations @MakeCaliGreatAgain
1
-
1
-
1
-
It will have to be someone who doesn't have any family -- having a family makes a leader more-easily corruptible by the wealthy-class right-wingers. Bernie has family, and he's been corrupted by the wealthy-class right-wingers. Bernie has given up on the working-class. And so will any other leader with a family to worry about.
Bernie is now more concerned with what could happen to his family after he dies.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
Vote RW-extremist Trump&Repubs, for the fast, open-road to fascism.
Vote moderate-RW Biden&Dems, for the slow, disguised-road to fascism.
Vote moderate-RW RFK, for the slower, more-disguised-road to fascism.
RW-politics are anti-working-class politics.
RW-politics are pro-wealthy-class-politics.
Trump, Biden, and RFK are ALL members of the wealthy-class, and, thus, ALL of them are RWers.
No thanks. 🤮
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Saying he's been blindsided lets him off the hook as some kind of simpleton,. Bernie has knowingly, willingly given up on the working-class
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@nicholasholden1896 It would be better to have a transparent and accountable government, creating and regulating jobs that are needed, than it would be to have your unaccountable and non-transparent, right-wing, wealthy-class overlords creating jobs that aren't needed.
But, it was right-wing wealthy-class overlords who created the sh!tehole of American government, and the same brand of right-wing wealthy-class overlords still control that sh!tehole government today.
Working-class dupes like you, with brown-noses and blackened-tongues from sniffing wealthy-class butt'oles and licking wealthy-class boots, are the biggest part of the problems.
My greatest fears are for those of your friends, family members, and neighbors whom you will murder first when you wealthy-class overlords command you to.
You are the weakest link among the lowest common denominator of humans.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@zwicker5585 I can see how I may have misunderstood OP's comment, but I think there are much bigger problems, here. Such as:
(1)OP can't, didn't, and/or doesn't write more clearly, and probably won't ever learn to.
(2)OP hasn't set the record straight, because they are either [a]unwilling to respond, or [b]incapable of learning how to respond (that's like knowing how to get mail while being incapable of sending mail, or knowing how to take a phone-call but not being able to use the same phone to call anyone else).
But I'm not just going to take-back or delete my comment without contextual-clarification. There are a couple-few indecent, working-class dupes who have outed themselves by spewing RW-propaganda, and that compelled some decent working-class people to write retorts to the RW-propagandists.
In fact, I'll double-down on my comment with the following: Vulnerable, decent & intelligent working-class people need to avoid, and get away from, the indecent & ignorant working-class dupes who support the indecent & intelligent wealthy-class authoritarians & their corrupt RW-politics.
I appreciate you pointing out the possibility that I misunderstood OPs comment, but my reply-comment still stands. But I'll go back and edit it, a little.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheRogueEmpire Huh... In my life, the pro-lynching folks are the opposite of commies. Maybe I've misunderstood you, or perhaps you've miscommunicated.
And just for the sake of clarification for any wandering readers:
A "commie" is a communist, and a "cappie" would be a capitalist.
Communism is the opposite of capitalism.
Communism is on the left and capitalism on the right.
Communism is a democratic system of majority-rule, and capitalism is an autocratic system of minority-rule or mob-rule.
That being said:
The only people I've ever known to defend slavery/lynching with the "States' Rights" argument, have been authoritarian capitalist right-wingers. Not democratic communist left-wingers. Coincidentally, or not, all the "States' Rights" racists I know are capitalists -- the opposite of communists
The only people I've ever known to defend child abuse with the "Parental Rights" argument, have been authoritarian capitalist right-wingers. Not democratic communist left-wingers. Coincidentally, or not, the only "Parental Rights" child-abusers I know are capitalists -- the opposite of communists.
The only people I've ever known to defend unfettered exploitation and manipulation with the "Privacy Rights" argument, have been authoritarian capitalist right-wingers. Not communist left-wingers.
The only people who have ever abused and neglected me are authoritarian capitalist right-wingers.
The only people who have ever tortured and excluded me are authoritarian capitalist right-wingers.
The only people who have ever enslaved and disenfranchised me are authoritarian capitalist right-wingers.
The only people who have ever molested and r@p*d me are authoritarian capitalist right-wingers.
The only people who have ever starved and poisoned me are authoritarian capitalist right-wingers.
The only people who have ever slandered and defamed me are authoritarian capitalist right-wingers.
And those authoritarian capitalist right-wingers did all those things to me in private (except for the disenfranchisement, slander, and defamation -- that was all done in public).
Democratic communist left wingers have never done anything to me.
In fact, I don't think it's a coincidence, at all, that the only "groomers," "welfare-queens," and "thugs" I've ever known have all been straight, wh!te, cis-gendered, right-wing, authoritarian capitalists. The opposite of left-wing communists.
All of the worst, most vile, most heinous, infantile-brained adults who I know, are all authoritarian capitalist right-wingers. Not communist left wingers.
All of the walking-talking-breathing pieces of human-excrement who I know -- those whose mouths could win thespian awards for acting like ten-pound diapers trying to contain a hundred-pounds of sh!te -- are all authoritarian capitalist right-wingers. Not communist left wingers.
So, maybe you made a mistake when you said "these commies will string you up," or, perhaps, I've just misunderstood you.
Or, maybe, your mouth has a full ten-pound load and you're trying to win an award.
I'm not sure which, and I almost don't care.
The most important thing for any wandering readers to realize is this:
Right-wing politics are pro-wealthy-class politics.
Right-wing politics are anti-working-class politics.
And one of the ways that the wealthy-class right-wingers maintained chattel-slavery and capitalism in the past was through privacy -- by keeping their atrocities private.
And one of the ways the wealthy-class right-wingers maintain wage-slavery and capitalism in the present is through privacy -- by keeping their atrocities private.
The wealthy-class right-wingers want to maintain unfettered privacy so they can privately continue the human-manipulation and labor-exploitation that is necessary for capitalism to exist and persist.
The wealthy-class, right-wing, capitalist addicts are responsible for the world's problems.
And the only thing as bad as a wealthy-class right-winger is class-traitor.
A class traitor is a working-class fool who votes for, and spews the propaganda of, wealthy-class right-wingers.
A class traitor is a working-class fool who suffers from the same addictions as the wealthy-class right-wingers, although in smaller doses.
A class-traitor is a working-class fool who won't sacrifice their standard of living (just like the wealthy-class right-wingers won't), even if their sacrifice would help others with lower standards of living.
A working-class class-traitor is no better than an authoritarian wealthy-class right-winger.
Neither is anything to be proud of.
Good day.
**Edit**
To TheRogueEmpire:
If I've misunderstood your reply, then I do apologize. If you amend your reply to include more context, to make more sense, then I'll delete my retort seen above.
However, if I haven't misunderstood you, and you're just another foolish, working-class, right-wing tool, you can go have intercourse with a hobbit's pickle slicer and then jump in a pool of salt.
😊
1
-
Adorable. You people think Democrat-party leadership cares if you don't support them over a social agenda. They don't care.
If you don't support the Democrat-party, that will make it easier for the Republic-party to win, thus making it easier to push through the pro-wealthy-class and anti-working-class economic agenda on which the Republic&Democrat party-leadership both agree.
Both parties are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by the wealthy-class.
Of course, the American sh!tehole was funded and founded by the wealthy-class, but in this most recent iteration of wealthy-class corruption and control, the Repubs have been owned for a century, and the Dems have been owned by the same wealthy-class since the Buckley v. Valeo SCOTUS ruling in 1976.
You've been living under the rule of two pro-wealthy-class, anti-working-class parties for nearly 40 years. If either party "goes down" there is still the other party to do the economic bidding of the wealthy-class.
I could go on, but it's as futile trying to explain the historical and international contexts of politics to right-wing Democrat-liberals as it is trying to explain it to right-wing Republican-liberals, neither of whom understand that liberalism is a right-wing political ideology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Exactly, if the working-class dupes in the US are going to continue electing wealthy-RW celebrities, it's just going to make it easier for the wealthy-class to sell the US to the wealthy-RWers in Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Qatar, and Oman. John Stewert should stay in his lane, just like Trump, Reagan, Schwarzenegger, Allred, Tuberville, and so many others should have.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I say 25 for MOST everything. Particularly anything associated with dopamine-inducing substances, alcohol, tobacco, and firearms. I would go as far to include driving, home ownership, positions of authority in the workplace, LEO and MIC jobs. I could be persuaded to put voting at 21 -- one POTUS election-cycle before 25.
I mean, the proof is more than clear that 18-21 isn't old enough to reduce the treachery imposed upon the majority of the citizenry by the child-brained minority.
Oh yeah, marriage and procreation at 25, too. No child-brains should be allowed to have actual children. Although, I'm an antinatalist, so I don't think anyone should be forcing the unborn to be birthed into this sh!te world that sh!te humans have fabricated.
1
-
1
-
@RevAnakin Public Records prove that RFKJr is (a)funded by the same corrupt wealthy-class, and (b)a promoter of the same corrupt RW-politics, as Trump & Biden. They are ALL bought, owned, bribed, & controlled by the corrupt wealthy-class and their corrupt RW-politics, just like BOTH political parties.
RFKJr, Trump, & Biden are ALL members of the corrupt wealthy-class.
RFKJr, Trump, & Biden are ALL supporters of their corrupt RW-politics.
And, for now, that is ALL provable with public records.
If you disagree, then you're either (a)an ignorant working-class dupe who doesn't comprehend the corruption that is inherent to RW-politics, or (b) you're a complicit working-class knave who pretends not to comprehend the corruption that is inherent to RW-politics because you benefit from the corruption.
Whether you're a dupe or a knave, neither is anything of which to be proud.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@mastadon Firstly: ALL working-class people are personally affected by the autocratic minority-rule of wealthy right-wingers. And, secondly: MOST of the ones I know, personally, write just as poorly as you do.
If I were as ignorant as most working-class people, I would ask the following:
1. Who failed you in your youth by teaching/allowing you to write so poorly?
2. Which right-wing, red-blue state did you receive such substandard education in?
3. When did you decide to stop trying to get any better at writing, OR do you not realize how bad you are at it, thus preventing you from choosing to improve?
But I'm not ignorant, so I don't need to ask those questions.
I already know that you're in the same anti-intellectual, anti-education, anti-self-aware bubble as most working-class American dupes. And I know it simply based on the low-quality and obtuse-context of your reply.
Perhaps that's why my writing style/quality is something you're not accustomed to -- because you've chosen to dwell in a bubble of duped working-class right-wingers who reek of low-quality steeped in obtuse-context.
