Comments by "Dylan Vogler" (@dylanvogler2165) on "Russia’s Biggest Problem: Ukrainians Want to Keep Fighting" video.

Крим - це Україна! Слава Україні!
64
@Avidire in ww2, you would have been a nazi colleberator ))
15
@dragosstanciu9866 Ukrainian is closer to Belarusian, Polish and Slovakian, than Russian. One of the easiest examples Ukrainian : Дякую (Dyakuyu), Belarusian: Дзякуй (Dziakuj), Polish: Dziękuję, Slovakian: Ďakujem and Czech: Děkuji. Compare this to the Russian : Спасибо (spasibo). So whilst they have similiarities, they are not the same. I for example speak Russian, but not Ukrainian (although I am studying it now).
3
@tomk3732 and before Ukraine it was known as Ruthenia. So what is your point? Little Russia is an imperialist term. Czechia was known as Bohemia until the 20th century. Does it mean Czech identity only came into existence in the 20th century? No. Try harder with the propaganda.
3
@mesofius yes and English and Dutch are quite different lol. If you only speak Dutch, you have a heard time understanding English. Of kun je me nu precies vertellen wat ik gezegd heb? Do you get my point?
3
@gabor6259 and yet Ukraine didn't ban it. I am speaking Russian with Ukrainians right now lol. As I am in Ukraine for humanitarian aid
3
 @gerri577 ah yes because he is the one justifying the war, not the ones actually invading. It's clear you would have blamed not Nazi Germany, bot the allies for ww2.
2
@quartermaster1976 "Ukraine fought for Germany" this is a blatant lie. The Ukrainian SSR fought on the side of the USSR and the few that fought on the German side (as did Belarusians and Russians btw, but a Moskal doesn't know history, he only knows myths) pale in comparison to the millions fighting for the USSR. You also forget to mention why some joined the Germans, namely the Holodomor. Ukraine, and Belarus, lost a larger percentage of their populations for the victory than Russia did. Don't appropriate the victory of the USSR and its many peoples, to just Russia.
2
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr lmao bro how deluded are you? Ukraine was banned in the Russian Empire so obviously it only became an official language in 1918 🤣. It's like me saying that Frisian isn't a real language because my country had bannend it until the 20th century 🤣
2
@rottenproten142 whilst he is wrong about the Golden Horde, your assesment is wrong too. Russian and Ukrainian are like Dutch and German. Ironically Ukrainian is closer to Belarusian, Polish and Slovakian, in that order, than Russian
1
@ЧеловекЧеловекович-и9ч yeah I can't pronounce палиниця either. 😂. Friend from Izium says I sound like a Russian lol (and I'm not even Russian 😂, although I speak the language). I am now trying to learn Ukrainian though.
1
 @gezalesko3813 bs claim which in unsupported by actual evidence. Saying this as someone with family and friends in the Donbass.
1
@gerri577 1. Donbass is majority ethnic Ukrainian, the Russians are a minority there. 2. Nobody cares what your ethnicity is, it is a Russian obsession not a Ukrainian one. 3. The insurrection started because of Russian intervention, including arming and funding the seperatists and even stationing Russian troops there. Even Girkin admitted this. 4. Pro Ukrainian critics and people in the so called DNR and LNR where killed or had to flee to save their lives. 5. DNR and LNR constantly broke the ceasefire agreements within Minsk and Minsk II. As you can read in the OSCE rapport. 6. DNR and LNR were supposed to hold Ukrainian elections in order for Minsk II to be implemented, they never did And yes I know what I talk about, my family is from Donetsk (the city) and I myself lived for a while in Donestk oblast (Kramatorsk) during my studies.
