Comments by "NobleCrow10" (@NobleCrow10) on "Global News"
channel.
-
32
-
30
-
22
-
17
-
15
-
13
-
11
-
9
-
According to what logic must the ancient Kurdish people be forever denied a country of their own, while concentrated efforts of so many countries and international organizations have been directed, year after year, decade after decade, at promoting Arafat’s terrorist organization to nationhood, at Israel’s expense? If someone can provide an answer that does not, explicitly or implicitly, refer to anti-Semitism, I’d love to hear it.
And while I am waiting, most probably in vain, for such an answer, I will ask another question, even more intriguing: Why have all those massive efforts resulted in exactly nothing? Why the so-called “Palestinians”, despite every attempt by Israel’s enemies to turn them into a nation, remain what they have always been since their inception in 1964 — a terrorist organization?
9
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
Even before Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas terrorists, in between bombing Israeli buses, shot a pregnant Jewish woman and her four daughters, ranging in age from two to eleven years old, on a highway.
Several governments and international organizations have made decent but completely meaningless sounds about this. The Arabs unanimously decided to consider the murderers heroes. Nobody was outraged by this. Neither the European Union nor the United States announced a cessation of funding for Arafat's gang, and no one expected this from them.
The most eloquent was, perhaps, the reaction of British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. He cursed the terrorist attack that occurred almost simultaneously in Saudi Arabia, but did not mention a word about another terrorist attack in Israel. If he had instead sent Arafat an open letter of congratulations, the effect would have been exactly the same.
What is the reason for this selective outrage? I believe that two factors played a role here: first, the killers were Arabs; secondly, their victims are Jews and their minions, Americans. Although, it is possible that I am wrong and everything is just the opposite: firstly, the victims are Jews and their minions, Americans, and, secondly, the killers are Arabs. Or maybe it doesn’t matter to them who the killer is, the main thing is that they kill the Jews and their henchmen, the Americans. Especially the Jews.
Let's talk about morality. Why was it moral to bomb the civilians of Belgrade, but not to bomb the frantic and absolutely useless Gaza? Why were the Arabs allowed to desecrate Joseph's tomb with impunity? Why is Khaled Meshaal allowed to hide from retribution in Qatar? Why would expelling Israel's enemies from Israeli soil be immoral, but expelling Israeli civilians from Israeli soil by the Israeli government would not?
The standard reference to the Geneva Conventions is meaningless in this case. The Geneva Conventions are only applicable if both parties to the conflict adhere to them. During World War II, in response to Germany's violation of international rules of war, the Allies began systematically destroying German cities, mercilessly killing civilians. Cruel? Undoubtedly. Not fair? Not at all: it was the civilian population of Germany that brought Hitler to power. There was not a single military installation in either Hiroshima or Nagasaki. But the civilian population of these cities, like all of Japan, was forced to pay for supporting the government’s militaristic policies. It was this forced cruelty that allowed us to defeat fascism.
Logically, justly and in full accordance with international law, the Arabs have lost the right to protection stipulated by the Geneva Conventions for the civilian population of civilized belligerents. And if our civilization is destined to survive, then sooner or later the Arabs will have to pay a terrible price in blood for dancing and distributing sweets to commemorate massacres, for systematically and completely turning their own children into cannibals, for supporting terrorism, for hating everything healthy that exists in our world. This is very cruel, but absolutely fair.
4
-
I am of opinion that it is safer NOT to mix vaccines. I know the government recommendation is that mixing vaccines is safe, but to state that they had to do a long-term impact study, which they did not have time to do. So the government recommendation that mixing the vaccines is safe is, in my opinion, the reflection of convenience, supply issues, difficulty of planning / logistics on the part of the government and the lack of immediate evidence that mixing vaccines could be harmful.
Also, the specialists in Israel (where the vaccination of the population was completed several months ago) are in opinion that Pfizer is the most efficient vaccine against the Delta Variant.
And now WHO expresses concern because nobody conducted the proper study. Canadian Officials say that it is reasonable to believe that mixing vaccine is OK because Moderna and Pfizer are similar.
In principle, they are might be similar. But the dosage is different (100 ml for Moderna vs 30 ml for Phizer), the freezing temperature is different, the thawing protocol is different and nobody knows how these two vaccine mixture will affect you in the long run.
Unfortunately, there is no phone to call to mass vaccination clinic or to Public Health and ask "what vaccine you administer today?". I called the Public Health, but they do not know. To find out I had to arrive and see in person and waste 2 hours each time, while exposing myself to risk of being infected by the COVID-Delta variant while in the elevator, outdoors and in the clinic.
Every day I watch on TV the City of Toronto Major trying to convince people to get vaccination. I do not need to be convinced. I want to be vaccinated, but the way government plans the process prevents / delay me from getting 2-d Pfizer shot.
Shame on you, the bureaucrats. You know nothing. You changed your opinion on Astrozeneca safety number of times. Why I should trust you now?
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
I am of opinion that it is safer NOT to mix vaccines. I know the government recommendation is that mixing vaccines is safe, but to state that they had to do a long-term impact study, which they did not have time to do. So the government recommendation that mixing the vaccines is safe is, in my opinion, the reflection of convenience, supply issues, difficulty of planning / logistics on the part of the government and the lack of immediate evidence that mixing vaccines could be harmful.