Or, maybe you don't have the cognitive-ability to realize the bubble you're in, thus preventing you from choosing otherwise.
But I do not share the same cognitive-condition as you and the people you've surrounded yourself with, all of which have caused you to reply to me as you have. Nor do I want to be like you all.
I don't want to be anything like the 150+ million working-class American dupes who voted for two right-wingers in the last election for POTUS. Nor do I spend my time around such dupes.
So the answers to those 3-questions in regards to you, personally, don't matter to me -- you're in the same bubble as most working-class American dupes, and I'm not.
I'm not so obtuse that I don't realize that I am also in a bubble.
In fact, maybe I'm in more than one bubble.
Let me take a moment to self-reflect -- to engage in the introspection that caused me to choose to become better at communicating in writing -- and let's talk about the bubbles I'm in:
1. The disabled bubble -- even though I have the willingness, motivation, and skills to work.
2. The debt bubble -- even though I never intended to be, and would like to be free of said debt.
3. The homeless bubble -- even though I know of countless duped working-class right-wingers who COULD help me, but WON'T help me because they are duped working-class right-wingers.
4. The unemployment bubble -- even though I have searched for and applied to many jobs, I have no job prospects because right-wing Repubs and right-wing Dems don't/won't hire people who are disabled, in debt, and/or homeless, with gaps in their employment-histories.
So, yes, I do reside in some bubbles, you're right about that.
But the bubbles in which I reside are all perpetrated and perpetuated by the political choices of right-wing Repubs and right-wing Dems.
The bubbles in which I dwell are the cause of BOTH right-wing political parties, BOTH of which are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by wealthy-class knaves who choose to exploit and manipulate the working-class.
And BOTH of those right-wing political parties have been supported by working-class dupes who have chosen to vote for BOTH of those right-wing political parties.
And those working-class dupes have chosen to vote for BOTH of those right-wing political parties for one of a couple of reasons:
1. Because they're too ignorant to comprehend the extent of the inherent exploitation and manipulation in right-wing politics, which are perpetuated by BOTH right-wing political parties, which they and their working-class mates are victims of.
OR
2. Because they are PRETENDING that they don't comprehend the exploitation and manipulation inherent in right-wing politics while being fully aware of said exploitation and manipulation. And so they vote for one of the two right-wing political parties with the hopes that the working-class people from the other right-wing political party will remain more victimized than themselves.
And just for the record; if a working-class person were pretending not to know such a thing for their own personal benefit, to the detriment of other working-class people, then that pretending would cause a working-class fool to be reclassified as a knave and a class-traitor.
Whether a working-class person is a duped unknowing-fool or a devious knowing-knave, it is possible to care about them as humans, even if I don't want to be like them, or even be around them.
But, whether you're a duped-fool or a devious-knave, neither is anything of which to be proud.
You know, I don't even understand what depth you're trying to reach with your response to my original comment, because, your response is so shallow.
But your words alone won't drown me. I won't stop until some right-winger, like you, chops my fingers off or buries me in the dirt, which I fully expect to happen.
If history is any indicator of the future (which, it is) then I fully expect my demise to come at the hands of you, or someone like you.
But, until then, I'm going to continue swimming in the sea of the written-word.
And until then -- with all the respect you deserve and kindness I can muster -- you should try to write better, and/or GFYS.
1
-
Brian Tyler Cohen is the Democrat-party equivalent to Candace Owens, Dave Rubin, Tomi Lahren, Scott Presler, and Lauren Boebert of the Republic-party. They all failed in the entertainment/Hollywood segment of the Media Industrial Complex, so their agents and managers got them into sensationalizing news and politics instead.
Cohen, Owens, Rubin, Lahren, Presler, and Boebert all had the financial backing of wealthy and powerful people who helped them become talking-heads, with Boebert being the most horrific success for the wealthy-class.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If you're just learning about "libertarianism," then you need to know that the libertarian-concept in historical-practice has NOT been the same as the Libertarian-party in modern-practice. The Libertarian-party is bought, owned, bribed, & controlled by the same corrupt wealthy-class, with their corrupt RW-politics, as the Repub&Dem parties.
Libertarians, Repubs&Dems, ALL espouse a small government, and they view the libertarian-concept to mean the inequitable "freedom TO oppress others" and NOT the equitable "freedom FROM oppression by others."
If the government isn't strong enough to ensure "freedom FROM oppression," then the biggest, strongest, and most vile&violent people would impose their "freedom TO oppress" the smallest, weakest, kindest & most-vulnerable people (instead of just having the people from the wealthy-class oppressing the people of the working-class, like we have now).
The people in the modern Libertarian-party advocate for small government and the individual freedom TO oppress others.
The people for the historical libertarian-concept advocate for a government that is big enough to protect the weakest&poorest individual's freedom FROM oppression by the strongest&wealthiest.
The Libertarian-party was literally started by some corrupt billionaires from the wealthy-class, because the Repubs&Dems weren't shrinking & destroying the government fast enough for them & their corrupt RW-politics.
Don't be fooled -- the political-Libertarians of the present are NOT the conceptual-libertarians of the past.
And when push-come-to-shove, the working-class dupes in the Libertarian-party will do whatever their masters in the wealthy-class tell them to do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Climate wouldn't be a problem if there wasn't so much production.
Production wouldn't be a problem if there weren't so many consumers.
Consumption wouldn't be a problem if there weren't so many addicts.
Addiction wouldn't be a problem if there wasn't a wealthy-class.
The wealthy-class wouldn't exist if they were eradicated, frequently and on a schedule.
Right-wing politics are pro-wealthy-class politics.
Right-wing politics are anti-working-class politics.
Wealthy-class right-wingers will never willingly give up their addictions, and they'll always try to enslave the working-class to produce those addictions.
The wealthy-class right-wingers will co-opt the dumbest fools in the working-class and turn those dumb working-class fools into cops and soldiers.
The wealthy-class right-wingers will give a few extra crumbs to those foolish working-class cops and soldiers, and, in exchange, those those foolish working-class cops and soldiers will protect the addictions of the wealthy-class right-wingers.
Then, the wealthy-class right-wingers will give those foolish working-class cops and soldiers a taste of the addiction to power, turning those foolish working-class cops and soldiers into power-addicts.
Then, those armed, foolish working-class addicts will be just like their wealthy-class overlords -- they will NEVER willingly give up their addictions.
Those armed, foolish working-class addicts will murder you and your entire family to maintain those addictions.They'll murder their own friends, families, and neighbors if the wealthy-class overlords tell them to -- just like the Nazi and Confederate soldiers did.
The wealthy-class knaves and the working-class fools will sabotage the entire earth just to maintain their addictions.
Until the wealthy-class knaves and the working-class fools, and the countries that give them harbor, are brought to heel, the Earth's problems will persist.
Do the unborn a favor: start practicing antinatalism. Do your part to breed the parasitic human race out of existence.
1
-
1
-
CardiB didn't get betrayed -- she got played.
She is literally part of the problem & shouldn't be taken seriously.
And Kyle shouldn't be taken seriously for giving publicity to her ignorance.
Cardi, like Kyle, is a former working-class dupe who got lucky in the inequitable economic-lottery that is perpetrated & perpetuated by the hereditary members of the corrupt wealthy-class, who maintain their lifestyle-addictions via their corrupt RW-politics. And, now, Cardi, like Kyle, is so addicted to her lifestyle that she's unwilling to make meaningful sacrifices to help the least-fortunate for the betterment of society, just like the other lifestyle-addicts from the corrupt wealthy-class.
And there are the millions of other working-class dupes who strive to become just like CardiB, and like Kyle. And just like Cardi, those other working-class dupes are too dumb to realize, and certainly too egotistical to admit it, that they are part of the problem. Just like all the egotistical wealthy-class knaves who are unwilling to (a)admit that their lifestyle-addictions are toxic, and (b)sacrifice their lifestyle-addictions to help the least-fortunate for the betterment of society.
CardiB, like Kyle, is just one of the many working-class pawns who have been given entry into the corrupt wealthy-class by the corrupt, hereditary members of the corrupt wealthy-class. And she, like Kyle, is too dumb to comprehend that she's just like the house-workers from the past who were used by those same hereditary members of the corrupt wealthy-class as pawns against the field-workers.
RW-politics are pro-wealthy-class & anti-working-class politics.
CardiB is a house-worker, but she's been allowed into the wealthy-class, and now she benefits from the same corrupt RW-politics as the wealthy-class, and she knows it. She doesn't want to risk being demoted to a field-worker again, so she will vote for Trump or Biden, or she won't vote at all.
Vote RW-extremist Repubs for the fast, open-road from capitalist-slavery to fascist-slavery.
Vote moderate-RW Dems for the slower, disguised-road from capitalist-slavery to fascist-slavery.
CardiB didn't get "betrayed" -- she got played like a pawn, and she'll continue to be played for as long as she continues to prioritize her lifestyle-addictions over education.
But she's certainly not someone who should be taken seriously by serious working-class people. Just like Klandace Owens, Larry Elder, Jesse Lee Peterson, Senator Tim (UncleThomas) Scott & (in)Justice Clarence (uncle)Thomas shouldn't be taken seriously.
And Kyle, as a moderate-RW member of the wealthy-class, shouldn't be taken seriously for giving her publicity.
1
-
1
-
1
-
RWers* rigged the primary. Twice. The moderate-RW Dems & the RW-extremist Repubs are BOTH bought, owned, bribed, & controlled by the same corrupt wealthy-class, with the same corrupt RW-politics. They are the ones who rigged the primaries in 2016&2020.
The wealthy-class, with their corrupt RW-politics, are working together behind the scenes, and a majority of working-class dupes continue to strive to be just like them.
The wealthy-class people, around the globe, have a severe & debilitating addiction problem, resulting in a subsequent mental-health epidemic. And they have passed on their addictions & mental-illness to the working-class.
The people in the US & the west are addicted to their lifestyles, and that addiction permeates, both, the wealthy-class AND the working-class.
And just like any other kind of addict, they will NEVER willingly give up their addictions.
The indecent & vile knaves from the wealthy-class will command & fund the destruction, and the indecent & vile dupes from the working-class will submit & commit the destruction -- all against other working-class strangers abroad, all for the cause of maintaining their lifestyle addictions.
In fact, the addicts will not only commit atrocities against working-class strangers abroad, but they ruin the entire earth, including the communities of their own family & friends, in order to maintain their addictions.
