Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "48 Hours"
channel.
-
3400
-
1900
-
1800
-
1800
-
1400
-
558
-
319
-
274
-
267
-
254
-
236
-
225
-
184
-
175
-
172
-
166
-
165
-
164
-
148
-
109
-
106
-
92
-
91
-
89
-
79
-
75
-
74
-
68
-
66
-
65
-
63
-
62
-
62
-
61
-
59
-
57
-
56
-
52
-
51
-
50
-
50
-
48
-
48
-
45
-
45
-
43
-
41
-
40
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
35
-
34
-
33
-
33
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
@eleanorsanchez
Did I say they deserve death? I said that they are not particularly sympathetic victims. True crime stories usually focus on the most innocent of victims - most people don't exactly cry over the death of gang members or street prostitutes, people who live recklessly and are hard to relate to. The stories that grab everyone are the ones where the victims were absolute innocents, such as the one I just saw about Helene Pruszynski, a cold case solved 38 years later through genealogical DNA. Helene Pruszynski was the type of person who did everything right, a very impressive young lady, who was raped and murdered by an incredibly evil person. Her case, and those like it, are gripping, because the soul cries out for justice on behalf of the victim, the most innocent of people who did absolutely nothing risky, someone who lived her life right in every way. Doesn't resonate the same way when the victim - or victims, in this case - were reckless individuals acting like worthless people, sitting ducks for the next bum they came across, and there were many of those in their lives, obviously.
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
Only the unintelligent would buy that story. Want actual facts?
1. They said that the detective did an exhaustive search of the scene, and found a handprint, no fingerprints. But a handprint means you don't need fingerprints.
2. For the first few weeks the investigation focused on three people, all of them white: The victim's A.ex-husband, B. boyfriend, and C.teenage son. All were eventually cleared.
3. At that point, it appeared very likely that this was a crime committed by a stranger, and not by someone known to the victim.
4. Several neighbors reported seeing an unknown black male nearby on the night she was murdered, so the investigation next turned to finding a black male who fit the description (height, weight, etc.) of the person described by neighbors.
Every step along the way, that is exactly how an investigation is normally run. There was more reason at that point to suspect a random attacker seen in the neighborhood then there was to look elsewhere (once the first three were cleared).
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
@julieuk5855
Thank you, again, for another thoughtful comment.
My grandfather came to the US from Europe in the 1930s, leaving behind his wife and children, which was their agreement; there was no other way to escape the Nazis. He then worked as hard as he could for a year, after which he was able to afford to bring my grandmother and their children over.
Less dramatically, my father-in-law moved 1600 miles away within the US a year ahead of my mother-in-law and their only child still living at home, a boy studying in high school. They joined him a year later.
Those two examples, along with that of your own family, are entirely different from the situation described in this video. They either were temporary separation of a family under desperate circumstances, or involve a far more minor situation.
Lena? She left behind a child, 12 years old at most but quite possibly younger, to pursue her own romantic goals. I find that very hard to swallow. While I did not feel compelled to make mention of it in direct response to the video, I read the OP's comment here and decided to chime in. I'm sorry, but who willingly moves 6000 miles away for their own gain and leaves behind her young daughter? Not someone who should be lauded as a Mother Of The Year candidate. So yes, the roses being thrown to Lena here in this thread sticks in my craw.
I am entirely unaware of the Windrush scandal. Perhaps that is well known in the UK, but not here.
Like you, I enjoy making "friends" in unplanned ways such as is occurring here. Hi, Friend! I am on the east coast of the United States, five hours behind you.
All the best, Jim.
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
@alenkabkk
Pure speculation. If she was involved, I truly doubt that she would have volunteered that she's said, "take care of it". Furthermore, he not once pointed the finger at her after he was arrested, then charged, then tried, then convicted, then sentenced. Weird, huh? Then the texts - thousands of them. Even when he tried to sell his soul for a time machine. Yet not a single one discussing the situation with her? Isn't that strange? Furthermore, prosecutors never met a person they didn't want to charge, yet somehow never charged her. I wonder why? At least they should have charged her initially in order to get her to cut a deal and testify against him. Yet they never did. It must be because these two were such criminal geniuses that they outsmarted everyone - oh wait, they were absolute idiots.
