Comments by "NobleCrow10" (@NobleCrow10) on "The Damage Report" channel.

Ilhan Omar hates the Jews because she is Muslim. Islam is evil ideology and must be banned on the USA soil. Muslim must be deported back to ME and Africa.
5
It is big problem that many people sincerely believe that Islam is "just another religion". No, it is not. It is political ideology of conquest and enslavement. Religious aspect of this hateful ideology is present, I do not argue about this. But it is used by Muslim clerics for the mobilization for the holy Jihad, for the political struggle. Just do yourself favour - learn about Islam. I did and I am scared of what I learned.
4
The essence of that universal goodness remains as obscure as the benevolence that, according to Obama, the American people have found at the heart of Islam. Nevertheless, contrary to Obama assertions, the American people do have quite a few issues with the people of Iran. The Islamic Revolution in Iran was a revolution, not a coup d'état. It was the people of Iran who deposed the shah and brought the ayatollahs to power. The legend goes that the shah's regime was too cruel and inhumane. It most certainly was, but, considering how the Iranian people today put up with the far superior cruelty of the ayatollahs, that was not why they got rid of the shah. They resented the fact that the shah was not hostile towards the West. They resented the fact that shah's rule was too secular. Today's regime in Iran is enormously more cruel and inhumane than the worst days of shah's reign. The shah, you see, had to look good in the eyes of the Westerners. The ayatollahs couldn't care less. It was the people of Iran who stormed the American embassy, took our diplomats hostage, and mutilated the bodies of American servicemen who died during an unsuccessful rescue attempt. It is the people of Iran who endorse the stoning of adulteresses and the hanging of homosexuals. Stoning, by its very nature, requires active participation of the people, because it done by a mob rather than a firing squad. And the hangings. They don't hang them the way they used to do it in civilized countries: the trap door opens, the condemned man falls through, his neck snaps, and he dies instantly. In Iran they bring a construction crane to a city square. The person is slowly hoisted up and slowly suffocated to death. The good people of Iran stand around watching Islamic justice in action. By the way, in Iran, unlike the United States, homosexuality has not become a political movement. Iranian homosexuals put forth no demands. They simply enjoy each other in a manner different from whatever the mullahs have deemed appropriate. For that, they are publicly executed in a country whose supreme leader Ayatollah Khomeini set up special rules for conducting sexual intercourse between Muslim males and cattle and between adult Muslim males and female infants. A naïve person might think that Iran is a country of superb morality. Believe it or not, prostitution there is a booming, and perfectly legal, business. The business of prostitution in Iran is conducted by the mullahs. You see, Islam forbids adultery, but it endorses both temporary marriages and polygamy. For an appropriate fee, a mullah will marry you to a qualified professional for an hour, till morning, or whatever arrangement you can afford. When you are done, he will be on hand to perform the ceremony of divorce. Pimping clerics only in Islam.
3
A religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most probably cause wide spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However, a cult that demands human sacrifices on the a global scale — conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all “infidel” everywhere in the world, a cult that is raising its own children for the purpose of dying while committing murder — is respectfully classified as a “monotheistic religion” and “Abrahamic faith”. In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.
3
“Taqiyya is a component of Sharia that allows, and even encourages you to lie to achieve your goals.” — Dr. Ben Carson, interview with The Hill newspaper, Sept. 20, 2015 If you scroll across the Internet, or just stick “taqiyya” into a Twitter search, you will stumble across many videos and articles arguing that “taqiyya” is central to Islam and permits a Muslim to lie with impunity to nonbelievers/infidels. The argument largely stems from two parts of the Koran: “Whoever expresses disbelief in God after having accepted belief [will suffer greatly] – except him who is forced while his heart is still at peace in belief” (16:106) “Let not the believers take unbelievers for their allies in preference to believers. Whoever does this has no connection with God, unless you but guard yourselves against them as a precaution.” (3:28)
3
@wrk1981 , Arab-IL conflict can be put to the rest as soon as Arabs put down the weapons. You know it as well as I do. I do not call this conflict as the one between the Pals and IL. This is the conflict between the entire Arab (or even Muslim world Dar-Al Islam) and the Jews (and by extension vs all the infidels - pagans, atheists, Christians, etc): 1.3B Muslims vs 5M Jews in IL. The "correct" Islam main book calls for Muslims to pursue and destroy the "dhimmi" Jews: "Oh Muslims, the Jew is hiding behind the stone. Go and kill him" - this is the quote from the Koran. Besides, the bloodshed in the ME most conflicts has nothing to do with IL: Syria and Yemen civil wars, Livia, Iraq, Lebanon civil war, war in Checnia, the conflict between Pakistan and India. At least on one side of all the conflicts you will see the Muslims. Indeed the religion of "love and peace"...
