Comments by "Dylan Vogler" (@dylanvogler2165) on "Kyiv attacked by ‘kamikaze’ drones, Ukrainian official says" video.

  1. The amount of Russian bots here is staggering.
    8
  2.  @thechroniclegamer4285  No it is not )) can you point me to the specific article in the Geneva convention that says so? Also you thus say that the Russian attacks on the military barracks near Lviv was a warcrime?
    5
  3.  @pelateiene3142  defeat NATO after losing 50.000+ troops in Ukraine? Good luck
    3
  4.  Purpleemp  donabss? Could you tell me were that lies? Also coup lmao another Kremlin bot detected.
    2
  5.  @kevinpotts123  yeah exactly. I agree with you ))
    2
  6.  @binkyslapass1  yankee? Since when am I American? Hahaha you orcs aren't the most intelligent are you?
    1
  7.  @nazihater2798  who are the niazis? Also, lmao. I am not even going to react on the bs in yout comment my little orc friend.
    1
  8.  @igorsmirnoff7640  hahahaha okay orc)) so why doesn't your führer attack a NATO country and find out? Aah I know cuz the thought of it makes him sh*'t his pants xD. Go away Moskal.
    1
  9.  @SimonElenor  so why is the orc complaining about warcrimes 🤣. Gotta love you orcs contradicting each other. Also maybe learn actual history, the USSR signed the Geneva conventions i. 1949 (as all UN members did, and the Ukrainian SSR was a member on its own as well btw..). Russia is a party to Geneva conventions I-IV and protocols I and II. Whilst Ukraine is a party to Geneva conventions I-IV and Protocols I-III
    1
  10.  @fazlayrabbi8815  has America been used twice? Damn... but now jokes about your horrific English aside, when you have to point to an act the Americans did in 1946 at the end of ww2 to justify the stuff you, you know how bad the argument you try to make is.
    1
  11.  @GoogleSpyZon  personnel, although I suppose you take it personal lol. And the myths about NATO are getting hilarious.
    1
  12.  @billy1276  congratulations you are spreading the "Donbass myth". Which makes you an idiot. Actual research would have pointed you to the fact that Russian backed separatists were responsible for as much, civilian, casualties as the Ukrainians.
    1
  13.  @thechroniclegamer4285  yeah and sleeping soldiers are considered neither. They're not incapacitated nor unconscious, as the moment they wake up they can fight you. They're not defenseless either... or am I also not allowed to shoot at a soldier that is not aware of me? The article you cite applies to either captured soldiers (POW), severely injured soldiers, whom are therfore incapacitated, or those rendered unconscious by enemy actions. So in essence it applies to those that are incapable of harming you, sleeping soldiers are capable of doing so the moment they wake up. Essentially it is the same as bombing aircraft when it is still on the ground. Not to mention, that if your definition would have been true, Russia themselves has committed this multiple times. A point could have been made that technically you could have considered it a warcrime as the Geneva conventions state, that anyone should be given a chance to surrender. In practice this is not applied in these cases.. as stealth missions would also become impossible if you have to give everyone the chance to surrender. So no it is not a warcrime. But this actually would have some merit, but it is clear your knowledge of the conventions is quite limited. As others have stated, militaries have a watch at night for particularly the reason, that there is a risk of attacks whilst the soldiers are asleep.
    1
  14.  @kevinpotts123  it is in the Geneva conventions, but it doesn't apply to sleeping soldiers for obvious reasons.
    1