"Western-Culture" & "RW-politics" are a breeding-ground for human-parasites, just like the Roman Empire, the Confedrate South, and Nat-C Germany were.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A community should be able to initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Under a system like that, my parents could have been divorced for numerous reasons on countless occasions. For examples:
1. After the first of the many times that my mother literally begged my father to hit her. She tried goading him into hitting her for years. He never did hit her though.
But I had to watch her purposefully manipulate him for years, and no kid should have to watch that kind of mind-f*kcing .
2. After the first of many times that my mother tricked me and my siblings into not reporting her to Child Protective Services for abusing us.
She would say things like, "they're just going to come and take you away."
She said it that way on purpose, to make us think it was our fault. Because, as kids, most of us get taught that when bad people do the wrong things, the cops come and take the wrong-doers away.
So, by telling us that "they" were going to "take us away," she tricked us into believing that we were the ones in the wrong.
Then, there was another thing she started doing.
When we would threaten to call CPS on her, she would say the 1-800-number out loud, like she had it memorized. Or, she would write the number on a piece of paper and hand it to us. It was as if she was daring us to call.
Looking back, I don't know if she did that because she believed that we wouldn't call or because she wouldn't have cared if we did call. (It's difficult, and probably futile, to try deciphering the specific and primary motives of consumer-driven socio/psychopathic narcissists.)
But she knew we were more scared of being taken away than we were of her abuse because she had already implanted the fear of "them" taking us away into our minds.
We didn't want to get taken away -- we just wanted the abuse to stop. And we were only scared because we didn't know any better.
Like, sure, for argument's sake, the foster-care system is a gamble. But we didn't know that as young kids in the 1980s.
And, besides, also for the sake of argument, which scenario is actually worse: Staying in an abusive situation or gambling on being moved to a less abusive situation?
Staying in an abusive situation isn't ideal, but neither is gambling. And no kid should have to make that choice.
Anyway. My mother played these manipulative mind-games on us until we stopped threatening to report her abuse. Instead of reporting her, we "learned" to live with the unreasonable and illogical abuse by succumbing to it.
I often wonder what could've been different for me if I would've rolled the dice and made the call to CPS.
Oh, goodness. That was quite a digression from my main point. I'll get back to it and conclude.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after my mother was provably neglecting me and after she rendered my father into a perception of powerlessness to do anything about it.
You might be asking yourself, "what, why, how?" Well, then, here are your answers.
3. After I almost lost my tongue was two years old.
I was in the garage alone. (WHAT?) Then I climbed up on the four-foot-tall workbench. (WHY?) Then I fell off the bench and slammed my chin onto the concrete floor, nearly biting my tongue in half. (HOW?)
4. Or, the time I ate mothballs.
5. Or, the time I ate rat poisoning.
6 Or, the time I drank ammonia.
7. Or, the time I drank bleach.
8. Or, the time I ate a bottle of children's aspirin. (Which didn't even happen, because I clearly remember pouring the pills down the drain. But I got caught with the empty bottle by my neglectful biatch-mother, so I got treated as if I had eaten the whole bottle).
9. Or, when I was 7 years old, my doctor admonished my mother for allowing me to become obese, at which point my mother stopped using that doctor to prevent the doctor from recording a paper trail of my mother's nutritional-negligence.
10. Or, when my relatives and neighbors started molesting me.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after one of those instances. Or maybe their divorce should have been required after...
11. ...my mother's first year of doctor-enabled opioid addiction. Maybe that would be a good precursor, indicating that someone would turn into a sh!te-mother and wife.
She's now 40+ years into a doctor-enabled opioid addict. Maybe that's a good clue, explaining why she's still a sh!te-human today.
If you're still asking yourself, "what, why, and how?" The answers are all easy and the same -- because my mother was too busy getting high on opioids to take care of herself and the vulnerable humans she was supposed to protect.
Certainly, there must be something on my list that would incite more than questions, like, what, why, and how"?
Surely, there must be something on my list that would move the better, caring members of the community to seek action, to end my parent's relationship and the misery it brought upon me and others.
There has to be something that will compel the working-class drones into action to protect children.
But, as of today: Nope!
Children are left to suffer without escape.
And these ignorant working-class adults keep pumping out innocent working-class children to continue the suffering. As if there's some magic number of suffering children that, if reached, will make the suffering of working-class adults disappear.
I don't say all these things to get sympathy for me. I don't need it now. But I do say these things to incite empathy for the children who are suffering RIGHT NOW.
I wouldn't change my childhood. My suffering gave me the sense of perception to grasp who is at fault for my suffering. The people at fault are those like J.D. Vance.
And my opening point remains the same:
There should be a system in place whereby the people of a community can initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Until better times, I'll be preaching antinatalism and celibacy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The moderate right-wing Democratic Governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, just signed a similar bill into law the other day. As a rule, I don't believe what the extremist right-wing Republicans OR the moderate right-wing Democrats say until a bill is signed into law.
And I don't rest any easier until a law has been functioning for at least a decade without some moderate-to-extremist right-wingers running it through the right-wing American court system. People rested easy for decades after Roe V. Wade, and look where that got 'em.
Furthermore, I don't really trust any laws or outcomes produced by jurisdictions controlled by right-wingers, which is basically 95% of all jurisdictions in the world.
People trusted that chattel-slavery was over when the right-wing extremist Confederacy was defeated. But the right-wing moderate Americans let the right-wing extremist Confederates off the hook.
In fact, the moderate right-wing Americans helped the extremist right-wing Confederates to develop a caste-like system to separate chattel-slaves and wage-slaves. And, now, slavery is still alive and well in America.
And people trusted that Nazism was over when the right-wing extremist Nazis were defeated. But the right-wing moderate Americans let the right-wing extremist Nazis off the hook.
In fact, the moderate right-wing Americans brought the right-wing extremist Nazis right in the front door and put the Nazis into positions of power in American government and society. And, now, Nazism is alive and well in America.
I could go on, but I'm trying to regulate my blood pressure before the moderate-to-extremist right-wing American-Confederate-Nazi enslavers come knocking.
...I wonder how large the contrast will be between the quality of the lunches provided by the extremist and moderate right-wingers to the children of wage-slaves in the public schools and the chattel-slaves in the prisons/jails/detention centers, in comparison to the lunches they'll provide to actual Leftists at the "camps." 🤔
1
-
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
1
-
First: Vapes, soda, and Twinkies shouldn't exist.
Second: Working-class people need help rewiring how they think about things, because the wealthy-class right-wingers have been so successful with their propaganda campaigns, and Kyle is proof here.
Even though the wealthy-class makes up a minority of the population, they still rule over the working-class majority. Kyle knows this, he talks about it, and it's no secret. And Kyle has also expressed that he doesn't like that dynamic, whereby the wealthy-class minority rules over the working-class majority.
But, on this topic of vapes, Kyle doesn't even want the working-class majority to rule. Kyle wants what Kyle wants, just like wealthy-class right-wingers.
Wealthy-class right-wingers believe they have the right to do whatever they want, no matter how many people have to suffer. And they pass on that individualist doctrine to the working-class via propaganda. And Kyle has embodied that doctrine here.
Kyle has been indoctrinated to believe that his personal decision (as the autocratic minority) outweighs the collective decision (of the democratic majority), just like the wealthy-class propaganda tells us to.
All that said, I'll get back to my original statement: Vapes, soda, and Twinkies shouldn't exist.
One: No working-class person should have to spend time producing poisonous vapes, soda, or Twinkies.
Two: No working-class person's livelihood should depend upon their willingness to work in the production of poisonous vapes, soda, or Twinkies.
Three: No working-class person should have to spend their time taking care of people who over-consume poisonous vapes, soda, or Twinkies.
Four: The wealthy-class shouldn't be able to use poisonous vapes, soda, and Twinkies to create more wealth for themselves.
Anyway, it's not surprising that so many working-class people suffer. I mean, of course, some working-class people suffer because of the wealthy-class people who cause their suffering. But some working-class people suffer because of the behaviors, addictions, and indoctrinations of fellow working-class mates. That's the kind of working-class mate Kyle is being here.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A community should be able to initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Under a system like that, my parents could have been divorced for numerous reasons on countless occasions. For examples:
1. After the first of the many times that my mother literally begged my father to hit her. She tried goading him into hitting her for years. He never did hit her though.
But I had to watch her purposefully manipulate him for years, and no kid should have to watch that kind of mind-f*kcing .
2. After the first of many times that my mother tricked me and my siblings into not reporting her to Child Protective Services for abusing us.
She would say things like, "they're just going to come and take you away."
She said it that way on purpose, to make us think it was our fault. Because, as kids, most of us get taught that when bad people do the wrong things, the cops come and take the wrong-doers away.
So, by telling us that "they" were going to "take us away," she tricked us into believing that we were the ones in the wrong.
Then, there was another thing she started doing.
When we would threaten to call CPS on her, she would say the 1-800-number out loud, like she had it memorized. Or, she would write the number on a piece of paper and hand it to us. It was as if she was daring us to call.
Looking back, I don't know if she did that because she believed that we wouldn't call or because she wouldn't have cared if we did call. (It's difficult, and probably futile, to try deciphering the specific and primary motives of consumer-driven socio/psychopathic narcissists.)
But she knew we were more scared of being taken away than we were of her abuse because she had already implanted the fear of "them" taking us away into our minds.
We didn't want to get taken away -- we just wanted the abuse to stop. And we were only scared because we didn't know any better.
Like, sure, for argument's sake, the foster-care system is a gamble. But we didn't know that as young kids in the 1980s.
And, besides, also for the sake of argument, which scenario is actually worse: Staying in an abusive situation or gambling on being moved to a less abusive situation?
Staying in an abusive situation isn't ideal, but neither is gambling. And no kid should have to make that choice.
Anyway. My mother played these manipulative mind-games on us until we stopped threatening to report her abuse. Instead of reporting her, we "learned" to live with the unreasonable and illogical abuse by succumbing to it.
I often wonder what could've been different for me if I would've rolled the dice and made the call to CPS.
Oh, goodness. That was quite a digression from my main point. I'll get back to it and conclude.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after my mother was provably neglecting me and after she rendered my father into a perception of powerlessness to do anything about it.
You might be asking yourself, "what, why, how?" Well, then, here are your answers.
3. After I almost lost my tongue was two years old.
I was in the garage alone. (WHAT?) Then I climbed up on the four-foot-tall workbench. (WHY?) Then I fell off the bench and slammed my chin onto the concrete floor, nearly biting my tongue in half. (HOW?)
