Comments by "Old Scientist" (@OldScientist) on "Could tech protect our coral reefs? | BBC News" video.
-
5
-
3
-
3
-
@Aaronwhatnow You'll have to be specific about which reports. I have certainly read some reports.
Here's a prècis:
The Northern region reached a low point in 2016. However, it has since completely recovered, with coral cover now at double the 2016 level, and recording record cover.
The Central region has experienced a greater degree of fluctuation, but is also now at record high coral cover.
The Southern region is now at record equalling coral cover, three times higher than at its low point in 2011.
Every region is at record-equalling high coral cover, once uncertainty estimates are taken into account.
For example take Capricorn Bunkers. This is one of the sections within the Southern Region (one of eleven). In 2022, Capricorn Bunkers had record high coral cover of 59%, around four times the lowest value, seen in 2011, of 16%. This doesn't do it justice though as the data for the reef shows a great degree of variability. This is natural. The reef always recovers strongly. And it's got nothing to do with CO2.
Increases in bleaching events has not prevented rapid and record increases in coral cover. AIMS states "Percent hard coral cover is one standard measure of reef condition recorded by scientists worldwide, it provides a simple and robust measure of reef health" with that in mind, and it being such a robust measure, let's just say it loud and clear: hard coral cover is at record-equalling levels in all three sectors of the GBR.
Crown of Thorns Starfish are also a non-problem. Northern: no starfish or no outbreak on all reefs. Central: no starfish or no outbreaks. Southern: out of 30 reefs, 27 had no starfish or no outbreaks.
And once more, oh yes, there is record hard coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef. And that is a robust measure of reef health. What a robust reef!
3
-
1