Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "TED-Ed" channel.

@revolrz22 Your comment. Do you really believe history is written by dispassionate, disinterested historians? That's laughable.
4
Stephen Douglas advocated for states' rights as the 1860 Democrat presidential nominee, in the form of popular sovereignty. Southerners were so offended at the suggestion that slavery could be voted out that broke off and formed the Southern Democrat party in defense of the unimpeachable right to own slaves. The entire future Confederacy voted for the Southern Democrat candidate, John C. Breckenridge. What else do you need to know? That settles the question right there.
4
@revolrz22 You are now attributing comments to me which I never wrote, along with not bothering to do any research that takes longer than ten seconds. Get back to me when you care about the facts.
2
@revolrz22 1. You asked me above for ONE example. I cited a book I read - from the 1990s - which polled historians as to how they ranked presidents. That book ranked Carter above Reagan. 2. You then either misunderstood my comment, or outright lied about it. 3. You proceeded to also ignore all the other evidence I cited, because you have no facts, and are utterly allergic to them. 4. And then you threw in some ad hominems as well, because that's what you do once you've been utterly destroyed. I'm sorry you lost, but you probably have lots of practice on that front. 5. Don't bother trying to lie any further, as everyone can see in this thread how you have humiliated yourself. That sound you hear is the internet laughing at you.
2
@revolrz22 My patience with you is at its end. Read the comments through. This should not be difficult for anyone with even a modicum of intelligence.
2
I wish I had Van Gogh's ear, which would sell for lots of Bitcoin.
2
@leonmat26 You made that up, obviously.
1
@revolrz22 Bwahahahahahahahaha
1
@revolrz22 Read a list of greatest-to-worst US Presidents, as decided by historians. One such book I had listed Carter ahead of Reagan! Historians are usually on the left, and their biases obvious.
1
@rb032682 You need to stop worshipping Ted Bundy before you start lecturing others.
1
@revolrz22 You asked for a single example, which I happily provided; it set you off because it did not fit your preconceived narrative. Sorry, but facts don't care about your feelings. It is rather well known that historians, along with a significantly disproportionate percentage of academics in most fields, lean rather obviously to the left. You've decided in advance that you'd rather ignore that fact, so no evidence I present will make a dent in your thinking feelings.
1
@rb032682 Anyone - like yourself - who idolizes serial killers cannot be taken seriously
1
@revolrz22 YT does not allow links to be posted in nearly all cases. It is hardly a debatable point that historians skew to the left. You have the internet; try using it. Of course you won't, though, because you prefer your false narrative to the facts.
1
@rb032682 You're a sick puppy. Anyone whose heroes are murderers should not be taken seriously. Seek professional help, pronto.
1
@revolrz22 1. I don't remember the name of the book. 2. It filled the requirement as a single piece of evidence. 3. You're still ignoring the mountain of other evidence I supplied. 4. You're a monumental waste of time.
1
Ted Ed is leftist propaganda, but they sure got this one right....except for one falsehood they threw right into the middle.
1
@guesswhoscomingtoyoutube What's that supposed to mean?
1
@guesswhoscomingtoyoutube Please don't put words in my mouth.
1
@guesswhoscomingtoyoutube You're actually making less sense than you did before. Congratulations.
1