Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "Good Cop/Bad Cop: Solving the Murder of Heather Bogle | Full Episode" video.

  1. ​ @JohnWickPotter  The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    26
  2. He shouldn't have written something so awful no matter what
    22
  3. You have absolutely no idea that this was about racism, of course. We know he's incompetent. That's all we know.
    20
  4. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    10
  5.  @seekinggodfirst754  "Racial hostility is evident and you can't prove otherwise"? Wow, do you have that one backwards. There is no evidence whatsoever that any of that was based upon race. 25 years of incompetence, falsely suspected a boatload of people, and in exactly one case the wrong people were black. Yet you somehow believe that he needs to prove that he is not a racist? How about showing a stitch of evidence that he is? Think, really.
    10
  6. ​ @moniqueloomis9772  Who are you going to call if you are attacked? A social worker? Loser take by you.
    7
  7. ​ @bradleysitsandsipstea33  You are absolutely correct. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    6
  8.  @fremontpathfinder8463  Please provide evidence for your claim.
    6
  9. ​ @Phoenix-cz6hh  The OP did edit the comment
    5
  10.  @fremontpathfinder8463  Your getting hysterical does not equal providing evidence. This woman was wronged; that is clearly true. Now, let's try this again: What evidence do you have that this was based upon racism?
    5
  11.  @craigime  1. Thank you 2. I wrote that they are guilty of an element of what they accuse him of, because they are making a false accusation against him while complaining that he falsely accused those three innocent people.
    5
  12. He wasn't dirty. He was incompetent.
    4
  13. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    4
  14. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    3
  15. Not corrupt. Incompetent.
    3
  16.  @Desantisgogoboots  No, that is not what happened. He was trying to make his case to a DA, which is hardly the same thing as making a case in court. He thought he had his guys. He was wrong.
    3
  17. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    3
  18.  @__sativa_diva__5415  You seem very confused
    3
  19.  @MermaidDolphinNYC  I'm sorry you were put through all of that. I do wish you would have left out the racial stuff, which is popular to shout these days but not remotely substantiated. Outside of that, your comment is very interesting. If you have the time and inclination, I would encourage you to write a full length article and see if you can get it published somewhere. But stick to the facts, stay away from conjecture, and explain yourself well. (What's an ACD, anyway?) All the best.
    3
  20.  @MermaidDolphinNYC  .....btw, you wrote something in there I couldn't quite figure out. "I was put behind bars in a holding sell (sic) for 11 hours as they were about to process me to go to Riker's Island". Were you accused of something so awful that you were not offered bail? Because processing should have ended not with Riker's, but with a preliminary hearing in front of a judge, which in turn would normally have ended with an ROR (released on your own recognizance), not being shipped off to Riker's. Unless, of course, you were charged with a very serious felony which would have included either no bail or high bail, and it doesn't like that is what happened in your case. Care to fill us in?
    3
  21.  @charlotteswebbing  There are 6,000 detectives in the NYPD. JS.
    3
  22.  @walden6272  Please back up your claim. Some evidence would be nice, not just "I feel like saying it because I enjoy virtue signaling".
    2
  23.  @BFdEutschLaNd  Instead of accusing people without evidence, why not stick to the facts? There is no evidence that this had anything whatsoever to do with race.
    2
  24.  @donnajeanpynefrankiesmom6590  And thank you for having an open mind. Not everyone likes hearing different perspectives, as can be seen in this comment section.
    2
  25.  @bladeprime8426  It's sad, isn't it? The world we live in today.
    2
  26. ​ @thunderstruck1078  Are you the previous detective, or just a troll?
    2
  27. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    2
  28. Not true, of course. There are neighborhoods where violent crime never happens.
    2
  29. Lol! As if good looks isn't something noticed by....everyone on planet earth.
    2
  30. 48 Hours did a brilliant job here, slowly winding us through the case as it developed. Anyone who stopped watching after 10 mins got the wrong idea.
    2
  31. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    2
  32.  @erica31glass  Incompetence in a detective is awful, and certainly 25 years of it! He should have been sacked many years ago. No need to add additional, thoroughly unproven allegations on top of it.
    2
  33. I'm thinking of Boulder, Colorado. Small town but incompetent police.
    2
  34.  @Rachauna  Probably, but it was weird that they never made any reference to him at all
    2
  35. Then he wouldn't have pled guilty. Duh.
    2
  36. Cop wasn't crooked. He was incompetent. Big difference.
    2
  37.  @toxicfree4102  They went after him because they needed to nail him so they could go after the actual killer. The case against him was rather thin. For better or for worse, when police send recommendations over to the DA's office, they commonly send over only the evidence that helps them. It is a very different animal than withholding exculpatory information from the defense, which violates Brady. And this guy made it easy to go after him, because he had a history of being wrong.
    2
  38.  @Desantisgogoboots  You're soooo funny. If you send someone over here with a triple digit IQ, I'll be happy to explain everything this guy did wrong, but also what he didn't. Clearly it is over your head.
    2
  39. We like solving crimes here. Law enforcement can have my DNA anytime they like.
    2
  40. No
    2
  41. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    2
  42. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    2
  43. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    2
  44.  @67marlins  Thank you for your comments
    2
  45. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    2
  46. Also, water is wet. You're welcome.
    2
  47. Utterly incomprehensible
    2
  48.  @incontruth4116  👍
    1
  49.  @mistressmozart  Apparently you don't understand what happened here.