3
So the so called "Palestinians" are very very very nice people? Do you mean to tell me that we cannot be at war against nice people?" What a question. What a perfectly understandable question! How much easier it must've been to be at war against vampires or cockroaches. We have all read so much about German atrocities during World War II, that it looks to us as appropriate retribution for those atrocities. We feel that the act of killing a German soldier was, in essence, the execution of a condemned criminal who, in all fairness, did not deserve to live due to the extreme depravity of his actions. In reality, more often than not, the dead German soldier was a high-school kid, decent, honest, respectful of his parents, hoping to live through the war, to come home, to meet the girl of his dreams, to become a husband and a father, and to spend the rest of his life as a scientist, or a farmer, or a businessman. More often than not, prior to being killed, he had demonstrated uncommon courage and excellent fighting skills in battle against a formidable enemy. More often than not, he had done absolutely nothing to deserve being killed. Regardless of his personal traits, his death was not a punishment. Killing him was as impersonal an act as issuing a parking ticket. He was killed only because we were at war with Germany and he happened to be wearing a German uniform. Here's the thing. We had to fight and defeat Nazism not because Nazi doctors were all butchers with awful bedside manners or because Nazi college students made unpleasant roommates. We didn't fight Nazism because of the Nazi crimes either, even though those crimes were perfectly real, my eulogy for the dead German soldier notwithstanding. We had to fight Nazism because its existence had become incompatible with the existence of our way of life. If we wanted freedom and democracy to survive in the United States of America, we had no choice but to fight Nazism in Europe and destroy it. Today, if we want freedom and democracy to survive in this country, we must fight Islam and destroy it everywhere it has established roots, which means everywhere, period.
2
America goes down unless people of good will will do something and bring America back to the values of the founding fathers. These measures will include total ban on Islam hateful ideology and massive deportations of traitors, mainly the Muslims. I would prefer Marshal Law and temporary military rule in the USA to bring America to its senses than Sharia Law, which would destroy the free America.
2
America goes down unless people of good will will do something and bring America back to the values of the founding fathers. These measures will include total ban on Islam hateful ideology and massive deportations of traitors, mainly the Muslims. I would prefer Marshal Law and temporary military rule in the USA to bring America to its senses than Sharia Law, which would destroy free America.
2
An Islamic court in Nigeria sentenced a woman to death for having sex outside marriage. First, she will be buried up to her neck. Then, a crowd of peaceful and loving co-religionists will begin throwing stones at her head. They will keep at it until the woman dies. The mullahs most probably won't let the stone throwers come too close to the victim: this way the most impressionable among the participants will be spared the goriest details of the torture, and the execution will last longer. I suppose the murderous crowd will consist of members of the community where the condemned woman lived. I can't help wondering if the man who seduced her is going to be among them. He told the court he had nothing to do with the incident and was released for lack of evidence against him. The woman was left with a child and had nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. Not a single Islamic spokesman of any authority has protested the sentence. Peace and love, indeed.
2
Every nation has the government it deserves. Every nation is responsible for the actions of its leaders. Based on that rule, we bombed Yugoslavia out of existence, even though it never presented any threat to us. Why don't we bomb our real enemies out of existence? What the hell is wrong with us? And whether you believe that the Palestinians constitute a nation or not, they are no exception from that rule either. I challenge you to give me a single example of something good that has ever come from Arabs occupying the land of Israel. I can make it even easier for you: name something good that has ever come from Muslim Arabs, no matter where they come from. And if this is still too difficult, think of any positive contribution to the humankind made by Muslims in general throughout the entire history of their murderous religion of peace. Take your time; the world has been waiting for an answer to the last question for 14 centuries.