1
@gabor6259 in many countries it is normal to have education in the language of the country you are in. Secondly, you're free to speak any language, including Russian, in public anytime you want. I barely speak Ukrainian and therefore only spoke Russian during my time in Ukraine. Including when visiting Ukrainian speaking towns like Lviv and Ternopil. I support the law as it saw the opening of more Ukrainian language schools, as before the most schools had been Russian language schools due to the extensive Russification policies of the USSR and the Russian Empire. Some examples of the anti Ukrainian language russification policies were: 1863 – Circular issued by Russia's minister of internal affair Pyotr Valuyev prohibiting censors from giving permission to the publication of Ukrainian spiritual and popular educational literature. 1864 – Adoption of the Charter of the primary school at which education was to be conducted only in Russian. (Quite ironic that you are now crying about Ukraine doing it isn't it?). 1876 - Alexander II's Ems decree banning the printing and importing from abroad of any text in Ukrainian, with exceptions of belles lettres and historical records, it also banned stage performances, public recitations and schooling in Ukraine, as well as it ordered removal of all Ukrainian books from school libraries, teachers that were suspected of Ukrainophilism were to be transferred outside of Ukraine. 1926 – Stalin's letter to "Comrade. Kaganovich and other members of the Politburo of the Central Committee of the CP (B) U with the sanction of the struggle against the "national bias", the beginning harassment of "Ukrainization". (Ukrainization, a term you orcs love to throw around now as well). There was a time in which giving your children Ukrainian names (so Volodymyr instead of Vladimir) was illegal. Learn some actual history before speaking.
1
@rottenproten142 language develop. German and Dutch were once dialects from each other, that is no longer the case. So that argument doesn't really matter. Also the part about the Russian peasants, this has more to do with Surzhyk than actual Ukrainian.
1
@neutralevil1917 and here we have the Moskal believing all his führer tells him. I am Dutch and understand 90% of German,, doesn't it mean German is a Dutch dialect? Low German is even more similar to Dutch so I guess that is a Dutch dialect too. Frisian is actually just an English dialect in your way of thinking. Also you do know that the "low" and "high" in languages, in for example, German doesn't have to do with one being higher than the other right? Low German is called as such because it is in the low laying lands, in German itself it is plattdeutsch (flat German, as the land is flat there), whilst High German (Hoch Deutsch) is called as Such because it is tradionally spoken in the South of Germany, Switzerland (different dialect) and Austria (also different dialect of High German), you know, the parts were there are MOUNTAINS.
1
@rottenproten142 yeah the guy saying Golden Horde is a bit far to the opposite side of the propaganda scale lol. But yeah I speak Russian and also a bit of Czech (I have family in Donetsk and another part of the family is originally from CZ) and for me Czech is closer to Ukrainian is terms of word use, than Russian is. Grammatically Ukrainian, to me, seems more Russian however. I don't speak Ukrainian yet (well a little bit) but am studying it and find that I have more use of my knowledge of Czech and Polish (I have had alot of Polish friends lol) than Russian (except for the alphabet ofcourse). But fair enough mate. Good to see there are normal people on here too haha
1
@neutralevil1917 speaking a language, doesn't mean you know everything about it. Your statement literally doesn't make sense as Ukrainian is closer to Belarusian, Polish and Slovakian, than Russian. So I guess in your orc mind, they're all Russian dialects?
1
@vrado441 as an ethnic Ukrainian. No I am not ethnic Russian. Don't tell me, or others, what we are and focus on yourself please.
1
@gerri577 no this is false too. Besides the fact that "Ukros" is a racist slur, in all oblasts of Ukraine, the majority identifies as ethnic Ukrainian. Only in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea the majority identifies as ethnic Russian. You are just blatenly repeating Russian Imperialist myths. Also the same can be said about Russia, so it should be divided amongst ethnic lines?
1
@vrado441 besides the racist slur, 400k? Any credible source for that? As that literally contradics the reality we see
1
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr this is false. The first Ukrainian texts are found in the Hetmenate of the 17th century. Surzhyk was never the name used for Ukrainian and is a term used to this day to describe a mixture of Russian and Ukrainian spoken it parts of Ukraine AND Russia. Also good luck mate, them with your arrogance come to Ukraine as your think you'll speak Ukrainian like any Ukrainian would. I think you end up in a funny place )). Once more a Moskal blindly spreading Russian Imperialist Propaganda. You know who also denied te existence of other countries and peoples? The Nazis. So congratulations, you sound like a follower of Hitler. The last point I make is, that not you, not Putn, not the Russian state, not anyone, but the Ukrainians can decide what they are and what their language is. You, and the fascist state you support, have no say in how Ukrainians self identify.