I think the situation is rather clear - she wasn't involved.
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
That's nonsense - investigations focus on the best suspects, not foolishness. Here are the facts:
1. They said that the detective did an exhaustive search of the scene, and found a handprint, no fingerprints. But a handprint means you don't need fingerprints.
2. For the first few weeks the investigation focused on three people, all of them white: The victim's A.ex-husband, B. boyfriend, and C.teenage son. All were eventually cleared.
3. At that point, it appeared very likely that this was a crime committed by a stranger, and not by someone known to the victim.
4. Several neighbors reported seeing an unknown black male nearby on the night she was murdered, so the investigation next turned to finding a black male who fit the description (height, weight, etc.) of the person described by neighbors.
Every step along the way, that is exactly how an investigation is normally run. There was more reason at that point to suspect a random attacker seen in the neighborhood then there was to look elsewhere (once the first three were cleared).
8
-
8
-
8
-
@julieuk5855
I appreciate your comment and your viewpoint.
The first sentence of your most recent post reads, "...but that was not the focus of the documentary". True! But my comment wasn't in response to the documentary, it was in response to the OP, who is blown away by the love Lena had for her daughter. Me? Color me skeptical. Because Lena picked up and moved 5700 miles for a man and left her young daughter behind. Who in the world does that?? I wouldn't. You wouldn't. The OP wouldn't. That is absolutely not motherly (or fatherly) behavior, don't you think? Yes, I am using conjecture in saying "mail order bride", but that is hardly an idle shot in the dark. Lena looks several years younger than does her husband Bill. 48 Hours, in deep sympathy for the mother and stepfather, somehow entirely glossed over the entire episode of how they met, and only made a passing reference to Diana joining her mom and stepdad at age 13. How long did she live in Moldova after her mom left her behind to chase a man? We aren't told. Anyway, if Diana and Bill had met innocently in advance, don't you think 48 Hours would have told us about it? They didn't because, I suspect, she was a mail order bride.
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@Sixpence_None_The_Richer
I didn't take a picture of mine, but my wife and I voted. I live in an extremely competitive district - for US Congress, for NYS Senate, and for NYS Assembly. The vote for POTUS means little, but a bunch of other votes are very important. I pray that my wonderful first term Congressman, Mike Lawler (NY 17), beats back the unbelievably dirty, crooked, lying, phony campaign that the Democrats have targeted him with, backed by hundreds of millions of dollars. If Republicans did half of what the Democrats are doing here, the New York Times and Washington Post and CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC would have screaming headlines about how filthy their campaign is. The shameless crooks in the Democrat/Media complex, though, just want to win, and couldn't care less about facts or decency.
I used to live in NYC. My entire life, both in NYC and where I now live in the suburbs, I'd been represented in Congress by Democrats, until Lawler was elected two years ago. Lawler is a conservative, but one who is willing to work with reasonable Democrats; he has in fact proposed bipartisan legislation. But the Democrats here have used a bunch of fake front groups to attack him. One group makes believes that they are a non-partisan voter information group, and has spent many millions prerending to send out general information about the candidates. It is very well disguised to look like they are a "good government" trying to help voters, while they are actually spreading blatant falsehoods about Lawler and his BLM-supporting opponent. Then the Democrats sent out a bunch of mailers claiming that Lawler, who has not really said anything about Trump one way or another, is in fact a wild-eyed Trump guy. Then the Democrats, behind a different front group made to seem like they are Maga, sent a mailer to every Republican attacking Lawler for being insufficiently Maga, and saying that no Maga Republican should vote for him because he hasn't wrapped Trump in a bear hug. They have no shame, and neither does the media which daily invents supposed GOP scandals but ignores the vile stuff that the Democrats are doing.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
Utter BS.
1. They said that the detective did an exhaustive search of the scene, and found a handprint, no fingerprints. But a handprint means you don't need fingerprints.
2. For the first few weeks the investigation focused on three people, all of them white: The victim's A.ex-husband, B. boyfriend, and C.teenage son. All were eventually cleared.
3. At that point, it appeared very likely that this was a crime committed by a stranger, and not by someone known to the victim.
