Comments by "NobleCrow10" (@NobleCrow10) on "CP24" channel.

  1. 43
  2. 35
  3. 20
  4. 16
  5. 13
  6. Even before Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas terrorists, in between bombing Israeli buses, shot a pregnant Jewish woman and her four daughters, ranging in age from two to eleven years old, on a highway. Several governments and international organizations have made decent but completely meaningless sounds about this. The Arabs unanimously decided to consider the murderers heroes. Nobody was outraged by this. Neither the European Union nor the United States announced a cessation of funding for Arafat's gang, and no one expected this from them. The most eloquent was, perhaps, the reaction of British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. He cursed the terrorist attack that occurred almost simultaneously in Saudi Arabia, but did not mention a word about another terrorist attack in Israel. If he had instead sent Arafat an open letter of congratulations, the effect would have been exactly the same. What is the reason for this selective outrage? I believe that two factors played a role here: first, the killers were Arabs; secondly, their victims are Jews and their minions, Americans. Although, it is possible that I am wrong and everything is just the opposite: firstly, the victims are Jews and their minions, Americans, and, secondly, the killers are Arabs. Or maybe it doesn’t matter to them who the killer is, the main thing is that they kill the Jews and their henchmen, the Americans. Especially the Jews. Let's talk about morality. Why was it moral to bomb the civilians of Belgrade, but not to bomb the frantic and absolutely useless Gaza? Why were the Arabs allowed to desecrate Joseph's tomb with impunity? Why is Khaled Meshaal allowed to hide from retribution in Qatar? Why would expelling Israel's enemies from Israeli soil be immoral, but expelling Israeli civilians from Israeli soil by the Israeli government would not? The standard reference to the Geneva Conventions is meaningless in this case. The Geneva Conventions are only applicable if both parties to the conflict adhere to them. During World War II, in response to Germany's violation of international rules of war, the Allies began systematically destroying German cities, mercilessly killing civilians. Cruel? Undoubtedly. Not fair? Not at all: it was the civilian population of Germany that brought Hitler to power. There was not a single military installation in either Hiroshima or Nagasaki. But the civilian population of these cities, like all of Japan, was forced to pay for supporting the government’s militaristic policies. It was this forced cruelty that allowed us to defeat fascism. Logically, justly and in full accordance with international law, the Arabs have lost the right to protection stipulated by the Geneva Conventions for the civilian population of civilized belligerents. And if our civilization is destined to survive, then sooner or later the Arabs will have to pay a terrible price in blood for dancing and distributing sweets to commemorate massacres, for systematically and completely turning their own children into cannibals, for supporting terrorism, for hating everything healthy that exists in our world. This is very cruel, but absolutely fair.
    11
  7. 9
  8. 8
  9. 6
  10. 5
  11. 5
  12. 5
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 3
  19. 3
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. When the Soviet Union collapsed, freedom came to Baku. The free people joyfully rushed to do what generations of Azerbaijanis had anxiously but vainly dreamed of: smashing the Armenians. People were burned alive, pregnant women had their bellies ripped open, and infants were thrown out of windows. They robbed, of course, too, why miss the opportunity, but, basically, the people were driven by a selfless love for killing defenseless people. Now everything there is civilized: the constitution, elections - everything is like in Damascus, including the transfer of the presidency by inheritance. Do you think democracy is possible in Azerbaijan? When US troops died in a failed attempt to rescue American hostages in Tehran in 1979, their corpses were put on display and desecrated. Do you think democracy is possible in Iran? When armed savages managed to shoot down an American helicopter in Mogadishu in 1993, the jubilant crowd, not embarrassed by press photographers, desecrated the corpses of the dead. Do you think democracy will ever come to Somalia? A similar incident made famous an unnecessary Iraqi city called Fallujah. On the occasion of the war, the circle was full of reporters, and unforgettable images of Arab freedom circulated throughout the world press: the happy faces of young people tearing into pieces the charred corpses of Americans. Think about it: is democracy possible among cannibals? And while you are puzzling over the answer, think at the same time that a society, even in theory, cannot be free if it is not built on the foundation of mutual tolerance. Consider also that the intolerance built into Islam is far more deadly than that which once formed the basis of the Third Reich. Keep in mind that Islam has been brainwashing people, roughly speaking, 120 times longer than this very Reich has existed. Think about whether it is possible to free a slave who dreams not of freedom, but of becoming a slave owner.
    2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. 1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1