1
@alexlazar4738 Russian is closer to Church Slavonic yes. And there you have it. Church Slavonic =/= Eastern Slavic. Ukrainian and Belarusian are closer to the language of the Kyivan Rus' than Russian is. That said, the Golden Horde part was bs lol
1
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr Ukrainians (and Belarusians) aren't Russians. That is like saying Dutch, English, Flemish and Frisian people, are Germans. People's divert, it's normal. Also Western-Ukraine wasn't a protectorate of Poland and Austria(-Hunagry) they were fully integrated parts of it. You just randomly throw terms everywhere. You have not studied history at any higher level than high school, that much is clear.
1
@gerri577 Western Ukraine saw the USSR just as much as occupiers as Nazi Germany. Which isn't weird considering that part of Ukraine had never been part of the Russian Empire of USSR before 1939. Also, having to choose between Stalin and Hitler, not an easy choice. There is no ethnic difference between those living in Western Ukraine and those living in the East. The irony in this comment section alone is funny. We have the All-Russian nation Moskals who say that all Ukrainians are actually Russians and then we have the other Moskals who contradict them by saying that there are two ethnicities in Ukraine. Which one is it going to be orcs?
1
@sershulginsperspective9339 maybe you should go to? Keyboard warriot
1
@Ian-vj5pv this is also bs. The first written records of Ukrainian are from the 17th century Cossack Hetmenate. As the Ukrainian peasantry was known to speak the language.
1
@Romkosss the majority is still Ukrainian though. But yes the Russians colonized it with alot of ethnic Russians after holodomor
1
@quartermaster1976 yes you're 100% a Moskal. Justifying the Holodomor and yet you call Ukrainians nazis 🤡. Hitler would be proud of you.
1
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr the name of a country literally doesn't matter one bit. Romania means the land of the Romans. I guess we should all recognise them as the true successor to Rome then. Modern Ghana doesn't even overlap with ancient Ghana and the same applies to Benin and Mauritania.
1
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr lmao look at you even trying to justify the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact hahaha. Hitler would be so proud. Also tell me how Western Ukraine is historical Russian land as it was never part of the Rus' and never part of the Russian Empire or the USSR before 1939. I am waiting ))
1
@Ian-vj5pv this too is false. Ukrainian distinct national and cultural identity started in the 17th century. Also each people and country had to start at a certain time. So a bit of a dumb argument.
1
@antoniussamuelson3748 Polish is Slavic to. Just West-Slavic instead of Russia's East-Slavic.
1
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr again I refer to situation of the Frisian language in the Netherlands. Which also wasn't recognized as such and actively banned and prosecuted. Russia systematically moved against the Ukrainian language, whatever the name at the time had been. Whilst the Moskals used their imperialist term of Little Russian, it was known as Ruthenian is the rest of Europe )).
