Comments by "Old Scientist" (@OldScientist) on "WFLA News Channel 8" channel.

  1. 9
  2. 6
  3. 4
  4. 3
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. @hosnimubarak8869  The Party line is the number and length of heatwaves has increased globally (1950-2014) as you would expect in a slowly warming world, but there is no trend for average intensity (Perkins-Kirkpatrick and Lewis, 2020, also ref. by IPCC). However, data that these heatwave assumptions are built upon are largely non-existent or fabricated. At least with the one data source GHCN it shows there is no reliable data going back to the 1950s across almost the whole of Indonesia, India, Arabia, Africa, plus Central and South America. The other data source Berkeley Earth "observational" dataset - now that's a misrepresentation! - just makes it up. It's supposed to be high resolution (1° lat, 1° long) and go back to 1850. So I thought, hmm, the Horn of Africa and Arabia are looking a bit toasty and red on the maps. Let's check out the data. I found Berkeley Earth’s data sources. I reviewed WMO, GSOD, and NCAR. For the period reviewed in the paper (1950-2014) in the Horn of Africa there were no meteorological station that cover that period. That's right - zero. In the whole of Arabia there were three, just three. Just like Arabia, the whole thing is built on sand. Very interestingly, if you look at the charts on Fig. 1 on the paper, the US, especially the eastern half looks distinctly unaffected by any increase in heatwaves. Bit of a blue tinge there, I think you'll agree. It's much more difficult to fudge that one because of the huge number of long-term meteorological stations in the US. And why do they start in 1950, and not 1930 or 1900? Hmm.
    1