Comments by "Dylan Vogler" (@dylanvogler2165) on "US plans to send controversial cluster munitions to Ukraine - BBC News" video.

  1. ​ @bbcisaids6727 why won't you fight for Putin then?
    9
  2. And what should Ukraine have done with nukes of which it didn't have the launch codes?
    2
  3. @Goe007  yes I agree. I wish the West would support them more as well. And well I am lucky me and my friends aren't in occupied territory. My friends in Izium got liberated last year. A father of a friend of mine is fighting near Bakhmut now. I am worried. But yeah you're right, there are alot of traitors too. The biggest insult for me is to call me pro Russian though, I am not a Moskal )). Stay safe mate and let's see when Crimea and Donbass are finally liberated too. Because as you know Крим і Донбас - це Україна! About the genocide.... yeah I know. It is something the Russians have been doing for ages. The last strike on Lviv was also just done because it is the centre of Ukrainian culture. I genuinely hate Russia and the Moskals. Слава Україні! Смерть ворогам! Україна переможе!
    2
  4. ​ @samsonsoturian6013 that's false
    2
  5. Until you realize Russia has these mines as well
    2
  6. ​ @davidnoelfranks1124 there is literal footage of it.
    2
  7. ​ @nirmalsiva1 would be the dumbest mistake Putin makes. It would result in direct NATO involvement as well as China withdrawing support. As China too warned against the use of nuclear weapons.
    1
  8.  @Goe007  and then they would have had worthless nuclear warheads in the 90's with Russia invading them. You don't seem to know much about the actual history surrounding the Budapest Memorandum. Besides the fact that Ukraine might have had difficulties maintaining them (the UA economy fell hard after independence), Russia litterally threatend to take them away by force.
    1
  9.  @Goe007  "your emperors", mate I am in Ukraine right now. What about you? Don't call me pro Russian, I am not a Moskal. Also where did I say Ukraine shouldn't get nuclear weapons in the future? I actually support Ukraine getting them as a deterrent. I was specifically talking about 1994, at which time keeping the nukes would have brought war to Ukraine, so at the time, they did the best option. I am also not afraid of nukes. My family is from Doentsk (I am half Dutch, half Ukrainian) and I lived in the Donbass myself as well. I know how it is to live with Russia as a neighbour. Next time before you acxuse someone of something. Use your brain. Again I rapport Ukraine getting nucleair wapens after the war and I think '94 was horrible for Ukraine in hindsight, but at that time it was the only real option. Anyway I am in Odesa now and going to Kharkiv soon because my girl returned for a few weeks from Kharkiv and I can see her now. What about you? Where in Ukraine are you?
    1
  10.  @samsonsoturian6013  😑 sure buddy
    1
  11.  @samsonsoturian6013  no it isn't. But a dumb comment gets a dumb response. I know perfectly well what they do and I support my country banning them. At the same time I support Ukraine getting them. But to state the treaty was signed due to the 100 countries not having said weapon, is false. But I guess you're American, the arrogance at least checks out.
    1
  12. Lmao the hypocrisy. Russia has been using these weapons since the start of the war
    1
  13. ​ @davidcritchley3509 who invaded who Vatnik?
    1
  14. ​@radojicaraduljyou mean on Ukraine using a weapon that they, as well as Russia itself, have been using since the start of the war? Please enlighten me.
    1
  15. For what? Both sides gave been using these weapons since the start of the war.
    1
  16. I didn't know the US speaks for all of NATO nowadays.. besides the fact that what you describe literally the case is with Russia's USSR cluster munitions...
    1
  17. @pnh9399  I think you must learn what a defensive alliance is, as that is exactly what you described and what NATO is. As yes vatnik, NATO only responds when a NATO country is invaded. It is exactly the same in the CSTO and why Kazachstan said no to Russia as is neutral in the conflict. You exactly prove the point about what NATO is. Congratulations, you played yourself vatnik. NATO has no responsibilities or rights in the souvereign discussions of its members states. There was plenty of criticism of the American actions, but in the end it is their own decision to make. You are the perfect example of the fact that being a vatnik is synonymous with having a low IQ. Anyone with any decent intelligence wouldn't have asked the questions you just did.
    1
  18. Relevant how?
    1
  19. Meanwhile the USSR lost in the same country, losing more men 🤦. When did imperialism did have a good example then? As you seem to be supporting Russian Imperialism.
    1
  20. "Escalates". Mate both sides have been using cluster munitions since the start of the war.