4. Or, the time I ate mothballs.
5. Or, the time I ate rat poisoning.
6 Or, the time I drank ammonia.
7. Or, the time I drank bleach.
8. Or, the time I ate a bottle of children's aspirin. (Which didn't even happen, because I clearly remember pouring the pills down the drain. But I got caught with the empty bottle by my neglectful biatch-mother, so I got treated as if I had eaten the whole bottle).
9. Or, when I was 7 years old, my doctor admonished my mother for allowing me to become obese, at which point my mother stopped using that doctor to prevent the doctor from recording a paper trail of my mother's nutritional-negligence.
10. Or, when my relatives and neighbors started molesting me.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after one of those instances. Or maybe their divorce should have been required after...
11. ...my mother's first year of doctor-enabled opioid addiction. Maybe that would be a good precursor, indicating that someone would turn into a sh!te-mother and wife.
She's now 40+ years into a doctor-enabled opioid addict. Maybe that's a good clue, explaining why she's still a sh!te-human today.
If you're still asking yourself, "what, why, and how?" The answers are all easy and the same -- because my mother was too busy getting high on opioids to take care of herself and the vulnerable humans she was supposed to protect.
Certainly, there must be something on my list that would incite more than questions, like, what, why, and how"?
Surely, there must be something on my list that would move the better, caring members of the community to seek action, to end my parent's relationship and the misery it brought upon me and others.
There has to be something that will compel the working-class drones into action to protect children.
But, as of today: Nope!
Children are left to suffer without escape.
And these ignorant working-class adults keep pumping out innocent working-class children to continue the suffering. As if there's some magic number of suffering children that, if reached, will make the suffering of working-class adults disappear.
I don't say all these things to get sympathy for me. I don't need it now. But I do say these things to incite empathy for the children who are suffering RIGHT NOW.
I wouldn't change my childhood. My suffering gave me the sense of perception to grasp who is at fault for my suffering. The people at fault are those like J.D. Vance.
And my opening point remains the same:
There should be a system in place whereby the people of a community can initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Until better times, I'll be preaching antinatalism and celibacy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@couchgrouches7667 Oh, I'm non-violent, I meant the concept. But, in order to eradicate the worst characteristics of "whiteness," some authoritarian-right-wingers are going to have to be dealt with in some kind of meaningful way.
And, if history is any indicator of the future -- which, it is -- the authoritarian-right-wingers in America are in for a bad time.
Of course, I'm talking about working-class authoritarian-right-wingers having a bad time -- the working-class will take it the hardest -- because the wealthy-class authoritarian-right-wingers will sneak out the backdoor, leaving the working-class authoritarian-right-wingers holding the metaphorical bag.
But, one way or another, the rest of the world is going to deal with the worst of America's white-supremacist, right-wing-authoritarianism. Just as history indicates.
Just like the the rest of the world had to deal with the worst of "whiteness" in the authoritarian-right-wing hellscapes of Nazi-Germany and the Confederate-South. And we know how the rest of the world dealt with that.
:)
Alas, I'm non-violent. So I'm just hoping that the knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing-authoritarians and the working-class fools who worship them, breed themselves out of existence. I don't want good working-class people to suffer just because the white-supremacist right-wingers had to be regulated again.
But the odds aren't on my side.
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is NOT astonishing, unless your blind or stupid. This is the normal right-wing politics of autocracy, feudalism, capitalism, oligarchy, monarchy, & theocracy. Right-wing Saudis & Americans are autocrats, feudalists, capitalists, oligarchs, monarchists, & theocrats.
This right-wing bulllsh!t is as old as the invention of currency.
This right-wing bullsh!t has been going on for all of recorded history.
If you're only just now finding yourself "astonished," then, either:
(A)You haven't been paying attention to the astonishing historical and international contexts of right-wing politics.
OR
(B)you've been incapable of comprehending the astonishing historical and international contexts of right-wing politics.
The thing that I find most astonishing is the ignorance & astonishment of most working-class Americans who have allowed themselves to be governed by two corrupt right-wing political parties that are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by corrupt, wealthy right-wingers.
This is NOT astonishing -- this is normal right-wing abhorrence.
1
-
1
-
This is why education and historical context are so important. The way Biden used the word makes perfect sense to people who are educated. Only uneducated fools would believe otherwise. Only educated knaves would pretend otherwise. So, the questions you should ask yourself are the following: "Is Kyle a fool who doesn't comprehend what Biden meant? Or, Is Kyle a knave who is pretending not to comprehend it, for clicks?"
Disclaimer: I do not support the right-winger, Joe Biden. Nor do I support the right-wingers Trump, Pelosi, McCarthy, Schumer, McConnell, Bush, or Clinton. F*kc the right-wing Democrats AND the right-wing Republicans. F*kc ALL the right-wingers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A community should be able to initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Under a system like that, my parents could have been divorced for numerous reasons on countless occasions. For examples:
1. After the first of the many times that my mother literally begged my father to hit her. She tried goading him into hitting her for years. He never did hit her though.
But I had to watch her purposefully manipulate him for years, and no kid should have to watch that kind of mind-f*kcing .
2. After the first of many times that my mother tricked me and my siblings into not reporting her to Child Protective Services for abusing us.
She would say things like, "they're just going to come and take you away."
She said it that way on purpose, to make us think it was our fault. Because, as kids, most of us get taught that when bad people do the wrong things, the cops come and take the wrong-doers away.
So, by telling us that "they" were going to "take us away," she tricked us into believing that we were the ones in the wrong.
Then, there was another thing she started doing.
When we would threaten to call CPS on her, she would say the 1-800-number out loud, like she had it memorized. Or, she would write the number on a piece of paper and hand it to us. It was as if she was daring us to call.
Looking back, I don't know if she did that because she believed that we wouldn't call or because she wouldn't have cared if we did call. (It's difficult, and probably futile, to try deciphering the specific and primary motives of consumer-driven socio/psychopathic narcissists.)
But she knew we were more scared of being taken away than we were of her abuse because she had already implanted the fear of "them" taking us away into our minds.
We didn't want to get taken away -- we just wanted the abuse to stop. And we were only scared because we didn't know any better.
Like, sure, for argument's sake, the foster-care system is a gamble. But we didn't know that as young kids in the 1980s.
And, besides, also for the sake of argument, which scenario is actually worse: Staying in an abusive situation or gambling on being moved to a less abusive situation?
Staying in an abusive situation isn't ideal, but neither is gambling. And no kid should have to make that choice.
Anyway. My mother played these manipulative mind-games on us until we stopped threatening to report her abuse. Instead of reporting her, we "learned" to live with the unreasonable and illogical abuse by succumbing to it.
I often wonder what could've been different for me if I would've rolled the dice and made the call to CPS.
Oh, goodness. That was quite a digression from my main point. I'll get back to it and conclude.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after my mother was provably neglecting me and after she rendered my father into a perception of powerlessness to do anything about it.
You might be asking yourself, "what, why, how?" Well, then, here are your answers.
3. After I almost lost my tongue was two years old.
I was in the garage alone. (WHAT?) Then I climbed up on the four-foot-tall workbench. (WHY?) Then I fell off the bench and slammed my chin onto the concrete floor, nearly biting my tongue in half. (HOW?)
4. Or, the time I ate mothballs.
5. Or, the time I ate rat poisoning.
6 Or, the time I drank ammonia.
7. Or, the time I drank bleach.
8. Or, the time I ate a bottle of children's aspirin. (Which didn't even happen, because I clearly remember pouring the pills down the drain. But I got caught with the empty bottle by my neglectful biatch-mother, so I got treated as if I had eaten the whole bottle).
9. Or, when I was 7 years old, my doctor admonished my mother for allowing me to become obese, at which point my mother stopped using that doctor to prevent the doctor from recording a paper trail of my mother's nutritional-negligence.
10. Or, when my relatives and neighbors started molesting me.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after one of those instances. Or maybe their divorce should have been required after...
11. ...my mother's first year of doctor-enabled opioid addiction. Maybe that would be a good precursor, indicating that someone would turn into a sh!te-mother and wife.
She's now 40+ years into a doctor-enabled opioid addict. Maybe that's a good clue, explaining why she's still a sh!te-human today.
If you're still asking yourself, "what, why, and how?" The answers are all easy and the same -- because my mother was too busy getting high on opioids to take care of herself and the vulnerable humans she was supposed to protect.
Certainly, there must be something on my list that would incite more than questions, like, what, why, and how"?
Surely, there must be something on my list that would move the better, caring members of the community to seek action, to end my parent's relationship and the misery it brought upon me and others.
There has to be something that will compel the working-class drones into action to protect children.
But, as of today: Nope!
Children are left to suffer without escape.
And these ignorant working-class adults keep pumping out innocent working-class children to continue the suffering. As if there's some magic number of suffering children that, if reached, will make the suffering of working-class adults disappear.
I don't say all these things to get sympathy for me. I don't need it now. But I do say these things to incite empathy for the children who are suffering RIGHT NOW.
I wouldn't change my childhood. My suffering gave me the sense of perception to grasp who is at fault for my suffering. The people at fault are those like J.D. Vance.
And my opening point remains the same:
There should be a system in place whereby the people of a community can initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Until better times, I'll be preaching antinatalism and celibacy.
1
-
1
-
@bushwacka5187 Since the removal of qualified immunity, those stupid cops have decreased the enforcement of what little bit of the law they are actually capable of understanding.
Qualified immunity allows cops to be ignorant, brutal criminals. And without qualified immunity, those stupid cops are realizing that they don't even know just exactly how stupid they actually are. It is frightening for stupid people who are realizing just how stupid they really are. And new fears stifle people, especially the stupidest people, like cops.
So, those stupid cops, who are having life-changing epiphanies about their own deficiencies, are resigning themselves, internally. They are choosing to not do their jobs, thus reducing the chances of themselves committing any stupidity, thus relieving themselves of any responsibility or consequences.
If they don't do anything stupid, then they won't get in trouble for being stupid.
If they don't do anything at all, then they won't get in trouble at all.
And, thus, if the stupid cops don't do anything at all, then crime goes up. And then, the stupidest working-class citizens get mad at other citizens instead of getting mad at stupid, brutal cops for not doing their jobs. Working-class dupes get mad at their working-class mates instead of getting mad at the wealthy-class, right-wing parasites who perpetuate the conditions which make crime more probable.
Then, the cops use the increase in crime, which they helped to create, to make the case for more cops and less transparency and accountability for cops.
Wash. Rinse. Repeat.
Now I'm wondering if what I said has much to do with what you said. Maybe I'm stupid.