4. Several neighbors reported seeing an unknown black male nearby on the night she was murdered, so the investigation next turned to finding a black male who fit the description (height, weight, etc.) of the person described by neighbors.
Every step along the way, that is exactly how an investigation is normally run. There was more reason at that point to suspect a random attacker seen in the neighborhood then there was to look elsewhere (once the first three were cleared).
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@BlkMagickGaia3
Yup! I know it well. My stalker harassed us - me, mostly, but also family - for years. It steadily got worse, but I was told that no Order of Protection could be issued until he committed a serious criminal act, such as sending me to a hospital. It was very predictable, and then it happened: He sent me to the hospital, and finally got arrested. Unfortunately, I did too: For defending myself, really. Charges against me were completely dropped, but spending 18 hours in custody was not fun. The stalker pled down to a lower charge, and we got a two year order of protection against him. He violated it whenever he felt like it, and then the Police would arrest him, and then he'd get released within three or four hours, and all charges eventually dropped. It was infuriating. So before the two year OP ran out, we moved, telling almost no one before we left, in a neighborhood where we knew hundreds of people. The whole thing is absurd. When will the law deal with stalking? It is a very serious issue, but few notice or care.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@bridgetsmith6733
You are very wrong. Here are the facts:
1. They said that the detective did an exhaustive search of the scene, and found a handprint, no fingerprints. But a handprint means you don't need fingerprints.
2. For the first few weeks the investigation focused on three people, all of them white: The victim's A.ex-husband, B. boyfriend, and C.teenage son. All were eventually cleared.
3. At that point, it appeared very likely that this was a crime committed by a stranger, and not by someone known to the victim.
4. Several neighbors reported seeing an unknown black male nearby on the night she was murdered, so the investigation next turned to finding a black male who fit the description (height, weight, etc.) of the person described by neighbors.
Every step along the way, that is exactly how an investigation is normally run. There was more reason at that point to suspect a random attacker seen in the neighborhood then there was to look elsewhere (once the first three were cleared).
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@leahstone9308
Thank you!! I can't tell you how much I appreciate that, doubly so coming from a woman. It is usually women who absolutely adore Morrison, for reasons that are utterly beyond me. His over-the-top put-on style is so incredibly grating, that I managed to watch half an episode of his on Dateline before I gave up, and refuse to watch anything of his since. Which is unfortunate, because I have a longstanding interest in true crime, and probably have hundreds of cases committed to memory. But even if I want to learn more about a case, if it's Keith Morrison, I'm out immediately. He is the worst of the worst. (Just to be clear, I'm sure he's a nice guy and all, and I'm not commenting on his character whatsoever, just his style of narration.)
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@laceyrugg
Nowhere did I use the word "abandoned" or "abandonment". I responded to the OP, who wrote of this mother's overwhelming love for her daughter, by noting that Lena moved 6000 miles away and left her preteen daughter behind, which really doesn't fit the narrative, now does it? Now, as far as why Lena came to the US... This episode does everything it can to paint Lena in the most sympathetic light possible, yet entirely avoided the question of why Lena moved here - without her young daughter - to begin with, which leads to the very strong suspicion that Lena at that point put her own needs far ahead of those of her young daughter. You know what a young girl needs? Her mother. You know what she doesn't need? To live with whomever while her mother moves across the world to marry someone, thus leaving her child behind. You know what else a little girl doesn't need? She doesn't need to only be able to reunite with her mother and her mother's husband - who little Diana had never met - by having to move to a new country, across the world, without knowing one word of the language spoken in that country.
So yeah, sorry, Lena doesn't exactly win Mother Of The Year in my book. And no, I would not have mentioned any of this in response to the video, but when someone posts, "I love how deeply and completely this woman loved her daughter 💗", I found that to be rather over the top. And so I responded.
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@kleeamd8274
And now I just read your second response. A little rough, but I got a kick out of it nonetheless. What is wrong with some people?