Also, the specialists in Israel (where the vaccination of the population was completed several months ago) are in opinion that Pfizer is the most efficient vaccine against the Delta Variant.
And now WHO expresses concern because nobody conducted the proper study. Canadian Officials say that it is reasonable to believe that mixing vaccine is OK because Moderna and Pfizer are similar.
In principle, they are might be similar. But the dosage is different (100ml for Moderna vs 30 ml for Phizer), the freezing temperature is different, the thawing protocol is different and nobody knows how these two vaccine mixture will affect you in the long run.
Unfortunately, there is no phone to call to mass vaccination clinic or to Public Health and ask "what vaccine you administer today?". I called the Public Health, but they do not know. To find out I had to arrive and see in person and waste 2 hours each time, while exposing myself to risk of being infected by the COVID-Delta variant while in the elevator, outdoors and in the clinic.
Every day I watch on TV the City of Toronto Major trying to convince people to get vaccination. I do not need to be convinced. I want to be vaccinated, but the way government plans the process prevents / delay me from getting 2-d Pfizer shot.
Shame on you, the bureaucrats. You know nothing. You changed your opinion on Astrozeneca safety number of times. Why I should trust you now?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
We, Canadian, have the same problem. The liberal governments of all levels use anti-constitutional policy of preference to hire visible minorities on government jobs. Since the job market is competitive, the liberals do it at account of white people, specially white men. They, liberals, believe that diversity is more important than ability and experience. This discriminatory policy is called "Diversity and Inclusion" and forced onto all government institutions and the crown companies. It is also forced on the free market companies which want to be awarded the government contracts.
This policy is not only unfair, illegal, anti-constitutional and contradicts the free market doctrine, but results in the reality when many key positions in government and companies are filled with incompetent rams, whose only advantage is that they are not white.
Similar illegal policy was conducted by the USSR Communist Party towards the Soviet Jews. The semi-secret party instruction prohibited to hire the Jews in Police, KGB, Military and the legal system. The Soviet Jews also were prohibited to study law and medicine. This policy lasted from mid1960-s till the collapse of the USSR in 1991, when the most Jews immigrated to Israel and the USA, some to Canada and Australia. This discriminatory policy was one of the reasons the Soviet Union croaked.
If Canada does not change to the fair free market system, it will end the same way as the USSR.
3
-
3
-
I am of opinion that it is safer NOT to mix vaccines. I know the government recommendation is that mixing vaccines is safe, but to state that they had to do a long-term impact study, which they did not have time to do. So the government recommendation that mixing the vaccines is safe is, in my opinion, the reflection of convenience, supply issues, difficulty of planning / logistics on the part of the government and the lack of immediate evidence that mixing vaccines could be harmful.
Also, the specialists in Israel (where the vaccination of the population was completed several months ago) are in opinion that Pfizer is the most efficient vaccine against the Delta Variant.
And now WHO expresses concern because nobody conducted the proper study. Canadian Officials say that it is reasonable to believe that mixing vaccine is OK because Moderna and Pfizer are similar.
In principle, they are might be similar. But the dosage is different (100ml for Moderna vs 30 ml for Phizer), the freezing temperature is different, the thawing protocol is different and nobody knows how these two vaccine mixture will affect you in the long run.
Unfortunately, there is no phone to call to mass vaccination clinic or to Public Health and ask "what vaccine you administer today?". I called the Public Health, but they do not know. To find out I had to arrive and see in person and waste 2 hours each time, while exposing myself to risk of being infected by the COVID-Delta variant while in the elevator, outdoors and in the clinic.
Every day I watch on TV the City of Toronto Major trying to convince people to get vaccination. I do not need to be convinced. I want to be vaccinated, but the way government plans the process prevents / delay me from getting 2-d Pfizer shot.
Shame on you, the bureaucrats. You know nothing. You changed your opinion on Astrozeneca safety number of times. Why I should trust you now?
3
-
3
-
Yes, there is a temporary defensive occupation, but it is legal and fully compliant with UN resolutions 242 and 338. When and if the Arabs show good will and are willing to sign and abide by a final peace agreement, the temporary defensive occupation will end.
It does not surprise me that the Russians, who carried out pogroms against Jews for the past 200 years, are on the side of the Arabs, even though the Arabs helped the Afghan Mujahedeen and Chechen militias kill Russian soldiers in the 1980-1990s. This means that Russians have more hatred of Jews than love for their sons, more than a sense of self-preservation.
The Russian Foreign Ministry, which is second only to the Gestapo in terms of the intensity of anti-Semitism, claims that it is necessary to return to the borders of 1967. I would like to ask the horsey mug of Lavrov: Are you ready to sell me your Moscow apartment at the price of 1967? If yes, then I am ready to buy it immediately.
In Soviet school I was taught that our space is four-dimensional: length, width, height and time. But Lavrov and his Foreign Ministry anti-Semites apparently skipped physics lessons and there is no time for them.
But if time does not exist, then why not return to the borders of 0067 AD, that is, during the time of Jesus, when not a single Arab was in the territory of Israel and Judea, and there was no trace of the Russian people?
Well, if “there’s such a booze that you can cut the last cucumber,” then why not go back to 1067 BC, during the time of King David and the first Jewish Temple? That was the time when Israel was almost half the size of Ukraine in terms of territory, which means Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt had to give up part of their lands to Israel.
Lavrov, hey!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3