2
@parsonj39 , According to what logic must the ancient Kurdish people be forever denied a country of their own, while concentrated efforts of so many countries and international organizations have been directed, year after year, decade after decade, at promoting Arafat’s terrorist organization to nationhood, at Israel’s expense? If someone can provide an answer that does not, explicitly or implicitly, refer to anti-Semitism, I’d love to hear it. And while I am waiting, most probably in vain, for such an answer, I will ask another question, even more intriguing: Why have all those massive efforts resulted in exactly nothing? Why the so-called “Palestinians”, despite every attempt by Israel’s enemies to turn them into a nation, remain what they have always been since their inception in 1964 — a terrorist organization?
1
Bugatti Boss , Until the Six Day War in 1967, the term “Palestinian” meant a Jew living anywhere “between the river and the sea”. Successful efforts of Arab propaganda resulted in an Orwellian switch of the definition. Today’s “Palestinians” are simply Arabs who came from anywhere at all and settled on the land that belongs to Israel. This hardly makes them a people. However, the lack of common ethnic origin alone can hardly be used as a compelling argument against their right to a nation of their own. Nor does it explain the utter failure of all attempts to create such a nation. After all, the American people lack ethnic commonality to a much greater extent than Arabs calling themselves “Palestinians”, and yet even the stupidest enemy of the United States would never deny that Americans are very much a people.
1
@parsonj39 , Apparently, there is a powerful factor at work that unites proud descendants of those who crossed the ocean on the Mayflower 15 generations ago with those who flock into the United States today from Mexico City, Minsk or Madras, hoping to eventually receive a Green Card. That factor is known as the American dream — a vague term that applies to a vast spectrum of good things not really common outside the United States, from the freedom of speech and religion to a very real opportunity for everyone to earn a decent living for themselves and a bright future for their children. Israel, also being a country of immigrants, although in a very different manner than the United States, has a uniting idea of its own. The “Israeli dream” is called Zionism. I will prudently abstain from any attempt to define it. Suffice it to say that Zionism manages to unite even those Jews who are unable to agree on the true meaning of the term. Does it mean that “Palestine” is impossible due to the lack of a “Palestinian dream”? Most certainly not. If the “Palestinian dream” didn’t exist, it could be invented. The problem is much worse. The “Palestinian dream” does exist, and Arabs do not make a secret out of it: they dream of Israel’s destruction. Today, as they did in Golda Meir’s time, Arabs hate Jews more than they love their own children. Unfortunately, this is not a colorful metaphor. This is an exact description of the horrible reality of the Middle East. The intensity of Arab hatred of Jews exceeds the limits of human imagination
1
Open the holy Bible and see the description of the IL borders. The Bible describe IL much larger than the one specified by the UN resolution. The Bible was written 3300 years ago. UN was created 70 year ago. There are no people called "Palestinians". They are generic Arabs. The term "Palestinian People" was invented by the analytical department of KGB USSR in 1964 in the soviet attempt to cause damage to Israel, which is the USA ally, which was the enemy of the USSR. If I were born Arab, I would leave the Jewish land I illegally occupy to one of the 22 Arab Muslim countries with combined area of territory 1000 larger than Israel. This would end the conflict.
1
@jasonch50 , Islam differs from Judaism and Christianity substantially. If you think that Islam is "just another religion", then Nazism is "just another" political philosophy". People on the West are blissfully ignorant with respect of knowledge of Islam. Islam will bury the Western civilization (like it destroyed everything and everybody during the 1400 years of un-ending Jihad) if we do not wake up in time.
1
@mojnumia9007 , A religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most probably cause wide spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However, a cult that demands human sacrifices on the a global scale — conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all “infidel” everywhere in the world, a cult that is raising its own children for the purpose of dying while committing murder — is respectfully classified as a “monotheistic religion” and “Abrahamic faith”. In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.
1
@kap1618 , A religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most probably cause wide spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However, a cult that demands human sacrifices on the a global scale — conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all “infidel” everywhere in the world, a cult that is raising its own children for the purpose of dying while committing murder — is respectfully classified as a “monotheistic religion” and “Abrahamic faith”. In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.