    1
  21. ​ @soreeyez ah yes I remember NATO troops invading Ukraine and bombing Ukrainian cities... ohw wait no, that was Russia.
    1
  22. Meanwhile Russia has been using clusterbombs since the start of the war.. congratulations, you are an hypocrite.
    1
  23. Until you realize Russia has been using these weapons since the start of the war as well.
    1
  24. ​@soreeyez yes they do. But invading another country isn't self defense. Imperialism isn't protected by the UN charter.. sorry.
    1
  25. @soreeyez  what are you using? Can I have some of it too? Maybe look up the definition of imperialism )) what Russia does (wanting to decide what its neighbours can and can't do) is litterally imperialism lol. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed are you? Also self defence? Against who? Ukraine was no threat to Russia. Ukraine was just minding its on business in 2014 and afterwards )). Also look up the meaning of an invasion )) It seems language isn't your talent )) The UN charter doesn't consider "preemptive strikes" as self defense either. It sees it as an act of aggression, something confirmed by a vast majority in the UN general assembly
    1
  26. "Terrorist attacks". Meanwhile Russia bombs civilians in Lviv, 1000+ km away from the front.
    1
  27. Russia and Ukraine have been using these weapons since the start of the war...
    1
  28. Wow maybe give up your land for peace. Maybe don't forget who invaded who, my little vatnik friend.
    1
  29. Lmao Italy? That is a new one 😂😂.
    1
  30. Russia and Ukraine have both been using them from the start of the war...
    1
  31. ​@bbcisaids6727 so go fight for Putin, долбоеб
    1
  32. Russia uses them too....
    1
  33. @jakepotter8810  all you do is whataboutism man. Are you 6 years old? The fact you lump "the West" together instead of recognising it is mostly the US, says enough. The irony is, that the conditions of modern Afghanistan were said when the USSR invaded it. Russia/USSR has invaded Afghanistan, Chechyna, Georgia (twice), Moldova, Ukraine (twice) and is also involved in Syria (where it destroyed Aleppo). You are the hypocrite here. "American imperialism bad! But Russian imperialism is okay!" Both are bad, one doesn't justify the other. So again, the only hypocrite is you. As you know how bad such invasions are, but are okay with Russia doing it.
    1
  34. Anti personal mines are banned too. For the same reason as cluster munitions. The risk of civilian casualties due to the nature of the weapon.
    1
  35. And yet the wars in the middle east were started by a Republican
    1
  36. Russia uses the same weapons 🤦. Neither Ukraine, Russia or the US have signed the treaty banning the use of these munitions.
    1
  37. ​​ @JohnofthefamilySmith they started the conflict in 2014 in Ukraine". No Russia did when they invaded Crimea and supplied weapons to an extremist minority in the Donbass. Also boy I don't want to tell you how much people the USSR/Russia killed in the last 80 years lol. And if we make it 90 years we can count alot of its own people in that number.
    1
  38.  @JohnofthefamilySmith  my point being that whataboutism is kinda pointless. But I am curious, as someone from.tne Donbass, what you think the truth is of what happend here))
    1
  39. Meanwhile Russia has been using cluster munitions since the start of the war🤡
    1
  40. @bbcisaids6727  goos luck bro. They won't do anything to me for telling the truth. It is common knowledge that Russia (and Ukraine too) has been using cluster munitions from the start of the war. Besides footage, including in Chernihiv and Kharkiv (where they even showed unexploded cluster munitions), it is also stated as such by human rights groups, including the one that also stated that at Izium, it were the Ukrainians who used cluster munition. I am most certainly biased, but I clearly are more objective than you are. Good luck with sending false rapport though, YT tends to appreciate that )) хуйло. How is it to live in a world where you can just deny reality the way you do?
    1
  41. @bbcisaids6727  so the real question is, are you a Russia troll, or do you actually believe the bs you say yourself? I hope it is the first, otherwise you clearly have 5 braincells and nothing more. Both Russia and Ukraine haven't signed the treaty that bans clustermunitions, and neither does the US btw. Why do you think that is? Lmao even a small brain like you should understand.
    1
  42. The irony being that some people from Donetsk themselves, said it was probably the Russians. As Russia has these mines too.
    1
  43. @tonysherwood9619  I know, my family is from Donetsk and I have lived in Donetsk oblast myself. But the point being that you, as a true vatnik, just blame Ukraine, when people from the city itself, aren't so sure about it ))
    1
  44.  @tonysherwood9619  you mean the weapons that Russia has been using from the start? Come on Vatnik, you can do better than this.
    1