Well, if I am stupid, then at least it won't get anyone killed.
And, despite the difficulties that come with abolishing qualified immunity, I still very much agree that it should be abolished.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
LOL @ the working-class fools obsessing over "cognitive decline."
As if Fetterman needs to be any better or worse than he is now to do the bidding of wealthy-class right-wingers who own and control the Republic and Democrat parties.
If moderate right-winger, Dianne Feinstein, can be propped with a rectum-rod for the past five years, then Fetterman will be fine.
If right-wing extremist, Donny Two-Scoops, can bumble through an entire term as POTUS while having the vocabulary of a toddler with a TBI, then Fetterman will be fine.
If right-wing extremist and murderer Dan Crenshaw can do the job -- after likely suffering multiple TBIs, while no longer having the legs to stand on principles nor the eyes to see logic and reason at the same time -- then Fetterman will be just fine.
If "The Squad" can be forced to espouse moderate right-wing positions on numerous policies within four years' time, then Fetterman will be just fine.
If supposedly sane liars, Kyrsten "The C. |_} |\| T" Sinema and Joe "The Geriatric" Manchin can vote with right-wing extremist Republicans, then Fetterman will be just fine.
And don't get me started on Lauren "The Dolt" Boebert, Margarine Traitor Greed, Louie "Gomer-Pile" Gohmert, and the rest of the intellectual regressives from the right-wing extremist Republic-party and the right-wing moderate Democrat-party.
They are all elected members of the right-wing wealthy-class, with 7-9-figure fortune$, doing the bidding of unelected wealthy-class right-wingers with 10-13-figure fortune$.
If all of those elected right-wing moderates and extremists can pass pro-wealthy-class and anti-working-class legislation, then Fetterman will be more than just fine: He'll be in sh!tty-good company.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
1
-
@MarmaladeINFP I've never heard of "anti-essentialism" -- But I went and read Galatians 3:28 (my Bible actually has verses 26-29 grouped together under the same sub-header which reads, "Sons through Faith in Christ").
Then, from Galatians 3:28, my Bible directed me to Romans 3:29 (my Bible has verses 21-31 grouped together under the sub-header which reads: "Righteousness through Faith in Christ").
Romans 3:29&30 says:
"[29]Is God the God of Jews only? Is He not the God of Gentiles too? Yes, of Gentiles too, [30]since there is only one God, who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through that same faith."
I believe that we can draw the following further-meaning from that passage: (1)God will also justify the heterosexual-believers and the homosexual-believers by their same faith, and (2)that God will justify the cisgender-believers and the transgender-believers by their same faith. That is also contradictory to modern fundamentalism and anti-traditional conservatism.
I'd be glad to hear/read your thoughts on that, but I understand if you don't have time.
Thank you, though, for taking the time to share what you already did. I found it to be edifying, as referenced in Romans 14:19, in which Paul also tells believers in Christ to be peaceful. Being peaceful seems to be contradictory to modern fundamentalism and anti-traditional conservatism, too.
Thanks again.
1
-
@MrAranton Jesus met people where they were at -- He structured His words around the contexts of the origins, education, financials, and politics of the individual person or the groups of people He was addressing at a given time (such as His disciples, or the Pharisees, the gentiles, or the multitudes.)
Knowing where you're at -- your origins, education, financials and politics -- would only serve to structure my responses.
But, really, God doesn't need me to explain or show you the error of your reading / comprehension / interpretation: He just needs you to submit to Him by asking Him to (a)deconstruct your ego, (b)reveal to you your equitable-inferiority in relation to your fellow humans, (c)have the Holy Spirit give you the strength to deal with your newly deflated-ego and the realization of your equitable-inferiority, and (d)have the Holy Spirit give you the wisdom to comprehend the contexts of the Bible, His words and His will.
Jesus called His followers, and believers in God, to live their lives in non-violence & anti-violence. If you believe the opposite, that it's okay to promote and commit violence, then you can take it up with Him when you see Him.
But I'm non-violent and anti-violence because of the words that were spoken and the example that was set by Jesus Christ (the Bible says that Jesus destroyed some property while protesting in the Temple, flinging His whip around and flipping tables, but it doesn't say He did harm to any people).
I'm not engaging in a rhetorical-p!ss!ng-contest with you -- I asked you a few simple questions, and if you don't want to answer them, then that's up to you.
Unlike many self-proclaimed Christians, I don't believe that God needs me to try to force you to be the kind of person that I think He calls us to be.
Jesus's words are in the book and you don't need, nor do you seem to want, mine.
1
-
1
-
Is he wrong, though?🤨 Just the other day, I overheard my neighbor in their backyard talking to their other neighbor, and they said they heard from the guy around the corner, who works with a lady, who has a relative from out-west, who plays video-games with someone who tried to get some groceries back-east and they couldn't get any. ☹
They said that they heard that the grocery store manager -- big guy, strong guy, from moving so many boxes -- was at the door, with tears in his eyes, and he said, "we only have fentanyl left." 😢
Sooo, you tell me, who's really in the right(WRONG-wing), here, libereenos? 🤔😤😠😡🤬
Disclaimer: *sarcasm
Disclaimer # 2: What a sh!tty right-wing world we live in, that I even have to make the first disclaimer.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Instead of Kyle making $10K per month through Patreon, maybe I should be making that $10K. Because, for a self-proclaimed commentator of news and politics, Kyle (and others) sure seem to have a hard time putting together the interwoven pieces of wealthy-class corruption.
All of these "local news" stations are owned by a few telecommunications corporations. For example, Sinclair Broadcast Group is the corporation which owns the local station in Albany, New York that ran the story about the Oklahoma gas plant explosion.
Start Side Note: If you're unfamiliar with Sinclair, they are the corporation that was exposed a few years ago for writing a propagandist-script and then forcing all of the news anchors at the local stations to repeat that propaganda on-air. You can find mashup-videos of the Sinclair Propaganda by doing a simple YouTube search. Also, John Oliver did an entire episode about Sinclair. :End Side Note
Those telecommunications corporations, like Sinclair, Hearst Communications, and others, are owned by the wealthy-class. The wealthy-class decides what goes on-air at the stations they own.
So you might be asking yourself: "Why would the wealthy-class want to put indoctrinating-propaganda, puff-pieces, tabloid-gossip, and non-local "news" on local news stations?
And the answer is simple: To increase the distraction and further the dumbing-down of the working-class citizens who are too busy to realize and too stupid to care that they are being force-fed the indoctrinating-propaganda, puff-pieces, tabloid-gossip, and non-local news.
So, now, you might be asking yourself: "Why would the wealthy-class want to distract and dumb-down the working-class citizens?"
And the answer is simple: To increase the power of the wealthy-class parasites over the working-class citizens by confusing those working-class citizens, and by alienating those working-class citizens from their local communities by preventing them from being informed and educated about the local news and politics that most-directly effects the lives and families of the working-class citizenry.
The wealthy-class parasites in the present know the same thing that the wealthy-class parasites knew in the past, and that is that stupid people make better slaves. So the wealthy-class sets out to keep their working-class slaves stupid by preventing them from becoming educated.
And if you're still asking yourself: "How does the wealthy-class keep the working-class slaves stupid and uneducated?"
The answer is simple: With indoctrinating-propaganda, puff-pieces, tabloid-gossip, and non-local news, thus resulting in the dumbing-down of the local working-class citizen-slaves who are too busy to realize and stupid to care that they are being force-fed the indoctrinating-propaganda, puff-pieces, tabloid-gossip, and non-local news.
Kyle spent 30-seconds of a three and a half minute video being baffled by why this is happening and how it happens, rather than explaining to his working-class viewers why this happens and educating those working-class viewers on how it happens.
Maybe I should be making $10K per month through Patreon, instead of Kyle.
1
-
1
-
@renlevy411 Prohibition was a wealthy-class right-wing ploy to do a number of things to benefit themselves and hurt the working-class:
1. To further enslave the working-class.
2. To sober-up the working-class slaves, to get more labor out of them.
3. To put working-class booze-makers out of business, thus forcing them into wage-slavery jobs at businesses owned by wealthy-class right-wingers.
4. To criminalize working-class booze-makers, throw them into for-profit prisons and jails to be used as chattel-slaves, as is allowed by the 13th Amendment, which was written and ratified by wealthy-class right-wingers. Just like the 18th & 21st Amendments.
5. To use the period of Prohibition to take control over as many aspects of the booze-industry as possible -- the kind of control that wealthy-class right-wingers didn't have before Prohibition. (This is very similar to the way that wealthy-class right-wingers have spent the last several decades taking control over as many aspects of the cannabis & psilocybin industries as possible.)
6. To create as much societal desperation among the working-class slaves as possible -- the kind of societal desperation, strain and strife that wealthy-class right-wingers are always creating -- because (A) the wealthy-class right-wingers can always use their wealth to shield themselves from societal stressors, and (B) because desperate working-class people make for better slaves.
And those six things are just SOME of the benefits from, and reasons why wealthy-class right-wingers wanted Prohibition.
Unfortunately, a sober working-class turned into a smarter working-class, which led to two-solid-decades of working-class-majority organizing and solidarity. And the wealthy-class right-wingers HATED that.
So, once the wealthy-class right-wingers had a good handle on the booze-industry, and imprisoned or murdered as much of the working-class competition as they could, they re-legalized booze again, and the working-class-majority organizing and solidarity devolved back to sh!te.
I could go on.
1
-
"...Nearly come to blows..." - that's bullllllllsh!t, Kyle. They were separated by 20-30ft and two tables. Kyle, and other "leftists" need to stop with the hyperbole. Hyperbole is one of many propagandist tools used by wealthy-class right-wingers -- like Mark-Wayne Mullin, the propagandist, hyperbolic, gaslighting, lying, cheating, thieving, parasitic, wealthy-class, right-wing-extremist, hypocrite senator from Oklahoma.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Hmmm.🤔 Debate with people who ultimately want you to conform on-command, confine you to a concrete-cage, or conceal you in a coniferous-coffin.
Now, I'm non-violent and anti-violence, so, I'm not going to do any of those things to anyone. Because, I'm not a right-winger.
But you let me know how those "debates" with right-wingers turn out.
I don't mean to be snide. But just, no. Enough debating with right-wingers.
No more debating the fact that wealthy right-wingers use their wealth to produce and promote propaganda with the goal of stoking the fear, anger, and hatred of the most ignorant people in the working-class, to the point that those ignorant people will commit sabotage, violence, murder, and genocide.
Right-wing politics are pro-wealthy-class politics.
