Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "" video.

@jordanwardle11 But they leave out half the sources as "unreliable". Their bias is outrageous.
9
I'm glad Stossel finally woke up! I was stunned when I saw his video a few years ago extolling Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia, and wrote long comment pointing out what Stossel finally realized here.
7
@RodMartinJr Go you! Thank you.
4
@evelynn4273 Really? I'd love an example of that.
4
@marcar9marcar972 No, they have hundreds of millions of dollars in the bank. Their fundraisers are highly misleading.
2
They have hundreds of millions of dollars in the bank, and should be embarassed at the tone of their fundraisers to begin with. But yes, they are radical leftist propaganda.
1
@NatesRandomVideo Absolutely correct, Stossel is very late to the party. When I saw his laudatory video of Wikipedia back when, the one where he interviewed Wales, I was horrified, and wrote a long comment pointing out how Stossel was way, way off base. Wikipedia IS radical leftist propaganda.
1
@rwingender Wikipedia is drowning in hundreds of millions of dollars in cash. They never deserved your money to begin with. And yes, they are radical leftist propaganda.
1
I once added something negative - but 100% factual - about AOC, quoting her own words. It was removed by an anti-Semitic editor, who publicly identified as a member of antifa, who then got me suspended for making my edit. Wikipedia is a joke.
1
Also, "administrators" are largely egotistical jerks, who just get off on reverting great work, ruining hours of someone's time. I once saw a wonderful edit about the 13 colonies, pointing out that it was really 21, not 13, but only 13 agreed to break off. It is a wonderful and accurate historical point - I'm a history teacher! And he was reverted by two editors who found the information "irrelevant". It can be maddening.
1
@zenon3021 The BBC is a far-left organization, and has been for some time now.
1