At the risk of offending, I don't know, almost everyone? I am in the distinct minority of those with an interest in true crime, in that I'm male. Combine that with the stereotype of men (myself included) preferring to read non-fiction while women prefer pulp fiction (romance novels, and the like). So, what is it about true crime that attracts some people's interest? Based upon the nature of the comments, combined with what I just noted above, it seems that a rather significant percentage of women who follow true crime don't think of it as real people facing real prison time, but more like Fabio and the rest of the dime store novel genre. Then when they dislike someone (usually the accused), they are ready to throw them in prison, and sometimes their defense atttorneys as well for daring to do their jobs. It is as if the whole thing is a game of Clue come to life, without actual consequences. Meanwhile, some of us (women included, obviously) actually appreciate basic Constitutional concepts such as "presumption of innocence" and the Sixth Amendment ("and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence"). What a concept, right?
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@michelleadams474
It once again sounds like you did not read my comment. Investigators have been taught how to push guilty people into confessing. For many decades, they would use these techniques, and feel amazing when those techniques worked to solve the case - or so they thought. It is only far more recently that studies were conducted showing that the same techniques which work to get the guilty to confess can work wonders on the innocent as well. These changes, though, take a long time to make their way through the system. The investigators in this case absolutely believed that they had their culprit when they sat down and put her through the ringer. And almost certainly they still believe the same today. It takes many years for new thinking to enter the conciousness of the old boys' network. Eventually, law enforcement as a whole will adjust, but the proces is still underway. Those investigators were taught the way these things have been taught for decades, and, like many people still today (including some who have commented in this section), they still find it impossible to believe that an innocent person would falsely confess to a gruesome crime, and even re-enact the scene with a doll. "Malicious" means they know they are doing the wrong thing. But they don't; they believe they did a bang-up job wearing down the perp and getting her to finally admit to what she had done. Therefore, wrong but not malicious.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Nonsense.
1. They said that the detective did an exhaustive search of the scene, and found a handprint, no fingerprints. But a handprint means you don't need fingerprints.
2. For the first few weeks the investigation focused on three people, all of them white: The victim's A.ex-husband, B. boyfriend, and C.teenage son. All were eventually cleared.
3. At that point, it appeared very likely that this was a crime committed by a stranger, and not by someone known to the victim.
4. Several neighbors reported seeing an unknown black male nearby on the night she was murdered, so the investigation next turned to finding a black male who fit the description (height, weight, etc.) of the person described by neighbors.
Every step along the way, that is exactly how an investigation is normally run. There was more reason at that point to suspect a random attacker seen in the neighborhood then there was to look elsewhere (once the first three were cleared).
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Sure, but we're wrong all the time, all of us. Sometimes it's really obvious and we are correct, but far more often we're guessing, as we don't know people's baseline personalities. Some people are nervous truth tellers, while others can calmly sell freezers on the North Pole.
No one knew this 30 years ago. Modern science has proven demonstrably how bad we all are at this, even if many individuals think they are brilliant at such matters. Fact is, mindreading is a huge reason why we used to convict innocents - and sometimes execute them - with all too much frequency. Along came DNA, and hundreds have been exonerated off of death row, people placed there because police and juries could "just tell". (Too late for thousands of others.) Follow-up studies have proven the point beyond any doubt, as Malcolm Gladwell and others have written about.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
The comment section, predictably, is 100% on Addimando's side. Why? How do you know that she is telling the truth? I would like to note that the host, Jericka Duncan, is a #MeToo activist, which obviously colors her reporting. And there were questions here that are tough to answer for those who blindly support Addimando. Why was Glover shot with a gun that directly touched his skin? Why does Addimando have a history of accusing men - many men - of abuse? How could she possibly have confused which man abused her, as she seems to have indicated about the repairman?