Right-wing politics are anti-working-class politics.
Wake the f*kc up and stop debating right-wingers, before the wealthy ones pay some worker ones to work you over,
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Kyle is outlasting his usefulness, for me anyway. Only idiots and elementary political-thinkers would be "shocked" by the Supreme Court decisions. The Supreme Court's right-wing majority isn't pro-Trump. They are pro-right-wing. And right-wing politics are wealthy-class politics.
The Supreme Court is dominated by right-wingers who will do anything to preserve the power of the wealthy-class. And Trump's bombastic style of greed is a threat to the stability of wealthy-class power. So they really do want him gone. They need a gentler face to enact fascism.
The wealthy-class only wanted Trump to use him as a pawn to distract the working-class. Trump is just a pawn -- like MTG, Boebert, Candace Owens, Matt Walsh, Ben Shapiro, Matt Gaetz, and countless others are also. Heck, even (in)Justice (uncle)Thomas is a pawn. They are all public-facing paws whose purpose is to distract from the wealthy-class right-wing fascism that is being implemented and solidified in private.
I suppose Kyle is still useful as an introduction to American politics for idiots and elementary political-thinkers, but there are actual professionals and experts who would do, could do, and actually do much better than Kyle.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
A community should be able to initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Under a system like that, my parents could have been divorced for numerous reasons on countless occasions. For examples:
1. After the first of the many times that my mother literally begged my father to hit her. She tried goading him into hitting her for years. He never did hit her though.
But I had to watch her purposefully manipulate him for years, and no kid should have to watch that kind of mind-f*kcing .
2. After the first of many times that my mother tricked me and my siblings into not reporting her to Child Protective Services for abusing us.
She would say things like, "they're just going to come and take you away."
She said it that way on purpose, to make us think it was our fault. Because, as kids, most of us get taught that when bad people do the wrong things, the cops come and take the wrong-doers away.
So, by telling us that "they" were going to "take us away," she tricked us into believing that we were the ones in the wrong.
Then, there was another thing she started doing.
When we would threaten to call CPS on her, she would say the 1-800-number out loud, like she had it memorized. Or, she would write the number on a piece of paper and hand it to us. It was as if she was daring us to call.
Looking back, I don't know if she did that because she believed that we wouldn't call or because she wouldn't have cared if we did call. (It's difficult, and probably futile, to try deciphering the specific and primary motives of consumer-driven socio/psychopathic narcissists.)
But she knew we were more scared of being taken away than we were of her abuse because she had already implanted the fear of "them" taking us away into our minds.
We didn't want to get taken away -- we just wanted the abuse to stop. And we were only scared because we didn't know any better.
Like, sure, for argument's sake, the foster-care system is a gamble. But we didn't know that as young kids in the 1980s.
And, besides, also for the sake of argument, which scenario is actually worse: Staying in an abusive situation or gambling on being moved to a less abusive situation?
Staying in an abusive situation isn't ideal, but neither is gambling. And no kid should have to make that choice.
Anyway. My mother played these manipulative mind-games on us until we stopped threatening to report her abuse. Instead of reporting her, we "learned" to live with the unreasonable and illogical abuse by succumbing to it.
I often wonder what could've been different for me if I would've rolled the dice and made the call to CPS.
Oh, goodness. That was quite a digression from my main point. I'll get back to it and conclude.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after my mother was provably neglecting me and after she rendered my father into a perception of powerlessness to do anything about it.
You might be asking yourself, "what, why, how?" Well, then, here are your answers.
3. After I almost lost my tongue was two years old.
I was in the garage alone. (WHAT?) Then I climbed up on the four-foot-tall workbench. (WHY?) Then I fell off the bench and slammed my chin onto the concrete floor, nearly biting my tongue in half. (HOW?)
4. Or, the time I ate mothballs.
5. Or, the time I ate rat poisoning.
6 Or, the time I drank ammonia.
7. Or, the time I drank bleach.
8. Or, the time I ate a bottle of children's aspirin. (Which didn't even happen, because I clearly remember pouring the pills down the drain. But I got caught with the empty bottle by my neglectful biatch-mother, so I got treated as if I had eaten the whole bottle).
9. Or, when I was 7 years old, my doctor admonished my mother for allowing me to become obese, at which point my mother stopped using that doctor to prevent the doctor from recording a paper trail of my mother's nutritional-negligence.
10. Or, when my relatives and neighbors started molesting me.
Perhaps my parents should have been forced to get a divorce after one of those instances. Or maybe their divorce should have been required after...
11. ...my mother's first year of doctor-enabled opioid addiction. Maybe that would be a good precursor, indicating that someone would turn into a sh!te-mother and wife.
She's now 40+ years into a doctor-enabled opioid addict. Maybe that's a good clue, explaining why she's still a sh!te-human today.
If you're still asking yourself, "what, why, and how?" The answers are all easy and the same -- because my mother was too busy getting high on opioids to take care of herself and the vulnerable humans she was supposed to protect.
Certainly, there must be something on my list that would incite more than questions, like, what, why, and how"?
Surely, there must be something on my list that would move the better, caring members of the community to seek action, to end my parent's relationship and the misery it brought upon me and others.
There has to be something that will compel the working-class drones into action to protect children.
But, as of today: Nope!
Children are left to suffer without escape.
And these ignorant working-class adults keep pumping out innocent working-class children to continue the suffering. As if there's some magic number of suffering children that, if reached, will make the suffering of working-class adults disappear.
I don't say all these things to get sympathy for me. I don't need it now. But I do say these things to incite empathy for the children who are suffering RIGHT NOW.
I wouldn't change my childhood. My suffering gave me the sense of perception to grasp who is at fault for my suffering. The people at fault are those like J.D. Vance.
And my opening point remains the same:
There should be a system in place whereby the people of a community can initiate the division of a couple/relationship, particularly if/when a couple/relationship becomes toxic to the community, especially for the sake of children.
Until better times, I'll be preaching antinatalism and celibacy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rainbowwarrior3570 You don't comprehend that Newsom is a moderate-RWer, do you? 😊 You're incapable of conceptualizing that RW-politics are anti-working-class & pro-wealthy-class politics, and that Newsom is a member of the wealthy-class, aren't you? 🙃 You've been tricked, like so many other working-class dupes, into thinking that Newsom is a "Marxist", haven't you? 🤪
The corrupt wealthy-class & their corrupt RW-politics are overdone on this plant, and your nonsensical reply is all the evidence needed to to prove that your working-class brain has been cooked in the fumes.
RW-politics are the politics of psychopaths. At worst, you're a psychopath. At best, you're an aider&abettor of psychopaths. If you don't want to be associated with psychopathy, then stop espousing the politics of psychopaths.
Be best!
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
If religious-fundamentalists(RFs) of all religions were to join forces, more-so than they already have, to combine the worst parts of their religions that coincide with atheism and right-wing(RW) politics, and they create a quasi-theocracy, they will eliminate any & all semblance of transparency & accountability. And if that happens, not Social Security will be the least of your worries -- the size of your concrete-sneakers and noose-circumference will be much more relevant than not having Social Security.
Most religious-fundamentalists(RFs) are more akin to autocratic right-wingers(RWs) than not.
Many atheist RWs believe in the cycle of violence & vengeance, just like many Muslim, Jewish, & (anti)Christian RFs do.
Many atheist RWs believe they are entitled to excessive wealth, just like many Muslims, Jewish, & (anti)Christian RFs do.
I'm not surprised that atheists & (anti)Christian RFs vote for RWs. I'm surprised that more Muslim & Jewish RFs don't.
How do you like your theocratic fascism?
Vote wealthy, right-wing extremist Repubs for the fast, open-road to fascism.
Vote wealthy, right-wing moderate Dems for the slow, disguised-road to fascism.
BOTH parties are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by wealthy right-wing fascists.
My comments are in response to Kyle's fear-mongering about Muslims choosing to vote for the right-wing extremist Repub-party instead of the moderate right-wing Dem-party -- it's a wonder they haven't already. Once they realize they agree on RW-material-possessions, RW-wealth-hoarding, and RF-autocratic-theocracy that will do it.
Ffs, the (anti)Christian RFs in the Bush-family and the Muslim RFs in the House of Saud realized their RW agreements decades ago. Not to mention RWRF-Ronald Reagan and the RWRF-Iranians before the Bush-fam & the Saudis.
I'm already planning my foot-migration to Canada, where I fully expect the moderate right-wingers who control the country will deny my request for asylum -- no security, no debates.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
If religious-fundamentalists(RFs) of all religions were to join forces, more-so than they already have, to combine the worst parts of their religions that coincide with atheism and right-wing(RW) politics, and they create a quasi-theocracy, they will eliminate any & all semblance of transparency & accountability. And if that happens, not having debates will be the least of your worries -- the size of your concrete-sneakers and noose-circumference will be much more relevant than not having debates.
Most religious-fundamentalists(RFs) are more akin to autocratic right-wingers(RWs) than not.
Many atheist RWs believe in the cycle of violence & vengeance, just like many Muslim, Jewish, & (anti)Christian RFs do.
Many atheist RWs believe they are entitled to excessive wealth, just like many Muslims, Jewish, & (anti)Christian RFs do.
I'm not surprised that atheists & (anti)Christian RFs vote for RWs. I'm surprised that more Muslim & Jewish RFs don't.
How do you like your theocratic fascism?
Vote wealthy, right-wing extremist Repubs for the fast, open-road to fascism.
Vote wealthy, right-wing moderate Dems for the slow, disguised-road to fascism.
BOTH parties are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by wealthy right-wing fascists.
My comments are in response to Kyle's fear-mongering about Muslims choosing to vote for the right-wing extremist Repub-party instead of the moderate right-wing Dem-party -- it's a wonder they haven't already. Once they realize they agree on RW-material-possessions, RW-wealth-hoarding, and RF-autocratic-theocracy that will do it.
Ffs, the (anti)Christian RFs in the Bush-family and the Muslim RFs in the House of Saud realized their RW agreements decades ago. Not to mention RWRF-Ronald Reagan and the RWRF-Iranians before the Bush-fam & the Saudis.
I'm already planning my foot-migration to Canada, where I fully expect the moderate right-wingers who control the country will deny my request for asylum.
1
-
Being a right-wing conservative IS BAD, because right-wing politics ARE BAD.
Right-wing politics are pro-wealthy-class, pro-autocratic-minority politics.
Right-wing politics are anti-working-class, anti-democratic-majority politics.
