Comments by "GorillaGuerilla🇺🇦" (@gorillaguerillaDK) on "Why is the West not reacting to Russian attacks?" video.
-
82
-
27
-
19
-
10
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
 @wendten2Â
A pipeline that is about to become absolutely useless to Russia, but blowing it up can still put a scare in the countries close to the pipeline, it gets blown up 24 hours before a new pipeline, that runs from Norway to Poland and passes relatively close by the region where the explosions happened is opened, it happens in a part of the Baltic Sea where Russia often operate, especially the explosion close to Danish territorial Sea, and happens just outside, (less than two nautical miles outside Danish Territorial Sea).
The following weeks Russia is very busy messing around in Kattegat - knowing that the new pipeline from Norway, through Denmark, to Poland run through the area where they suddenly have three ships cruising around like the captain on one of the vessels had lost one of his contact lenses and the others were trying to help him find it!
Add to this, the pipelines are insured, Russia had an agreement that they still had to deliver a certain amount of gas at a fixed price to Germany, and this was a way to get out of that agreement and try to push Germany to be against further sanctions and to buy gas through other pipelines, at a higher price!
Also, do you seriously think that the US would risk alienating close allies in the region by blowing up nearly useless shit in their allies backyards?
Do you seriously think Biden would approve such an operation and risk ruining negotiations with the Danish government about using Danish ports as transit hubs and getting access to Denmarks most Eastern military base?
The country that basically has the right to tell the Americans to pack their northernmost airbase down and go home - especially at a time where the Americans are negotiating with the Danish government about getting to make said airbase larger…?
The Americans really didn’t have much to gain from it, and A LOT to lose!
The Russians really didn’t have much to lose from it, but a lot to gain on several fronts!
(Including exposing how vulnerable we are to attacks on our energy supplies)
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
 @ChurchCommitteeÂ
Well, if you counted all my responses, then I guess you're right and I've written more posts than the 15-20 or something connents I thought I was at.
Yes, I engage in the conversation under several of Anders P. Nielsens videos.
Sometimes I just express that I'm delighted to see another video from him. I have absolutely no idea if he has ever read a comment of mine, I sometimes add my thoughts on the topic, mention things I wish he had mentioned, or ask questions - just like most others do when commenting on YouTube.
I'm sure you can find videos where I've engaged even more than I have so far on this one!
Well, you got lucky, I was watching the Superbowl, so I answered pretty quickly.
If you had any real knowledge about NAFO, the history behind, and the enormous amount of internal disagreements there is in this movement, you would also know that it is based on volunteers who raise fonds through charity to various projects benefitting Ukraine, and counter the constant attempts of dishonest Russian historic revisionism and disinformation spread by vatniks, (you know, you can just look up what it means right? As you might have guessed it's a slang word, and yes, you're right, vatniks isn't something positive), and of course by Glavset, aka Yevgeny Prigozhin's "Trolls of Olgino", and various European social media "influencers" who assist Russia in their spread of propaganda to "justify" Russia's imperialist efforts and their war of aggression towards a democratic European country that has no interest in being a vassal state to Russia.
Oh, and in case you haven't realised it, the moment you and I engage in debates on the topic of Ukraine, we both become low key volunteer contributors in one of the outermost layers of hybrid warfare.
It is unavoidable as long as there is a war going on, and there is people who support Ukraines right to exist without getting invaded, occupied, and having a neighboring country attempting to steal Ukrainian territory - and people who think the old Kissinger way and insist we should accept that some countries has the right to wage war to uphold hegemony in their "sphere of influence" - or even worse, thinks that Ukraine is just part of Russia and thus should submit to the rule of Kremlin!
As long as the war is raging, and these viewpoints are the defining narratives of the two sides, any contribution to the debate is de-facto part of hybrid warfare.
Although, in our case, a very low key and in a grain of salt in the universe kind of way....
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
 @nvelsen1975Â
Yeah, I never liked the guy, (Elon Musk), - even less so now!
There must be laws/international resolutions regulating the entire satellite issue, but I'm not familiar with how it's regulated.
But they definitely should look into Musk's economic activities and what his obligations are to the State and to international customers.
Yes, it's a great thing that the old cats get to spin again.
Although compared to the Leo2, Abrams1, and Challenger2, it would probably be more precise to label them Medium Tank instead of MBT.
But I wish Germany wouldn't be so reluctant to send their old Typhoon, they have around 90 of them - and if that doesn't happen, then hopefully the UK and others will send some Eurofighters...
It's much needed to gain control of the airspace...
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1