Comments by "Old Scientist" (@OldScientist) on "USA TODAY" channel.

If you took away El Niño and Tonga (both natural events) there would be nothing to see. Sea surface temperatures were trending downwards 2000-2018 (HadSST 4), and from 1950-1980, and from 1880-1910. The oceans warmed at a faster rate 1910-1940 than 1980-2010. Remember CO2 has been accumulating in the atmosphere at an accelerating rate all the time, so there is little correlation between the two.
1
Don't worry, there's nothing to be concerned about. There is no objective observational evidence that we are living in a global climate crisis. The IPCC AR6, chapter 12 "Climate Change Information for Regional Impact and for Risk Assessment", section 12.5.2, table 12.12 confirms there is a lack of evidence or no signal that the following have changed: Air Pollution Weather (temperature inversions), Aridity, Avalanche (snow), Average precipitation, Average Wind Speed, Coastal Flood, Agricultural drought, Hydrological drought, Erosion of Coastlines, Fire Weather (hot and windy), Flooding From Heavy Rain (pluvial floods), Frost, Hail, Heavy Rain, Heavy Snowfall and Ice Storms, Landslides, Marine Heatwaves, Ocean Acidity, Radiation at the Earth’s Surface, River/Lake Floods, Sand and Dust Storms, Sea Level, Severe Wind Storms, Snow, Glacier, and Ice Sheets, Tropical Cyclones. There is no objective observational evidence that we are living through a global climate crisis. None.
1
@catalinamaria9169 You appear to be using anecdotal evidence to support your desires. I have an anecdote. A friend of mine has farmed all his life in Carmarthenshire, UK. I discussed climate change with him recently. He had spoken with the old men in the village and considered the changes in his own lifetime. The only thing he could barely discern was that the grass started growing again a little earlier in the spring by a few days on average. Maybe a week. Apart from that the weather was as changeable as it ever was. Upon reflection he was satisfied with that. More grass meant healthier cattle. That's the problem with anecdotal evidence, it's very subjective, so it's of little value in isolation for a big issue like global climate change.
1