Conserving right-wing politics IS BAD
When the things you're trying to conserve are inequality, inequity, and injustice, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve white-supremacy & racism, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve patriarchy & sexism, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve segregation & separation, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve labor-exploitation & worker-manipulation, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve resource-hoarding & land-pillaging, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve monetary-accumulation & possession-collection, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve familial-dynasty and nepotism, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve social-status and kakistocracy, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve work-avoidance & easy-living, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve mob-rule BY the economic-minority, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve the autocratic-rule OF the economic-majority, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve the systems of chattel-slavery, debt-slavery, & wage-slavery as a means to enslave the working-class-majority, THAT'S BAD.
When you're trying to conserve right-wing-conservatism, THAT'S BAD.
And, unfortunately, MOST of America -- from the wealthy-class-minority of knaves to the working-class-majority of fools -- is trying to conserve some aspect of right-wing politics, because MOST of America benefits from the inherent corruption of right-wing politics in one way or another.
When you're a working-class fool who doesn't have a f*kcing clue what right-wing politics are, THAT'S BAD
When you're a working-class fool who votes for right-wing Repubocrat and right-wing Demlican knaves, THAT'S BAD.
America is a sh!thole because of the working-class fools and wealthy-class knaves who fight to conserve right-wing politics and all of the poison that comes with it -- Nazi Germany and Confederate America were sh!tholes for the same reason -- THAT's BAD.
It's time for the rest of the world to flush the modern American-Nazi-Confederate right-wing sh!thole.
Because IT'S BAD!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
1
-
Most religious-fundamentalists(RFs) are more akin to autocratic right-wingers(RWs) than not.
Many atheist RWs believe in the cycle of violence & vengeance, just like many Muslim, Jewish, & (anti)Christian RFs do.
Many atheist RWs believe they are entitled to excessive wealth, just like many Muslims, Jewish, & (anti)Christian RFs do.
I'm not surprised that atheists & (anti)Christian RFs vote for RWs. I'm surprised that more Muslim & Jewish RFs don't.
If RFs of all religions were to join forces, more-so than they already have, to combine the worst parts of their religions that coincide with atheism and right-wing politics, and they create a quasi-theocracy, they will eliminate any & all semblance of transparency & accountability.
And if that happens, not having debates will be the least of your worries -- the size of your concrete-sneakers and noose-circumference will be much more important than not having debates.
How do you like your theocratic fascism?
Vote wealthy, right-wing extremist Repubs for the fast, open-road to fascism.
Vote wealthy, right-wing moderate Dems for the slow, disguised-road to fascism.
BOTH parties are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by wealthy right-wing fascists.
I'm already planning my foot-migration to Canada, where I fully expect the moderate right-wingers who control the country, will deny my request for asylum.
My comments are in response to Kyle's fear-mongering about Muslims choosing to vote for the right-wing extremist Repub-party instead of the moderate right-wing Dem-party -- it's a wonder they haven't already. Once they realize they agree on RW-material-possessions, RW-wealth-hoarding, and RF-autocratic-theocracy that will do it. Ffs, the (anti)Christian RFs in the Bush-family and the Muslim RFs in the House of Saud realized their RW agreements decades ago.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Khanna doesn't want to do that. Khanna's family is tied to Billionaire Oligarchs. So really listen to what he says @1:01 of the video. He says, "we need 'progressive Capitalism.'" But Capitalism is a RW-economic system. And RW-politics are pro-wealthy-class politics & anti-working-class politics. So you need to understand that Khanna does NOT want to do away with (a)the corrupt, Billionaire Oligarchs known as the wealthy-class, or (b)their corrupt RW-politics. Because Khanna is a member of the same wealthy-class as the Billionaire Oligarchs.
Furthermore, Capitalism just leads to Corporatism, which leads to Fascism, and all three of those systems are RW-economic systems.
We don't need "progressive Capitalism" (what an oxymoron -- Capitalism is a regressive system in which the wealthy-class maintains their power over the working-class).
We need to Abo l!sh Capitalism, and Khanna isn't going to help with that, because HE is a member of the wealthy-class, just like Krystal&Kyle are. All three of them will support the corrupt wealthy-class and their corrupt RW-economics of Capitalism, Corporatism, & Fascism.
I've suspected Khanna of being a knave, who really doesn't care about the working-class, for a long time now. But that statement at the beginning of the interview -- "we need 'progressive Capitalism" -- that really sealed it for me.
1
-
This is why the voting-age should be periodically adjusted, to account for the deficiencies of a generation that have been bred by wealthy-class, right-wing, fascist extremists and the propaganda they produce to confuse child-brains.
Those child-brains have obviously never heard, or they are incapable of comprehending, the history of the Republic-party over the past 100 years.
I say raise the voting age to 25 for the foreseeable future -- the average age when the consensus of medical professionals agree that the nervous system and the brain are mostly finished developing.
That will give the adults in the room/communities some time to remove the wealthy-class, right-wing, fascist extremists from their addictions and positions of power, without being hampered by the electoral-sabotage committed by child-brains who have been duped into becoming soldiers by and for those wealthy-class, right-wing, fascist extremists.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@bilbobaggins9451 Excuses, reasons -- semantics. Working-class Americans are following the lead, and striving after the lifestyles of their wealthy-class right-wing masters. American addicts, just like Nazi and Confederate addicts, will NEVER willingly give up their addictions.
Another way of putting it would be:
A majority of working-class Americans are the most privileged working-class people on the planet. The wealthy-class right-wingers have allowed so many working-class Americans to taste the addictions enjoyed by the wealthy-class. And those working-class Americans, just like the wealthy-class, don't want to lose their addictions.
Unfortunately for the working-class Confederates and Nazis, there were enough other, better people in the world who finally got tired of Confeder-Nazi sh!t and rose up against them.
And, then, while the working-class Confeder-Nazis were distracted and fighting the Liberators, the wealthy-class Confeder-Nazis snuck out the back door and left the working-class holding the bag.
I presume that America is already too far down the sh!tehole, and the same thing will have to happen to working-class American-Confeder-Nazi addicts before any real change happens.
Based on some of your replies, I believe you're capable of grasping mine. I mean absolutely no snark nor sarcasm.
✌
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
Kyle IS a "rich," moderate, white, liberal-conservative -- but Kyle IS NOT a "wealthy," extremist, white, liberal-conservative -- so, of course Kyle thinks that "people" SHOULD be allowed to get "rich," but SHOULDN'T be allowed to get "wealthy."
Kyle, and the other rich, moderate, white, liberal-conservatives are barely better than wealthy, extremist, white, liberal-conservatives. But the moderates and extremists are BOTH on the same team.
Rich-Kyle, along with the people who are most like rich-Kyle and the people who are aspiring to be like rich-Kyle, are all on the same team as the wealthy, extremist, white, liberal-conservatives. Whether the moderate fools are capable of comprehending it or not. And whether the extremist knaves are willing to admit it or not
1
-
1
-
Chris Sununu & his wealthy-class, right-wing family are mentally-ill addicts. The main goal of wealthy-class right-wingers is to conserve their lifestyle addictions via the inequitable, corrupt system of Capitalism. He/they need rehabilitation & re-education.
They need rehabilitation for their addictions and the terrible things they have done to maintain those addictions.
They need re-education to prevent them from relapsing and doing terrible things in the future.
Their rehabilitation and re-education should focus on:
1. community-service over family-serving
2. public-good over private-gain
3. collective-edification over individual-amplification
4. majority-rule over minority-rule
5. democracy over autocracy
6. people over profits
7. sharing over pillaging
8. selflessness over selfishness
9. collaboration over competition
10. necessities over wants
11. sympathy, empathy, and compassion
12. ethics, morals, and values
13. equity, unity, and community
14. meritocracy, nepotism, and luck-of-birth
15. corruption, bribery, manipulation and exploitation
Without rehabilitation and re-education, the lazy, parasitic Sununu family, and those like them, will cause them to continue striving to maintain systems of inequity to service their addictions. They will NEVER, EVER willingly give up their addictions.
Not only will they continue striving to maintain the inequitable system of Capitalism, but they will absolutely continue to strive to regress society back into the systems of lord-vs-serf Feudalism and/or owner-vs-owned Slavery.
Without rehabilitation and re-education, they will continue to uphold slavery, feudalism and capitalism, under which systems the wealthy-class addicts do none of the manual labor, while forcing chattel-slaves, debt-slaves, and wage-slaves to do all the labor for them.
Chris Sununu and the wealthy-class right-wingers can't save anyone -- they need to be saved from themselves.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yup. One whole week per month and one whole month per year, Congress-critters should be required to participate in a blue-collar, manual-labor job inside their district.
Congress-critters should be required to experience all of the rigors, unfairness, manipulation, and exploitation that their blue-collar, working-class constituents are subjected to. If the Congress-critter can't do manual-labor, or if they can't hold down a blue-collar job, then they shouldn't be allowed to be a Congress-critter.
And don't give me any sh!te about the disabled/handicapped Congress-critters. MOST of the disabled/handicapped people I know are also participants in the labor-force. And the disabled people I know who don't participate in the labor-force, WOULD LOVE to participate, but the wealthy-class employers are greedy, discriminatory pieces of human-excrement.
America is a sh!thole because the lazy, greedy, discriminatory, right-wing pieces of human-excrement from the wealthy-class have made the U.S. their home.
It's time for the world to give the wealthy, right-wing Americans the flush. Just like the world flushed the right-wing Confederates and right-wing Nazis.
But, this time, there needs to be a double-flush.
And a plunging for good-measure.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
How do you like your fascism?
Vote wealthy, right-wing extremist Repubs for the fast, open-road to fascism.
Vote wealthy, moderate right-wing Dems for the slow, disguised-road to fascism.
BOTH parties are bought, owned, bribed and controlled by wealthy right-wing fascists.
Edit: And when Independents start to make headway, they'll also become corrupted by wealthy right-wing fascists, just like the Lolbertarian party.
Wealthy right-wingers own the corporate "news" channels and the corporate social-media companies, and they've corrupted the campaign-finance and electoral system by using their channels and companies to push right-wing propaganda and politics into every aspect of life.
The right-wing American sh!thole is headed the way of the right-wing Roman Empire, the right-wing Confederacy, and right-wing Nazi Germany, and you're going to help by voting for right-wing Independants, or No-Labels right-wingers.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@hermes7587 That would be a fine question, for a human with a God-complex. But for humans with a shred of empathetic-decency, the answer would be simple.
There are some intelligent people who are completely innocent on all accounts, and those innocent people don't deserve to suffer at the hands of ignorant people who are easily led by devious people.
