General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Dylan Vogler
DW News
comments
Comments by "Dylan Vogler" (@dylanvogler2165) on "Western troops to Ukraine? Macron sparks debate" video.
@WingkKong "just respect Russia's interests" for what? What makes Russia special considering they have a smaller population and economy than the EU. In your logic Russia should "just respect the EU's interests" .
5
@iam_joshua_bcxvii one problem with your whole point chief, which you'd known if you researched it, foreign bases are illegal in Ukraine. The Ukrainian constitution specifically forbids it, it is why Yanukovych acted unconstitional with his Kharkiv Pact. Not to mention that Russia is just fighting an imperialist war against Ukraine, we can try spinning the narrative all we want, but that is the truth.
4
As they did with tanks and fighter jets....
4
@VodkaPandas dude the Minsk Agreements were broken the day they were signed by the seperatists and Russia, claiming part of the front "wasn't part of the ceasefire" because it was the place where they were winning.
3
@markc6140 where do you think the majority of money from unicef comes from? 🤦♂️
3
@totoshaebosha7983 for what reasons should Russian interest be respected when it involves occupying territory from a souvereign state? Why is are its wishes more important than those of Ukraine or any of its neighbours?
2
@d.p.2386 those 3 days surely do take long
2
@trumpforever6706 "nuclear weapons" there is the nuclear threat again haha.
2
@Heterosexual51 Russia broke the Minsk Agreements and the seperatists cancelled every Ukrainian election that was supposed to be held there (part of the same Minsk Agreements).
1
@VodkaPandas no, Russia demanded NATO to return to it's 1991 members. Which is a violation of the souverenighty of the Eastern European states, then again, violating their sovereignty is Russia's speciality.
1
@therealistOba nobody in Africa is going to fight a war for Russia if it's the aggressor
1
@VodkaPandas and when the agreements were made, the seperatists broke them. Also why were these agreements necessary as there was the Russo-Ukrainian friendship agreement and Budapest Memorandum both explicitly stating Russia wouldn't intervene in Ukraine, and yet it did 🤔
1
@VodkaPandas no this is proven lie. The Russia specifically wanted a section of the front to be excluded. Also the seperatists had almost lost before Russia intervened directly.
1
@VodkaPandas and yet Russia ratified it. )) deflecting won't work here mate ))
1
@markc6140 sure. Will you pay for humanitarian aid in Africa? Would save a all alot of money.
1
@ukrlaa will you join too?
1
@raisonneur682 "Russophobe" again. Not everybody having problems with Russian Imperialism is Russophobe. But tell me, how is your Russian? I mean you're a Russophile, so for sure you speak Russian right?
1
@raisonneur682 can you give me the definition of imperialism please. Before we continue the conversation. Also yeah there are ethnic Russians in Ukraine, but they're a minority. The vast majority is ethnic Ukrainian, even amongst Russian speakers.
1
@raisonneur682 1. Russians in Ukraine weren't suppressed or oppressed. I speak Russian daily, nobody cares. 2. The land is internationally recognized recognized as Ukrainian, so Russia has no bussiness being there. 3. imperialism /ɪmˈpɪərɪəlɪz(ə)m/ noun a policy of extending a country's power and influence through colonization, use of military force, or other means. So exactly what Russia is doing. 4. Being anti Russian Imperialism and anti Russian Federation doesn't make you a Russophobe. I have no problems with Russian culture or Russians in general, but I have a problem with the RF and the Z zombies supporting them.
1
If only the Russian navy was an actual threat
1
@wolfswinkel8906 France and Ukraine are allies. The Netherlands also soon signs security guarantees to Ukraine, making them allies too (I specifically mention them as I see your name). Also Ukraine is also none of Russia's bussiness and yet here we are.
1
@Max_Da_G and it also says than an attack on on is an attack on all, meaning that you're considered at war with the aggressor. Whilst you can argue about sending troops, you're still at war.
1
@mirnamisevic1993 dude you believe in wunderwaffe.
1
@WalkOverHotCoal dude you believe in myths.
1
@estaler and yet Russia did nothing when it lost Kherson
1
@estaler что?
1
@estaler it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things. A bullet fired by a French rifle will kill all the same if it is held by French or Ukrainian hands.
1