You want to know my opinion? I suspect that Glover probably did in fact abuse her. But I don't KNOW that, and neither do you. Unfortunately, the YT comment is frequently a cesspool of idiocy and overemotionalism, and this is doubly so when it comes to true crime videos. As such, any possible replies to this comment will probably, at a minimum, accuse me of mansplaining, and more likely of being an abuser myself. That's just the nature of the neighborhood around here. It's unfortunate, as true crime can be fascinating. But the overwhelming number of those interested in the topic - assuming that the comment section is a representative sample - are uneducated, unthinking, overemotional fools, who shoot accusations in all directions rather than ever bothering to stop and think. God forbid you should challenge your own preconceived notions and consider a different perspective, or actually follow the evidence. It is a rather sad spectacle.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@craftilady
Very fair answer. While I believe that the focus placed on the cops here is absurd, if in fact the ideas you raised could be widely implemented, and in fact could save the lives of even a small percentage of these girls, then sure, sounds like a wonderful idea. All that said, I can think of other situations where such counseling could be more useful, such as a)in high school, and b)when female victims of clear, obvious, undeniable abuse return to their abuser, as almost always happens. This case was far murkier.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@cindytrayer4279
Cindy, darling, had you written above that based upon 33 year experience as a behavioral health professional, and with the obvious caveat that you couldn't possibly diagnose someone without their having been your patient, you believe that this individual may well be a (fill in the blank)? No problema. Not what I'm talking about.
The issue is that on true crime videos there are the inevitable comments accusing the perpetrator - or, even worse, the accused without evidence - of being a narcissist/psychopath/sociopath. And I mean, it's in the comment section of every single true crime video. Sorry, such nonsense is utterly without basis, rather serving as a means for the commenter to vent, and perhaps virtue signal, while receiving some likes placed by other ignoramuses. My patience has long waned for such foolishness.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@Pitbulllover77-y3l
What a fatuous, strawman, obviously false claim. As any rational person with even a modicum of intelligence understands, no one - not me, not anyone else - would defend the supposed misbehavior of the attorney if only the claim were true. The point is, many, including yourself, are throwing out an accusation of massive impropriety - IF ONLY IT WERE TRUE. Those of us who rightly note that a serious accusation requires serious evidence are pointing out that accusing people of massive wrongdoing - in public, no less - without a shred of evidence? That is highly improper behavior, and smells of slander, quite possibly driven by virtue signaling. Your defense - that because the claim is heavy, it must necessarily be true without any evidence, and furthermore anyone denying the baseless claim necessarily supports the highly improper behavior alleged, despite the lack of evidence? As I wrote above, no great amount of intelligence, wisdom or integrity is necessary to see through both the foolishness and immorality of such an absurd accusation. But it seems that those who have no problem accusing the attorney without evidence are just as happy to falsely accuse online commenters as well. Par for the course, I guess.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anthonyholmes1911
You are making no sense. The person who was responsible for picking up prints was the black detective. He found a palm print, not a fingerprint. So yes, you are blaming him, and no, it makes absolutely no sense, as the palm print was just as good as the fingerprint.
Once the ex-husband and boyfriend were ruled out, this crime looked like a random act. It did not appear that she knew her killer (and in fact, she may not have known her son's football coach). At that point, looking at Coach Joe once they established that he had left after dropping off the kid didn't make sense. Neighbors reported seeing a black male that night who did not live there, so they focused on finding the mysterious black male, but only after they focused heavily on her 1)ex-husband, 2)boyfriend, and 3)15 year old son, all of whom are white. The idea that the perpetrator wasn't caught earlier because of racism is baseless nonsense.
1
-
@anthonyholmes1911
1. They said that the detective did an exhaustive search of the scene, and found a handprint, no fingerprints. But a handprint means you don't need fingerprints.
2. For the first few weeks the investigation focused on three people, all of them white: The victim's A.ex-husband, B. boyfriend, and C.teenage son. All were eventually cleared.
3. At that point, it appeared very likely that this was a crime committed by a stranger, and not by someone known to the victim.
4. Several neighbors reported seeing an unknown black male nearby on the night she was murdered, so the investigation next turned to finding a black male who fit the description (height, weight, etc.) of the person described by neighbors.
Every step along the way, that is exactly how an investigation is normally run. There was more reason at that point to suspect a random attacker seen in the neighborhood then there was to look elsewhere (once the first three were cleared).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Sixpence_None_The_Richer
Pennsylvania, as I'm sure you know, is considered the ultimate decider of this year's presidential election.
