Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "The Case Against Nicole Addimando | Full Episode" video.

  1. The comment section, predictably, is 100% on Addimando's side. Why? How do you know that she is telling the truth? I would like to note that the host, Jericka Duncan, is a #MeToo activist, which obviously colors her reporting. And there were questions here that are tough to answer for those who blindly support Addimando. Why was Glover shot with a gun that directly touched his skin? Why does Addimando have a history of accusing men - many men - of abuse? How could she possibly have confused which man abused her, as she seems to have indicated about the repairman? You want to know my opinion? I suspect that Glover probably did in fact abuse her. But I don't KNOW that, and neither do you. Unfortunately, the YT comment is frequently a cesspool of idiocy and overemotionalism, and this is doubly so when it comes to true crime videos. As such, any possible replies to this comment will probably, at a minimum, accuse me of mansplaining, and more likely of being an abuser myself. That's just the nature of the neighborhood around here. It's unfortunate, as true crime can be fascinating. But the overwhelming number of those interested in the topic - assuming that the comment section is a representative sample - are uneducated, unthinking, overemotional fools, who shoot accusations in all directions rather than ever bothering to stop and think. God forbid you should challenge your own preconceived notions and consider a different perspective, or actually follow the evidence. It is a rather sad spectacle.
    2
  2. Not that this really matters, but...Glover wearing those bizarre-looking caps instead of just facing his hair loss? Pretty sad. As to Addimando? Girl is an absolute knockout, 10/10.
    1