Comments by "NobleCrow10" (@NobleCrow10) on "CNN" channel.

  1. 21
  2. 5
  3. 5
  4. 4
  5. 4
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1
  41. 1
  42. Terror is not the enemy. Terror is just a weapon. As long as we are fighting the weapon instead of the enemy, we are bound to lose. Declaring his war in the wake of September 11, President Bush miserably failed to identify the real enemy. Against all evidence, he emphatically stated, “Islam is not the enemy. Meanwhile our enemies don't even bother to camouflage themselves. On September 11, while hundreds of people were standing on windowsills of the Twin Towers deciding whether to jump or burn alive, a spontaneous celebration began in Muslim communities all over the world, from Cairo, Egypt, to Ramallah, Israel, to Dearborn, MI, to Patterson, NJ, to Brooklyn, NY. Elated Muslim crowds were dancing in the streets and passing sweets around. A friend described to me a scene she witnessed at the ObGyn waiting room of a Manhattan hospital where the TV was showing the tragedy live. Two heavily pregnant Arab women were happily laughing and clapping their hands while watching it. When the first tower fell, they hugged and kissed and began jumping up and down. Obviously, they weren't afraid to shake their fetuses lose in the process, proving once again that Golda Meir was right when she said that Arabs hate us more than they love their own children. The rest of those present didn't interfere: after all, America, even under attack, is still a free country. So, since the president has failed to name the enemy, let us do it and state the obvious. Contrary to his assertions, the enemy is Islam.
    1
  43. 1
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. The best of the Jews returned home and built a country. Its price is unimaginably high. Every centimeter of Eretz Yisroel is fertilized with Jewish blood. Since 1948, Israel has not known a single day of peace. When, instead of a death camp, a prosperous country emerged, anti-Semites invented the myth of the “Palestinian people.” Such a people never existed. This myth is the same anti-Semitic slander as goyish blood in Passover matzah. But can you name at least one country that would not participate in the spread of this slander? Such a country does not exist, just as the “Palestinian people” themselves do not exist. This is anti-Semitism. The name "Palestine" was invented by the Romans as part of their attempt to wipe Israel off the map without a trace. This was pure anti-Semitism. I don't know who invented the name "West Bank". They say it's the KGB. But I know that it is as much a lie as “Palestine.” And the purpose of this lie is the same: to falsify history and geography, to destroy all evidence of Jewish life on Jewish land, to once again rob the Jews of their country. This is anti-Semitism. Is there even one government outside of Israel, one news agency, that calls Judea and Samaria by their real names? No one. This is anti-Semitism. Unfortunately, the “greatest in the entire universe” the Russian people are again, as always, in their vile, deceitful and bloody history - on the side of the barbarians, Arabs and Persians, and as always, the Russians hate Jews, just like their allies in 1939, the German Nazis.
    1
  50. 1
  51. 1
  52. 1
  53. 1
  54. 1
  55. 1
  56. 1
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. In recent years, more and more surveys have been conducted among members of the Arab terrorist organization known as the “Palestinian people.” Sometimes the results of such surveys are quite unexpected. Thus, recently the majority of terrorists surveyed said that they would like for their future country, which they will never have, a form of government similar to Israeli democracy. For some unknown reason, they preferred Israeli democracy to French and even American democracy. Unfortunately, the Taliban was not included in the list of forms of government, so it will forever remain a mystery to us whether the respondents would prefer this most natural system of government for Muslims to Israeli democracy or not. The optimists still remaining in our ranks immediately declared that the choice of the Arabs meant that they did not believe the anti-Semitic myth of apartheid in Israel. In fact, the results of the survey cast doubt on whether the question was understood: we should not forget that democracy is as deeply alien to the Arabs as slavery is to us, and they do not really understand what it is and why it is needed. My doubts were confirmed by the results of another survey conducted almost simultaneously in the same terrorist organization. This time the subjects were asked who they would like to be their leader. Hamas won with a majority of votes. The idea of an Israeli democracy with Hamas at the helm reminded me of the basic law of organic chemistry: if you mix a pound of jam with a pound of feces, you get two pounds of feces.