1
Apparently, there is a powerful factor at work that unites proud descendants of those who crossed the ocean on the Mayflower 15 generations ago with those who flock into the United States today from Mexico City, Minsk or Madras, hoping to eventually receive a Green Card. That factor is known as the American dream — a vague term that applies to a vast spectrum of good things not really common outside the United States, from the freedom of speech and religion to a very real opportunity for everyone to earn a decent living for themselves and a bright future for their children. Israel, also being a country of immigrants, although in a very different manner than the United States, has a uniting idea of its own. The “Israeli dream” is called Zionism. I will prudently abstain from any attempt to define it. Suffice it to say that Zionism manages to unite even those Jews who are unable to agree on the true meaning of the term. Does it mean that “Palestine” is impossible due to the lack of a “Palestinian dream”? Most certainly not. If the “Palestinian dream” didn’t exist, it could be invented. The problem is much worse. The “Palestinian dream” does exist, and Arabs do not make a secret out of it: they dream of Israel’s destruction. Today, as they did in Golda Meir’s time, Arabs hate Jews more than they love their own children. Unfortunately, this is not a colorful metaphor. This is an exact description of the horrible reality of the Middle East. The intensity of Arab hatred of Jews exceeds the limits of human imagination
1
@ppronny12345 , The so called "Pal... People" were invented in the analytical department of the KGB USSR. The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy. For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it “Palestinian people” and installed it in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. How else can you explain the refusal by Jordan and Egypt to unconditionally accept back the “West Bank” and Gaza, respectively? The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza, Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them. The so called “Palestinians” have only one motivation: the destruction of Israel, and in my book that is not sufficient to consider them a “nation” — or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled. In fact, there is only one way to achieve piece in the Middle East. Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 50 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel's ancient sovereignty over Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. That will mark the end of the Palestinian people. What are you saying was its beginning?
1
@ppronny12345 , Open the holy Bible and see the description of the IL borders. The Bible describe IL much larger than the one specified by the UN resolution. The Bible was written 3300 years ago. UN was created 70 year ago.
1
@said8784 , Islamic Jihad is not about territories. It is about a way of life. If I wanted to destroy your way of life, going after your military installations would be largely futile, especially if your military might was a billion times greater than anything I could ever dream of amassing against you. Your army, no matter how powerful, is only a tiny portion of your way of life. Blowing up an office building full of so called “innocent civilians” advances my cause much farther and much more convincingly (especially if you respond by engaging in soul-searching instead of exterminating me once and for all, which is perfectly within your power) than killing the same number of military personnel, precisely because those civilians are the most important, irreplaceable components of the way of life I am trying to destroy. Their “innocence” is non-existent. The term is nothing but an absurd euphemism for their absurd inability to defend themselves. Think about it: how can an infidel be innocent? Isn't it an obvious contradiction in terms?
1
@said8784 , A religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most probably cause wide spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However, a cult that demands human sacrifices on the a global scale — conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all “infidel” everywhere in the world, a cult that is raising its own children for the purpose of dying while committing murder — is respectfully classified as a “monotheistic religion” and “Abrahamic faith”. In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.
1
Ilhan Omar hates the Jews because she is Muslim. Islam is evil ideology and must be banned on the USA soil. Muslim must be deported back to ME and Africa.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , Islam differs from Judaism and Christianity substantially. If you think that Islam is "just another religion", then Nazism is "just another" political philosophy". People on the West are blissfully ignorant with respect of knowledge of Islam. Islam will bury the Western civilization (like it destroyed everything and everybody during the 1400 years of un-ending Jihad) if we do not wake up in time.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , It is big problem that many people like you sincerely believe that Islam is "just another religion". No, it is not. It is political ideology of conquest and enslavement. Religious aspect of this hateful ideology is present, I do not argue about this. But it is used by Muslim clerics for the mobilization for the holy Jihad, for the political struggle. Just do yourself favour - learn about Islam. I did and I am scared of what I learned.
1
@truthbrotha1244 , The so called investigative journalists were the students of the professors whos salaries were paid by Saudis. Their opinion is of little value for me.
1
@Odd Fellow , Jihad however is not about territories. It is about a way of life. If I wanted to destroy your way of life, going after your military installations would be largely futile, especially if your military might was a billion times greater than anything I could ever dream of amassing against you. Your army, no matter how powerful, is only a tiny portion of your way of life. Blowing up an office building full of so called “innocent civilians” advances my cause much farther and much more convincingly (especially if you respond by engaging in soul-searching instead of exterminating me once and for all, which is perfectly within your power) than killing the same number of military personnel, precisely because those civilians are the most important, irreplaceable components of the way of life I am trying to destroy. Their “innocence” is non-existent. The term is nothing but an absurd euphemism for their absurd inability to defend themselves. Think about it: how can an infidel be innocent? Isn't it an obvious contradiction in terms?