Yes, it would be wonderful if Dave McCormick could defeat Bob Casey Jr. for the Pa. Senate seat. Either way, the Senate is without question going to be Republican this coming term. Question is, will it be 51 GOP Senators or 55? It makes a big difference, particularly for two years down the road, when the Democrats will almost certainly win back some Senate seats in the 2026 elections. This year the Senate map massively favors Republicans, as the Democrats had a big year six years ago in 2018, and have more seats to defend. But the Republicans did better in 2020, and will probably lose a seat or two, maybe more in 2026, so it would be great if we could build up something like a 55-45 majority this time around.
And then there is the House. Currently Republican, it has, sorry to say, a pretty strong chance of going Democrat this year. I hope I'm wrong on that last part. It would be really nice if we could win the White House, Senate, and House next week, and then actually use it to help stabilize not only the US but also the free world, instead of getting hijacked by clowns like Matt Gaetz and Marjorie Taylor Greene, publicity hounds who don't mind wrecking everything so long as they can play to the lowest common denominator among the Maga idolators.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@puckerupbuttercup1980
Yup! I know it well. My stalker harassed us - me, mostly, but also family - for years. It steadily got worse, but I was told that no Order of Protection could be issued until he committed a serious criminal act, such as sending me to a hospital. It was very predictable, and then it happened: He sent me to the hospital, and finally got arrested. Unfortunately, I did too: For defending myself, really. Charges against me were completely dropped, but spending 18 hours in custody was not fun. The stalker pled down to a lower charge, and we got a two year order of protection against him. He violated it whenever he felt like it, and then the Police would arrest him, and then he'd get released within three or four hours, and all charges eventually dropped. It was infuriating. So before the two year OP ran out, we moved, telling almost no one before we left, in a neighborhood where we knew hundreds of people. The whole thing is absurd. When will the law deal with stalking? It is a very serious issue, but few notice or care.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Jericka Duncan is not a reporter, she is a hack and propagandist. She never, ever reports a story - she always turns it into a propaganda piece, usually about race, occasionally about gender. Here she did both.
No, the Moab PD did nothing wrong, and neither did social media by focusing on the case. The word "news" is plural of the word "new".
For better or worse, inner city and reservation girls disappear all the time. If the cameras showed up whenever that happened, that's all they would report on, and their ratings would go in the tank.
No, the police did nothing wrong by letting those two go. Easy for psychologists, knowing what came next, to second-guess everyone on that scene. But nothing the Police did would have made a difference. They handled a sensitive situation with sensitivity, which was the right thing to do. And if the hadn't, and had locked everyone up for a day or two? It would have ultimately made no difference.
Beautiful 22 year old girls on social media do not suddenly disappear, making that story "new", and therefore news. I am so very tired of the media putting their stupid leftist slant on everything. And Jericka Duncan may be the worst out of all the mainstream news reporters.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@orbitmouf
The evidence is overwhelming that being black is a massive advantage these days when applying for work, applying for college, dealing with law enforcement, and just about every other method of measurement. Brilliant folks such as Thomas Sowell, Heather Mac Donald, Glenn Loury, John McWhorter, Ben Shapiro and others have done all the research needed, and explained this 100 times over. Spend a little time reading up on (or watching) the evidence, which backs up what all thinking people know. There is a reason that people fake being of color these days, the opposite of how things were 50 years ago.
1
-
@auntiemeemaw3885
There was no reason whatsoever to suspect him. In every case a decision is made pretty early on whether or not the crime was likely committed by someone known to the victim, or by a stranger. This case had all the hallmarks of having been done by a stranger. Nonetheless they still spent the first few weeks on three males (all white) who were close to her, because that is still standard operating procedure. Afterward, with all the evidence pointing to an outsider, including the numerous neighbors who saw an unknown black man running nearby at that time, the focus obviously turned in that direction, as it should have.
Fact is, if there had been no signs of forced entry, as opposed to the screen being cut out, the investigation would have gone in a very different direction, obviously. That's just basic criminology.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@PippiOnePointOh
Sure, but we're wrong all the time, all of us. Sometimes it's really obvious and we are correct, but far more often we're guessing, as we don't know people's baseline personalities. Some people are nervous truth tellers, while others can calmly sell freezers to the eskimoes.