    1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. Everything has an explanation. I am about to offer you mine. My explanation is that the shah was kicked out not because his regime was oppressive (can you point out an Islamic regime that is not oppressive?), but because, to the discriminating taste of his subjects, his regime was too secular, too liberal, and too pro-Western. From this, it follows easily that the Iranian people prefer the strictest rule of Sharia to any semblance of democracy, and their hatred towards the West exceeds their drive to improve their personal lives. They don't mind stoning adulteresses, hanging homosexuals, and sending their children to die for nothing. They display no desire to pursue their happiness; in fact, they don't seem to share our definition of happiness. They wholeheartedly support the ayatollahs' nuclear ambitions even though there is no way, even in theory, even in the most imbecilic dream, that the possession of nuclear arms can lead their country anywhere but towards self-annihilation. They volunteer en mass for suicide missions against the United States. You know what all that means? It means that they, just like the Arabs, hate us more than they love their own children. That, in turn, means that the Iranian people, or, at least the vast majority of the Iranian people, are religious fanatics. You can also call them Muslim extremists, Islamists, Islamicists, Islamofascists, or feel free to use any of the many synonyms that have been recently invented by Western pundits to explain the paranoid schizophrenia that has taken possession of Dar el-Islam.
    1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. Terror is not the enemy. Terror is just a weapon. As long as we are fighting the weapon instead of the enemy, we are bound to lose. Declaring his war in the wake of September 11, President Bush miserably failed to identify the real enemy. Against all evidence, he emphatically stated, “Islam is not the enemy. Meanwhile our enemies don't even bother to camouflage themselves. On September 11, while hundreds of people were standing on windowsills of the Twin Towers deciding whether to jump or burn alive, a spontaneous celebration began in Muslim communities all over the world, from Cairo, Egypt, to Ramallah, Israel, to Dearborn, MI, to Patterson, NJ, to Brooklyn, NY. Elated Muslim crowds were dancing in the streets and passing sweets around. A friend described to me a scene she witnessed at the ObGyn waiting room of a Manhattan hospital where the TV was showing the tragedy live. Two heavily pregnant Arab women were happily laughing and clapping their hands while watching it. When the first tower fell, they hugged and kissed and began jumping up and down. Obviously, they weren't afraid to shake their fetuses lose in the process, proving once again that Golda Meir was right when she said that Arabs hate us more than they love their own children. The rest of those present didn't interfere: after all, America, even under attack, is still a free country. So, since the president has failed to name the enemy, let us do it and state the obvious. Contrary to his assertions, the enemy is Islam.
    1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. According to every commentary I have read, the main stumbling block on the road to peace, except for the very existence of Israel of course, is the so-called “right of return” of Arabs to the Jewish land. Simple, but elegant: If Israel agrees, it will cease being a Jewish state; if it doesn't, the Arabs, with the support of the peace-loving international community, will have a perfectly legitimate reason to continue fighting Israel. Today, the material support of the “Palestinians” by countries of the still free world remains mostly humanitarian. Humanitarian support is a great invention. For example, if I only have enough money to buy either bread or ammunition, and your humanitarian assistance provides me with bread, then I will be able to afford the ammo as well. As a result, you, with perfectly clear conscience, will be rightfully proud of your good deeds, while I, no longer hungry, can continue killing Jews. Therefore, the only difference between you and Saddam Hussein, when it comes to the support of Arab terrorism against Israel, is that Saddam Hussein no longer supports anything. When “Palestine” — which has never existed in any shape or form — will be commonly recognized as a country, then the necessity to restrict the support of Arab terrorism to humanitarian assistance will disappear, and the peace-loving international community will acquire new, efficient methods of pressuring Israel as long as it ruthlessly refuses to accept a few million Arabs suffering from their homesickness for the Jewish home. I heard that criminals often have an irresistible urge to return to the scene of the crime. Such urge is the only actual basis for the “Palestinian” “right of return”.