1
@Odd Fellow , A religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most probably cause wide spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However, a cult that demands human sacrifices on the a global scale — conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all “infidel” everywhere in the world, a cult that is raising its own children for the purpose of dying while committing murder — is respectfully classified as a “monotheistic religion” and “Abrahamic faith”. In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , A religious cult requiring animal sacrifices would most probably cause wide spread protests and be eventually outlawed in this country. However, a cult that demands human sacrifices on the a global scale — conversion, enslavement, or extermination of all “infidel” everywhere in the world, a cult that is raising its own children for the purpose of dying while committing murder — is respectfully classified as a “monotheistic religion” and “Abrahamic faith”. In reality, it is Satan himself clumsily disguised as a saint.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 Let's now take a look at “innocent civilians” from our side of the fence. An article in the recent issue of New York Times describes a quintessential innocent civilian — a 10-year-old boy from Gaza named Abdul — shot to death by an Israeli soldier. The article, among other things, tells us that Abdul was described by his friends as the smartest kid in his class and that his dream was to become a martyr. Unfortunately for everyone, Abdul wasn't smart enough to abstain from throwing stones at Israeli soldiers, which was exactly how he became a martyr. Fortunately for us, this was not the kind of martyrdom Abdul had in mind: he did not die killing infidels. I can't help asking an ultimately cynical question: how many Israeli or American children would I be willing to sacrifice to allow him to grow up and fulfill his dream? Would four yeshiva students be enough to pay for Abdul's 77 eternal virgins, or should it be something on the scale of September 11?
1
@Odd Fellow , Let's now take a look at “innocent civilians” from our side of the fence. An article in the recent issue of New York Times describes a quintessential innocent civilian — a 10-year-old boy from Gaza named Abdul — shot to death by an Israeli soldier. The article, among other things, tells us that Abdul was described by his friends as the smartest kid in his class and that his dream was to become a martyr. Unfortunately for everyone, Abdul wasn't smart enough to abstain from throwing stones at Israeli soldiers, which was exactly how he became a martyr. Fortunately for us, this was not the kind of martyrdom Abdul had in mind: he did not die killing infidels. I can't help asking an ultimately cynical question: how many Israeli or American children would I be willing to sacrifice to allow him to grow up and fulfill his dream? Would four yeshiva students be enough to pay for Abdul's 77 eternal virgins, or should it be something on the scale of September 11?
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , The essence of that universal goodness remains as obscure as the benevolence that, according to Obama, the American people have found at the heart of Islam. Nevertheless, contrary to Obama assertions, the American people do have quite a few issues with the people of Iran. The Islamic Revolution in Iran was a revolution, not a coup d'état. It was the people of Iran who deposed the shah and brought the ayatollahs to power. The legend goes that the shah's regime was too cruel and inhumane. It most certainly was, but, considering how the Iranian people today put up with the far superior cruelty of the ayatollahs, that was not why they got rid of the shah. They resented the fact that the shah was not hostile towards the West. They resented the fact that shah's rule was too secular. Today's regime in Iran is enormously more cruel and inhumane than the worst days of shah's reign. The shah, you see, had to look good in the eyes of the Westerners. The ayatollahs couldn't care less. It was the people of Iran who stormed the American embassy, took our diplomats hostage, and mutilated the bodies of American servicemen who died during an unsuccessful rescue attempt. It is the people of Iran who endorse the stoning of adulteresses and the hanging of homosexuals. Stoning, by its very nature, requires active participation of the people, because it done by a mob rather than a firing squad. And the hangings. They don't hang them the way they used to do it in civilized countries: the trap door opens, the condemned man falls through, his neck snaps, and he dies instantly. In Iran they bring a construction crane to a city square. The person is slowly hoisted up and slowly suffocated to death. The good people of Iran stand around watching Islamic justice in action. By the way, in Iran, unlike the United States, homosexuality has not become a political