Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "A Mind for Murder | Full Episode" video.

  1.  @curtisbrown4449  His "smugness" is evidence? Really not. I wrote on a different thread that I do not see anything approaching "beyond a reasonable doubt" here, and got criticized for "defending a murderer" (ah yes, the YT comment section). Most of the "evidence" people have written about across the comment section has been nonsense, things like his choice of words or his alleged smugness. It's scary that such people serve as jurors.
    30
  2.  @curtisbrown4449  Do you understand what "beyond a reasonable doubt" means? Do you know anything at all about the law? When there was evidence pointing to others - DNA, footprints - do you just ignore that because it is inconvenient?
    17
  3. I hope all of you stay very far away from juries. What you consider "evidence"!
    10
  4.  @smoke2sweaty  While I found the guilty verdict surprising considering the evidence in both directions, I don't think it is fair to call it absurd based off watching a 42 minute video. They sat on the jury and heard all the evidence. We didn't.
    10
  5.  @glamdolly30  That's an awful lot of speculation on your part
    6
  6.  @curtisbrown4449  Lol! Your "hearing" that is an example of how innocent people get convicted of crimes they did not do. The detectives heard nothing like that at all. Nonsense like this passes for "evidence" in YT comment sections, not in real life. Anyone who believes that is actual evidence should stay far off of juries.
    3
  7. 1. Did you hear beyond reasonable doubt? I sure didn't. 2. His fancy defense attormeys did not impress me. 3. Might be a nice case for the Innocence Project, what with the complete lack of physical evidence (except for the physical evidence in his favor!), but I doubt he's on top of their list. They prefer poor non-whites to caucasian linguistic professors. He doesn't exactly bring forth a rush of emotion in his favor, does he? 4. Don't you just love how these shows paint the victim out to be a saint? She was a cheater, period. Honor your marriage vows.
    2
  8.  @Audrey-fu7bi  "Red flag" was the term used, which in this context obviously means evidence.
    2
  9.  @Adventures-with-Sisters  Still a little strange, certainly. Not evidence of anything, though.
    2
  10.  @curtisbrown4449  He said nothing of the sort, obviously.
    2
  11.  @BlackSeranna  Thank you. Glad to see some reasonableness can be found. All too often the comment sections on true crime videos contain emotional rants. To say this was "beyond a reasonable doubt" seems really, really farfetched to me.
    2
  12. I didn't hear beyond a reasonable doubt. Did you? Also, stop telling me how special Carmin was. She was a run-of-the-mill mindless leftist, protesting policies she didn't understand, changing careers every five minutes, to something rather wacky, eventually, and then breaking up her marriage by being a cheater while her daughter was right there. Hardly a sympathetic victim.
    1
  13.  @WouldntULikeToKnow.  Oh, the irony. I made two reasoned, intelligent points, which I clearly explained. You disagreed by writing like a twelve year old child. If you think you actually have something worthwhile to say, then try expressing it like an adult.
    1