Comments by "SsjC" (@ssjcosty) on "Dilbert creator Scott Adams melts down in racist rant, Elon Musk defends him" video.

  1. 3
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4.  @tiffanywyatt5137  Absolutely not. You should be biased against those who actually commit crimes, not against a whole group arbitrarily defined by some biological characteristic. According to the FBI 2019 Uniform Crime Report, African-Americans accounted for 55.9% of all homicide offenders in 2019, with whites 41.1%, and "Other" 3%. Be aware that this is only a percentage of the total who commit violent crimes, which overall are a tiny percent of the population. Consider that the violent crime rate in the USA is about 366.7 per 100k inhabitants, meaning about 0.36% of the population — according to the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting 2019. Now according to the USA Census Bureau, for 2022, Black Americans represented 13.6% of the total population of 333,287,557 people. I'll spare you the calculations, but considering the percentages mentioned above, it means that of all the black people in the USA, only 0.002% of them are violent criminals. Would you seriously discriminate against a group on the basis that 0.002% of them are criminals? It's unjustifiable to the extreme. Now contrast this with what I said in my previous comments. Specific religious organisations and political groups promote specific values that are harmful, discriminatory and even racist, and I am against them doing that. Sometimes, expressing negative opinions of their practices leads to followers of those organisations to claim they are offended. Should I care about their offense? I believe I shouldn't. I also believe the same people should be far more offended at the bad shit done by those organisations than by people uncovering said issues.
    1
  5. 1