    1
  50.  @Estef182  And how exactly would you know that?
    1
  51.  @todd880  And how exactly would you know that?
    1
  52. Why?
    1
  53. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    1
  54.  @Crazyman23  Is that bad luck? Anyway, how do you know about all this? Do you know him, or did you see that on a different video?
    1
  55. The Boulder PD still won't pass the JonBenét Ramsey case to the professionals, so invested are they in the false narrative blaming a family member. They have the perp's DNA, for gosh sake!
    1
  56.  @DonovenGrey  Where did ever write that?
    1
  57.  @williamelliott  I say that you murdered JFK, and also were involved in 9/11. Now prove that isn't so. If you can't, then we all know it's true. Do you get it yet? (Probably not, unfortunately.)
    1
  58.  @Thatbisss  Please do not confuse your ignorance and shallowness for righteousness. The investigator in question wasn't very good at his job, which is why he no longer has it. There was reason initially to look at the earlier suspects. Assuming that any time a black person is a victim that it is necessarily due to race? Do you really not get how absurd that sounds? #EvidenceMatters #FactsMatter
    1
  59.  @doodlebob2023  That is certainly true. Sad, but true. The gaslighting media does everything in its power to try to fan the flames of racism any way it can.
    1
  60. No one at 48 Hours will see your comment. Try calling CBS instead.
    1
  61. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    1
  62.  @LizBytes  I already explained elsewhere how you have humiliated yourself publicly. Get a clue.
    1
  63.  @LizBytes  Aha. You claim I am biased. I would like you to point to one word I wrote which is biased or inaccurate. Floor is yours.
    1
  64.  @InnerHorizonLed  Your comment makes no sense, obviously.
    1
  65. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    1
  66. Incompetent, not dirty. Two different things.
    1
  67. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    1
  68.  @BruteStrength99  Brady violations =/= racism. The closest thing anyone came to accusing him of racism was one guy here saying "all of the above" or something similar, which is hardly dispositive. One case in 25 years of incompetence in which he falsely suspected black people? That rather obviously doesn't make someone into a racist. There is no reason whatsoever to believe that if the same people had come up on his radar, evasiveness and history of illegal behavior all, that he would not have suspected them were they whiite.
    1
  69. BS. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    1
  70. Negligence. Anything else is guesswork, making you around as bad as he is.
    1
  71.  @jpizel1070  Apparently you didn't watch the video, which makes it strange that you would comment on it
    1
  72. She went to his home, you know.
    1
  73. Are you referring to a certain former POTUS?
    1
  74. Scarcella is much worse. No comparison.
    1
  75. ​ @petergriffiinbirdistheword  Leave politics out of this, ffs.
    1
  76. It is in Boulder, Colorado, where they refuse to solve the JonBenét Ramsey case. Incompetent detectives convinced themselves that day that it was done by a family member, and still refuse to admit they were wrong 27 years later. John Ramsey, JonBenét's father, has begged for the case to be turned over to the professionals, so they can use genealogical DNA and finally solve the case, but the Boulder PD stubbornly refuses.
    1
  77. * should
    1
  78.  @techlife9853  You don't know English?
    1
  79.  @erica31glass  That he is racist, or that he knowingly went after the wrong people. Those are allegations without evidence. Hanlon's Razor is in effect.
    1
  80. Not corrupt. Incompetent. Not the same.
    1
  81. I kept waiting for them to mention the baby's father as a suspect. Apparently this child was born of an immaculate conception.
    1
  82.  @TawnyC_  For what it's worth, he actually discussed it elsewhere, and said that he wrote that in order to give her tough love and try to get her to double down in her efforts, but realizes in retrospect that it was wrong and abusive.
    1
  83.  @pinkpugginz  No way to know that
    1
  84. As a percentage of society, they are miniscule.
    1
  85. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    1
  86. You are right about phone records. Racism? No evidence of that.
    1
  87. Lol
    1
  88. Zero. Next question.
    1
  89.  @charlotteswebbing  Why would you write that? Smh.
    1
  90. ​ @moniqueloomis9772  Seems she did
    1
  91. The only thing you can prove about the first investigator is his incompetence, nothing else. YT commenters unaware of the concept of irony are accusing him of racism and corruption: Every one of those commenters are guilty of a measure of exactly what they accuse him of. Oh, the irony.
    1
  92. Why would you post this? In case someone reads the comments before watching the video, so you can ruin it for them?
    1
  93.  @JervelHalls  Seriously, the commenter adds no insight. What was the point of the comment? Explain.
    1
  94.  @WangHamgLow4U  Yeah, but I don't think monique is.
    1
  95. We know. We watched the video.
    1
  96.  @shadowguard3578  How do you know it's deliberate? Competence is all too rare.
    1
  97.  @shadowguard3578  Because it would be idiotic, as the evidence would likely emerge to clear them. Why would you assume it was intentional? Besides making no sense, it violates a basic concept of innocent until proven guilty. While we can certainly prove that O'Connell is incompetent, that's all we can prove, no more.
    1
  98. You can't tell a damn thing through "body language". That has been disproven many times.
    1