movement. Iranian homosexuals put forth no demands. They simply enjoy each other in a manner different from whatever the mullahs have deemed appropriate. For that, they are publicly executed in a country whose supreme leader Ayatollah Khomeini set up special rules for conducting sexual intercourse between Muslim males and cattle and between adult Muslim males and female infants. A naïve person might think that Iran is a country of superb morality. Believe it or not, prostitution there is a booming, and perfectly legal, business. The business of prostitution in Iran is conducted by the mullahs. You see, Islam forbids adultery, but it endorses both temporary marriages and polygamy. For an appropriate fee, a mullah will marry you to a qualified professional for an hour, till morning, or whatever arrangement you can afford. When you are done, he will be on hand to perform the ceremony of divorce. Pimping clerics only in Islam.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , Every nation has the government it deserves. Every nation is responsible for the actions of its leaders. Based on that rule, we bombed Yugoslavia out of existence, even though it never presented any threat to us. Why don't we bomb our real enemies out of existence? What the hell is wrong with us? And whether you believe that the Palestinians constitute a nation or not, they are no exception from that rule either. I challenge you to give me a single example of something good that has ever come from Arabs occupying the land of Israel. I can make it even easier for you: name something good that has ever come from Muslim Arabs, no matter where they come from. And if this is still too difficult, think of any positive contribution to the humankind made by Muslims in general throughout the entire history of their murderous religion of peace. Take your time; the world has been waiting for an answer to the last question for 14 centuries.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 So the so called "Palestinians" are very very very nice people? Do you mean to tell me that we cannot be at war against nice people?" What a question. What a perfectly understandable question! How much easier it must've been to be at war against vampires or cockroaches.We have all read so much about German atrocities during World War II, that it looks to us as appropriate retribution for those atrocities. We feel that the act of killing a German soldier was, in essence, the execution of a condemned criminal who, in all fairness, did not deserve to live due to the extreme depravity of his actions. In reality, more often than not, the dead German soldier was a high-school kid, decent, honest, respectful of his parents, hoping to live through the war, to come home, to meet the girl of his dreams, to become a husband and a father, and to spend the rest of his life as a scientist, or a farmer, or a businessman. More often than not, prior to being killed, he had demonstrated uncommon courage and excellent fighting skills in battle against a formidable enemy. More often than not, he had done absolutely nothing to deserve being killed. Regardless of his personal traits, his death was not a punishment. Killing him was as impersonal an act as issuing a parking ticket. He was killed only because we were at war with Germany and he happened to be wearing a German uniform. Here's the thing. We had to fight and defeat Nazism not because Nazi doctors were all butchers with awful bedside manners or because Nazi college students made unpleasant roommates. We didn't fight Nazism because of the Nazi crimes either, even though those crimes were perfectly real, my eulogy for the dead German soldier notwithstanding. We had to fight Nazism because its existence had become incompatible with the existence of our way of life. If we wanted freedom and democracy to survive in the United States of America, we had no choice but to fight Nazism in Europe and destroy it. Today, if we want freedom and democracy to survive in this country, we must fight Islam and destroy it everywhere it has established roots, which means everywhere, period.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , According to what logic must the ancient Kurdish people be forever denied a country of their own, while concentrated efforts of so many countries and international organizations have been directed, year after year, decade after decade, at promoting Arafat’s terrorist organization to nationhood, at Israel’s expense? If someone can provide an answer that does not, explicitly or implicitly, refer to anti-Semitism, I’d love to hear it. And while I am waiting, most probably in vain, for such an answer, I will ask another question, even more intriguing: Why have all those massive efforts resulted in exactly nothing? Why the so-called “Palestinians”, despite every attempt by Israel’s enemies to turn them into a nation, remain what they have always been since their inception in 1964 — a terrorist organization?