    1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1
  93. 1
  94. 1
  95. 1
  96. 1
  97. The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza, Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them. The so called “Palestinians” have only one motivation: the destruction of Israel, and in my book that is not sufficient to consider them a “nation” — or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled. In fact, there is only one way to achieve piece in the Middle East. Arab countries must acknowledge and accept their defeat in their war against Israel and, as the losing side should, pay Israel reparations for the more than 50 years of devastation they have visited on it. The most appropriate form of such reparations would be the removal of their terrorist organization from the land of Israel and accepting Israel's ancient sovereignty over Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. That will mark the end of the Palestinian people. What are you saying again was its beginning? You are absolutely correct in your understanding of the “Palestinians'” murderous motives. I am afraid however that you, along with 99% of the population of this planet have missed the beginning of WWIII (the enemy call it Jihad) quite a few years ago. The siege of the US embassy in Tehran in 1979, an event to which the latest Nobel Peace Prize winner had so miserably failed to respond, can be very well used as the day WWIII stepped out of the pages of the Koran and into the current events. I pray the United States and Israel lead the world to victory in this war. Come to think of it, there is no choice, be you a Christian, a Jew, or even, believe it or not, a Muslim
    1
  98. 1
  99. 1
  100. 1
  101. 1
  102. 1
  103. 1
  104. 1
  105. 1
  106. 1
  107. 1
  108. 1
  109. 1
  110. 1
  111. 1
  112. 1
  113. 1
  114. 1
  115. 1
  116. 1
  117. 1
  118. 1
  119. 1
  120. 1
  121. 1
  122. 1
  123. 1
  124. 1
  125. 1
  126. In recent years, more and more surveys have been conducted among members of the Arab terrorist organization known as the “Palestinian people.” Sometimes the results of such surveys are quite unexpected. Thus, recently the majority of terrorists surveyed said that they would like for their future country, which they will never have, a form of government similar to Israeli democracy. For some unknown reason, they preferred Israeli democracy to French and even American democracy. Unfortunately, the Taliban was not included in the list of forms of government, so it will forever remain a mystery to us whether the respondents would prefer this most natural system of government for Muslims to Israeli democracy or not. The optimists still remaining in our ranks immediately declared that the choice of the Arabs meant that they did not believe the anti-Semitic myth of apartheid in Israel. In fact, the results of the survey cast doubt on whether the question was understood: we should not forget that democracy is as deeply alien to the Arabs as slavery is to us, and they do not really understand what it is and why it is needed. My doubts were confirmed by the results of another survey conducted almost simultaneously in the same terrorist organization. This time the subjects were asked who they would like to be their leader. Hamas won with a majority of votes. The idea of an Israeli democracy with Hamas at the helm reminded me of the basic law of organic chemistry: if you mix a pound of jam with a pound of feces, you get two pounds of feces.
    1
  127. 1
  128. 1
  129. 1
  130. 1
  131. 1
  132. 1
  133. 1
  134. 1
  135. 1
  136. 1
  137. 1
  138. 1
  139. 1
  140. 1
  141. The people who were killed by the rocket were not resurrected because the rocket turned out to be Arab and not Jewish. Then why did the indignation in Western countries immediately fade away as soon as it became clear that Israel was not to blame for this particular incident? Palestinians in the Hospital were killed by Islamic Jihad terrorists. Why doesn't anyone condemn Terrorists for committing war crimes? The UN is silent, Trudeau is silent, Amnesty International is silent, the BBC and CBC are silent, socialists and liberals around the world who only yesterday were indignant about the “barbaric murder” of civilians in the Hospital by bloodthirsty Zionists, today quickly cooled down and forgot both the victims of this crime and the criminals themselves. The only people who continue to blame Israel are Muslims and Putin's zombie-box. How why? For both Muslims and Russians, the pogrom against Jews has always been a favorite sport. Hatred of Jews is what unites these two dissimilar “peace-loving” peoples. The Russians killed 1,240,000 Muslims in Afghanistan, 200,000 in Chechnya, and 9,000 in Syria. In total, 250,000 civilians were killed in the Syrian civil war, of which 4,000 were Palestinian Arabs. These victims were talked about at seminars and lectures, but they never caused such a surge of emotions as the death of several dozen, and not 500, as previously stated, Arabs in the hospital. This episode perfectly demonstrates the importance of anti-Semitism in international politics.
