Comments by "Exercitus Nationum Europaeae Liberatio" (@2_Purpura_Legio_88_5) on "Rus Kupiansk Advance, UK Blames Trees; Brazil, Mexico, China Pull Out of Jeddah, Putin Erdogan Speak" video.

  1. Ah yes another "climate of Russia defeated us. Certainly not Russian soldiers, our incompetence, stubborness and stupidity. No. We anglo-sorosians are clean. It is all these pesky Russian elemental mages and certainly not their bettet equipment and better training and knowledge of terrain". Pathetic. BRICS+ and SCO are The future. Wretched anglo-sorosian reptiloids are falling and will fall. Russia fights for Humanity. Eurasia will be free of anglo-sorosian yoke. Wretched anglo-sorosian reptiloids are falling and will fall.
    2
  2. 9:44 that is "climate story" all over again. They know they were defeated and "three days to azov" collapsed so they are now searching for "convenient reason" to sell to their populace. They can't know that british goverment and goverments of other natozi states are bunch of baffoons with at best dyletant knowledge about military or economic matters. They can't admit that "mongol hordes" have beaten them (not for the first time actually we Poles, swedes, napoleon, germans and now anglo-globalists) so they inventing "new storries how climate" or in that case damn bushes or small trees beaten "greatest, strongest" natozi army. Nothing new there and also one of reasons why Russia defeats armies from the west. Commanders from the west never consider Russians worthy as such they develop an interesting dogmatic thinking according to which they plan their further objectives. If they fail in their initial strategic goal they preffer to give it "minor inconvenience" batch at best and "ignorance" at worst. With that approach (which often develops in to war crimes against Russian populace that only gives them more fire in their furnaces or cause sudden reconcilation with Communism even after all miscalculation it did) they lose the most important feature of good commander flexibity. When flexibity is lost arrogance takes it's place and believe in ones "almost godlike" "knowledge" about "mongols". When arrogance steps in the ability to properly react on Russias movements also disapears. With that war is basicaly over and we get new "scientific", "realistic", "memoirs" that enforcess our "view" of Russians. And so their greatest strategic advantage over us is our arrogance and stupidity that exist from the centuries. None western commander ever considered them his equall. Napoleon did not had high opinion of Russians, karl xii didn't even considered them Human, Poles were poles and considered them savages and germans at the time if "brown shirt" well i don't have to recall that. Tfu anglo-globalists are not very different and will end at the same as we, swedes, french and germans. Teutons were similar to germans in that matter but more on "religious front" than racial or national. West will never defeat Russia. We simply lack ability to see.
    2
  3. ​ @ArthurTane-e5b  The "climate thing" is just close thing to what these imbeciles are cooking. For it is similar to "small bushes and Little trees" crap like "winter beat me. Certainly not irregular tactics".
    1
  4. that is "climate story" all over again. They know they were defeated and "three days to azov" collapsed so they are now searching for "convenient reason" to sell to their populace. They can't know that british goverment and goverments of other natozi states are bunch of baffoons with at best dyletant knowledge about military or economic matters. They can't admit that "mongol hordes" have beaten them (not for the first time actually we Poles, swedes, napoleon, germans and now anglo-globalists) so they inventing "new storries how climate" or in that case damn bushes or small trees beaten "greatest, strongest" natozi army. Nothing new there and also one of reasons why Russia defeats armies from the west. Commanders from the west never consider Russians worthy as such they develop an interesting dogmatic thinking according to which they plan their further objectives. If they fail in their initial strategic goal they preffer to give it "minor inconvenience" batch at best and "ignorance" at worst. With that approach (which often develops in to war crimes against Russian populace that only gives them more fire in their furnaces) they lose the most important feature of good commander flexibity. When flexibity is lost arrogance takes it's place and believe in ones "almost godlike" "knowledge" about "mongols". When arrogance steps in the ability to properly react on Russias movements also disapears. With that war is basicaly over and we get new "scientific", "realistic", "memoirs" that enforcess our "view" of Russians. And so their greatest strategic advantage over us is our arrogance and stupidity that exist from the centuries. None western commander ever considered them his equall. Napoleon did not had high opinion of Russians, karl xii didn't even considered them Human, Poles were poles and considered them savages and germans at the time if "brown shirt" well i don't have to recall that. Tfu anglo-globalists are not very different and will end at the same as we, swedes, french and germans. Teutons were similar to germans in that matter but more on "religious front" than racial or national. West will never defeat Russia. We simply lack ability to see.
    1
  5. 1:06:40 erdogan simply play his cards very well. But eventually he will have to take a side. Most likely Russia or wider BRICS+ for he can get the most out of it. If he sides with the west then west will simply eventually remove him. As they already tried once.
    1