Comments by "GorillaGuerilla🇺🇦" (@gorillaguerillaDK) on "Where is the Ukrainian counteroffensive?" video.

I read that Ukraine probably has used ATACMS, can’t remember if it was you who mentioned it to a Danish Media outlet, or who it was - but it made me curious about what we could expect to see if Ukraine is provided with a couple of US's PrSM and if you think it’s possible that the Americans are willing to do so, (given the fact that they have a very limited stock, and it’s a brand new product). Aside from this, as always, your perspective is very much appreciated! Tusind tak for at du gider at dele din indsigt og vurdering med os Anders!
5
@witness1013 In RoSSiyaskaya Gazeta or in the Nezavisimaya Gazeta??
3
I can’t help wonder,is there really any other reasonable explanation for their ability to hit targets more than 100Km away with extremely high precision? I’m willing to bet that they have them! Now if only the US would send them a couple of their PrSM then I believe it should be within their reach to hit the Kerch Strait Bridge - but the big question would be, will the US give them any? They only have a small stockpile of them themselves and as I recall it, it hasn’t even been officially implemented in the US Army yet - but this is a great opportunity to test if they really can do what they’re expected to….
1
@deepinthewoods8078 That’s the most obvious explanation if you ask me, but I’m really curious about the potential in providing Ukraine with a couple of the brand new PrSM. From what I understand, there’s only a very limited stock, and I’m wondering if the US perhaps could be willing to send a couple of them to Ukraine - from what I understand, they would probably make it possible to target the Kerch Strait Bridge! Cutting off this line of supply could be extremely beneficial for Ukraine!
1
@andersjjensen I was thinking about the Kerch Strait Bridge, as O understand it, it's currently to far away to target, but with the brand new PrSM it should be within the possible using the HIMARS pkatform. But for mostly anything else but that, I definitely see your point and fully agree with you.
1
@andersjjensen Ah, then I see the problem, I had the impression that the brand new PrSM had not only a higher effective range but also carried a more effective load. Given how few there’s probably in stock for now and if, as you say, it would take up to maybe twenty pieces and require at least one to hit explosives or fuel car to create enough structural damage on the bridge, it would not be cost effective and only of symbolic value! Guess it’s better to just focus on Kherson then, and hopefully eventually move the front close enough to target the Kerch Strait Bridge with ATACMS! Thank you very much for clearing this up!
1