    1
  142. 1
  143. 1
  144. 1
  145. 1
  146. 1
  147. 1
  148. 1
  149. 1
  150. 1
  151. 1
  152. 1
  153. 1
  154. 1
  155. 1
  156. 1
  157. 1
  158. 1
  159. 1
  160. 1
  161. 1
  162. 1
  163. Everything has an explanation. I am about to offer you mine. My explanation is that the shah was kicked out not because his regime was oppressive (can you point out an Islamic regime that is not oppressive?), but because, to the discriminating taste of his subjects, his regime was too secular, too liberal, and too pro-Western. From this, it follows easily that the Iranian people prefer the strictest rule of Sharia to any semblance of democracy, and their hatred towards the West exceeds their drive to improve their personal lives. They don't mind stoning adulteresses, hanging homosexuals, and sending their children to die for nothing. They display no desire to pursue their happiness; in fact, they don't seem to share our definition of happiness. They wholeheartedly support the ayatollahs' nuclear ambitions even though there is no way, even in theory, even in the most imbecilic dream, that the possession of nuclear arms can lead their country anywhere but towards self-annihilation. They volunteer en mass for suicide missions against the United States. You know what all that means? It means that they, just like the Arabs, hate us more than they love their own children. That, in turn, means that the Iranian people, or, at least the vast majority of the Iranian people, are religious fanatics. You can also call them Muslim extremists, Islamists, Islamicists, Islamofascists, or feel free to use any of the many synonyms that have been recently invented by Western pundits to explain the paranoid schizophrenia that has taken possession of Dar el-Islam.
    1
  164. 1
  165. 1
  166. 1
  167. 1
  168. 1
  169. 1
  170. 1
  171. 1
  172. 1
  173. 1
  174. 1
  175. 1
  176. 1
  177. 1
  178. 1
  179. 1
  180. 1
  181. 1
  182. 1
  183. 1
  184. 1
  185. 1
  186. 1
  187. 1
  188. 1
  189. 1
  190. 1
  191. 1
  192. 1
  193. 1
  194. 1
  195. 1
  196. 1
  197. 1
  198. 1
  199. 1
  200. 1
  201. 1
  202. 1
  203. 1
  204. 1
  205. 1
  206. 1
  207. 1
  208. 1
  209. 1
  210. 1
  211. 1
  212. 1
  213. 1
  214. 1
  215. 1
  216. 1
  217. 1
  218. 1
  219. 1
  220. 1
  221. 1
  222. 1
  223. 1
  224. 1
  225. 1
  226. I hoped you avoid the temptation to trace the modern day “Palestinians” to the Biblical Philistines: substituting etymology for history won't work here. Here is the least sarcastic question of all: If the people you mistakenly call “Palestinians” are anything but generic Arabs collected from all over — or thrown out of — the Arab world, if they really have a genuine ethnic identity that gives them right for self-determination, why did they never try to become independent until Arabs suffered their devastating defeat in the Six Day War? The truth should be obvious to everyone who wants to know it. Arab countries have never abandoned the dream of destroying Israel; they still cherish it today. Having time and again failed to achieve their evil goal with military means, they decided to fight Israel by proxy. For that purpose, they created a terrorist organization, cynically called it “Palestinian people” and installed it in Gaza, Judea, and Samaria. How else can you explain the refusal by Jordan and Egypt to unconditionally accept back the “West Bank” and Gaza, respectively? The fact is, Arabs populating Gaza, Judea, and Samaria have much less claim to nationhood than that Indian tribe that successfully emerged in Connecticut with the purpose of starting a tax-exempt casino: at least that tribe had a constructive goal that motivated them. The so called “Palestinians” have only one motivation: the destruction of Israel, and in my book that is not sufficient to consider them a “nation” — or anything else except what they really are: a terrorist organization that will one day be dismantled.
    1
  227. 1
  228. 1
  229. 1
  230. 1
  231. 1