No one knew this 30 years ago. Modern science has proven demonstrably how bad we all are at this, even if many individuals think they are brilliant at such matters. Fact is, mindreading is a huge reason why we used to convict innocents - and sometimes execute them - with all too much frequency. Along came DNA, and hundreds have been exonerated off of death row, people placed there because police and juries could "just tell". (Too late for thousands of others.) Follow-up studies have proven the point beyond any doubt, as Malcolm Gladwell and others have written about.
1
-
@PippiOnePointOh
Sure, but we're wrong all the time, all of us. Sometimes it's really obvious and we are correct, but far more often we're guessing, as we don't know people's baseline personalities. Some people are nervous truth tellers, while others can calmly sell freezers to the eskimoes.
No one knew this 30 years ago. Modern science has proven demonstrably how bad we all are at this, even if many individuals think they are brilliant at such matters. Fact is, mindreading is a huge reason why we used to convict innocents - and sometimes execute them - with all too much frequency. Along came DNA, and hundreds have been exonerated off of death row, people placed there because police and juries could "just tell". (Too late for thousands of others.) Follow-up studies have proven the point beyond any doubt, as Malcolm Gladwell and others have written about.
1
-
@PippiOnePointOh
Sure, but we're wrong all the time, all of us. Sometimes it's really obvious and we are correct, but far more often we're guessing, as we don't know people's baseline personalities. Some people are nervous truth tellers, while others can calmly sell freezers to the inuits.
No one knew this 30 years ago. Modern science has proven demonstrably how bad we all are at this, even if many individuals think they are brilliant at such matters. Fact is, mindreading is a huge reason why we used to convict innocents - and sometimes execute them - with all too much frequency. Along came DNA, and hundreds have been exonerated off of death row, people placed there because police and juries could "just tell". (Too late for thousands of others.) Follow-up studies have proven the point beyond any doubt, as Malcolm Gladwell and others have written about.
1
-
@PippiOnePointOh
Sure, but we're wrong all the time, all of us. Sometimes it's really obvious and we are correct, but far more often we're guessing, as we don't know people's baseline personalities. Some people are nervous truth tellers, while others can calmly sell freezers on the North Pole.
No one knew this 30 years ago. Modern science has proven demonstrably how bad we all are at this, even if many individuals think they are brilliant at such matters. Fact is, mindreading is a huge reason why we used to convict innocents - and sometimes execute them - with all too much frequency. Along came DNA, and hundreds have been exonerated off of death row, people placed there because police and juries could "just tell". (Too late for thousands of others.) Follow-up studies have proven the point beyond any doubt, as Malcolm Gladwell and others have written about.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Nice story, but way off base.
1. They said that the detective did an exhaustive search of the scene, and found a handprint, no fingerprints. But a handprint means you don't need fingerprints.
2. For the first few weeks the investigation focused on three people, all of them white: The victim's A.ex-husband, B. boyfriend, and C.teenage son. All were eventually cleared.
3. At that point, it appeared very likely that this was a crime committed by a stranger, and not by someone known to the victim.
4. Several neighbors reported seeing an unknown black male nearby on the night she was murdered, so the investigation next turned to finding a black male who fit the description (height, weight, etc.) of the person described by neighbors.
Every step along the way, that is exactly how an investigation is normally run. There was more reason at that point to suspect a random attacker seen in the neighborhood then there was to look elsewhere (once the first three were cleared).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. It took me days to click because when 48 Hours posts a "marathon", I've usually seen all three episodes already. This time, I'd seen none 👍
2. The hate poured on Jessica throughout the comment section is horribly unfair. Someone more worldly might have known not to meet with her stalker, but she was trying to do the right thing. People here claim "she was playing both sides", but that is absolutely false: She met with him after two months, he used it to try to end her relationship with Patrick, and then she got the Order of Protection. She'd avoided him like the plague for nearly half a year before the unaliving of Patrick.
3. My family and I got a court order of protection against my stalker. He would violate it, get arrested, released a few hours later, and charges dropped. Rinse and repeat. Orders of Protection don't do much if the DA's office doesn't bother enforcing them.
4. Richard Schlesinger is a new level of awesome. He's always been the best 48 Hours host, but the pilot thing raises him to a new level.
5. CeeCee Moore is amazing! With Investigative Genetic Genealogy, getting away with violent crime has become really difficult, thank God.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1