Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "The Murder of Anna Repkina | Full Episode" video.

  1. She was a loser, but she's not at fault here.
    35
  2.  @alenkabkk  Pure speculation. If she was involved, I truly doubt that she would have volunteered that she's said, "take care of it". Furthermore, he not once pointed the finger at her after he was arrested, then charged, then tried, then convicted, then sentenced. Weird, huh? Then the texts - thousands of them. Even when he tried to sell his soul for a time machine. Yet not a single one discussing the situation with her? Isn't that strange? Furthermore, prosecutors never met a person they didn't want to charge, yet somehow never charged her. I wonder why? At least they should have charged her initially in order to get her to cut a deal and testify against him. Yet they never did. It must be because these two were such criminal geniuses that they outsmarted everyone - oh wait, they were absolute idiots. I think the situation is rather clear - she wasn't involved.
    9
  3.  @myliza700  Please provide evidence for your claim.
    6
  4.  @ExiledStardust  Which is why you should repay the loan you refuse to repay, despite assuring the bank that you were good for it. Pay up, already!
    4
  5.  @Larry-rz4ed  Try reading my entire post. The evidence clearly shows that she was not involved.
    3
  6.  @TheLoneCamper  He could have cut a deal at some point when things were looking bleak. Anyway, that is only one point of several that I raised. Read my full comment; she was not involved.
    3
  7.  @triamaria  Did she even read my comment before responding? She was obviously not involved, as the evidence I laid out makes abundantly clear.
    3