As a German who claims to have "saw this coming when you heard Trump´s campain speeches in late 2015," you should also be smart enough to understand how this could happen somewhere besides your country.
After WW2, a bunch of your Fascists invaded the US and implanted their poison.
As a German, you should understand, more than most people, just how ignorant & devious people can be.
They are literally making a comeback in your country right now.
But, you stay up there, and don't fall off your pedestal, you simpleton. 🙄
1
-
1
-
Tens of thousands of unplanned suicides to be stumbled upon, and cleaned up, after the fact? Orrr, hundreds of thousands of planned suicides, with no stumbling, and minimal clean up? Hmmm, as someone who's spiritual beliefs support free-will but denounce suicide, this is a tough one.
Good thing those spiritual beliefs also discourage voting for pro-wealthy-class, pro-authoritarian, anti-working-class, anti-democracy governments.
No voting = no dirty hands on the 20,000 versus 200,000 suicide debate.
1
-
Bernie has family. He's more concerned with what could happen to them after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows what the right-wingers have done to working-class leftists through history.
Bernie sees the rhyming-nature of that history coming back around.
Bernie lived through the "Red Scare" and "McCarthyism."
Bernie doesn't want those kinds of things to happen to his family after he dies.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that there are too many foolish, working-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many knavish, wealthy-class, right-wing addicts.
Bernie knows that there are too many right-wing addicts with mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Berne knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts will willingly give up their addictions.
Bernie knows that NONE of the right-wing addicts can cure their own mental illnesses.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie knows that, in order to maintain their addictive lifestyles, the mentally ill working-class fools will do whatever the mentally ill wealthy-class knaves tell them to do; just like they did during the Red Scare and McCarthyism.
And, so, Bernie has given up on the working-class.
Bernie has now entered the phase known as, "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em."
Bernie is MORE concerned with the quality of life his family will have when he dies.
Bernie is LESS concerned with the quality of life for the working-class.
Bernie is ONLY concerned with his own family-unit minority
Bernie is NOT concerned about the working-class majority.
Bernie is the perfect example of why any effective leader(s) on the left-wing will have to be someone(s) without family -- it's too easy for the wealthy-class right-wingers to corrupt left-wingers who have families, and Bernie is a prime example.
Bernie has exchanged his working-class principles to secure a wealthy-class standard of living for his family after he dies.
Bernie has given up on the anti-wealthy-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given up on the pro-working-class nature of left-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the anti-working-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given in to the pro-wealthy-class nature of right-wing politics.
Bernie has given up.
It's only surprising/upsetting if one doesn't know the facts, or rhyming-nature, of history.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The military-industrial-complex is an exasperation, an embellishment, an inflated view, of all the problems with Amerikkka. Mental illness abound -- in association with greed, corruption, materialism, symbolism, pollution, looting, hoarding, pillaging, manipulation, exploitation, violence, hate, murder, r@pe, torture, hedonism, hierarchy -- it's all there. The lowest on the totem pole are slaves, and the highest are owners. What a disgusting country.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
He's correct. Only working-class fools are dumb enough to be duped into volunteering to murder other working-class fools. It's working-class fools who are too dumb to comprehend the international/historical fact that murderous governments are bought, owned, bribed, and controlled by murderous, yet lazy, wealthy right-wingers.
And maybe the murderous, working-class fools don't deserve the same punishments as the murderous, wealthy-class, right-wing knaves. But the murderous, working-class fools certainly shouldn't be trusted in positions of public trust, just like the murderous, wealthy-class, right-wing knaves shouldn't.
The murderous working-class fools exposed their own ignorance, fear, anger, and hate when they volunteered to murder strangers abroad. They've shown they can be duped by the worst people (the wealthy-class right-wingers) in a society. They've proven their willingness to commit unprovoked violence on other working-class humans.
Both, the murderous working-class fools and the murderous wealthy-class knaves, should never be trusted with decing anything, other than when they get to p!ss & sh!t, ever again.
F*kc the military and anyone who volunteers for the military. The military is a working-class fool's attempt at garnering unearned respect through unmitigated violence, and it's the wealthy-class knave's attempt at garnering slaves through unmitigated deception -- and f*kc anyone who disagrees.
Disclaimer: Trump isn't really correct. He's a wealthy-class, right-wing deceiver. And if you didn't already know that, or if you disagree, then you can go ahead and keep your military-rank, or civilian-envy, a secret. Shut your mouth until you need to take a p!ss or a sh!t, and then you can open wide.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I'd like to see the 'tale of the tape' on it before I make a bet. JC might have some weight on NM, but NM probably learned some hand-to-hand combat skills at The Citadel. NM looks scrawny, but if NM knows how to grapple better than JC, then NC will have the upper hand on JC, even if NM is lighter than JC.
Of course, this is all nonsense, and, in a civilized society, threatening violence would result in automatic removal from office and a special-election planned for that district.
Mace is as dumb as MarkWayne Mullin from Oklahoma, who tried to incite Sean O'Brien in a Senate Hearing. Mace & Mullin are both puppets, like a bunch of ConfedState Reps & Senators.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@vincesmith2499 I'm pretty sure you're not alive. And if you are alive, you're brain-dead. And if you're not brain-dead, the depths of your intelligence are akin to that of a Dixie Cup. And, btw, plants aren't sentient, and neither are gametes, zygotes, embryos, nor fetuses. Ffs, you might be alive, and not brain-dead, but you're BARELY sentient. 😅
1
-
1
-
Kyle & Ana "The Aryan" Kasparian, and everyone else, need to stop laughing at Trump. It's not funny when he's bombastic, hyperbolic, or deceptive. He acts that way to incite his ignorant, vile&violent followers. Laughing at Trump is like laughing at a sadistic prison-warden who allows the inmates out of the prison on leashes, that are just long enough to get to you, as you walk or drive by the building, and they catch you having a laugh at their expense. Or something like that. Makeup whatever analogy you need to, in order to smarten yourself up and stop laughing. He hurts the very people who are dumb enough to follow him, and they will hurt you and anyone else if he tells them to. It is NOT funny. 🙄
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Also Brian Mast: "Firstly, I'm a fool sometimes, a knave other times, and a hypocrite always. Now, the violent Palestinians are only doing the SAME things to non-violent Zionists that violent Zionists have done to non-violent Palestinians. They're doing the SAME things that violent Americans have done. Ffs, I even lost my legs while doing the SAME thing as violent Palestinians. And Rashida Tlaib's decision to post a Palestinian flag at work is simply the SAME kind of theatrics that I engaged in when I decided to wear an Israeli military uniform to work. Yes, I'm a fool, just like my working-class voters, but I'm also a knave & hypocrite, just like my wealthy right-wing campaign donors. And wealthy right-wingers, like me, support Israel while condemning Palestine & Tlaib because we're HYPOCRITES. But, thankfully, my working-class voters are too foolish to comprehend that, so please don't educate them."
⬆That's Brian Mast.⬆
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@helene420 If you're just learning about "libertarianism," then you need to know that the libertarian-concept in historical-practice has NOT been the same as the Libertarian-party in modern-practice. The Libertarian-party is bought, owned, bribed, & controlled by the same corrupt wealthy-class, with their corrupt RW-politics, as the Repub&Dem parties.
Libertarians, Repubs&Dems, ALL espouse a small government, and they view the libertarian-concept to mean the inequitable "freedom TO oppress others" and NOT the equitable "freedom FROM oppression by others."
If the government isn't strong enough to ensure "freedom FROM oppression," then the biggest, strongest, and most vile&violent people would impose their "freedom TO oppress" the smallest, weakest, kindest & most-vulnerable people (instead of just having the people from the wealthy-class oppressing the people of the working-class, like we have now).
The people in the modern Libertarian-party advocate for small government and the individual freedom TO oppress others.
The people for the historical libertarian-concept advocate for a government that is big enough to protect the weakest&poorest individual's freedom FROM oppression by the strongest&wealthiest.
The Libertarian-party was literally started by some corrupt billionaires from the wealthy-class, because the Repubs&Dems weren't shrinking & destroying the government fast enough for them & their corrupt RW-politics.
Don't be fooled -- the political-Libertarians of the present are NOT the conceptual-libertarians of the past.
And when push-come-to-shove, the working-class dupes in the Libertarian-party will do whatever their masters in the wealthy-class tell them to do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. "Fed land to build cities" -- Nope. The earth doesn't need more people (let alone more Americans). And, thus, neither the earth nor America need more cities.
Furthermore, the wealthy-class wants the working-class to come up with ideas so that the wealthy-class can steal and exploit the best ideas for themselves. Meanwhile the wealthy-class wants to continue to perpetuate a society in which working-class people suffer.
Sure, fix the cities that already exist.
And then depopulate them.
Spread people out so they aren't packed in like sardines, suffering from all the mental and physical health conditions that come with city life.
Start designing communities to be most compatible with "Dunbar's Number" so we can; (A) better identify the people who are the worst addicts (wealthy-class and right-wingers) and/or the people most in need of mental-health-care (working-class right-wingers), and (B) come up with plans on what to do with them.
Living in communities that are sized according to Dunbar's Number is one of the best ways to have fewer/prevent future/heal from instances of addiction, violence and mental illness.
Lastly, and most importantly: eliminate and prevent private people/companies from extracting profits from housing, communities, and government.
2. "Develop flying cars" -- Nope. The transportation that already exists, especially in America, is already substandard (on purpose), and it causes incalculable and unpredictable detriments to people and communities.
Sure, fix the transportation we already have.
And then reinvent it.
Start designing transportation to best suit the purpose. Transporting resources and humans should be done on separate infrastructures.
Individualized human travel should be minimized, for EVERYONE. Communal and group travel should be equitablely accessable for all people who want to. And trips should be well planned and prepared for, giving the people who live in the destination-communities plenty of time to prepare for the travelers.
And -- this should go without saying, but -- having massive, city-sized transportation methods, for the purpose of transporting thousands of working-class humans to the lands of other working-class humans with the intent to murder them, should be abolished.
Lastly, and most importantly: eliminate and prevent private people/companies from extracting profits from transportation, communities, and government.
3. Revitalize Rural Industries: Nope. That sounds a lot like, "spread out the production, and thus, spread out the pollution."
I could say more, but I'm bored.
So I'll end with this.
Right-wing politics are pro-wealthy-class politics.
Right-wing politics are anti-working-class politics.
F*kc the wealthy-class right-wingers, their private companies, and their profits. And f*kc the working-class fools who worship them.
1
-
1