Comments by "NobleCrow10" (@NobleCrow10) on "Police investigate 2 hate motivated incidents" video.
-
Even before Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas terrorists, in between bombing Israeli buses, shot a pregnant Jewish woman and her four daughters, ranging in age from two to eleven years old, on a highway.
Several governments and international organizations have made decent but completely meaningless sounds about this. The Arabs unanimously decided to consider the murderers heroes. Nobody was outraged by this. Neither the European Union nor the United States announced a cessation of funding for Arafat's gang, and no one expected this from them.
The most eloquent was, perhaps, the reaction of British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. He cursed the terrorist attack that occurred almost simultaneously in Saudi Arabia, but did not mention a word about another terrorist attack in Israel. If he had instead sent Arafat an open letter of congratulations, the effect would have been exactly the same.
What is the reason for this selective outrage? I believe that two factors played a role here: first, the killers were Arabs; secondly, their victims are Jews and their minions, Americans. Although, it is possible that I am wrong and everything is just the opposite: firstly, the victims are Jews and their minions, Americans, and, secondly, the killers are Arabs. Or maybe it doesn’t matter to them who the killer is, the main thing is that they kill the Jews and their henchmen, the Americans. Especially the Jews.
Let's talk about morality. Why was it moral to bomb the civilians of Belgrade, but not to bomb the frantic and absolutely useless Gaza? Why were the Arabs allowed to desecrate Joseph's tomb with impunity? Why is Khaled Meshaal allowed to hide from retribution in Qatar? Why would expelling Israel's enemies from Israeli soil be immoral, but expelling Israeli civilians from Israeli soil by the Israeli government would not?
The standard reference to the Geneva Conventions is meaningless in this case. The Geneva Conventions are only applicable if both parties to the conflict adhere to them. During World War II, in response to Germany's violation of international rules of war, the Allies began systematically destroying German cities, mercilessly killing civilians. Cruel? Undoubtedly. Not fair? Not at all: it was the civilian population of Germany that brought Hitler to power. There was not a single military installation in either Hiroshima or Nagasaki. But the civilian population of these cities, like all of Japan, was forced to pay for supporting the government’s militaristic policies. It was this forced cruelty that allowed us to defeat fascism.
Logically, justly and in full accordance with international law, the Arabs have lost the right to protection stipulated by the Geneva Conventions for the civilian population of civilized belligerents. And if our civilization is destined to survive, then sooner or later the Arabs will have to pay a terrible price in blood for dancing and distributing sweets to commemorate massacres, for systematically and completely turning their own children into cannibals, for supporting terrorism, for hating everything healthy that exists in our world. This is very cruel, but absolutely fair.
11
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
According to what logic must the ancient Kurdish people be forever denied a country of their own, while concentrated efforts of so many countries and international organizations have been directed, year after year, decade after decade, at promoting Arafat’s terrorist organization to nationhood, at Israel’s expense? If someone can provide an answer that does not, explicitly or implicitly, refer to anti-Semitism, I’d love to hear it.
And while I am waiting, most probably in vain, for such an answer, I will ask another question, even more intriguing: Why have all those massive efforts resulted in exactly nothing? Why the so-called “Palestinians”, despite every attempt by Israel’s enemies to turn them into a nation, remain what they have always been since their inception in 1964 — a terrorist organization?
1
-
1
-
1
-
According to what logic must the ancient Kurdish people be forever denied a country of their own, while concentrated efforts of so many countries and international organizations have been directed, year after year, decade after decade, at promoting Arafat’s terrorist organization to nationhood, at Israel’s expense? If someone can provide an answer that does not, explicitly or implicitly, refer to anti-Semitism, I’d love to hear it.
And while I am waiting, most probably in vain, for such an answer, I will ask another question, even more intriguing: Why have all those massive efforts resulted in exactly nothing? Why the so-called “Palestinians”, despite every attempt by Israel’s enemies to turn them into a nation, remain what they have always been since their inception in 1964 — a terrorist organization?
1
-
Even before Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas terrorists, in between bombing Israeli buses, shot a pregnant Jewish woman and her four daughters, ranging in age from two to eleven years old, on a highway.
Several governments and international organizations have made decent but completely meaningless sounds about this. The Arabs unanimously decided to consider the murderers heroes. Nobody was outraged by this. Neither the European Union nor the United States announced a cessation of funding for Arafat's gang, and no one expected this from them.
The most eloquent was, perhaps, the reaction of British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw. He cursed the terrorist attack that occurred almost simultaneously in Saudi Arabia, but did not mention a word about another terrorist attack in Israel. If he had instead sent Arafat an open letter of congratulations, the effect would have been exactly the same.
What is the reason for this selective outrage? I believe that two factors played a role here: first, the killers were Arabs; secondly, their victims are Jews and their minions, Americans. Although, it is possible that I am wrong and everything is just the opposite: firstly, the victims are Jews and their minions, Americans, and, secondly, the killers are Arabs. Or maybe it doesn’t matter to them who the killer is, the main thing is that they kill the Jews and their henchmen, the Americans. Especially the Jews.
Let's talk about morality. Why was it moral to bomb the civilians of Belgrade, but not to bomb the frantic and absolutely useless Gaza? Why were the Arabs allowed to desecrate Joseph's tomb with impunity? Why is Khaled Meshaal allowed to hide from retribution in Qatar? Why would expelling Israel's enemies from Israeli soil be immoral, but expelling Israeli civilians from Israeli soil by the Israeli government would not?
The standard reference to the Geneva Conventions is meaningless in this case. The Geneva Conventions are only applicable if both parties to the conflict adhere to them. During World War II, in response to Germany's violation of international rules of war, the Allies began systematically destroying German cities, mercilessly killing civilians. Cruel? Undoubtedly. Not fair? Not at all: it was the civilian population of Germany that brought Hitler to power. There was not a single military installation in either Hiroshima or Nagasaki. But the civilian population of these cities, like all of Japan, was forced to pay for supporting the government’s militaristic policies. It was this forced cruelty that allowed us to defeat fascism.
Logically, justly and in full accordance with international law, the Arabs have lost the right to protection stipulated by the Geneva Conventions for the civilian population of civilized belligerents. And if our civilization is destined to survive, then sooner or later the Arabs will have to pay a terrible price in blood for dancing and distributing sweets to commemorate massacres, for systematically and completely turning their own children into cannibals, for supporting terrorism, for hating everything healthy that exists in our world. This is very cruel, but absolutely fair.
1
-
According to what logic must the ancient Kurdish people be forever denied a country of their own, while concentrated efforts of so many countries and international organizations have been directed, year after year, decade after decade, at promoting Arafat’s terrorist organization to nationhood, at Israel’s expense? If someone can provide an answer that does not, explicitly or implicitly, refer to anti-Semitism, I’d love to hear it.
And while I am waiting, most probably in vain, for such an answer, I will ask another question, even more intriguing: Why have all those massive efforts resulted in exactly nothing? Why the so-called “Palestinians”, despite every attempt by Israel’s enemies to turn them into a nation, remain what they have always been since their inception in 1964 — a terrorist organization?
1
-
1