Comments by "Traveller" (@traveller23e) on "Sabine Hossenfelder" channel.

  1. 10
  2. 6
  3. 4
  4. Thank you, I'm so glad I'm not the only one. I'm 23 and was diagnosed at the age of somewhere around twelve. For me (and in retrospect probably even more for my family) it was really helpful because I could finally start to understand why I didn't ever really fit in and start to get some help in the for of books and so on targeted to that audience. I have a fairly high intelligence (particularly when it comes to mathematical and logical topics) and not too much in the way of sensory issues so for me it's mostly good, but I do struggle in social situations. I don't need help in everyday life, certainly not more than what friends can provide now and again, though I do sometimes amuse people around me for not thinking about something that is "obvious" and sometimes I have to remind myself that I'm in public so I shouldn't dance and mouth the lyrics of the song I'm listening to in my head. I do also struggle in social situations as well; that may be part of why I've yet to have a date for all my trying. Coming from this background, more or less all discussion of autism irritates me for some reason or another. First off, a self-diagnosis as far as I'm concerned is not a diagnosis. It doesn't mean you don't have autism, but I'm not going to believe you do just because you claim to. Yes you're very special Chad, next. Personally I've always been a little nervous and embarrassed when I tell someone, never sure how much they're going to judge me for it. Though in today's trend of marks of not being normal, I guess I shouldn't bother to be concerned. Also, by the time I know someone well enough to discuss it, there's no way they haven't noticed that after three or four sentences of smalltalk I'm out of my depth. Secondly, the terms neurotypical and neurodivergent. When a sizeable percentage of your population is neurodivergent, and both groups have a great amount of internal diversity, I don't think it's a useful distinction. It would be a "useless or whatever" thing in my mind if I weren't seeing these terms used ever more frequently with correlation to the trend discussed in the previous paragraph. Next off, ASD: As mentioned in this video, disorder is not always the most appropriate term. When it's mostly just thing that sets you apart and doesn't require medical attention or constant assistance, I think using the term disorder may be misguided. Condition might be a better term, as in a lot of cases much as with dwarfism there's not really anything particularly wrong with the person per se. Dismissing it as not an issue: There are people for whom it is debilitating, so those people need support. Really I think what it boils down to is a lack of attention to the severity of the issue and particular unique traits or struggles of the person. I suspect if there were medical classifications (preferably without the word "autism") specifically for people who really need help living their lives do to the issue and/or separate classifications for the different facets of the condition, it would be easier to discuss. And as a last note, each and every one of us upon this planet has our foibles; just please have a little patience for those of the people around you and help out where you can. Life's too short to laugh at someone for walking funny, never remembering that you ordered a cappuccino unless they make it right away, or singing joyously one day an moping around the next.
    3
  5. 2
  6. 2
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1