General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Jim Werther
The Rubin Report
comments

Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "2024 Predictions That No One Sees Coming with Co-Host Megyn Kelly" video.

Tulsi is not a conservative. Neither is RFK Jr.
5
 @reggtop Why? Because he followed the Constitution?
4
It's probably going to be Elise Stefanik
4
 @bpuryea He's taking Stefanik
4
@megangoldsney8214 Happy to hear! Thank you for filling me in.
3
Pierre Polievre, whose name I undoubtedly misspelled, seems amazing. Can he win for PM?
2
Really, really not.
2
Rubin has a good show, and Megyn's a great guest. I wish Rubin would do something about whoever clickbaits every one of his video titles, though, which is why I stopped watching him long ago. I watched this for Megyn, but the clickbait never changes.
2
Trump turns on everyone in his orbit soon enough. It's always everyone else's fault in his mind, never his.
1
@IVY12023 Pence did his job, which was to give Trump cover with the evangelicals, and to back Trump blindly. Up until Jan 6th, when Trump asked him to violate the Constitution.
1
@jammer68 When has it been done before? Anyway, Trump didn't ask for a delay, which itself was unwarranted, Trump asked Pence to certify Trump as the winner.
1
@jillybeangaming Trump turned on every single person he brought in. At a certain point, it's no longer everyone else's fault.
1
@lindahake1666 A. There was no reason for delay. B. Trump didn't ask for delay, he asked Pence to certify Trump the winner, which would have brought down the country.
1
@IVY12023 His job was to give Trump cover with the evangelicals, helping him get elected, which he did. He then was the most loyal VP imaginable - until Trump asked him to violate the Constitution on Jan 6th.
1
@IVY12023 The Electoral Count Act became law in 1887. It was DC's reaction to the disaster that was the stolen 1876 election, as well as the dustups that occurred in 1880 and 1884. Yes, the Act was updated/clarified in 2022, due to Trump's attempted shananigans of the year before. No Constitutional lawyer believes that Pence had any choice but to certify the election. Any other idea was and is utter madness.
1
@lindahake1666 Just to be clear, no, there is nothing whatsoever in the Constitution about a 10 day delay. Doesn't exist.
1
@IVY12023 The Electoral Count Act became law in 1887, due to the disaster of the 1876 presidential election followed by some foibles in 1880 and 1884. It was slightly amended in 2022, a reaction to the mess that happened a year earlier. No Constitutional lawyer believes that Pence had the ability to do anything but certify the election of Joe Biden.
1
@IVY12023 The
1
@IVY12023 Electoral
1
@IVY12023 Count
1
@IVY12023 Act
1
@IVY12023 Was
1
@IVY12023 Made
1
@IVY12023 Law
1
@IVY12023 In
1
@IVY12023 1887,
1
@IVY12023 Because
1
@IVY12023 Of
1
@IVY12023 The
1
@IVY12023 Problems
1
@IVY12023 Of
1
@IVY12023 The
1
@IVY12023 Three
1
@IVY12023 Prior
1
@IVY12023 Presidential
1
@IVY12023 Elections,
1
@IVY12023 Particularly
1
@IVY12023 That
1
@IVY12023 of
1
@IVY12023 1876.
1
@IVY12023 It
1
@IVY12023 Was
1
@IVY12023 Updated
1
@IVY12023 In
1
@IVY12023 2022,
1
@IVY12023 Because
1
@IVY12023 Of
1
@IVY12023 The
1
@IVY12023 Bogus
1
@IVY12023 Claims
1
@IVY12023 Made
1
@IVY12023 In
1
@IVY12023 January
1
@IVY12023 2021.
1
@IVY12023 No
1
@IVY12023 Constitutional
1
@IVY12023 Lawyer
1
@IVY12023 Believes
1
@IVY12023 That Pence had any choice but to certify the election
1
@IVY12023 YT deleted many attempts at my responding to you. I don't know what made it through, if anything.
1
Megyn's story about her friend, starting at 34:20, was wild.
1
@Christina-71 1. Tucker Carlson is one of the most dishonest human beings in public life today. 2. Trump is likely to take a)a woman, who b)is not too pro-life, but similar to where Trump is, and c)would only take someone who he knows will blindly back him, and d)someone he sees as having star power, but e)not someone who the center despises, such as Kari Lake. Stefanik checks off all the boxes. I am feeling kind of ballsy about the pick these days because Megyn Kelly is smart and knowledgeable, and her vague descriptions of her prediction for Trump's running mate sound very much like she believes it will be Stefanik.
1
@stormystrikes I don't know what she is, and I don't think she does either. My best guess is that she's a Tucker Carlson wannabe. Tucker is a radical leftist on far too many issues. No thank you. To be clear. I am very open to voting for Joe Manchin in the general should he run.
1
@stormystrikes She is a Tucker wannabe. No thank you. I would seriously consider voting Manchin in the general though.
1
@banjax80 I trust her as far as I can throw her
1
@Vetrarland Why would Trump take her as a running mate then?
1
@banjax80 Why??
1