Comments by "Dylan Vogler" (@dylanvogler2165) on "Ukraine backs UN call for Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant safe zone - BBC News" video.

I have never seen so much bs in one comment. I think it's a record.
7
@antipropo461 I didn't know we were fighting Russia, please enlighten me? I thought it was the Russo-Ukrainian war 🤔. That said I support a UN mission to the NPP (blue helmets) and not a NATO mission for obvious reasons. But the Russians rather keep their nuclear blackmail card Also you started your comment with an ad hominem. Totally unnecessary and it actually makes the point you try to make weaker.
5
@davidnoelfranks1124 actually he is right. An inspector asked why the rocket (which was stuck in the ground) was stuck in this particular position as the position it was in, seemed to indicate it was fired from the south (occupied territory). To which the Russian guide, and I am not joking, said that when a rocket hits the ground, it will rotate 180° and that is the reason the rocket was in this position. There actually was a video in the media about this. It turns out that you are the bot.
3
@vru9267 now they claim it is HIMARS, which they have claimed to have destroyed btw, and if that doesn't work they'll say it is Azov.
2
@vru9267 yes it would as you could circumvent them and make the come in from the Russian side.
2
@vru9267 yeah they did, this is why they claim to have destroyed more Himars than Ukraine actually has gotten from the US.
2
Because they haven't? Why would Ukraine shell its own NPP which, if a disaster develops from this, would hit them the most? Not to mention that the inspectors also indicated specifically that the Russian troops need to leave. Russian soldiers would not even talk to the inspectors, how about disrespect for the UN. There's also a video of an inspector asking why the rocket, stuck in the ground, is in an angle that suggests it was launched from the south (occupied territory). To which the biggest meme reply ever was given by the guide :"rockets rotate 180° when they hit the ground". I wish this was a joke, but yeah he really did say that.
2
@vru9267 no they don't have such weapons. it is funny though. According to the Russians the Ukrainians now have rockets than can turn either 180° during flight when near their target or when they hit their target/ground. That's some neat technology lmao.
1
@westhuizenarchives2614 uhm no mate. The Russian army was collapsing until Hitler made the brilliant move of declaring war on the US after Pearl Harbour. US landlease helped stabilize the eastern front. What you are spewing here is the Soviet myth. The reason D-Day was launched was because Stalin kept asking for a second front to take some pressure of the Eastern front. Without allied support, we can doubt that the USSR would have won considering the imense losses of both men and equipment. Whilst men could be replaced by the USSR, they relied on US lendlease for equipment. The USSR needed the allies as much as the allies needed the USSR. That one country is the sole reason the war was won (or beating Germany on its own) be it USSR, UK or USA, is a myth. Nothing more, nothing less.
1
@dinara_ti good English mate. Also it kinda shows how much of a sad person if this is all you can say. Does this make you happy? Is the rest of your life so terrible that you find joy in this? Wouldn't be surprised since your Russian but still. And about your question, yeah doing fine mate, as we luckily don't come from a sh*thole like yourself. About the Western achievements.. you are litterally emulating the West with everything... Russia hates the west, yet you try to copy us with everything lol. At this very moment you are using a Western site/app, on the internet which is a Western invention and the phone/tablet/PC that you're using, has Western tech in it. What has Russia contributed to humanity after the fall of the USSR? Nothing. Nothing at all. You're so unimportant that we would not even discuss you in our countries before the war. China has taken your place as being the important rival.
1
@user-g5xnx7gjqb lmao first it was always Azov, no it is always HIMARS. Can you explain to me how it are the HIMARS if Russia claimed it had destroyed them all? Not to mention that there is actual media showing the inspectors asking why the rocket stuck in the ground, seems to be fired from the south...
1
@user-g5xnx7gjqb Russian fascination about Goebbels is hilarious. Especially considering their own leader using rethoric comparable with that of Hitler. Also, as I pointed out earlier, there seems to be evidence pointing to rockets being launched from the south. Then there is the part that the IAEA mission is not about finding who is responsible and that ,regardless of whom is responsible, it is insane that there are military forces in a NPP in the first place. It should be demilitarized and under UN control. The fact Ukraine accepts this (whilst it is Ukrainian territory) and Russia declines it (whilst it is a occupational force) says enough doesn't it?
1
@user-g5xnx7gjqb nice way to twist the Russian claims. The Ukrainians joke about the Russian claims that they destroyed then all, if you don't understand this, I feel sorry for those around you. Haven't you destroyed the Ukrainian airforce like 3 times by now?
1
@tomtube1012 no not China. Let neutral countries do it. Maybe Kazakhstan, Indonesia countries like this
1
Lol
1
@voodooillusion7219 lol ww2? Really. I could also point to the Holodomor then 🤦‍♂️
1