1
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr my country litterally means "Low lands" and used to called "those lands over there" by the French. No the names don't matter. They're just names. You're trying to justify a war because of a name. So if Ukraine had decided to rename itself Ruthenia, land of the Ruthenes which is the latinzed version of Rus' and the Rus' people, all would have been okay? After all that is know modern Ukraine was known as during the 17th to 20th century by the countries outside of Ukraine. Do you see the stupidity of your comment? Everyone considers the Holy Roman Empire as the predessor to Germany, and not as the successor to the Roman Empire. Russia itself wasn't known as such until Moscovy renamed itself as such. Names are just names. Geographical terms that become country names, no longer are just that geographical term, but a name. My country, with the meaning low countries (litteral translation of the Netherlands/de Nederlanden or low country when we use Nederland) used to controll Indonesia, not really a low laying country lol. France in German and Dutch has name that means Empire of the Franks (Frankreich and Frankrijk respectively) whilst the French name for Germany, Allemagne means the country of the Allemani, a Germanic tribe from antiquity. Names are just names. The fast majority of the world calls my country Holland, which are actually only 2 of the 12 provinces of the country, Holland originally comes from Holtlant, meaning wooded land. I don't know if you've been to the Netherlands, but the Holland regions are everything but wooded nowadays. So yeah again, and I say this as someone with a degree in history, names are just names. Often used to justify things, like you are doing. Moscovy calling itself Russia in order to claim the legacy of the former Rus'. The Holy Roman Empire and Romania calling themselves as such to claim the legacy of the Roman Empire. Ghana, Benin and Mauretania naming themselves as such to claim the legacy of ancient states. Belgium using a form of the Latin name for the low countries in contrast to the Netherlands using a native name. Spain being named after the old Roman province of Hispania, France being named after Francia to claim the historical legacy of the Empire of Charlemagne. I can go on and on.
1
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr do you know what the term ancient means? Also maybe read up on the Cossack Hetmenate, the language used there, was Ruthenian, nowadays known as Ukrainian. Also you are aware that nation means people right? 🤣🤣 nations divert, as did the Russians, Belarusians and Ukrainians. The Rus' wouldn't have considered any of the three successor nations as "Rus'". Ukrainians and Belarusians were never Russian, they were Rus'. Just like the Russians were. This group split due to external influences (Russia has more tatar influences for example, and Belarus and Ukraine more Polish, this is normal I history). If you deny Ukrainian nationhood, you do the same to Belarus and Russia, as no, you aren't the Rus', you're a seprate divergent people. You sound like the people in my country from the 19th century who claimed we are Batavians, eventhough we aren't lol. Trying to justify your actions because of history is r*tarded. Saying this as a historian lol. Dutch and Flemish are decendants from the Salian Franks, the French have alot of influence from another Frankish tribe as do the Germans. The Dutch and Flemish are the only one still speaking a Lower Franconian language as their official language (Dutch) as Germany has Saxon dialects (Lower German) and as its official language High German (a different dialect group), the same applies to Switzerland and Austria, as in their speak High German, and France doesn't even speak a Germanic language but a Romance language. So in your mind, we have the rights of all former lands of Charlemagne and are the true Franks. I specifically use this example to show you how ridiculous your claims are. I am half Dutch, half Ukrainian, using Ukraine as an example doesn't make sense as you have heard the Russian Imperialist Propaganda to long, so I used another example.
1
@Manntashsh-Pyrre-tu7wr it is funny when you say you believe there is a seprate Ukrainian people. Which means you believe there is a seprate Ukrainian nation. As it is the same thing. Maybe you meant nation state or just state overall, but what you just said was a contradiction.
1
@neutralevil1917 nah you're the orc spreading imperialist propaganda. Who of the two of us, хуйло, is the one telling that a people doesn't exist and how others should self identify? Exactly ))
1
@tomk3732 thanks you literally proven my point with the last paragraph. Meaning of terms change. Ukraine using Ruthenia would be fine. Romania used to be used to describe the Eastern Roman Empire. Now, it describes the country of Romania. Ruthenian first meant all Rus', then Ukrainians, and now only the Rusyn. German used to describe all central germanic peoples, including the Netherlands. Nowadays, it doesn't. So you prove my point. France itself is named after the Frankish Empire, whilst the people's closest to the actual Franks are culturally the Dutch and Flemish. Have you ever looked on a map about historical Ghana, Mauretania, and Benin and compared them to the modern countries of the same name? My point being that imperialists focus to much on names and stuff like that. Ukraine is just the name of the country, whatever meaning it once had in Russian or Polish, doesn't matter at all. My country was once known as "the lands over there" by the French )).
1
@Thinking858 okay moskal ))
1