Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "(UPDATE) Supreme Revenge: Battle for the Supreme Court | FRONTLINE" video.

@dannyturkian9083 Yes, that was one problem. Not the only one though.
4
@MarlzJinx This was the left's attempt at unbiased, as whoever made this legitimately tried to be fair. But since they only understand their own side, it was still biased to the left. At least they tried.
2
This was the left's attempt at unbiased, as whoever made this legitimately tried to be fair. But since they only understand their own side, it was still biased to the left. At least they tried.
2
This was the left's attempt at unbiased, as whoever made this legitimately tried to be fair. But since they only understand their own side, it was still biased to the left. At least they tried.
1
This was the left's attempt at unbiased, as whoever made this legitimately tried to be fair. But since they only understand their own side, it was still biased to the left. At least they tried.
1
@breakthewheelnow8223 The problem is that you are left with the impression that it's all down the middle, everything 50/50. In fact, the evidence that Kavanaugh was innocent of Blasey-Ford's accusation is absolutely overwhelming. They made it sound here like McConnell and other Republicans didn't care either way, they just wanted the seat. In fact they believed Kavanaugh innocent of the accusation because he clearly was, and backed him to the hilt. Remember, they could have told Trump that Kavanaugh wouldn't get their vote, that Trump should pull the nomination and instead go for another, more qualified conservative, such as Thomas Hardiman or Raymond Kethledge. Conclusion: PBS's best attempts at evenhandedness still involve bias to the left, even though they certainly tried to be fair about it.
1
@IndependentManyUnited I would say the left, but they never had one to begin with.
1
This was the left's attempt at unbiased, as whoever made this legitimately tried to be fair. But since they only understand their own side, it was still biased to the left. At least they tried.
1
@RafPos13 This was the left's attempt at unbiased, as whoever made this legitimately tried to be fair. But since they only understand their own side, it was still biased to the left. At least they tried.
1
@tinaamariee832 They tried, and were somewhat successful. But it balanced the two sides' narrative evenly, not a reflection of the facts. They also presented Nan Aron, Nina Totenberg, Jane Meyer, and Peter Baker as if they were just journalists, when in fact they are far-left ideologues, and the first three were directly involved in trying to sabotage Thomas's career.
1
@tinaamariee832 No, I never said that PBS as a whole makes an attempt. I said that Frontline does, which is hardly the same thing. Much of PBS these days is right there with the radical left trying to convince five year olds that they are actually trans. CNBC is actually pretty centrist. Some anchors are right, some are left, some are center. As it is, any network could actually choose to hire people from all over the spectrum, right? They don't actually have to hire 97% leftists. Ever see the percentages of where the media sends their political donations? Not much diversity there.
1
Did Barr hit on you?
1