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 Apparently, there is a powerful factor at work that unites proud descendants of those who crossed the ocean on the Mayflower 15 generations ago with those who flock into the United States today from Mexico City, Minsk or Madras, hoping to eventually receive a Green Card. That factor is known as the American dream — a vague term that applies to a vast spectrum of good things not really common outside the United States, from the freedom of speech and religion to a very real opportunity for everyone to earn a decent living for themselves and a bright future for their children. Israel, also being a country of immigrants, although in a very different manner than the United States, has a uniting idea of its own. The “Israeli dream” is called Zionism. I will prudently abstain from any attempt to define it. Suffice it to say that Zionism manages to unite even those Jews who are unable to agree on the true meaning of the term. Does it mean that “Palestine” is impossible due to the lack of a “Palestinian dream”? Most certainly not. If the “Palestinian dream” didn’t exist, it could be invented. The problem is much worse. The “Palestinian dream” does exist, and Arabs do not make a secret out of it: they dream of Israel’s destruction. Today, as they did in Golda Meir’s time, Arabs hate Jews more than they love their own children. Unfortunately, this is not a colorful metaphor. This is an exact description of the horrible reality of the Middle East. The intensity of Arab hatred of Jews exceeds the limits of human imagination
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , Unfortunately this time your are right. America goes down unless people of good will will do something and bring America back to the values of the founding fathers. These measures will include total ban on Islam and massive deportations of traitors, mainly Muslims.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , Open the holy Bible and see the description of the IL borders. The Bible describe IL much larger than the one specified by the UN resolution. The Bible was written 3300 years ago. UN was created 70 year ago. There are no people called "Palestinians". They are generic Arabs. The term "Palestinian People" was invented by the analytical department of KGB USSR in 1964 in the soviet attempt to cause damage to Israel, which is the USA ally, which was the enemy of the USSR. If I were born Arab, I would leave the Jewish land I illegally occupy to one of the 22 Arab Muslim countries with combined area of territory 1000 larger than Israel. This would end the conflict.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , Arabs sincerely believe that Israel has no legitimacy and the land is rightfully theirs. That makes every crime they commit against us an act of heroism in their own eyes. Our views and opinions are of no concern to them, nor should they be. There is no universal concept of good and evil. They have their own ethics, we have ours. So, what should we do in the absence of internationally recognized legal basis for our rather feeble attempts to defend ourselves? Only one thing: free ourselves of the corruption of moral relativism, ignore the irrelevant opinions of the Europeans, and summon the necessary courage to use our superior military might to enforce our own concepts of good and evil, our own understanding of right and wrong with the maximum efficiency and minimum loss of life on our side. This is equally true for Israel in its suffering from the never ending pan-Arab war against it and the United States in its War on Terrorism. After all, every passing day brings new evidence that the two wars are actually one and the same.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 An Islamic court in Nigeria sentenced a woman to death for having sex outside marriage. First, she will be buried up to her neck. Then, a crowd of peaceful and loving co-religionists will begin throwing stones at her head. They will keep at it until the woman dies. The mullahs most probably won't let the stone throwers come too close to the victim: this way the most impressionable among the participants will be spared the goriest details of the torture, and the execution will last longer. I suppose the murderous crowd will consist of members of the community where the condemned woman lived. I can't help wondering if the man who seduced her is going to be among them. He told the court he had nothing to do with the incident and was released for lack of evidence against him. The woman was left with a child and had nowhere to run, nowhere to hide. Not a single Islamic spokesman of any authority has protested the sentence. Peace and love, indeed.
1
@myfavoriteplanet3247 , Google for "samples of stoning in Islam". You will see 600,000 articles and plenty of examples. Here is another story: A Muslim preacher, an educated man of 30, dressed as an Orthodox Jew, put on a bomb belt and boarded a bus crowded with Jews coming home after a service at the Wall. He blew himself up, killing 22 people, including 6 children, some of them babies. He left behind a pregnant wife and two young children of his own. His widow told reporters that her late husband had been dreaming of martyrdom; she was happy that his dream had finally come true. Not a single Islamic spokesman of any authority condemned the crime. Not a single Islamic spokesman of any authority called murdering children an un-Islamic act. Not a single Islamic spokesman of any authority thought it necessary to distance mainstream Islam from such murderous extremism. Love and peace indeed.
1
Let's now take a look at “innocent civilians” from our side of the fence. An article in the recent issue of New York Times describes a quintessential innocent civilian — a 10-year-old boy from Gaza named Abdul — shot to death by an Israeli soldier. The article, among other things, tells us that Abdul was described by his friends as the smartest kid in his class and that his dream was to become a martyr. Unfortunately for everyone, Abdul wasn't smart enough to abstain from throwing stones at Israeli soldiers, which was exactly how he became a martyr. Fortunately for us, this was not the kind of martyrdom Abdul had in mind: he did not die killing infidels. I can't help asking an ultimately cynical question: how many Israeli or American children would I be willing to sacrifice to allow him to grow up and fulfill his dream? Would four yeshiva students be enough to pay for Abdul's 77 eternal virgins, or should it be something on the scale of September 11?
1